International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1710183

1710183 Vol 9 · Issue 2 Download Paper

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in 5G Coverage Prediction

Varsha N Suhas K C Harish T A

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Machine Learning

Abstract

The development of 5G technology is the next rad- ical change in the sphere of telecommunication, which promises to virtually eliminate the speed of data transmission, provide an insignificant level of latency, and enable a very large quantity of devices to be connected at once. Nevertheless, it is a challenge to provide the best and reliable 5G signal coverage as the network gets more complex with dense infrastructure. Conventional ways of planning networks and validating coverage through methods like field testing and making use of propagation modeling are not only time consuming, highly expensive but also unable to respond to real time changes in the environment. In this project, the idea is to present a machine learning approach to intelligent, automated, and predictive measurement of 5G signal strength. The idea is to create the system which is able to predict signal quality of network based on such parameters as Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ), Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), downlink and uplink bitrates, CELLHEX, NODEHEX, and geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude). Depending on these parameters, the signal strength is categorized into three, namely: Strong, Moderate, and Poor coverage. In order to come up with this we perform a comparative analysis of a range of supervised machine learning models, i.e. Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, AdaBoost, K- Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Gaussian Naive Bayes, LightGBM and ensemble models such as Voting Classifier and Stacking Classifier. These models are compared on the basis of their prediction accuracy with appropriate real time implementation. In order to produce a better model performance and reliability the dataset is fully preprocessed. Among them are treatment of the missing values, outlier deletion with the help of Interquartile Range (IQR), a coding of categorical features, and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to correct the issue of class imbalance. This is a smart solution that seeks to assist telecom operators in real-time and precise large-scale 5G network design and development optimization.

References

[1] Y. Zhang et al., ”Machine Learning Models for Wireless Signal Strength Forecasting,” *IEEE Communications Letters*, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 2220-2224, Oct. 2020.

[2] L. Wang et al., ”Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Signal Strength Estimation in Urban Areas,” *Wireless Networks*, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2417-2432, Apr. 2021.

[3] F. B. Mismar and B. L. Evans, ”Reinforcement Learning for 5G Resource Allocation,” *IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing*, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2233-2245, Oct. 2019.

[4] S. Ali et al., ”Deep Learning for mmWave Coverage Prediction Using Satellite Imagery,” *IEEE Access*, vol. 9, pp. 45632-45644, 2021.

[5] D. Camps-Mur et al., ”Gradient Boosting Models for 5G Signal Predic- tion,” *Computer Communications*, vol. 181, pp. 240-250, Jan. 2022.

[6] W. Khawaja et al., ”Propagation Modeling for 5th Generation mmWave: A Survey,” *IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials*, vol. 22, no. 3,pp. 1444-1474, Q3 2020.

[7] J. Tang et al., ”Context-Aware Machine Learning for Wireless Coverage Mapping,” *Sensors*, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1-19, Feb. 2021.

[8] X. Zhang and Y. Liu, ”Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for 5G Signal Estimation,” *Wireless Networks*, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2023-2035, May 2022.

[9] J. Wang et al., ”5G Signal Strength Prediction in Smart Cities by Using Machine Learning,” *IEEE Internet of Things Journal*, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 8429-8439, Sep. 2020.

[10] M. H. Alsharif et al., ”Machine Learning in 5G and its Future Genera- tion: A Survey,” *IEEE Access*, vol. 8, pp. 222422-222444, 2020.

[11] M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, ”Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier,” in *Proc. ACM SIGKDD*, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 1135–1144.

[12] ] L. Zhao et al., ”Explaining ML Predictions for 5G Planning with LIME,” *IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management*, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 245–257, Mar. 2021.s

[13] G. N. Kamga, M. M. A. Khan, and A. T. Khader, “Hybrid Ensemble Models for Signal Strength Prediction in Dense Urban 5G Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 11378–11391, Nov. 2021.

[14] P. K. Sharma and J. H. Park, “Blockchain and Machine Learning-Based Secure and Privacy- Preserving Framework for 5G Smart Cities,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 129046–129063, 2021.

[15] S. Wang, T. Tuor, and M. Wang, “When Edge Meets Learning: Adaptive Control for Resource-Constrained Distributed Machine Learning,” IEEE INFOCOM 2018, pp. 63–71.

[16] M. S. Hossain and G. Muhammad, “Cloud- Assisted Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)– Enabled Framework for Health Monitoring,” Computer Networks, vol. 101, pp. 192–202, 2016..

[17] S. Li, L. Da Xu, and S. Zhao, “5G Internet of Things: A Survey,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 10, pp. 1–9, 2018.S. A. Awad, A. Ksentini, and A. C. Viana, “Predicting QoE in 5G Networks Using Machine Learning and Big Data Analytics,” IEEE Network, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 10–17, Jul. 2019.

[18] F. Tariq, M. R. A. Khandaker, and K. Wong, “A Survey on the Feasibility of Machine Learning for 5G and Beyond Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 123600–123623, 2021.

[19] M. Elsayed and M. Erol-Kantarci, “AI-Enabled Future Wireless Net- works: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 205383–205414, 2020.

[20] Parcha Saketh Kumar, Abburi Naga Venkata Harshita Sreevardhan Cheerla, “Dynamic 5G Throughput Prediction Framework Using Hybrid Machine Learning Approaches,” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, vol.10, no.2, pp.2556– 2564, Feb.2025

[21] Ibrahim Yazıcı Emre Gures, “A Robust Machine Learning Approach for Path Loss Prediction in 5G Networks with Nested Cross Validation,” arXiv, Oct.2023.

[22] Muhammad Qurratulain Khan et al., “A Low- Complexity Machine Learning Design for mmWave Beam Prediction,” arXiv, Oct.2023.

[23] Paul Almasan, Jose´ Sua´rez-Varela, et al., “Enhancing 5G Radio Planning with Graph Representations and Deep Learning,” arXiv, Sep.2023.

[24] Lucas F. A. Silva, Bruno Yuji Lino Kimura Jurandy Almeida, “Deep Learning in Beyond 5G Networks with Image based Time Series Representation,” arXiv, Apr.2021.

How to cite this paper

Varsha N, Suhas K C, Harish T A "Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in 5G Coverage Prediction" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 2 2025 Page 626-634
Varsha N, Suhas K C, Harish T A "Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in 5G Coverage Prediction" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 2, Aug. 2025
Varsha N, Suhas K C, Harish T A (2025). Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in 5G Coverage Prediction. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(2).
Varsha N, Suhas K C, Harish T A "Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in 5G Coverage Prediction" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 2, Aug. 2025.
@article{1710183,
      author = {Varsha N, Suhas K C, Harish T A},
      title = {Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms in 5G Coverage Prediction},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {626-634},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710183.pdf},
      abstract = {The development of 5G technology is the next rad- ical change in the sphere of telecommunication, which promises to virtually eliminate the speed of data transmission, provide an insignificant level of latency, and enable a very large quantity of devices to be connected at once. Nevertheless, it is a challenge to provide the best and reliable 5G signal coverage as the network gets more complex with dense infrastructure. Conventional ways of planning networks and validating coverage through methods like field testing and making use of propagation modeling are not only time consuming, highly expensive but also unable to respond to real time changes in the environment. In this project, the idea is to present a machine learning approach to intelligent, automated, and predictive measurement of 5G signal strength. The idea is to create the system which is able to predict signal quality of network based on such parameters as Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), Reference Signal Received Quality (RSRQ), Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), downlink and uplink bitrates, CELLHEX, NODEHEX, and geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude). Depending on these parameters, the signal strength is categorized into three, namely: Strong, Moderate, and Poor coverage. In order to come up with this we perform a comparative analysis of a range of supervised machine learning models, i.e. Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, AdaBoost, K- Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Gaussian Naive Bayes, LightGBM and ensemble models such as Voting Classifier and Stacking Classifier. These models are compared on the basis of their prediction accuracy with appropriate real time implementation. In order to produce a better model performance and reliability the dataset is fully preprocessed. Among them are treatment of the missing values, outlier deletion with the help of Interquartile Range (IQR), a coding of categorical features, and Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) to correct the issue of class imbalance. This is a smart solution that seeks to assist telecom operators in real-time and precise large-scale 5G network design and development optimization.},
      month = {August},
  }