Teacher?s perspective on using augmented reality in the classroom to teach scientific concepts

References

[1] Amaah(2021). "Diffusion of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Pre-K to 12 Education: Experiences and Perceptions of Pioneer Teachers" Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 2906.

[2] Abu-Dalbouh. (2013). A questionnaire approach based on the technology acceptance model for mobile tracking on patient progress applications. Journal of Computer Science, 9(6), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.763.770

[3] Barroso Osuna, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Llorente-Cejudo, M. D. C., & Valencia

[4] Education: Visions from the Experts. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.409

[5] Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4

[6] Burton, E. P., Frazier, W., Annetta, L., Lamb, R., Cheng, R., &Chmiel, M. (2011). Modeling Augmented Reality Games with Preservice. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 303-329.

[7] Chris Cope, & Peter Ward. (2002). Integrating learning technology into classrooms: The importance of teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 67–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.5.1.67

[8] Czerkawski, B., &Berti, M. (2021). Learning experience design for augmented reality. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2429

[9] da Silva, M., Teixeira, J., Cavalcante, P. et al. Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: a systematic review. J BrazComput Soc 25, 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-019-0084-8

[10] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[11] Granić, A., &Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

[12] Hurwitz, C. L. (1999). A teacher’s perspective on technology in the classroom: Computer visualization, concept maps and learning logs. Journal of Education, 181, 123. Available from EBSCOhost.

[13] Kesim, M., &Ozarslan, Y. (2012b). Augmented Reality in Education: Current Technologies and the Potential for Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654

[14] Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250

[15] Petrov, P. D., &Atanasova, T. V. (2020). The Effect of Augmented Reality on Students’ Learning Performance in Stem Education. Information, 11(4), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040209

[16] Quintero, J., Baldiris, S., Rubira, R., Cerón, J., & Velez, G. (2019). Augmented Reality in Educational Inclusion. A Systematic Review on the Last Decade. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01835

[17] Rizov, T., &Rizova, E. (2015). AUGMENTED REALITY AS A TEACHING TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 3(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2015-3-1-7-15

[18] Richey, S. (2018). Utilizing Presence in Augmented-Reality Applications to Improve Learning Outcomes. Performance Improvement, 57(4), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21773

[19] Royer, R. (2002). Supporting technology integration through action research. Clearing House, 75, 233. Available from EBSCOhost.

[20] Saidin, N. F., Abd Halim, N. D., & Yahaya, N. (2015b). A Review of Research on Augmented Reality in Education: Advantages and Applications. International Education Studies, 8(13). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1

[21] Spinuzzi, Clay. (2005). The Methodology of Participatory Design. Technical Communication. 52. 163-174.

[22] Yilmaz, Ozkan. “Augmented Reality in Science Education: An Application in Higher Education.” Shanlax International Journal of Education, vol. 9, no. 3, 2021, pp. 136-148.

@article{1704013,
      author = {Nevil Pradeep Dsouza, Bhargavi D Hemmige},
      title = {Teacher?s perspective on using augmented reality in the classroom to teach scientific concepts},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {7},
      pages = {207-213},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704013.pdf},
      abstract = {Technology plays an essential part in the conveyance of information from one individual to another. Smartphones and computers enable effective communication by enabling the transmission of messages to a big group or a single individual, as well as the receipt of feedback. The integration of technology into educational setting has become increasingly important. Emerging technologies like Augmented reality (AR) introduce computer generated images to the real time environment, and we could see the use this technology in gaming and in the entertainment sector. Numerous research have been undertaken globally to determine the use of Augmented reality technology from the perspective of learners. To fill the void, this study investigates the utility and ease of use of technology from the viewpoint of scientific educators. This study is based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the Likert scale, and interviews with instructors to determine their opinions. In the perspective of educators, augmented reality (AR) offers great potential and advantages in the creation of instructional content. The limitation of the study, which will be addressed in the further research.},
      keywords = {Augmented Reality (AR), Teaching learning, Communication, Usefulness of technology, (TAM), ScienceEducation , Scientific learning.},
      month = {January},
  }