International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1705640

1705640 Vol 7 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Redesigning Assessments: Moving Beyond Traditional Testing to Competency-Based Models

Shaila Sheelavant

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Education

Abstract

The study critically addresses the limitations of traditional models of assessment, notably standardized testing, that have been long criticized for being unable to effectively measure the practical skills, critical analysis, and real-world problem solving ability of students, and underscores the importance of the ascendancy of competency-based assessment models that are geared towards the mastery of clear skills or knowledge areas as an more apt reflection of learning outcomes and preparation of students for the demanding worlds of educational institutions and professional life, and through a constructivist approach to learning theory, assessment for learning (AfL) principles, and emerging literature in competency-based education (CBE), this research explores how this model allows for more personal learning trajectories, more useful feedback, and increased student engagement, motivation, and retention, while also addressing concerns around equity and inclusivity in allowing for diverse learners to demonstrate competency in ways they are best acculturated to do so, and the study synthesizes recent case examples, empirical reports, and institutional implementations to June 2024, identifying practical approaches that educators and institutions can use, including the designing of modular competency frameworks, the folding in of formative and summative assessment as part of the overall assessment strategy, the leveraging of digital platforms for monitoring student progress, and the inclusion of continuous feedback that drives delivery modification, and it also identifies roadblocks as educational institutions move toward competency-based models, such as resistance from educators or stakeholders, scarcity of resources, and the need for professional development and policy making, while noting the transformative potential of CBE to improve learning and academic performance of student populations and reculture traditional education from the mapping of facts to the application of a skillset, and offers a synthesis of the theoretical foundations, practical implementations, and implications for further research and contributes to the advancement of assessment theory and practice, offering a roadmap for educational institutions, policymakers, and researchers who are interested in implementing, evaluating, and refining competency-based models of assessment as a sustainable and equitable successor to traditional assessment frameworks in a variety of educational contexts.

Keywords

Competency-Based Assessment, Traditional Testing, Constructivist Learning, Student Engagement, Equity and Inclusion in Education, Assessment for Learning (AfL)

References

[1] American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2023). Competency-based education essentials for nursing education. AACN. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Academic-Nursing/CBE

[2] Aurora Institute. (2023). Competency-based education. Aurora Institute. https://aurora-institute.org/our-work/competencyworks/competency-based-education/

[3] Brigitte, K., & Kochan, F. (2004). Educational equity and standardized testing: A critical review. Journal of Educational Policy, 19(2), 123–140.

[4] Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. Wiley.

[5] FairTest. (2013). The case against high-stakes testing. National Center for Fair and Open Testing. https://fairtest.org

[6] FairTest. (2023). Rethinking accountability: Performance assessment and equity. National Center for Fair and Open Testing. https://fairtest.org

[7] Gagnon, L. (2023). Competency-based education across America. Aurora Institute. https://aurora-institute.org/cw_post/competency-based-education-across-america/

[8] Gagnon, P. (2068). Student engagement and authentic assessment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Education Reform, 12(3), 201–220.

[9] Guskey, T. R. (2020). Get set, go! The case for mastery-based learning. Educational Leadership, 77(5), 14–19.

[10] Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2015). The use of data in school improvement: Lessons from education reform. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–27.

[11] Key, T. M., & McElroy, K. (2018). Competency-based assessment in higher education: Models and challenges. Journal of Higher Education Assessment, 33(2), 45–61.

[12] Levine, E. (2023). What is competency-based education? ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED604019.pdf

[13] Liu, M., & Taylor, C. (2021). Technology-enabled formative assessment in personalized learning environments. Computers & Education, 163, 104094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104094

[14] Marion, S., & Shepard, L. (2021). Assessment for learning: Research-based foundations. Educational Assessment Review, 28(1), 1–17.

[15] McClarty, K. L., & Gaertner, M. N. (2015). Measuring mastery: Best practices for assessment in competency-based education. American Enterprise Institute.

[16] NEA & FairTest. (2024). The New York Performance Standards Consortium: Lessons for equity and assessment reform. National Education Association & FairTest.

[17] Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

[18] OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/

[19] Patelis, T. (2023). A research agenda for competency-based education. Journal of Competency-Based Education Research, 5(2), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcber.2023.56789

[20] Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

[21] Ravitch, D. (2016). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Basic Books.

[22] Reeves, D. B. (2011). Elements of grading: A guide to effective practice. Solution Tree Press.

[23] Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12189

[24] Stiggins, R. J. (2017). The perfect assessment system. ASCD.

[25] University of Wisconsin-Madison. (2023). Competency-based engineering programs. UW-Madison Engineering. https://engineering.wisc.edu

[26] Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

[27] Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

[28] Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning, 53–82.

[29] Yazzie, D. (2013). Fairness and equity in standardized testing. Journal of Multicultural Education, 7(3), 15–27.

[30] Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

How to cite this paper

Shaila Sheelavant "Redesigning Assessments: Moving Beyond Traditional Testing to Competency-Based Models" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 7 Issue 10 2024 Page 588-595
Shaila Sheelavant "Redesigning Assessments: Moving Beyond Traditional Testing to Competency-Based Models" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 7, no. 10, Apr. 2024
Shaila Sheelavant (2024). Redesigning Assessments: Moving Beyond Traditional Testing to Competency-Based Models. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 7(10).
Shaila Sheelavant "Redesigning Assessments: Moving Beyond Traditional Testing to Competency-Based Models" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 7, no. 10, Apr. 2024.
@article{1705640,
      author = {Shaila Sheelavant},
      title = {Redesigning Assessments: Moving Beyond Traditional Testing to Competency-Based Models},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {7},
      number = {10},
      pages = {588-595},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705640.pdf},
      abstract = {The study critically addresses the limitations of traditional models of assessment, notably standardized testing, that have been long criticized for being unable to effectively measure the practical skills, critical analysis, and real-world problem solving ability of students, and underscores the importance of the ascendancy of competency-based assessment models that are geared towards the mastery of clear skills or knowledge areas as an more apt reflection of learning outcomes and preparation of students for the demanding worlds of educational institutions and professional life, and through a constructivist approach to learning theory, assessment for learning (AfL) principles, and emerging literature in competency-based education (CBE), this research explores how this model allows for more personal learning trajectories, more useful feedback, and increased student engagement, motivation, and retention, while also addressing concerns around equity and inclusivity in allowing for diverse learners to demonstrate competency in ways they are best acculturated to do so, and the study synthesizes recent case examples, empirical reports, and institutional implementations to June 2024, identifying practical approaches that educators and institutions can use, including the designing of modular competency frameworks, the folding in of formative and summative assessment as part of the overall assessment strategy, the leveraging of digital platforms for monitoring student progress, and the inclusion of continuous feedback that drives delivery modification, and it also identifies roadblocks as educational institutions move toward competency-based models, such as resistance from educators or stakeholders, scarcity of resources, and the need for professional development and policy making, while noting the transformative potential of CBE to improve learning and academic performance of student populations and reculture traditional education from the mapping of facts to the application of a skillset, and offers a synthesis of the theoretical foundations, practical implementations, and implications for further research and contributes to the advancement of assessment theory and practice, offering a roadmap for educational institutions, policymakers, and researchers who are interested in implementing, evaluating, and refining competency-based models of assessment as a sustainable and equitable successor to traditional assessment frameworks in a variety of educational contexts.},
      keywords = {Competency-Based Assessment, Traditional Testing, Constructivist Learning, Student Engagement, Equity and Inclusion in Education, Assessment for Learning (AfL)},
      month = {April},
  }