International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708024

1708024 Vol 4 · Issue 11 Download Paper

Enhancing Auditor Judgment and Skepticism through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review

Oluwatosin Ilori Comfort Iyabode Lawal Solomon Christopher Friday Ngozi Joan Isibor Ezinne C. Chukwuma- Eke

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Finance

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of financial reporting and accountability, the role of auditors in ensuring the integrity of financial statements remains critical. However, despite technological advancements and regulatory reforms, audit failures persist, often linked to lapses in auditor judgment and professional skepticism. This systematic review explores how behavioral insights?particularly cognitive biases?influence auditor decision-making and examines targeted interventions designed to enhance skepticism and audit quality. Drawing on literature from behavioral accounting, psychology, and organizational behavior, the review identifies key cognitive biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring, overconfidence, and the halo effect, which impair objective judgment during audit engagements. These biases can lead auditors to selectively seek evidence that supports client-preferred positions or rely excessively on initial assessments, thereby undermining audit effectiveness. The review synthesizes empirical evidence from peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2021, using the PRISMA method to ensure methodological rigor and transparency. It highlights behavioral interventions including structured decision aids, accountability mechanisms, mindfulness training, and debiasing prompts as promising strategies for mitigating judgment distortions. Notably, the incorporation of counterfactual reasoning tasks, professional skepticism training, and team-based review protocols show consistent efficacy in enhancing critical thinking and skepticism among auditors. Moreover, the review underscores the importance of audit firm culture and leadership in reinforcing skeptical behavior. Interventions are more effective when aligned with organizational norms that prioritize independence, ethical conduct, and reflective thinking. The findings advocate for a paradigm shift in audit training and practice?moving beyond technical competence to include behavioral competence as a core component of auditor development. This study offers actionable recommendations for audit firms, regulators, and educators, calling for the integration of behavioral science into audit methodology, professional standards, and continuing education programs. By bridging behavioral theory and audit practice, this review provides a foundational framework for improving auditor judgment and sustaining trust in financial reporting.

Keywords

Auditor Judgment, Professional Skepticism, Cognitive Bias, Behavioral Insights, Audit Quality.

References

[1] Adekunle, B. I., Chukwuma-Eke, E. C., Balogun, E. D., & Ogunsola, K. O. (2021). A predictive modeling approach to optimizing business operations: A case study on reducing operational inefficiencies through machine learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.1.791-799

[2] Adekunle, B. I., Chukwuma-Eke, E. C., Balogun, E. D., & Ogunsola, K. O. (2021). Machine learning for automation: Developing data-driven solutions for process optimization and accuracy improvement. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 800–808. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.1.800-808

[3] Adewoyin, M. A. (2021). Developing frameworks for managing low-carbon energy transitions: overcoming barriers to implementation in the oil and gas industry.

[4] Adiloğlu, B. and GÜNGÖR, N. (2019). Investigation of increasing technology use and digitalization in auditing. Pressacademia, 9(9), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2019.1058

[5] Agbede, O. O., Akhigbe, E. E., Ajayi, A. J., & Egbuhuzor, N. S. (2021). Assessing economic risks and returns of energy transitions with quantitative financial approaches. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 552-566. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.1.552-566

[6] Agho, G., Ezeh, M. O., Isong, M., Iwe, D., & Oluseyi, K. A. (2021). Sustainable pore pressure prediction and its impact on geo-mechanical modelling for enhanced drilling operations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 12(1), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.12.1.0536

[7] Ajayi, A. J., Akhigbe, E. E., Egbuhuzor, N. S., & Agbede, O. O. (2021). Bridging data and decision-making: AI-enabled analytics for project management in oil and gas infrastructure. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.1.567-580

[8] Akhigbe, E. E., Egbuhuzor, N. S., Ajayi, A. J., & Agbede, O. O. (2021). Financial valuation of green bonds for sustainability-focused energy investment portfolios and projects. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2021.2.1.0033

[9] Aliyu, A., Μαγλαράς, Λ., He, Y., Yevseyeva, I., Boiten, E., Cook, A., … & Janicke, H. (2020). A holistic cybersecurity maturity assessment framework for higher education institutions in the united kingdom. Applied Sciences, 10(10), 3660. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103660

[10] AlKetbi, L., Neglekerke, N., Ali, H., ZeinAlDeen, S., & Ameri, T. (2014). Audit of healthy lifestyle behaviors among patients with diabetes and hypertension attending ambulatory health care services in the united arab emirates. Global Health Promotion, 21(4), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975914528248

[11] AlKetbi, L., Neglekerke, N., Ali, H., ZeinAlDeen, S., & Ameri, T. (2014). Audit of healthy lifestyle behaviors among patients with diabetes and hypertension attending ambulatory health care services in the united arab emirates. Global Health Promotion, 21(4), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975914528248

[12] Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2017). Big data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: research needs. Auditing a Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684

[13] Askary, S., Goodwin, D., & Lanis, R. (2012). Improvements in audit risks related to information technology frauds. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 8(2), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2012040104

[14] Balios, D., Kotsilaras, P., Eriotis, N., & Vasiliou, D. (2020). Big data, data analytics and external auditing. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2020.05.002

[15] Betti, N. and Sarens, G. (2020). Understanding the internal audit function in a digitalised business environment. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(2), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2019-0114

[16] Buchheit, S., Dzuranin, A., Hux, C., & Riley, M. (2020). Data visualization in local accounting firms: is slow technology adoption rational?. Current Issues in Auditing, 14(2), A15-A24. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-2019-501

[17] Chang, C. and Luo, Y. (2019). Data visualization and cognitive biases in audits. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-08-2017-1637

[18] Chang, C. and Luo, Y. (2019). Data visualization and cognitive biases in audits. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-08-2017-1637

[19] Chukwuma-Eke, E. C., Ogunsola, O. Y., & Isibor, N. J. (2021). Designing a robust cost allocation framework for energy corporations using SAP for improved financial performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.1.809-822

[20] Ciołek, M. (2017). Professional skepticism in auditing and its characteristics. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu, (474), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.474.03

[21] Colquhoun, H., Lamontagne, M., Duncan, E., Fiander, M., Champagne, C., & Grimshaw, J. (2016). A systematic review of interventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(3), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516644309

[22] Cooke, L., Duncan, D., Rivera, L., Dowling, S., Symonds, C., & Armson, H. (2018). How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers?. Implementation Science, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8

[23] Cooke, L., Duncan, D., Rivera, L., Dowling, S., Symonds, C., & Armson, H. (2018). The calgary audit and feedback framework: a practical, evidence-informed approach for the design and implementation of socially constructed learning interventions using audit and group feedback. Implementation Science, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0829-3

[24] Dagilienė, L. and Kloviené, L. (2019). Motivation to use big data and big data analytics in external auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(7), 750-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-01-2018-1773

[25] Diamantopoulou, V., Tsohou, A., & Karyda, M. (2020). From iso/iec27001:2013 and iso/iec27002:2013 to gdpr compliance controls. Information and Computer Security, 28(4), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1108/ics-01-2020-0004

[26] DiGabriele, J. (2016). The expectation differences among stakeholders in the financial valuation fitness of auditors. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-06-2013-0043

[27] Drivas, G., Chatzopoulou, A., Μαγλαράς, Λ., Lambrinoudakis, C., Cook, A., & Janicke, H. (2020). A nis directive compliant cybersecurity maturity assessment framework.. https://doi.org/10.1109/compsac48688.2020.00-20

[28] Egbuhuzor, N. S., Ajayi, A. J., Akhigbe, E. E., Agbede, O. O., Ewim, C. P.-M., & Ajiga, D. I. (2021). Cloud-based CRM systems: Revolutionizing customer engagement in the financial sector with artificial intelligence. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 3(1), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2021.3.1.0111

[29] Eissa, A. (2020). Auditor’s perceptions of ceos overconfidence in egypt: a quasi-experimental study. Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies, 6(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2020.008

[30] Elwyn, G. (2006). Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international delphi consensus process. BMJ, 333(7565), 417-0. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.ae

[31] Fabiianska, V., Kutsyk, P., Babich, I., Ilashchuk, S., Воронко, Р., & Savitska, S. (2021). Auditor's professional skepticism: a case from ukraine. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(3), s281-s295. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i3.1529

[32] Gepp, A., Linnenluecke, M., O’Neill, T., & Smith, T. (2018). Big data techniques in auditing research and practice: current trends and future opportunities. Journal of Accounting Literature, 40(1), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2017.05.003

[33] Gissel, J. (2018). Professional skepticism: practitioners’ perceptions and training practices. Review of Business Information Systems (Rbis), 22(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v22i2.10224

[34] Glover, S. and Prawitt, D. (2014). Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: the professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), P1-P10. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50895

[35] Haapamäki, E. and Sihvonen, J. (2019). Cybersecurity in accounting research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3923245

[36] Hamshari, Y. M., Ali, H. Y., & Alqam, M. A. (2021). The relationship of professional skepticism to the risks of auditing and internal control, and the discovery of fraud and core errors in the financial statements in Jordan. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), 105-105.

[37] Harding, N. and Trotman, K. (2016). The effect of partner communications of fraud likelihood and skeptical orientation on auditors' professional skepticism. Auditing a Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51576

[38] Henrizi, P., Himmelsbach, D., & Hunziker, S. (2021). Anchoring and adjustment effects on audit judgments: experimental evidence from switzerland. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 598-621. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-01-2020-0011

[39] Hikmayah, N., & Aswar, K. (2019). The impact of factors on the audit quality in Indonesia: The moderating effect of professional commitments. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 9(4), 285-293.

[40] Honigsberg, C. (2020). Forensic accounting. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020320-022159

[41] Hu, K., Chen, F., Hsu, M., & Tzeng, G. (2020). Identifying key factors for adopting artificial intelligence-enabled auditing techniques by joint utilization of fuzzy-rough set theory and mrdm technique. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(2), 459-492. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.13181

[42] Hurtt, R. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing a Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149

[43] Hurtt, R., Brown‐Liburd, H., Earley, C., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing a Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45-97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361

[44] Isibor, N. J., Ewim, C. P. M., Ibeh, A. I., Adaga, E. M., Sam-Bulya, N. J., & Achumie, G. O. (2021): A Generalizable Social Media Utilization Framework for Entrepreneurs: Enhancing Digital Branding, Customer Engagement, and Growth.

[45] Islam, M., Farah, N., & Stafford, T. (2018). Factors associated with security/cybersecurity audit by internal audit function. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(4), 377-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-07-2017-1595

[46] Ivers, N., Grimshaw, J., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., O’Brien, M., French, S., … & Odgaard‐Jensen, J. (2014). Growing literature, stagnant science? systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29(11), 1534-1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2913-y

[47] Joshi, K., Elluri, L., & Nagar, A. (2020). An integrated knowledge graph to automate cloud data compliance. Ieee Access, 8, 148541-148555. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3008964

[48] Kahyaoğlu, S. and Çalıyurt, K. (2018). Cyber security assurance process from the internal audit perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(4), 360-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-02-2018-1804

[49] Kartika, M., Fitriana, F., & Yuliaty, F. (2021). Ethics, education level, and professional skepticism on audit quality. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 13(1), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrak.v13i1.3814

[50] Kim, S., Kim, T., Pae, S., & Kim, S. (2018). Audit fees via an indirect payment channel and professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(5), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-12-2016-1490

[51] Kusumawati, A. and Syamsuddin, S. (2018). The effect of auditor quality to professional skepticsm and its relationship to audit quality. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(4), 998-1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-03-2017-0062

[52] Landis‐Lewis, Z., Brehaut, J., Hochheiser, H., Douglas, G., & Jacobson, R. (2015). Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change. Implementation Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0203-z

[53] Lankton, N., Price, J., & Karim, M. (2020). Cybersecurity breaches and the role of information technology governance in audit committee charters. Journal of Information Systems, 35(1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-18-071

[54] Larkin, C., Sanseverino, A., Joseph, J., Eisenhauer, L., & Reznek, M. (2021). Accuracy of emergency physicians’ self-estimates of ct scan utilization and its potential effect on an audit and feedback intervention: a randomized trial. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00182-1

[55] Lewallen, J. (2020). Emerging technologies and problem definition uncertainty: the case of cybersecurity. Regulation & Governance, 15(4), 1035-1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12341

[56] Lois, P., Drogalas, G., Karagiorgos, A., & Tsikalakis, K. (2020). Internal audits in the digital era: opportunities risks and challenges. Euromed Journal of Business, 15(2), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-07-2019-0097

[57] Lowe, D., Bierstaker, J., Janvrin, D., & Jenkins, J. (2017). Information technology in an audit context: have the big 4 lost their advantage?. Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51794

[58] Makarov, D., Ciprut, S., Kelly, M., Walter, D., Shedlin, M., Braithwaite, R., … & Sherman, S. (2021). Protocol: a multi-modal, physician-centered intervention to improve guideline-concordant prostate cancer imaging. Trials, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05645-3

[59] Mamahit, A. and Urumsah, D. (2018). The comprehensive model of whistle-blowing, forensic audit, audit investigation, and fraud detection. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 1(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v1i2.43

[60] Maradona, A. (2020). A qualitative exploration of heuristics and cognitive biases in auditor judgements. Accountability, 9(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.32400/ja.30634.9.2.2020.94-112

[61] McDonald, H., Charles, C., & Gafni, A. (2011). Assessing the conceptual clarity and evidence base of quality criteria/standards developed for evaluating decision aids. Health Expectations, 17(2), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00740.x

[62] McDonald, H., Charles, C., & Gafni, A. (2011). Assessing the conceptual clarity and evidence base of quality criteria/standards developed for evaluating decision aids. Health Expectations, 17(2), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00740.x

[63] Nasution, S. (2021). Determinants of audit quality with auditor's professionalism skepticism as a mediating variable in public accounting firm (kap) medan city. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(9), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20210915

[64] Noviyanti, S. and Winata, L. (2015). The role of "tone at the top" and knowledge of fraud on auditors’ professional skeptical behavior. Contemporary Management Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.12239

[65] Noviyanti, S. and Winata, L. (2015). The role of "tone at the top" and knowledge of fraud on auditors’ professional skeptical behavior. Contemporary Management Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.12239

[66] Odio, P. E., Kokogho, E., Olorunfemi, T. A., Nwaozomudoh, M. O., Adeniji, I. E., & Sobowale, A. (2021). Innovative financial solutions: A conceptual framework for expanding SME portfolios in Nigeria's banking sector. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 495-507.

[67] Ogunnowo, E., Ogu, E., Egbumokei, P., Dienagha, I., & Digitemie, W. (2021). Theoretical framework for dynamic mechanical analysis in material selection for high-performance engineering applications. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 117-131.

[68] Otokiti, B. O., Igwe, A. N., Ewim, C. P. M., & Ibeh, A. I. (2021). Developing a framework for leveraging social media as a strategic tool for growth in Nigerian women entrepreneurs. Int J Multidiscip Res Growth Eval, 2(1), 597-607.

[69] Oyedokun, O. O. (2019). Green human resource management practices and its effect on the sustainable competitive edge in the Nigerian manufacturing industry (Dangote) (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School).

[70] Oyegbade, I.K., Igwe, A.N., Ofodile, O.C. and Azubuike. C., 2021. Innovative financial planning and governance models for emerging markets: Insights from startups and banking audits. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 01(02), pp.108-116.

[71] Oyeniyi, L. D., Igwe, A. N., Ofodile, O. C., & Paul-Mikki, C. (2021). Optimizing risk management frameworks in banking: Strategies to enhance compliance and profitability amid regulatory challenges.

[72] Paul, P. O., Abbey, A. B. N., Onukwulu, E. C., Agho, M. O., & Louis, N. (2021). Integrating procurement strategies for infectious disease control: Best practices from global programs. prevention, 7, 9.

[73] Perdana, A., Rob, A., & Rohde, F. (2018). Does visualization matter? the role of interactive data visualization to make sense of information. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1681

[74] Rahman, C. (2020). Organizational culture and its influence on auditing practices: a case study in audit firms. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 1(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v1i1.363

[75] Ramasubramanian, L., Ranasinghe, N., & Ellison, J. (2011). Evaluation of a structured assessment framework to enable adherence to the requirements of mental capacity act 2005. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 314-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00675.x

[76] Ramasubramanian, L., Ranasinghe, N., & Ellison, J. (2011). Evaluation of a structured assessment framework to enable adherence to the requirements of mental capacity act 2005. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 314-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00675.x

[77] Sabillón, R., Serra-Ruiz, J., Cavaller, V., & M., J. (2017). A comprehensive cybersecurity audit model to improve cybersecurity assurance: the cybersecurity audit model (csam)., 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1109/inciscos.2017.20

[78] Sardi, A., Rizzi, A., Sorano, E., & Guerrieri, A. (2020). Cyber risk in health facilities: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(17), 7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177002

[79] Setiyawati, H., Iskandar, D., & Putri, G. (2020). The factors that affect the audit quality. Epra International Journal of Economic and Business Review, A 48-A 53. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra3031

[80] Setiyawati, H., Iskandar, D., & Putri, G. (2020). The factors that affect the audit quality. Epra International Journal of Economic and Business Review, A 48-A 53. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra3031

[81] Sobowale, A., Odio, P. E., Kokogho, E., Olorunfemi, T. A., Nwaozomudoh, M. O., & Adeniji, I. E. (2021). Innovative financial solutions: A conceptual framework for expanding SME portfolios in Nigeria's banking sector. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(1), 495–507. ANFO Publication House.

[82] Soleymani, F., Rashidian, A., Hosseini, M., Dinarvand, R., Kebriaeezade, A., & Abdollahi, M. (2019). Effectiveness of audit and feedback in addressing over prescribing of antibiotics and injectable medicines in a middle-income country: an rct. Daru Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 27(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-019-00248-5

[83] Soleymani, F., Rashidian, A., Hosseini, M., Dinarvand, R., Kebriaeezade, A., & Abdollahi, M. (2019). Effectiveness of audit and feedback in addressing over prescribing of antibiotics and injectable medicines in a middle-income country: an rct. Daru Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 27(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40199-019-00248-5

[84] Sow, M. and Gehrke, C. (2019). Evaluating information security system effectiveness for risk management, control, and corporate governance. Business and Economic Research, 9(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v9i1.13994

[85] Stevens, E., Moroney, R., & Webster, J. (2019). Professional skepticism: the combined effect of partner style and team identity salience. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12161

[86] Stevens, E., Moroney, R., & Webster, J. (2019). Professional skepticism: the combined effect of partner style and team identity salience. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12161

[87] Sulistyawati, A. (2021). Auditor’s professional skepticism: an empirical study at public accounting firm in central java province. Jurnal Akuntansi, 25(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v25i1.726

[88] Sulistyowati, D., Handayani, F., & Suryanto, Y. (2020). Comparative analysis and design of cybersecurity maturity assessment methodology using nist csf, cobit, iso/iec 27002 and pci dss. Joiv International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 4(4), 225-230. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.4.4.482

[89] Sun, T. (2019). Applying deep learning to audit procedures: an illustrative framework. Accounting Horizons, 33(3), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52455

[90] Sun, T. and Vasarhelyi, M. (2018). Embracing textual data analytics in auditing with deep learning. IJDAR, 49-67. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v18_3

[91] Szymczak, J., Feemster, K., Zaoutis, T., & Gerber, J. (2014). Pediatrician perceptions of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(S3), S69-S78. https://doi.org/10.1086/677826

[92] Szymczak, J., Feemster, K., Zaoutis, T., & Gerber, J. (2014). Pediatrician perceptions of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 35(S3), S69-S78. https://doi.org/10.1086/677826

[93] Tejedor‐Sojo, J., Creek, T., & Leong, T. (2014). Impact of audit and feedback and pay-for-performance interventions on pediatric hospitalist discharge communication with primary care providers. American Journal of Medical Quality, 30(2), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860614521277

[94] Tejedor‐Sojo, J., Creek, T., & Leong, T. (2014). Impact of audit and feedback and pay-for-performance interventions on pediatric hospitalist discharge communication with primary care providers. American Journal of Medical Quality, 30(2), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860614521277

[95] Tiwari, R. and Debnath, J. (2017). Forensic accounting: a blend of knowledge. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-05-2016-0043

[96] Tula, O. A., Adekoya, O. O., Isong, D., Daudu, C. D., Adefemi, A., & Okoli, C. E. (2004). Corporate advising strategies: A comprehensive review for aligning petroleum engineering with climate goals and CSR commitments in the United States and Africa. Corporate Sustainable Management Journal, 2(1), 32-38.

[97] Yahya, F., Yustina, A., & Mahmudah, H. (2021). The mediating role of independence in the relationship between auditors’ conscientiousness & openness and professional skepticism. JP, 61(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2021-61-10

[98] Yang, L., Brink, A. G., & Wier, B. (2018). The impact of emotional intelligence on auditor judgment. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 83-97.

[99] Yasa, P., Yuliansyah, Y., & Kesumaningrum, N. (2021). The influence of ethics, experience, and competence on auditors’ professional skepticism (study at bpkp representative of lampung province). Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Dan Akuntabilitas, 1(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.35912/jastaka.v1i1.34

[100] Yuara, S., Ibrahim, R., & Diantimala, Y. (2019). The influence of auditor's professional skepticism attitude, audit evidence competence, and time pressure on fraud detection at the Inspectorate of Bener Meriah Regency. Darussalam Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.24815/jped.v4i1.10924

How to cite this paper

Oluwatosin Ilori, Comfort Iyabode Lawal, Solomon Christopher Friday, Ngozi Joan Isibor, Ezinne C. Chukwuma- Eke "Enhancing Auditor Judgment and Skepticism through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 4 Issue 11 2021 Page 357-373
Oluwatosin Ilori, Comfort Iyabode Lawal, Solomon Christopher Friday, Ngozi Joan Isibor, Ezinne C. Chukwuma- Eke "Enhancing Auditor Judgment and Skepticism through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 4, no. 11, May. 2021
Oluwatosin Ilori, Comfort Iyabode Lawal, Solomon Christopher Friday, Ngozi Joan Isibor, Ezinne C. Chukwuma- Eke (2021). Enhancing Auditor Judgment and Skepticism through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 4(11).
Oluwatosin Ilori, Comfort Iyabode Lawal, Solomon Christopher Friday, Ngozi Joan Isibor, Ezinne C. Chukwuma- Eke "Enhancing Auditor Judgment and Skepticism through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 4, no. 11, May. 2021.
@article{1708024,
      author = {Oluwatosin Ilori, Comfort Iyabode Lawal, Solomon Christopher Friday, Ngozi Joan Isibor, Ezinne C. Chukwuma- Eke},
      title = {Enhancing Auditor Judgment and Skepticism through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2021},
      volume = {4},
      number = {11},
      pages = {357-373},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708024.pdf},
      abstract = {In the evolving landscape of financial reporting and accountability, the role of auditors in ensuring the integrity of financial statements remains critical. However, despite technological advancements and regulatory reforms, audit failures persist, often linked to lapses in auditor judgment and professional skepticism. This systematic review explores how behavioral insights?particularly cognitive biases?influence auditor decision-making and examines targeted interventions designed to enhance skepticism and audit quality. Drawing on literature from behavioral accounting, psychology, and organizational behavior, the review identifies key cognitive biases such as confirmation bias, anchoring, overconfidence, and the halo effect, which impair objective judgment during audit engagements. These biases can lead auditors to selectively seek evidence that supports client-preferred positions or rely excessively on initial assessments, thereby undermining audit effectiveness. The review synthesizes empirical evidence from peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2021, using the PRISMA method to ensure methodological rigor and transparency. It highlights behavioral interventions including structured decision aids, accountability mechanisms, mindfulness training, and debiasing prompts as promising strategies for mitigating judgment distortions. Notably, the incorporation of counterfactual reasoning tasks, professional skepticism training, and team-based review protocols show consistent efficacy in enhancing critical thinking and skepticism among auditors. Moreover, the review underscores the importance of audit firm culture and leadership in reinforcing skeptical behavior. Interventions are more effective when aligned with organizational norms that prioritize independence, ethical conduct, and reflective thinking. The findings advocate for a paradigm shift in audit training and practice?moving beyond technical competence to include behavioral competence as a core component of auditor development. This study offers actionable recommendations for audit firms, regulators, and educators, calling for the integration of behavioral science into audit methodology, professional standards, and continuing education programs. By bridging behavioral theory and audit practice, this review provides a foundational framework for improving auditor judgment and sustaining trust in financial reporting.},
      keywords = {Auditor Judgment, Professional Skepticism, Cognitive Bias, Behavioral Insights, Audit Quality.},
      month = {May},
  }