Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709433
The Economics of Bamboo Construction: Cost-Effectiveness Vs. Traditional Materials
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Architecture
Abstract
As the global construction sector seeks sustainable alternatives to environmentally intensive materials like concrete, steel, and timber, bamboo has emerged as a renewable, low-carbon option with growing interest. This study investigates the economic viability of bamboo construction by comparing cost-related perceptions and performance against conventional materials, while capturing real-world insights from key stakeholders. A structured questionnaire was administered to 60 respondents, including architects, engineers, builders, contractors, developers, and homeowners, all of whom had prior experience using bamboo in construction. Quantitative analysis revealed that 55% of respondents viewed bamboo as having lower long-term costs, while 70% considered it more durable than traditional materials. However, over 90% rated market acceptance as low, citing major barriers such as lack of awareness (70%), regulatory constraints (63%), and perceived durability issues (57%). Despite these challenges, 60% expressed willingness to reuse bamboo, underscoring a gap between personal confidence and broader industry skepticism. The study concludes that bamboo is economically promising, especially over the lifecycle of a building, but its widespread adoption hinges on policy reform, awareness-building, technical training, and investment in supply chain infrastructure. These findings contribute to bridging the gap between bamboo's environmental potential and its real-world economic competitiveness.
Keywords
Adoption Barriers, Bamboo Construction, Cost-Effectiveness, Durability, Sustainable Materials
References
[1] Ahmed, S. (2021). Evaluating the feasibility of mass timber as a mainstream building material in the US construction market: industry perception, cost competitiveness, and environmental performance analysis.
[2] Amuah, E. E. Y., Fei-Baffoe, B., Sackey, L. N. A., Douti, N. B., & Kazapoe, R. W. (2022). A review of the principles of composting: understanding the processes, methods, merits, and demerits. Organic Agriculture, 12(4), 547-562.
[3] Atiku, S. O., Jeremiah, A., Semente, E., & Boateng, F. (Eds.). (2024). Eco-innovation and sustainable development in industry 5.0. IGI Global.
[4] Binfield, L., Nasir, V., & Dai, C. (2024). Bamboo industrialization in the era of Industry 5.0: an exploration of key concepts, synergies and gaps. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-32.
[5] Bredenoord, J. (2024). Bamboo as a sustainable building material for innovative, low-cost housing construction. Sustainability, 16(6), 2347.
[6] Call, D. R., & Herber, D. R. (2022). Applicability of the diffusion of innovation theory to accelerate model‐based systems engineering adoption. Systems Engineering, 25(6), 574-583.
[7] Chilton, K., Kadivar, M., & Hinkle, H. (2025). From Problems to Possibilities: Overcoming Commercialization Challenges to Scale Timber Bamboo in Buildings. Sustainability, 17(4), 1575.
[8] Davidson, A., & Gales, J. (2021). BIM and fire safety engineering-overview of state of the art. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 10(4), 251-263.
[9] Dhurve, S. (2024). The challenges and opportunities of transitioning from conventional materials to natural and sustainable materials in commercial projects. Journal of Research in Infrastructure Designing, 7(1), 28-46.
[10] Elegbede, O. T., & Akinbile, B. F. (2024). Perception of professionals on factors influencing skilled labor shortages in the Nigerian construction industry.
[11] Gan, J., Chen, M., Semple, K., Liu, X., Dai, C., & Tu, Q. (2022). Life cycle assessment of bamboo products: Review and harmonization. Science of the Total Environment, 849, 157937.
[12] Gebremariam, H., Amede, E., & Hailemariam, L. (2024). Unlocking the potential of existing bamboo scaffold connections: a comprehensive review on reusability. Eur. J. Mater. Sci. Eng, 9, 93-108.
[13] Ghobadi, M., & Sepasgozar, S. M. (2023). Circular economy strategies in modern timber construction as a potential response to climate change. Journal of Building Engineering, 77, 107229.
[14] Gunawarman, A. A. G. R., Pradnyaningrum, P. S., Murti, A. A. G. K., Utari, P. M. E., & Kanaka, I. M. A. G. R. (2025). Innovation in hanging bamboo weaving of malet gusti using modern techniques for interior design and building facades: Sustainable materials. Journal of Innovation Materials, Energy, and Sustainable Engineering, 2(2), 140-153.
[15] Huang, Z. (2021). Development of Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM) for Resource-Driven Bamboo Construction. In Resource-Driven Sustainable Bamboo Construction in Asia-Pacific Bamboo Areas (pp. 87-122). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[16] Iroegbu, A. O. C., & Ray, S. S. (2021). Bamboos: From bioresource to sustainable materials and chemicals. Sustainability, 13(21), 12200.
[17] Iroegbu, A. O. C., & Ray, S. S. (2021). Bamboos: From bioresource to sustainable materials and chemicals. Sustainability, 13(21), 12200.
[18] Kuo, J. H., McManus, C., & Lee, J. A. (2021). Analyzing the adoption of radiofrequency ablation of thyroid nodules using the diffusion of innovations theory: understanding where we are in the United States?. Ultrasonography, 41(1), 25.
[19] Lyons, H. (2024). Sustainable Development: A Thesis Portfolio Showcasing Practice and Theory (Master's thesis, The University of Iowa).
[20] Madhushan, S., Buddika, S., Bandara, S., Navaratnam, S., & Abeysuriya, N. (2023). Uses of bamboo for sustainable construction—a structural and durability perspective—a review. Sustainability, 15(14), 11137.
[21] Mohan, N., Dash, S. P., Boby, N. M., & Shetty, D. (2022). Study of bamboo as a building material–Construction & preservation techniques and its sustainability. Materials Today: Proceedings, 60, 100-114.
[22] Negrão, K. R. M., Gomes, S. C., Carvalho, M. C. D. S. D., & Emmendoerfer, M. L. (2024). Strategic Management for Sustainability. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 28(06), e240221.
[23] Nguyen, M. V. (2024). Assessing the readiness for sustainable building material adoption: a study from construction organizations of different sizes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
[24] Reichelt, F., Holder, D., & Maier, T. (2023). Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design, Vol. 100, 2023, 109-118 AHFE. Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design, 109.
[25] Rusch, F., Wastowski, A. D., de Lira, T. S., Moreira, K. C. C. S. R., & de Moraes Lúcio, D. (2023). Description of the component properties of species of bamboo: a review. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(3), 2487-2495.
[26] Sain, A., Gaur, A., Khichad, J. S., & Somani, P. (2024, June). Treatment of Bamboo for Sustainable Construction Practise: A Comprehensive Review. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1326, No. 1, p. 012049). IOP Publishing.
[27] Tiza, M. T., Imoni, S., Akande, E. O., Mogbo, O., Jiya, V. H., & Onuzulike, C. (2024). Revolutionizing Infrastructure Development: Exploring Cutting-Edge Advances in Civil Engineering Materials. Recent Progress in Materials, 6(3), 1-68.
[28] Vitug, E. G., & Alvarez, S. C. (2024). Harnessing the Market Potential of the Bamboo Industry in Central Luzon, Philippines: An Analysis of the Internal and External Environment. Open Journal of Ecology, 14(5), 395-418.
How to cite this paper
@article{1709433,
author = {Adedokun A. ROBERTS, Adekunle O. OGUNNAIKE},
title = {The Economics of Bamboo Construction: Cost-Effectiveness Vs. Traditional Materials},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {12},
pages = {1798-1808},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709433.pdf},
abstract = {As the global construction sector seeks sustainable alternatives to environmentally intensive materials like concrete, steel, and timber, bamboo has emerged as a renewable, low-carbon option with growing interest. This study investigates the economic viability of bamboo construction by comparing cost-related perceptions and performance against conventional materials, while capturing real-world insights from key stakeholders. A structured questionnaire was administered to 60 respondents, including architects, engineers, builders, contractors, developers, and homeowners, all of whom had prior experience using bamboo in construction. Quantitative analysis revealed that 55% of respondents viewed bamboo as having lower long-term costs, while 70% considered it more durable than traditional materials. However, over 90% rated market acceptance as low, citing major barriers such as lack of awareness (70%), regulatory constraints (63%), and perceived durability issues (57%). Despite these challenges, 60% expressed willingness to reuse bamboo, underscoring a gap between personal confidence and broader industry skepticism. The study concludes that bamboo is economically promising, especially over the lifecycle of a building, but its widespread adoption hinges on policy reform, awareness-building, technical training, and investment in supply chain infrastructure. These findings contribute to bridging the gap between bamboo's environmental potential and its real-world economic competitiveness.},
keywords = {Adoption Barriers, Bamboo Construction, Cost-Effectiveness, Durability, Sustainable Materials},
month = {June},
}