Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709211
A Strategic Project Management Framework for High-Complexity Offshore Engineering Projects in Emerging Energy Economies
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Emerging Energy Economies
Abstract
The rapid expansion of offshore engineering projects in emerging energy economies presents unique challenges due to their inherent technical complexity, environmental risks, regulatory variability, and socio-economic factors. These high-complexity projects demand robust, adaptive, and context-sensitive project management approaches to ensure successful delivery within time, budget, and quality constraints. This proposes a strategic project management framework tailored specifically for high-complexity offshore engineering projects operating in emerging energy markets. The framework integrates established project management principles with strategic alignment, risk resilience, and sustainability considerations, addressing the multifaceted challenges typical of offshore developments in emerging economies. It incorporates adaptive planning, stakeholder engagement, and local capacity building to navigate infrastructural limitations and regulatory uncertainties effectively. The proposed model is structured into five phases?initiation and strategic alignment, detailed planning and risk assessment, execution with agile adaptations, control and compliance, and project closure with knowledge transfer?each designed to foster flexibility while maintaining rigorous oversight. A comprehensive literature review highlights gaps in existing methodologies, which often lack contextual sensitivity to emerging markets? unique operational environments and socio-political dynamics. The framework?s design acknowledges these deficiencies and emphasizes the importance of cultural considerations, resource constraints, and environmental stewardship. By tailoring project management practices to the specific needs of emerging energy economies, this framework aims to improve risk mitigation, enhance stakeholder coordination, and promote sustainable project outcomes. The integration of local knowledge and engagement further supports economic development and capacity building, critical for long-term sector growth. This strategic framework serves as a practical guide for project managers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders involved in complex offshore projects, offering a structured yet adaptable approach that balances technical rigor with contextual responsiveness. Future research directions include the integration of digital technologies and AI-driven decision support to further enhance project resilience and efficiency in these challenging settings.
Keywords
Strategic, Project management, Framework, High-complexity, Offshore, Engineering projects, Emerging energy economies
References
[1] ADEWOYIN, M.A., OGUNNOWO, E.O., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. A Conceptual Framework for Dynamic Mechanical Analysis in High-Performance Material Selection.
[2] ADEWOYIN, M.A., OGUNNOWO, E.O., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. Advances in Thermofluid Simulation for Heat Transfer Optimization in Compact Mechanical Devices.
[3] Akpan, U.U., Adekoya, K.O., Awe, E.T., Garba, N., Oguncoker, G.D. and Ojo, S.G., 2017. Mini-STRs screening of 12 relatives of Hausa origin in northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(1), pp.48-57.
[4] Akpan, U.U., Awe, T.E. and Idowu, D., 2019. Types and frequency of fingerprint minutiae in individuals of Igbo and Yoruba ethnic groups of Nigeria. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 10(1).
[5] Awe, E.T. and Akpan, U.U., 2017. Cytological study of Allium cepa and Allium sativum.
[6] Awe, E.T., 2017. Hybridization of snout mouth deformed and normal mouth African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Animal Research International, 14(3), pp.2804-2808.
[7] Awe, E.T., Akpan, U.U. and Adekoya, K.O., 2017. Evaluation of two MiniSTR loci mutation events in five Father-Mother-Child trios of Yoruba origin. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 33, pp.120-124.
[8] Baumann, A., Cabassa, L.J., Stirman, S.W., Brownson, R. and Colditz, G.A., 2017. Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice, 2, pp.286-300.
[9] Brown, T.L., Potoski, M. and Van Slyke, D.M., 2018. Complex contracting: Management challenges and solutions. Public Administration Review, 78(5), pp.739-747.
[10] Bumblauskas, D., Gemmill, D., Igou, A. and Anzengruber, J., 2017. Smart Maintenance Decision Support Systems (SMDSS) based on corporate big data analytics. Expert systems with applications, 90, pp.303-317.
[11] Burnard, K., Bhamra, R. and Tsinopoulos, C., 2018. Building organizational resilience: Four configurations. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 65(3), pp.351-362.
[12] Chakkol, M., Selviaridis, K. and Finne, M., 2018. The governance of collaboration in complex projects. International journal of operations & production management, 38(4), pp.997-1019.
[13] Chudi, O., Iwegbu, J., Tetegan, G., Ikwueze, O., Effiom, O., Oke-Oghene, U., Ayodeji, B., Opatewa, S., Oladipo, T., Afolayan, T. and Tonyi, A.A., 2019, August. Integration of rock physics and seismic inversion for net-to-gross estimation: Implication for reservoir modelling and field development in offshore Niger Delta. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D033S028R010). SPE.
[14] Chudi, O., Kanu, M., Anaevune, A., Yamusa, I., Iwegbu, J., Sesan, O. and Musa, J., 2019, August. A Novel Approach for Predicting Sand Stringers: A Case Study of the Baka Field Offshore Nigeria. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D023S006R003). SPE.
[15] Cleaver, F. and Whaley, L., 2018. Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 23(2).
[16] Coe, N.M., 2017. Missing links: Logistics, governance and upgrading in a shifting global economy. In Global value chains and global production networks (pp. 224-256). Routledge.
[17] Cook, C.R., Lyon, A.R., Locke, J., Waltz, T. and Powell, B.J., 2019. Adapting a compilation of implementation strategies to advance school-based implementation research and practice. Prevention Science, 20, pp.914-935.
[18] Cooper, R.G. and Sommer, A.F., 2018. Agile–Stage-Gate for Manufacturers: Changing the Way New Products Are Developed Integrating Agile project management methods into a Stage-Gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management, 61(2), pp.17-26.
[19] Cormier, R., Elliott, M. and Rice, J., 2019. Putting on a bow-tie to sort out who does what and why in the complex arena of marine policy and management. Science of the Total Environment, 648, pp.293-305.
[20] Crawford, B.A., Katz, R.A. and McKay, S.K., 2017. Engaging stakeholders in natural resource decision-making.
[21] Derks, M. and Romijn, H., 2019. Sustainable performance challenges of rural microgrids: Analysis of incentives and policy framework in Indonesia. Energy for Sustainable Development, 53, pp.57-70.
[22] Desha, C., Rowe, D. and Hargreaves, D., 2019. A review of progress and opportunities to foster development of sustainability-related competencies in engineering education. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), pp.61-73.
[23] Elbassoussy, A., 2019. European energy security dilemma: major challenges and confrontation strategies. Review of Economics and Political Science, 4(4), pp.321-343.
[24] Engström, V., 2018. Complexities of the Baltic Sea regulatory framework. Marine Policy, 98, pp.191-200.
[25] Eze, J., Nwagboso, C. and Georgakis, P., 2017. Framework for integrated oil pipeline monitoring and incident mitigation systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 47, pp.44-52.
[26] Fustik, V., 2017. THE ADVANTAGES OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES APPLIED IN THE ICT DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. International journal on information technologies & security, 9(4).
[27] Geels, F.W., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S., Jenkins, K. and Sovacool, B.K., 2018. Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. Energy research & social science, 40, pp.23-35.
[28] Giudici, P., 2018. Fintech risk management: A research challenge for artificial intelligence in finance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 1, p.1.
[29] Grip, K., 2017. International marine environmental governance: A review. Ambio, 46(4), pp.413-427.
[30] Gui, E.M. and MacGill, I., 2018. Typology of future clean energy communities: An exploratory structure, opportunities, and challenges. Energy research & social science, 35, pp.94-107.
[31] Gurara, D., Klyuev, V., Mwase, N. and Presbitero, A.F., 2018. Trends and challenges in infrastructure investment in developing countries. International Development Policy| Revue internationale de politique de développement, (10.1).
[32] Hagemann, R., Huddleston Skees, J. and Thierer, A., 2018. Soft law for hard problems: The governance of emerging technologies in an uncertain future. Colo. Tech. LJ, 17, p.37.
[33] Hatzivasilis, G., Papaefstathiou, I., Plexousakis, D., Manifavas, C. and Papadakis, N., 2018. AmbISPDM: Managing embedded systems in ambient environments and disaster mitigation planning. Applied Intelligence, 48, pp.1623-1643.
[34] Henderson, J., 2019. Oceans without history? Marine cultural heritage and the sustainable development agenda. Sustainability, 11(18), p.5080.
[35] Hyman, K. and Pieterse, E., 2017. Infrastructure deficits and potential in African Cities. The SAGE Handbook of Urban Sociology: New approaches to the twenty-first century city, pp.429-451.
[36] Jagoda, K. and Wojcik, P., 2019. Implementation of risk management and corporate sustainability in the Canadian oil and gas industry: An evolutionary perspective. Accounting Research Journal, 32(3), pp.381-398.
[37] Jobst, A.A., 2018. Credit risk dynamics of infrastructure investment: considerations for financial regulators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8373).
[38] Jones, S.A., Michelfelder, D. and Nair, I., 2017. Engineering managers and sustainable systems: the need for and challenges of using an ethical framework for transformative leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.205-212.
[39] Keshta, N. and Morgan, Y., 2017, October. Comparison between traditional plan-based and agile software processes according to team size & project domain (A systematic literature review). In 2017 8th IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) (pp. 567-575). IEEE.
[40] Khan, Y., O’Sullivan, T., Brown, A., Tracey, S., Gibson, J., Généreux, M., Henry, B. and Schwartz, B., 2018. Public health emergency preparedness: a framework to promote resilience. BMC public health, 18, pp.1-16.
[41] Lange, M., O'Hagan, A.M., Devoy, R.R., Le Tissier, M. and Cummins, V., 2018. Governance barriers to sustainable energy transitions–Assessing Ireland's capacity towards marine energy futures. Energy Policy, 113, pp.623-632.
[42] Lech, P., 2019. Enterprise system implementations in transition and developed economies: differences in project contracting and governance. Information Technology for Development, 25(2), pp.357-380.
[43] Leo, M., Sharma, S. and Maddulety, K., 2019. Machine learning in banking risk management: A literature review. Risks, 7(1), p.29.
[44] Linkov, I. and Trump, B.D., 2019. The science and practice of resilience. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[45] Madni, A.M. and Purohit, S., 2019. Economic analysis of model-based systems engineering. Systems, 7(1), p.12.
[46] Magagna, D., Margheritini, L., Alessi, A., Bannon, E., Boelman, E., Bould, D., Coy, V., De Marchi, E., Frigaard, P., Guedes Soares, C. and Golightly, C., 2018. Workshop on identification of future emerging technologies in the ocean energy sector. 27th March 2018 Ispra, Italy.
[47] Magnus, K., Edwin, Q., Samuel, O. and Nedomien, O., 2011, September. Onshore 4D processing: Niger Delta example: Kolo Creek case study. In SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting (pp. SEG-2011). SEG.
[48] Malesky, E. and Taussig, M., 2017. The danger of not listening to firms: Government responsiveness and the goal of regulatory compliance. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), pp.1741-1770.
[49] Marsilio, M., Torbica, A. and Villa, S., 2017. Health care multidisciplinary teams: The sociotechnical approach for an integrated system-wide perspective. Health care management review, 42(4), pp.303-314.
[50] Mazzetto, S., 2018. Multidisciplinary collaboration in project management education: Practical approach. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 144(4), p.05018014.
[51] Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Romero, D. and Wuest, T., 2018. A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of manufacturing systems, 49, pp.194-214.
[52] Notteboom, T. and Neyens, K., 2017. The future of port logistics: meeting the challenges of supply chain integration. Bruselas: ING Bannk.
[53] OGUNNOWO, E.O., ADEWOYIN, M.A., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. Systematic Review of Non-Destructive Testing Methods for Predictive Failure Analysis in Mechanical Systems.
[54] Omisola, J.O., Etukudoh, E.A., Okenwa, O.K. and Tokunbo, G.I., 2020. Innovating Project Delivery and Piping Design for Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Conceptual Framework. perception, 24, pp.28-35.
[55] Oyedokun, O.O., 2019. Green human resource management practices and its effect on the sustainable competitive edge in the Nigerian manufacturing industry (Dangote) (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School).
[56] Papadakis, E. and Tsironis, L., 2018. Hybrid methods and practices associated with agile methods, method tailoring and delivery of projects in a non-software context. Procedia computer science, 138, pp.739-746.
[57] Paul, J.D., Buytaert, W., Allen, S., Ballesteros‐Cánovas, J.A., Bhusal, J., Cieslik, K., Clark, J., Dugar, S., Hannah, D.M., Stoffel, M. and Dewulf, A., 2018. Citizen science for hydrological risk reduction and resilience building. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5(1), p.e1262.
[58] Peng, H.G., Shen, K.W., He, S.S., Zhang, H.Y. and Wang, J.Q., 2019. Investment risk evaluation for new energy resources: An integrated decision support model based on regret theory and ELECTRE III. Energy Conversion and Management, 183, pp.332-348.
[59] Phillips, M.A. and Ritala, P., 2019. A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technological forecasting and social change, 148, p.119739.
[60] Raptis, T.P., Passarella, A. and Conti, M., 2019. Data management in industry 4.0: State of the art and open challenges. IEEE Access, 7, pp.97052-97093.
[61] Roth, L., Bempong, D., Babigumira, J.B., Banoo, S., Cooke, E., Jeffreys, D., Kasonde, L., Leufkens, H.G., Lim, J.C., Lumpkin, M. and Mahlangu, G., 2018. Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems. Globalization and health, 14, pp.1-12.
[62] Sax, J. and Andersen, T.J., 2019. Making risk management strategic: Integrating enterprise risk management with strategic planning. European Management Review, 16(3), pp.719-740.
[63] Scholl, E. and Westphal, K., 2017. European energy security reimagined: Mapping the risks, challenges and opportunities of changing energy geographies.
[64] Sin, I.S.M., Musa, N.A. and Ng, K.Y.N., 2017. Building business resilience through incident management body of knowledge (IMBOKTM): the amalgamated framework for total resilient capability. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 22(1), pp.38-50.
[65] Sisto, R., Lopolito, A. and Van Vliet, M., 2018. Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements. Land use policy, 70, pp.442-450.
[66] Šmite, D., Moe, N.B., Šāblis, A. and Wohlin, C., 2017. Software teams and their knowledge networks in large-scale software development. Information and Software Technology, 86, pp.71-86.
[67] Solanke*, B., Aigbokhai, U., Kanu, M. and Madiba, G., 2014. Impact of accounting for velocity anisotropy on depth image; Niger Delta case history. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014 (pp. 400-404). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
[68] Steen, M. and Hansen, G.H., 2018. Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography, 94(2), pp.188-210.
[69] Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J.Y., Dong, J., Duffy, V.G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L.P. and Guo, Y., 2019. Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), pp.1229-1269.
[70] Street, R.B., Buontempo, C., Mysiak, J., Karali, E., Pulquério, M., Murray, V. and Swart, R., 2019. How could climate services support disaster risk reduction in the 21st century. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 34, pp.28-33.
[71] Wan, C., Yan, X., Zhang, D. and Yang, Z., 2019. A novel policy making aid model for the development of LNG fuelled ships. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119, pp.29-44.
[72] Wang, D., Fang, S. and Fu, H., 2019. The effectiveness of evolutionary governance in mega construction projects: a moderated mediation model of relational contract and transaction cost. Journal of civil engineering and management, 25(4), pp.340-352.
[73] Watson, R., Wilson, H.N., Smart, P. and Macdonald, E.K., 2018. Harnessing difference: a capability‐based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), pp.254-279.
[74] White, S., 2017. Regulating for local content: Limitations of legal and regulatory instruments in promoting small scale suppliers in extractive industries in developing economies. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(2), pp.260-266.
[75] Yao, L., Shi, X. and Andrews-Speed, P., 2018. Conceptualization of energy security in resource-poor economies: The role of the nature of economy. Energy Policy, 114, pp.394-402.
How to cite this paper
@article{1709211,
author = {Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol},
title = {A Strategic Project Management Framework for High-Complexity Offshore Engineering Projects in Emerging Energy Economies},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2020},
volume = {3},
number = {7},
pages = {262-279},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709211.pdf},
abstract = {The rapid expansion of offshore engineering projects in emerging energy economies presents unique challenges due to their inherent technical complexity, environmental risks, regulatory variability, and socio-economic factors. These high-complexity projects demand robust, adaptive, and context-sensitive project management approaches to ensure successful delivery within time, budget, and quality constraints. This proposes a strategic project management framework tailored specifically for high-complexity offshore engineering projects operating in emerging energy markets. The framework integrates established project management principles with strategic alignment, risk resilience, and sustainability considerations, addressing the multifaceted challenges typical of offshore developments in emerging economies. It incorporates adaptive planning, stakeholder engagement, and local capacity building to navigate infrastructural limitations and regulatory uncertainties effectively. The proposed model is structured into five phases?initiation and strategic alignment, detailed planning and risk assessment, execution with agile adaptations, control and compliance, and project closure with knowledge transfer?each designed to foster flexibility while maintaining rigorous oversight. A comprehensive literature review highlights gaps in existing methodologies, which often lack contextual sensitivity to emerging markets? unique operational environments and socio-political dynamics. The framework?s design acknowledges these deficiencies and emphasizes the importance of cultural considerations, resource constraints, and environmental stewardship. By tailoring project management practices to the specific needs of emerging energy economies, this framework aims to improve risk mitigation, enhance stakeholder coordination, and promote sustainable project outcomes. The integration of local knowledge and engagement further supports economic development and capacity building, critical for long-term sector growth. This strategic framework serves as a practical guide for project managers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders involved in complex offshore projects, offering a structured yet adaptable approach that balances technical rigor with contextual responsiveness. Future research directions include the integration of digital technologies and AI-driven decision support to further enhance project resilience and efficiency in these challenging settings.},
keywords = {Strategic, Project management, Framework, High-complexity, Offshore, Engineering projects, Emerging energy economies},
month = {January},
}