International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709212

1709212 Vol 3 · Issue 9 Download Paper

A Conceptual Framework for Process Automation Maturity in Offshore Oil and Gas Floating Production Systems

Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu Joshua Emeka Ozor Oludayo Sofoluwe Dazok Donald Jambol

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Process Automation

Abstract

The offshore oil and gas industry is increasingly dependent on Floating Production Systems (FPS) such as Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading units (FPSOs) and Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) platforms to exploit remote and deepwater reserves. These complex, high-risk environments demand advanced process automation to ensure safe, efficient, and cost-effective operations. However, the adoption and effectiveness of automation technologies in these systems vary widely across the industry. There is a critical need for a structured approach to assess and guide the maturity of process automation capabilities specific to offshore floating production systems. This proposes a conceptual framework for evaluating and advancing process automation maturity in offshore FPS environments. The framework is structured around four key dimensions: technical capabilities, organizational readiness, process integration, and data/digitalization maturity. Each dimension is assessed across five maturity levels?Initial, Managed, Standardized, Integrated, and Optimized?providing a comprehensive view of an organization?s current automation status and future development path. The framework draws from existing automation maturity models and adapts them to the unique operational, environmental, and safety challenges of offshore facilities. It emphasizes not only the technological components, such as control systems and real-time analytics, but also organizational factors like workforce competence, management support, and digital culture. By offering a diagnostic tool and roadmap, the proposed model enables offshore operators, engineers, and decision-makers to benchmark their automation practices, identify gaps, and prioritize investments. Furthermore, the framework supports strategic alignment between automation initiatives and broader goals such as digital transformation, operational excellence, and sustainability. The conceptual framework lays the foundation for future empirical validation and can be adapted for various offshore asset types. It serves as a valuable guide for enhancing automation maturity, ultimately improving safety, performance, and resilience in offshore oil and gas production operations.

Keywords

Conceptual framework, Process automation, Maturity, Offshore oil, Gas floating, Production systems

References

[1] ADEWOYIN, M.A., OGUNNOWO, E.O., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. A Conceptual Framework for Dynamic Mechanical Analysis in High-Performance Material Selection.

[2] ADEWOYIN, M.A., OGUNNOWO, E.O., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. Advances in Thermofluid Simulation for Heat Transfer Optimization in Compact Mechanical Devices.

[3] Akpan, U.U., Adekoya, K.O., Awe, E.T., Garba, N., Oguncoker, G.D. and Ojo, S.G., 2017. Mini-STRs screening of 12 relatives of Hausa origin in northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(1), pp.48-57.

[4] Akpan, U.U., Awe, T.E. and Idowu, D., 2019. Types and frequency of fingerprint minutiae in individuals of Igbo and Yoruba ethnic groups of Nigeria. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 10(1).

[5] Aldinucci, M., Rabellino, S., Pironti, M., Spiga, F., Viviani, P., Drocco, M., Guerzoni, M., Boella, G., Mellia, M., Margara, P. and Drago, I., 2018, May. HPC4AI: an ai-on-demand federated platform endeavour. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (pp. 279-286).

[6] Andoni, M., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Abram, S., Geach, D., Jenkins, D., McCallum, P. and Peacock, A., 2019. Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 100, pp.143-174.

[7] Awe, E.T. and Akpan, U.U., 2017. Cytological study of Allium cepa and Allium sativum.

[8] Awe, E.T., 2017. Hybridization of snout mouth deformed and normal mouth African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Animal Research International, 14(3), pp.2804-2808.

[9] Awe, E.T., Akpan, U.U. and Adekoya, K.O., 2017. Evaluation of two MiniSTR loci mutation events in five Father-Mother-Child trios of Yoruba origin. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 33, pp.120-124.

[10] Bento, N. and Fontes, M., 2019. Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 99, pp.66-82.

[11] Carotenuto, F., Delauney, L., Dussud, L., Gioli, B., Turpin, V. and Zaldei, A., 2019. Report on opportunities and applications of unmanned observatories for usage across RIs.

[12] Chen, J.Y., Tai, K.C. and Chen, G.C., 2017. Application of programmable logic controller to build-up an intelligent industry 4.0 platform. Procedia Cirp, 63, pp.150-155.

[13] Chudi, O., Iwegbu, J., Tetegan, G., Ikwueze, O., Effiom, O., Oke-Oghene, U., Ayodeji, B., Opatewa, S., Oladipo, T., Afolayan, T. and Tonyi, A.A., 2019, August. Integration of rock physics and seismic inversion for net-to-gross estimation: Implication for reservoir modelling and field development in offshore Niger Delta. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D033S028R010). SPE.

[14] Cohen, Y., Naseraldin, H., Chaudhuri, A. and Pilati, F., 2019. Assembly systems in Industry 4.0 era: a road map to understand Assembly 4.0. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105, pp.4037-4054.

[15] Colli, M., Berger, U., Bockholt, M., Madsen, O., Møller, C. and Wæhrens, B.V., 2019. A maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era. Annual Reviews in Control, 48, pp.165-177.

[16] Digmayer, C. and Jakobs, E.M., 2018, July. Employee Empowerment in the Context of domain-specific Risks in Industry 4.0. In 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) (pp. 125-133). IEEE.

[17] Dinh, V.N. and McKeogh, E., 2019. Offshore wind energy: technology opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 1st Vietnam Symposium on Advances in Offshore Engineering: Energy and Geotechnics (pp. 3-22). Springer Singapore.

[18] Dizon, R.A., 2019. A New Way of Healing: Regulating Healthcare AI. Ateneo LJ, 64, p.1127.

[19] Doss, D.A., Goza, R., Tesiero, R., Gokaraju, B. and McElreath, D.H., 2017. The Capability Maturity Model as an industrial process improvement model. Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4(2), pp.17-24.

[20] Enemosah, A., 2019. Implementing DevOps Pipelines to Accelerate Software Deployment in Oil and Gas Operational Technology Environments. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 8(12), pp.501-515.

[21] Engel, N., Davids, M., Blankvoort, N., Dheda, K., Pant Pai, N. and Pai, M., 2017. Making HIV testing work at the point of care in South Africa: a qualitative study of diagnostic practices. BMC health services research, 17, pp.1-11.

[22] Evans, S.J., 2019, April. How digital engineering and cross-industry knowledge transfer is reducing project execution risks in oil and gas. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D022S057R014). OTC.

[23] Foehr, M., Vollmar, J., Calà, A., Leitão, P., Karnouskos, S. and Colombo, A.W., 2017. Engineering of next generation cyber-physical automation system architectures. Multi-disciplinary engineering for cyber-physical production systems: Data models and software solutions for handling complex engineering projects, pp.185-206.

[24] Gambhir, H.S., 2018. Design and Implementation of a Safe and Reliable Instrumentation and Control System in Oil and Gas Industry. In Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Volume 3 (pp. 930-939). CRC Press.

[25] Gefen, A., Alves, P., Creehan, S., Call, E. and Santamaria, N., 2019. Computer modeling of prophylactic dressings: an indispensable guide for healthcare professionals. Advances in skin & wound care, 32(7S), pp.S4-S13.

[26] Gil, Y. and Selman, B., 2019. A 20-year community roadmap for artificial intelligence research in the US. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02624.

[27] Good, N., Ellis, K.A. and Mancarella, P., 2017. Review and classification of barriers and enablers of demand response in the smart grid. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, pp.57-72.

[28] Grange, E.L., 2018, April. A roadmap for adopting a digital lifecycle approach to offshore oil and gas production. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D011S011R006). OTC.

[29] Harris, N., Shealy, T., Kramer, H., Granderson, J. and Reichard, G., 2018. A framework for monitoring-based commissioning: Identifying variables that act as barriers and enablers to the process. Energy and Buildings, 168, pp.331-346.

[30] Horowitz, M.C., 2018. Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power (May 2018).

[31] Hu, Z.Z., Tian, P.L., Li, S.W. and Zhang, J.P., 2018. BIM-based integrated delivery technologies for intelligent MEP management in the operation and maintenance phase. Advances in Engineering Software, 115, pp.1-16.

[32] Hudedmani, M.G., Umayal, R.M., Kabberalli, S.K. and Hittalamani, R., 2017. Programmable logic controller (PLC) in automation. Advanced Journal of Graduate Research, 2(1), pp.37-45.

[33] Ismail, M.H., Khater, M. and Zaki, M., 2017. Digital business transformation and strategy: What do we know so far. Cambridge Service Alliance, 10(1), pp.1-35.

[34] Issa, A., Hatiboglu, B., Bildstein, A. and Bauernhansl, T., 2018. Industrie 4.0 roadmap: Framework for digital transformation based on the concepts of capability maturity and alignment. Procedia Cirp, 72, pp.973-978

[35] Itiki, R., Di Santo, S.G., Itiki, C., Manjrekar, M. and Chowdhury, B.H., 2019. A comprehensive review and proposed architecture for offshore power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 111, pp.79-92.

[36] Kapadia, Y. and Elliott, S., 2018, November. Digitalization of Safety Lifecycle Compliance for Operational Excellence. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D041S106R002). SPE.

[37] Keliris, A. and Maniatakos, M., 2018. ICSREF: A framework for automated reverse engineering of industrial control systems binaries. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.03478.

[38] Kokina, J. and Blanchette, S., 2019. Early evidence of digital labor in accounting: Innovation with Robotic Process Automation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 35, p.100431.

[39] Kothandapani, H.P., 2019. Drivers and barriers of adopting interactive dashboard reporting in the finance sector: an empirical investigation. Reviews of Contemporary Business Analytics, 2(1), pp.45-70.

[40] Kuusk, A. and Gao, J., 2019, July. Automating data driven decisions for asset management–a how to framework for integrating OT/IT operational and information technology, procedures and staff. In World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (pp. 201-213). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[41] Li, J.Q., Yu, F.R., Deng, G., Luo, C., Ming, Z. and Yan, Q., 2017. Industrial internet: A survey on the enabling technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1504-1526.

[42] Lindøe, P.H. and Baram, M.S., 2019. The role of standards in hard and soft approaches to safety regulation. In Standardization and Risk Governance (pp. 235-254). Routledge.

[43] Liu, G. and Li, H., 2017. Offshore platform integration and floatover technology. Springer.

[44] LiVecchi, A., Copping, A., Jenne, S., Gorton, A., Preus, R., Gill, G., Robichaud, R., Green, R., Geerlofs, S., Gore, S. and Hume, D., 2019. Powering the Blue Economy: Exploring Opportunities for Marine Renewable Energy in Various Maritime (No. DOE/GO-1020195157). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

[45] Magnus, K., Edwin, Q., Samuel, O. and Nedomien, O., 2011, September. Onshore 4D processing: Niger Delta example: Kolo Creek case study. In SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting (pp. SEG-2011). SEG.

[46] Mittal, S., Khan, M.A., Romero, D. and Wuest, T., 2018. A critical review of smart manufacturing & Industry 4.0 maturity models: Implications for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of manufacturing systems, 49, pp.194-214.

[47] Moan, T., 2018. Life cycle structural integrity management of offshore structures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 14(7), pp.911-927.

[48] Mostafa, S.A., Ahmad, M.S. and Mustapha, A., 2019. Adjustable autonomy: a systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 51, pp.149-186.

[49] Nave, A. and Ferreira, J., 2019. Corporate social responsibility strategies: Past research and future challenges. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), pp.885-901.

[50] OGUNNOWO, E.O., ADEWOYIN, M.A., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. Systematic Review of Non-Destructive Testing Methods for Predictive Failure Analysis in Mechanical Systems.

[51] Olah, G.A., Goeppert, A. and Prakash, G.S., 2018. Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. John Wiley & Sons.

[52] Oliver, P.R., 2018, March. Enhancing operations with digital technology to bring expertise to site. In Offshore Technology Conference Asia (p. D021S008R002). OTC.

[53] Omisola, J.O., Etukudoh, E.A., Okenwa, O.K. and Tokunbo, G.I., 2020. Innovating Project Delivery and Piping Design for Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Conceptual Framework. perception, 24, pp.28-35.

[54] Oyedokun, O.O., 2019. Green human resource management practices and its effect on the sustainable competitive edge in the Nigerian manufacturing industry (Dangote) (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School).

[55] Pearlman, J., Bushnell, M., Coppola, L., Karstensen, J., Buttigieg, P.L., Pearlman, F., Simpson, P., Barbier, M., Muller-Karger, F.E., Munoz-Mas, C. and Pissierssens, P., 2019. Evolving and sustaining ocean best practices and standards for the next decade. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, p.277.

[56] Randolph, M. and Gourvenec, S., 2017. Offshore geotechnical engineering. CRC press.

[57] Rogers, W.P., Kahraman, M.M., Drews, F.A., Powell, K., Haight, J.M., Wang, Y., Baxla, K. and Sobalkar, M., 2019. Automation in the mining industry: Review of technology, systems, human factors, and political risk. Mining, metallurgy & exploration, 36, pp.607-631.

[58] Roldán, J.J., Peña-Tapia, E., Garcia-Aunon, P., Del Cerro, J. and Barrientos, A., 2019. Bringing adaptive and immersive interfaces to real-world multi-robot scenarios: Application to surveillance and intervention in infrastructures. Ieee Access, 7, pp.86319-86335.

[59] Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., ten Hompel, M. and Wahlster, W., 2017. Industrie 4.0 maturity index. Managing the digital transformation of companies, 61.

[60] Settemsdal, S., 2019, April. Updated case study: The pursuit of an ultra-low manned platform pays dividends in the north sea. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D021S016R003). OTC.

[61] Solanke*, B., Aigbokhai, U., Kanu, M. and Madiba, G., 2014. Impact of accounting for velocity anisotropy on depth image; Niger Delta case history. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014 (pp. 400-404). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.

[62] Söylemez, M. and Tarhan, A., 2017. A review and comparison of maturity/capability frameworks for healthcare process assessment and improvement. Software Quality Professional, 19(2).

[63] Szalavetz, A., 2019. Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, pp.384-395.

[64] Tofte, B.L., Vennemann, O., Mitchell, F., Millington, N. and McGuire, L., 2019, April. How digital technology and standardisation can improve offshore operations. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D041S055R004). OTC.

[65] Wekerle, T., Trabasso, L.G., Loures da Costa, L.E., Villela, T., Brandão, A. and Leonardi, R., 2017. Design for autonomy: Integrating technology transfer into product development process. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 2(01), p.1750004.

[66] Williams, P.A., Lovelock, B., Cabarrus, T. and Harvey, M., 2019. Improving digital hospital transformation: development of an outcomes-based infrastructure maturity assessment framework. JMIR medical informatics, 7(1), p.e12465.

[67] Wood, R.T., Upadhyaya, B.R. and Floyd, D.C., 2017. An autonomous control framework for advanced reactors. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 49(5), pp.896-904.

[68] Wu, C., Xu, B., Mao, C. and Li, X., 2017. Overview of BIM maturity measurement tools. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 22, pp.34-62.

[69] Yang, Y., 2019. Reforming health, safety, and environmental regulation for offshore operations in China: Risk and resilience approaches?. Sustainability, 11(9), p.2608.

[70] Yang, Y., Ng, S.T., Xu, F.J., Skitmore, M. and Zhou, S., 2019. Towards resilient civil infrastructure asset management: An information elicitation and analytical framework. Sustainability, 11(16), p.4439.

[71] Yasseri, S., Bahai, H. and Yasseri, R., 2018. Reliability assurance of subsea production systems: a systems engineering framework. International Journal Of Coastal, Offshore And Environmental Engineering (ijcoe), 3(1), pp.1-19.

[72] Yeow, A., Soh, C. and Hansen, R., 2018. Aligning with new digital strategy: A dynamic capabilities approach. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), pp.43-58.

[73] Yogi, V. and Vachhani, L., 2019, December. Commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) solution for Robot Sensing and Control. In 2019 Sixth Indian Control Conference (ICC) (pp. 344-349). IEEE.

[74] Zhang, J., Haskins, C., Liu, Y. and Lundteigen, M.A., 2018. A systems engineering–based approach for framing reliability, availability, and maintainability: A case study for subsea design. Systems Engineering, 21(6), pp.576-592.

[75] Zimmermann, A., Schmidt, R., Sandkuhl, K., Jugel, D., Bogner, J. and Möhring, M., 2018, October. Evolution of enterprise architecture for digital transformation. In 2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW) (pp. 87-96). IEEE.

How to cite this paper

Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol "A Conceptual Framework for Process Automation Maturity in Offshore Oil and Gas Floating Production Systems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 3 Issue 9 2020 Page 334-349
Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol "A Conceptual Framework for Process Automation Maturity in Offshore Oil and Gas Floating Production Systems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 9, Mar. 2020
Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Process Automation Maturity in Offshore Oil and Gas Floating Production Systems. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 3(9).
Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol "A Conceptual Framework for Process Automation Maturity in Offshore Oil and Gas Floating Production Systems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 9, Mar. 2020.
@article{1709212,
      author = {Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol},
      title = {A Conceptual Framework for Process Automation Maturity in Offshore Oil and Gas Floating Production Systems},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2020},
      volume = {3},
      number = {9},
      pages = {334-349},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709212.pdf},
      abstract = {The offshore oil and gas industry is increasingly dependent on Floating Production Systems (FPS) such as Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading units (FPSOs) and Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) platforms to exploit remote and deepwater reserves. These complex, high-risk environments demand advanced process automation to ensure safe, efficient, and cost-effective operations. However, the adoption and effectiveness of automation technologies in these systems vary widely across the industry. There is a critical need for a structured approach to assess and guide the maturity of process automation capabilities specific to offshore floating production systems. This proposes a conceptual framework for evaluating and advancing process automation maturity in offshore FPS environments. The framework is structured around four key dimensions: technical capabilities, organizational readiness, process integration, and data/digitalization maturity. Each dimension is assessed across five maturity levels?Initial, Managed, Standardized, Integrated, and Optimized?providing a comprehensive view of an organization?s current automation status and future development path. The framework draws from existing automation maturity models and adapts them to the unique operational, environmental, and safety challenges of offshore facilities. It emphasizes not only the technological components, such as control systems and real-time analytics, but also organizational factors like workforce competence, management support, and digital culture. By offering a diagnostic tool and roadmap, the proposed model enables offshore operators, engineers, and decision-makers to benchmark their automation practices, identify gaps, and prioritize investments. Furthermore, the framework supports strategic alignment between automation initiatives and broader goals such as digital transformation, operational excellence, and sustainability. The conceptual framework lays the foundation for future empirical validation and can be adapted for various offshore asset types. It serves as a valuable guide for enhancing automation maturity, ultimately improving safety, performance, and resilience in offshore oil and gas production operations.},
      keywords = {Conceptual framework, Process automation, Maturity, Offshore oil, Gas floating, Production systems},
      month = {March},
  }