Home / Current Issue / Paper 1708860
Meta-Synthesis of Organisational Barriers to Decision Tree Data Analytics Adoption in Payment-Fraud Operations
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Data Analytics
Abstract
Increased incidences of payment fraud in the financial sector thus saw the increased use of advanced data analytic tools to detect and prevent fraudulent transactions. Among these tools, Decision Tree models are highly valued for their interpretability, simplicity in implementation, and their ability to classify and predict fraudulent behavior. However, from a practical point of view, and despite the technical prowess of Decision Tree analytics, adoption of these in payment-fraud operations remains scant. This study presents a meta-synthesis of existing qualitative studies to investigate the organizational barriers that hinder the adoption of Decision Tree data analytics in fraud detection processes. It synthesizes findings from diverse industry and academic sources and reveals the principal challenges these organizations face in integrating these technologies into their fraud operations. The meta-synthesis brings out some of the main barriers to adoption, among which are: cultural resistance against machine learning tools; organizational resistance against embracing algorithmic decision-making; and distrust towards any automated system. Meanwhile, there are huge skill and knowledge deficits, since many organizations have a hard time locating personnel sufficiently trained in both implementing and interpreting Decision Tree models. Other data-related issues emerged as key challenges that hindered the construction of good models: data silos fragmented within organizations and poor data quality. Moreover, legacy infrastructure and expensive integration thwarted were substantial hindrances in organizations with legacy systems. Strategic misalignment, where fraud analytics goals are not sufficiently tied to larger business objectives, inhibits the more successful adoption of analytics. It supports the view that in overcoming these barriers, organizations should nurture a data-driven culture, encourage cross-functional collaboration, and commit resources to technical infrastructure and talent development. In addition, these insights fit well within technology adoption frameworks, describing how the interference of organizational, culture, and strategic issues may affect uptake of Decision Tree analytics. Providing actionable recommendations, this study should provide fertile ground for institutions, fintech entities, and payment processors willing to reach further in fraud detection. The research further calls for additional work, especially longitudinal and sector-specific, to lay the adoption issues and opportunities within fraud prevention in a broader light throughout its metamorphosis.
Keywords
Decision Tree analytics, payment fraud detection, organizational barriers, technology adoption, machine learning, fraud operations, meta-synthesis, data analytics, organizational culture, infrastructure challenges, strategic alignment.
References
[1] Mostafapoor, H., Keramati, M., Mehrinejad, S., & Minouei, M. (2024). Application of Meta-Synthesis Technique in Bank Profitability Model Considering the Role of Modern Banking Technologies. Management Strategies and Engineering Sciences, 6(2), 15-24.
[2] Shakibaei Bonakdeh, E., Sohal, A., Rajabkhah, K., Prajogo, D., Melder, A., Nguyen, D. Q., ... & Tong, E. (2024). Influential factors in the adoption of clinical decision support systems in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(4), 1463-1500.
[3] Adabi, M. Application of Meta-Synthesis Technique in Human Resource Educational Management Based on Artificial Intelligence.
[4] Pigola, A., & Da Costa, P. R. (2023). Dynamic capabilities in cybersecurity intelligence: A meta-synthesis to enhance protection against cyber threats. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 53(1), 1099-1135.
[5] Bello, O. A., Ogundipe, A., Mohammed, D., Adebola, F., & Alonge, O. A. (2023). AI-Driven Approaches for real-time fraud detection in US financial transactions: challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 11(6), 84-102.
[6] Ejiofor, O. E. (2023). A comprehensive framework for strengthening USA financial cybersecurity: integrating machine learning and AI in fraud detection systems. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 11(6), 62-83.
[7] Oladeinde, M., Hassan, A. O., Farayola, O. A., Akindote, O. J., & Adegbite, A. O. (2023). Review of it innovations, data analytics, and governance in nigerian enterprises. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 4(3), 300-326.
[8] Sumankuuro, J., Crockett, J., & Wang, S. (2018). Sociocultural barriers to maternity services delivery: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature. Public health, 157, 77-85.
[9] Vasudevan, A., & Ford, E. (2022). Motivational factors and barriers towards initiating and maintaining strength training in women: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Prevention Science, 23(4), 674-695.
[10] Li, X., Yang, C., Møller, C., & Lee, J. (2024). Data Issues in Industrial AI System: A Meta-Review and Research Strategy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.15784.
[11] Nguyen, Q. T., Tran, T. N., Heuchenne, C., & Tran, K. P. (2022). Decision support systems for anomaly detection with the applications in smart manufacturing: a survey and perspective. In Machine Learning and Probabilistic Graphical Models for Decision Support Systems (pp. 34-61). CRC Press.
[12] Xu, B., & Wang, S. (2024). Examining windows file system irp operations with machine learning for ransomware detection.
[13] Fazel, E., Nezhad, M. Z., Rezazadeh, J., Moradi, M., & Ayoade, J. (2024). IoT convergence with machine learning & blockchain: A review. Internet of Things, 101187.
[14] Tragouda, M., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2024). Identification of fraudulent financial statements through a multi‐label classification approach. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 31(2), e1564.
[15] Ejaz, U., & Gimah, M. (2024). AI in Subscription-Based Services for Churn Detection.
[16] Merhej, J., Harb, H., Abouaissa, A., & Idoumghar, L. (2024). Toward a New Era of Smart and Secure Healthcare Information Exchange Systems: Combining Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence. Applied Sciences, 14(19), 8808.
[17] Rodríguez Cardona, D., Werth, O., Schönborn, S., & Breitner, M. H. (2019). A mixed methods analysis of the adoption and diffusion of Chatbot Technology in the German insurance sector.
[18] Alalwany, E., & Mahgoub, I. (2024). Security and trust management in the internet of vehicles (IoV): Challenges and machine learning solutions. Sensors, 24(2), 368.
[19] Abbasi, B., Khanmohammadi, M., Moradi, Z., & Mahmoodiyan, T. (2019). Capacity building of green accounting consequences based on the explanation of strategic management accounting techniques. Iranian Journal of Finance, 3(4), 23-59.
[20] Göktepe Körpeoğlu, S., & Göktepe Yıldız, S. (2023). Comparative analysis of algorithms with data mining methods for examining attitudes towards STEM fields. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2791-2826.
[21] Breilin, S. (2022). Comparison of Blockchain technology in various segments of supply chain management.
[22] Schardong, F., & Custódio, R. (2022). Self-sovereign identity: a systematic review, mapping and taxonomy. Sensors, 22(15), 5641.
[23] Turi, A. N. (2023). Financial Technologies and DeFi. A Revisit to Digital Financial Revolution.
[24] Platania, S. A. (2023). The state-of-the-art of the research methodology on blockchain technology: proposal for a research agenda and policy implications.
[25] Tran, K. P. (Ed.). (2022). Machine Learning and Probabilistic Graphical Models for Decision Support Systems. CRC Press.
[26] Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of planning education and research, 39(1), 93-112.
How to cite this paper
@article{1708860,
author = {Pankajkumar Tejraj Jain, Ashok Ghimire, Reshma Leslie, Sandeep Shrestha},
title = {Meta-Synthesis of Organisational Barriers to Decision Tree Data Analytics Adoption in Payment-Fraud Operations},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {12},
pages = {26-33},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1708860.pdf},
abstract = {Increased incidences of payment fraud in the financial sector thus saw the increased use of advanced data analytic tools to detect and prevent fraudulent transactions. Among these tools, Decision Tree models are highly valued for their interpretability, simplicity in implementation, and their ability to classify and predict fraudulent behavior. However, from a practical point of view, and despite the technical prowess of Decision Tree analytics, adoption of these in payment-fraud operations remains scant. This study presents a meta-synthesis of existing qualitative studies to investigate the organizational barriers that hinder the adoption of Decision Tree data analytics in fraud detection processes. It synthesizes findings from diverse industry and academic sources and reveals the principal challenges these organizations face in integrating these technologies into their fraud operations. The meta-synthesis brings out some of the main barriers to adoption, among which are: cultural resistance against machine learning tools; organizational resistance against embracing algorithmic decision-making; and distrust towards any automated system. Meanwhile, there are huge skill and knowledge deficits, since many organizations have a hard time locating personnel sufficiently trained in both implementing and interpreting Decision Tree models. Other data-related issues emerged as key challenges that hindered the construction of good models: data silos fragmented within organizations and poor data quality. Moreover, legacy infrastructure and expensive integration thwarted were substantial hindrances in organizations with legacy systems. Strategic misalignment, where fraud analytics goals are not sufficiently tied to larger business objectives, inhibits the more successful adoption of analytics. It supports the view that in overcoming these barriers, organizations should nurture a data-driven culture, encourage cross-functional collaboration, and commit resources to technical infrastructure and talent development. In addition, these insights fit well within technology adoption frameworks, describing how the interference of organizational, culture, and strategic issues may affect uptake of Decision Tree analytics. Providing actionable recommendations, this study should provide fertile ground for institutions, fintech entities, and payment processors willing to reach further in fraud detection. The research further calls for additional work, especially longitudinal and sector-specific, to lay the adoption issues and opportunities within fraud prevention in a broader light throughout its metamorphosis.},
keywords = {Decision Tree analytics, payment fraud detection, organizational barriers, technology adoption, machine learning, fraud operations, meta-synthesis, data analytics, organizational culture, infrastructure challenges, strategic alignment.},
month = {June},
}