Home / Current Issue / Paper 1705063
Assessing Mathematical Understanding: Unveiling the True Essence of Feedback as a Process
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Mathematics Education
Abstract
This study unveiled the true essence of feedback as a process in assessing and enhancing learners' mathematical understanding within a socio-cultural learning environment. The study adopted the Socio-Cultural theory of learning as a theoretical framework to investigate the role of feedback in the learning process. The data for this qualitative study was derived from interviews conducted with two experienced mathematics teachers. Polkinghorne's narrative analysis was employed to analyse the interview data and identify key themes and patterns. The findings highlight the importance of feedback as a process in guiding learners towards self-assessment and self-correction, leading to deeper mathematical understanding. The study emphasizes the need for feedback to be meaningful, specific, and aligned with the goals and learning objectives of the task. It also highlights the importance of considering individual learner needs and learning styles in providing constructive feedback.
Keywords
Mathematical understanding; Feedback; Process; Product
References
[1] Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252-265.
[2] Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
[3] Carless D. and D. Boud. 2018. “The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315-1325, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
[4] Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 219-233.
[5] Cizek, G. J., Rachor, R. E., & Fitzgerald, S. M. (1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159–179. doi: 10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
[6] Dann, R. (2015). Developing the foundations for dialogic feedback in order to better understand the'learning gap'from a pupil's perspective. London Review of Education.
[7] Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 258–291.
[8] Goos, M. (2014). Creating opportunities to learn in mathematics education: A sociocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 439-457.
[9] Groves, S. (2012). Developing mathematical proficiency. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 35(2), 119-145. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30051321
[10] Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: the role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269-290.
[11] Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2014). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: the role of feedback’s perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, 34(3), 269-290.
[12] Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 263-285). Routledge.
[13] Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
[14] Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in educational evaluation, 38(1), 21-27.
[15] Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics, 2(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538.
[16] Hlangwani, W. (2023). An exploration of ACE teaching cycle in improving grade 12 learners’ understanding of quadratic functions. Unpublished Master of Education dissertation, University of Limpopo, Polokwane.
[17] Hlangwani, W., Dhlamini, Z.B., Chuene, K.M. (2023, June). Exploring learners’ conceptual obstacles of a quadratic function: A case of vertex concept. In Proceedings of the 28th National Congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa: AMESA.
[18] Jónsson, Í. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 52-58.
[19] Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2002). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9822.html
[20] Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Retrieved February, 15, 2007.
[21] Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781-796.
[22] Nicol, D. 2010. “From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559.
[23] Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5-23.
[24] Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan. 2010. “Feedback: All That Effort, but What is the Effect?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–289. doi: 10.1080/02602930903541007.
[25] Rittle‐Johnson, B. (2017). Developing mathematics knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12229
[26] Shute, V. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (10): 153–189. doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.
[27] Van der Kleij, F. M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175-189.
[28] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[29] Winstone, N., R. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017b. “‘It’d Be Useful, but I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041.
How to cite this paper
@article{1705063,
author = {Wisani Hlangwani},
title = {Assessing Mathematical Understanding: Unveiling the True Essence of Feedback as a Process},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {304-311},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705063.pdf},
abstract = {This study unveiled the true essence of feedback as a process in assessing and enhancing learners' mathematical understanding within a socio-cultural learning environment. The study adopted the Socio-Cultural theory of learning as a theoretical framework to investigate the role of feedback in the learning process. The data for this qualitative study was derived from interviews conducted with two experienced mathematics teachers. Polkinghorne's narrative analysis was employed to analyse the interview data and identify key themes and patterns. The findings highlight the importance of feedback as a process in guiding learners towards self-assessment and self-correction, leading to deeper mathematical understanding. The study emphasizes the need for feedback to be meaningful, specific, and aligned with the goals and learning objectives of the task. It also highlights the importance of considering individual learner needs and learning styles in providing constructive feedback.},
keywords = {Mathematical understanding; Feedback; Process; Product},
month = {September},
}