Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708091
Assessing Ecosystem Service Value Changes Due to Land Use Shifts in Kuje, Abuja: An SDG Indicator Approach
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Ecosystem Services Assessment
Abstract
Ecosystem services offer numerous benefits to humanity, such that, its continuous administration is pivotal for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study analyzes the historical transformation of land in Kuje Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria, over a 30-year period (1994?2024), with a focus on urban expansion, agricultural growth, environmental degradation, and ecosystem service value (ESV) dynamics. Using satellite imagery and geospatial analysis, findings reveal significant transformations in land use patterns. Cultivated land increased from 21.49% to 46.55%, and built-up areas rose from 0.08% to 2.18%, driven by rapid population growth and urbanization. Conversely, vegetation cover and forest areas sharply declined, falling from 65.99% to 34.41% and 4.75% to 0.04%, respectively highlighting widespread deforestation and ecological loss. The study further assessed changes using Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators 15.1.1, 15.1.2, and 15.1.4, indicating substantial degradation, minimal forest stability, and limited reforestation progress. Ecosystem Service Value analysis showed steep declines in the ESV of forests and vegetation, offset by gains in built-up and agricultural zones. Accuracy assessments showed moderate to substantial classification reliability, with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.67. A transition probability matrix and spatial analysis exposed extensive environmental degradation, especially in wards like Kwaku, Kabi, and Gwargwada. In response, the study proposes a phased, community-led reforestation program aligned with local vulnerability and land restoration capacity. Overall, the results emphasize the critical importance for renewable land management, environmental policy reform, and integrated development planning to restore ecological balance and ensure long-term resilience in Kuje Area Council.
Keywords
Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), Deforestation, Ecosystem Service Value (ESV), Environmental Degradation, Sustainable Development Goals (15.1.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.4)
References
[1] Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 168–192.
[2] Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. PNAS, 109(40), 16083–16088.
[3] Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press.
[4] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
[5] TEEB. (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan.
[6] de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260–272.
[7] Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516.
[8] Turner, R. K., & Daily, G. C. (2008). The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(1), 25–35.
[9] Foley, J. A., et al. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574.
[10] Bateman, I. J., et al. (2011). Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(2), 177–218.
[11] Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., & Windhorst, W. (2009). Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 8(6), 1–9.
[12] Xie, G., Zhen, L., Lu, C., Xiao, Y., & Chen, C. (2008). Expert knowledge-based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5), 911–919.
[13] Liu, Y., et al. (2017). Spatiotemporal variations of ecosystem service values in response to land-use change in China. Sustainability, 9, 2334.
[14] Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., ... & Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.
[15] Liu, J., et al. (2010). Ecosystem services in China: Value and dynamics. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 2843–2850.
[16] Wu, K., & Zhang, H. (2012). Land use changes and ecosystem service value in Beijing. Ecological Indicators, 16, 67–75.
[17] Zhao, S., Liu, S., Zhou, D. (2016). Land use and ecosystem services: Dynamics, simulation, and policy implications. Science of the Total Environment, 573, 825–835.
[18] Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., & Liu, X. (2005). Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: A case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4), 1–12.
[19] Zhao, Y., & Shao, G. (2018). Spatiotemporal analysis of ecosystem services under land use changes. Remote Sensing, 10, 1343.
[20] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution A/RES/70/1.
[21] Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press.
[22] Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12), 1394–1404.
[23] Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis (pp. 110–139).
[24] FAO. (2018). Land Use and Ecosystem Services. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[25] Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. PNAS, 108(9), 3465–3472.
[26] IPBES. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
[27] Chen, W., et al. (2014). The impacts of land-use change on ecosystem services in China. Ecological Indicators, 42, 203–212.
[28] Ziter, C., et al. (2019). Scale-dependent effects of urbanization on ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(7), 392–400.
[29] Qiu, J., & Turner, M. G. (2013). Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. PNAS, 110(29), 12149–12154.
[30] Li, R., & Wu, J. (2020). Land system changes and ecosystem services in China. Landscape Ecology, 35, 1–20.
[31] National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Demographic and Socioeconomic Outlook of Area Councils in Nigeria: Focus on FCT. Abuja: Government of Nigeria Press.
[32] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019). Localizing the SDGs: A guide for local government. New York: UNDP.
[33] Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D. R., ... & Daily, G. C. (2009). Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 4–11.
[34] [Skipped, no reference #34 cited in your text – can be added if needed later]
[35] Toyosi, B. A., Olalekan, A. F., & Olayemi, J. D. (2021). Assessing ecosystem service value and land use dynamics in the Lagos coastal region. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Management, 25(3), 45–58.
[36] Abakpa, B. M., Ayanlade, A., & Fasona, M. J. (2020). Urbanization and vegetation degradation in peri-urban Abuja: A remote sensing approach. African Journal of Ecology, 58(4), 447–456.
[37] Ameachi, C. J., & Okolie, C. J. (2022). Analysis of urban growth using CA-Markov model in Kuje, Nigeria: Implications for sustainable planning. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 14(2), 89–105.
[38] Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA). (2022). Land use and administrative boundaries within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria. Abuja: FCDA Geospatial and Planning Division.
[39] Adekayi, O. A. (2019). Ecological Survey of Tree Species in the Savannah Zone of the Federal Capital Territory. Abuja: Nigerian Forestry Research Institute.
[40] National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA). (2020). Land Use and Land Cover Classification Scheme for Nigeria: Remote Sensing Standards. Abuja: NASRDA Environmental Monitoring Unit
[41] United Nations. (2020). Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Updated). New York: United Nations Statistics Division. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/
[42] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[43] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[44] de Groot, R., Fisher, B., Christie, M., Aronson, J., Braat, L., Gowdy, J., ... & Portela, R. (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations (pp. 9–40). London: Earthscan.
[45] Ghermandi, A., & Nunes, P. A. L. D. (2013). A global map of coastal recreation values: Results from a spatially explicit meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 86, 1–15.
[46] Troy, A., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 435–449.
[47] Plummer, M. L. (2009). Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 38–45.
[48] Van der Ploeg, S., & de Groot, R. S. (2010). The TEEB Valuation Database: A searchable database of ecosystem service values. Foundation for Sustainable Development (FSD). Retrieved from http://www.teebweb.org
[49] Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
[50] Rufin, P., Müller, H., Pflugmacher, D., Hostert, P., & Griffiths, P. (2019). Global agriculture and land systems: Understanding drivers of agricultural expansion in West Africa. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4b62
[51] Akinbode, O. M., & Akinbode, S. O. (2016). Urban sprawl and loss of agricultural land in peri-urban areas of Nigeria. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10(4), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2016.2072
[52] Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., ... & Townshend, J. R. G. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
[53] Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
[54] Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., ... & Snyder, P. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
[55] Borel-Saladin, J., & Turok, I. (2013). The challenges of urban sprawl in sub-Saharan Africa. Urban Forum, 24, 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-012-9178-2
[56] Simon, D. (2016). Rethinking sustainable cities: Accessible, green and fair. Policy Press.
[57] Jayne, T. S., Chamberlin, J., & Headey, D. D. (2014). Land pressures, the evolution of farming systems, and development strategies in Africa: A synthesis. Food Policy, 48, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.014
[58] Ouedraogo, I., Neef, A., & Becker, M. (2010). Land degradation and livelihood in semi-arid land use systems: A case study from Burkina Faso. ZEF Working Paper Series, 66, 1–21.
[59] Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H. J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J. P. (2002). Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science, 297(5583), 999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070656
[60] Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., & Potapov, P. V. (2010). Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(19), 8650–8655. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912668107
[61] Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
[62] Meyfroidt, P., Rudel, T. K., & Lambin, E. F. (2010). Forest transitions, trade, and global leakage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(49), 20917–20922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014773107
[63] IPBES. (2018). The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration. Montanarella, L., Scholes, R., & Brainich, A. (Eds.). Bonn, Germany: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
[64] Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., ... & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
[65] Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., & Liu, X. (2005). Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: A case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.002
[66] Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
[67] Song, X. P., Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., Potapov, P. V., & Tyukavina, A. (2018). Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature, 560, 639–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9
[68] Locatelli, B., Pavageau, C., Pramova, E., & Di Gregorio, M. (2015). Integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture and forestry: Opportunities and trade-offs. WIREs Climate Change, 6(6), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.357
[69] Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
[70] Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J., & Lepers, E. (2003). Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 205–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105459
[71] Chazdon, R. L., Lindenmayer, D. B., & Benayas, J. R. (2016). A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest restoration. Conservation Biology, 30(4), 900–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12797
[72] Lescure, C., & Dufour, E. (2010). Spatial visualization and data classification techniques for land-use analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.003
[73] Fekete, B. M., & DellaSera, D. L. (2017). Geographic information system-based methods for visualizing and analyzing land-use data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 91, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.001
How to cite this paper
@article{1708091,
author = {Temitope Oyadokun, Onuigbo Ifeanyi Chukwudi, Azikiwe Peter Onwualu},
title = {Assessing Ecosystem Service Value Changes Due to Land Use Shifts in Kuje, Abuja: An SDG Indicator Approach},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {10},
pages = {1121-1136},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708091.pdf},
abstract = {Ecosystem services offer numerous benefits to humanity, such that, its continuous administration is pivotal for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study analyzes the historical transformation of land in Kuje Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria, over a 30-year period (1994?2024), with a focus on urban expansion, agricultural growth, environmental degradation, and ecosystem service value (ESV) dynamics. Using satellite imagery and geospatial analysis, findings reveal significant transformations in land use patterns. Cultivated land increased from 21.49% to 46.55%, and built-up areas rose from 0.08% to 2.18%, driven by rapid population growth and urbanization. Conversely, vegetation cover and forest areas sharply declined, falling from 65.99% to 34.41% and 4.75% to 0.04%, respectively highlighting widespread deforestation and ecological loss. The study further assessed changes using Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators 15.1.1, 15.1.2, and 15.1.4, indicating substantial degradation, minimal forest stability, and limited reforestation progress. Ecosystem Service Value analysis showed steep declines in the ESV of forests and vegetation, offset by gains in built-up and agricultural zones. Accuracy assessments showed moderate to substantial classification reliability, with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.67. A transition probability matrix and spatial analysis exposed extensive environmental degradation, especially in wards like Kwaku, Kabi, and Gwargwada. In response, the study proposes a phased, community-led reforestation program aligned with local vulnerability and land restoration capacity. Overall, the results emphasize the critical importance for renewable land management, environmental policy reform, and integrated development planning to restore ecological balance and ensure long-term resilience in Kuje Area Council.},
keywords = {Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), Deforestation, Ecosystem Service Value (ESV), Environmental Degradation, Sustainable Development Goals (15.1.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.4)},
month = {April},
}