Mental Health Law Reform and Patient Autonomy: A Legal Review of Involuntary Treatment Statutes

• Author(s): Augustine Onyeka Okoli ; Irene Sagay ; Sandra Oparah ; Opeoluwa Oluwanifemi Ajayi ; Collins Nwannebuike Nwokedi
• Paper ID: 1709722
• Page: 200-216
• Published Date: 28-02-2019
• Published In: Iconic Research And Engineering Journals
• Publisher: IRE Journals
• e-ISSN: 2456-8880
• Volume/Issue: Volume 2 Issue 8 February-2019

Abstract

This article critically examines the legal frameworks governing involuntary mental health treatment, with a focus on ongoing reforms aimed at enhancing patient autonomy and safeguarding human rights. Mental health law traditionally permits involuntary hospitalization and treatment based on criteria such as risk of harm to self or others and severe mental illness impairing decision-making capacity. While these statutes are designed to protect individuals and the public, they raise significant ethical and legal concerns about personal liberty, informed consent, and discriminatory practices against persons with psychosocial disabilities. Recent legal reforms in various jurisdictions reflect growing emphasis on human rights standards, particularly following the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The CRPD challenges traditional involuntary treatment models by advocating for supported decision-making and the elimination of coercive practices. This review analyzes national mental health laws, judicial decisions, and international guidelines to assess their compatibility with evolving human rights norms. Key issues explored include capacity assessments, the right to refuse treatment, procedural safeguards, and judicial oversight mechanisms. The paper highlights divergent approaches among jurisdictions, ranging from incremental reforms introducing stricter procedural protections, to more transformative models seeking to abolish involuntary treatment altogether. It also examines critiques of current legal standards that prioritize risk management over individual autonomy, as well as concerns about the adequacy of community-based alternatives to coercive care. This legal review concludes by emphasizing the need for a balanced, rights-based framework that protects both individual liberty and health. It calls for comprehensive reforms grounded in principles of dignity, autonomy, and non-discrimination, alongside robust investment in voluntary, community-centered mental health services. By advancing legal models that minimize coercion and empower patients, mental health law reform can better align with international human rights obligations and contemporary ethical standards.

Keywords

Mental health law, Reform, Patient Autonomy, Legal review, Involuntary treatment statutes

Citations

IRE Journals:
Augustine Onyeka Okoli , Irene Sagay , Sandra Oparah , Opeoluwa Oluwanifemi Ajayi , Collins Nwannebuike Nwokedi "Mental Health Law Reform and Patient Autonomy: A Legal Review of Involuntary Treatment Statutes" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 2 Issue 8 2019 Page 200-216

IEEE:
Augustine Onyeka Okoli , Irene Sagay , Sandra Oparah , Opeoluwa Oluwanifemi Ajayi , Collins Nwannebuike Nwokedi "Mental Health Law Reform and Patient Autonomy: A Legal Review of Involuntary Treatment Statutes" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 2(8)