International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709426

1709426 Vol 8 · Issue 12 Download Paper

Silent Surveillance: Legal Blind Spots in Emotion-Tracking AI and the Future of Data Privacy

Chinelo Patience Umeanozie Esther Chinwe Eze Chisom Elizabeth Alozie

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Data Privacy

Abstract

This article examines the emerging field of emotion-tracking artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for data privacy and legal frameworks. As technologies capable of detecting, analyzing, and responding to human emotions become increasingly sophisticated and widespread, they create unprecedented challenges for privacy regulation. This analysis explores the current legal blind spots surrounding emotion-tracking AI, evaluates existing regulatory frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, and proposes potential pathways for policy development that balance technological innovation with fundamental privacy rights. By identifying the unique characteristics of emotional data and the novel risks they present, this article contributes to scholarly discourse on the future of data privacy in an era of ambient emotional intelligence.

References

[1] Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2020). Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 736-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1191

[2] Ajunwa, I. (2020). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo Law Review, 41(5), 1671-1742.

[3] Ball, K. (2024). Electronic monitoring and surveillance in the workplace: A review of theoretical perspectives and research findings. International Labour Review, 160(4), 511-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12218

[4] Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(1), 1-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930

[5] Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.

[6] Bramwell, R. (2020). Emotional data laundering in the age of affective computing. AI & Society, 35(3), 761-770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00974-4

[7] Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 81, 77-91.

[8] Calo, R. (2014). Digital market manipulation. George Washington Law Review, 82(4), 995-1051.

[9] Clifford, D. (2020). The legal limits to the monetisation of online emotions [Doctoral dissertation, KU Leuven].

[10] Cohen, I. G., & Mello, M. M. (2019). HIPAA and protecting health information in the 21st century. JAMA, 321(17), 1711-1712. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.2820

[11] Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press.

[12] Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.

[13] Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2018). Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. MIT Press.

[14] EDPB (European Data Protection Board). (2021). Guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines-32019-processing-personal-data-through-video_en

[15] Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2018). Enslaving the algorithm: From a 'right to an explanation' to a 'right to better decisions'? IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(3), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701152

[16] Frischmann, B., & Selinger, E. (2018). Re-engineering humanity. Cambridge University Press.

[17] Gstrein, O. J., Zwitter, A. J., & Gellert, R. (2021). Big data, privacy and COVID-19 -- learning from humanitarian expertise in data protection. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 6(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-020-00087-z

[18] Harris, T. (2021). The attention economy and emotional manipulation. Center for Humane Technology.

[19] Hartzog, W. (2021). Privacy's blueprint: The battle to control the design of new technologies. Harvard University Press.

[20] Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

[21] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[22] Kaminski, M. E. (2019). The right to explanation, explained. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 34, 189-218. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38TD9N83H

[23] Keene, A. (2019). Algorithmic colonialism and the opacity of microexpression analysis. Native Appropriations.

[24] Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

[25] Margetts, H., Hale, S. A., & Yasseri, T. (2021). Political turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton University Press.

[26] Martinez-Martin, N., Dunn, L. B., & Roberts, L. W. (2021). Is it ethical to use prognostic estimates from machine learning to treat psychosis? AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(4), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.277

[27] Mesquita, B., Boiger, M., & De Leersnyder, J. (2017). Doing emotions: The role of culture in everyday emotions. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 95-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1329107

[28] Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the South(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739

[29] Mohammad, S. M. (2022). Ethics sheet for automatic emotion recognition and sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 48(2), 239-278. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00433

[30] Patra, R., Das, P., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2022). Privacy-by-design in emotion recognition systems. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[31] Penney, J. W. (2017). Internet surveillance, regulation, and chilling effects online: A comparative case study. Internet Policy Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.2.692

[32] Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019). Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7

[33] Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 33-44). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873

[34] Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Clarendon Press.

[35] Rhue, L. (2019). Racial influence on automated perceptions of emotions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3281765

[36] Richards, N. M., & Hartzog, W. (2019). The pathologies of digital consent. Washington University Law Review, 96(6), 1461-1503.

[37] Sacks, S., & Sherman, J. (2021). China's data governance regime: A framework for competition, innovation, and national security. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3841342

[38] Salminen, J., Jung, S. G., Santos, J. M., & Jansen, B. J. (2022). The effect of experience on cross-cultural emotion recognition: Exploring differences between human and machine. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 256-277). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05643-7_17

[39] Schaub, F., Balebako, R., & Cranor, L. F. (2018). Designing effective privacy notices and controls. IEEE Internet Computing, 22(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2018.2806183

[40] Schwartz, P. M. (2021). Global data privacy: The EU way. New York University Law Review, 94(4), 771-848.

[41] Sedenberg, E., & Hoffmann, A. L. (2021). Recovering the history of informed consent for data science and internet industry research ethics. Technology and Society.

[42] Stark, L. (2018). Facial recognition, emotion and race in animated social media. First Monday, 23(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i9.9406

[43] Stark, L. (2021). Facial recognition is the plutonium of AI. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 27(3), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468280

[44] Stark, L., Stanhaus, A., & Anthony, D. L. (2021). "I don't want someone to watch me while I'm working": Gendered views of facial recognition technology in workplace surveillance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(9), 1074-1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24478

[45] Susser, D. (2019). Invisible influence: Artificial intelligence and the ethics of adaptive choice architectures. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 403-408). https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314286

[46] Susser, D., Roessler, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Technology, autonomy, and manipulation. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1410

[47] Svenaeus, F. (2019). A defense of the phenomenological account of health and illness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 44(4), 459-478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhz013

[48] Turow, J., Hennessy, M., Draper, N., Akanbi, O., & Virgilio, D. (2021). Consumers' understanding of privacy rules in the marketplace. In Surveillance Capitalism and Privacy (pp. 127-152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66866-6_6

[49] Veale, M., & Binns, R. (2021). Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717743530

[50] Viljoen, S. (2020). Democratic data: A relational theory for data governance. Yale Law Journal, 131.

[51] Waldman, A. E. (2020). Privacy, practice, and performance. California Law Review, 108, 1441-1482.

[52] Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.

[53] Yeung, K. (2017). 'Hypernudge': Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186713

[54] Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158

[55] Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.

How to cite this paper

Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Esther Chinwe Eze, Chisom Elizabeth Alozie "Silent Surveillance: Legal Blind Spots in Emotion-Tracking AI and the Future of Data Privacy" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 8 Issue 12 2025 Page 1496-1509
Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Esther Chinwe Eze, Chisom Elizabeth Alozie "Silent Surveillance: Legal Blind Spots in Emotion-Tracking AI and the Future of Data Privacy" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 12, Jun. 2025
Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Esther Chinwe Eze, Chisom Elizabeth Alozie (2025). Silent Surveillance: Legal Blind Spots in Emotion-Tracking AI and the Future of Data Privacy. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 8(12).
Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Esther Chinwe Eze, Chisom Elizabeth Alozie "Silent Surveillance: Legal Blind Spots in Emotion-Tracking AI and the Future of Data Privacy" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 12, Jun. 2025.
@article{1709426,
      author = {Chinelo Patience Umeanozie, Esther Chinwe Eze, Chisom Elizabeth Alozie},
      title = {Silent Surveillance: Legal Blind Spots in Emotion-Tracking AI and the Future of Data Privacy},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {8},
      number = {12},
      pages = {1496-1509},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709426.pdf},
      abstract = {This article examines the emerging field of emotion-tracking artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for data privacy and legal frameworks. As technologies capable of detecting, analyzing, and responding to human emotions become increasingly sophisticated and widespread, they create unprecedented challenges for privacy regulation. This analysis explores the current legal blind spots surrounding emotion-tracking AI, evaluates existing regulatory frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, and proposes potential pathways for policy development that balance technological innovation with fundamental privacy rights. By identifying the unique characteristics of emotional data and the novel risks they present, this article contributes to scholarly discourse on the future of data privacy in an era of ambient emotional intelligence.},
      month = {June},
  }