Home / Current Issue / Paper 1710573
Conceptual Framework for Applying Digital Twins in Sustainable Construction and Infrastructure Management
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Digital Twin Technology in Construction
Abstract
The increasing complexity of construction projects and the growing imperative for sustainable infrastructure management have intensified the need for advanced digital solutions. Digital twin technology?a virtual representation of physical assets that integrates real-time data, simulations, and predictive analytics?offers transformative potential for sustainable construction and infrastructure management. This proposes a conceptual framework for applying digital twins to enhance environmental performance, operational efficiency, and resilience throughout the lifecycle of construction projects and infrastructure systems. The framework is structured around four interdependent layers. The input layer encompasses real-time sensor data, Internet of Things (IoT) networks, and historical performance records, providing a comprehensive foundation for understanding physical and environmental conditions. The decision layer employs advanced analytics, including machine learning, predictive modeling, and scenario simulation, to optimize design, resource allocation, and operational strategies in line with sustainability targets. The implementation layer integrates digital twin outputs into building management systems, asset operations, and infrastructure governance, facilitating evidence-based decision-making and automated compliance with environmental standards. Finally, the feedback layer ensures continuous learning, enabling adaptive management, performance benchmarking, and knowledge transfer across projects and portfolios. Application scenarios for the framework include monitoring energy efficiency in commercial and residential buildings, optimizing water and resource use in urban infrastructure, predicting maintenance needs for bridges and transportation networks, and supporting lifecycle-based environmental impact assessments. By linking real-time data with predictive simulations, digital twins enable proactive interventions, minimize resource waste, and enhance the resilience of infrastructure systems under changing environmental and operational conditions. This framework bridges technological innovation, sustainability objectives, and strategic management, positioning digital twins as a central tool for advancing sustainable construction practices. Future directions emphasize integration with artificial intelligence for automated decision-making, blockchain-enabled data integrity for transparent reporting, and cross-sector collaborations to scale adoption globally. The conceptual framework thus provides a structured pathway for leveraging digital twin technology to achieve efficient, resilient, and environmentally responsible construction and infrastructure systems.
Keywords
Digital Twins, Sustainable Construction, Infrastructure Management, Smart Buildings, Real-Time Monitoring, Predictive Maintenance, Lifecycle Assessment, Energy Efficiency, Resource Optimization, Data Analytics, Building Performance, Simulation Modeling, Iot Integration
References
[1] Afolabi, A.O., Ojelabi, R.A., Omuh, I., Tunji-Olayeni, P. and Afolabi, A., 2018. Building designs and plumbing facilities: The implication for rising maintenance cost. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(8), pp.1336-1344.
[2] Allaoui, H., Guo, Y. and Sarkis, J., 2019. Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, pp.761-774.
[3] Ameer, S., Shah, M.A., Khan, A., Song, H., Maple, C., Islam, S.U. and Asghar, M.N., 2019. Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for predicting air quality in smart cities. IEEE access, 7, pp.128325-128338.
[4] Autiosalo, J., Vepsäläinen, J., Viitala, R. and Tammi, K., 2019. A feature-based framework for structuring industrial digital twins. IEEE access, 8, pp.1193-1208.
[5] Baniasadi, A., Habibi, D., Bass, O. and Masoum, M.A., 2018. Optimal real-time residential thermal energy management for peak-load shifting with experimental verification. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(5), pp.5587-5599.
[6] Barni, A., Fontana, A., Menato, S., Sorlini, M. and Canetta, L., 2018, September. Exploiting the digital twin in the assessment and optimization of sustainability performances. In 2018 International conference on intelligent systems (IS) (pp. 706-713). IEEE.
[7] Barricelli, B.R., Casiraghi, E. and Fogli, D., 2019. A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE access, 7, pp.167653-167671.
[8] Bartlett, D., Herman, T. and Klinkman, A., 2017. Business Models for Extracting More Useful Life from Lithium Ion Battery Systems. master Project, Duke University.
[9] Bello, O., Yang, D., Lazarus, S., Wang, X.S. and Denney, T., 2017, May. Next generation downhole big data platform for dynamic data-driven well and reservoir management. In SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition (p. D031S014R002). SPE.
[10] Boer, H., Berger, A., Chapman, R. and Gertsen, F., 2017. CI changes from suggestion box to organisational learning: Continuous improvement in Europe and Australia. Routledge.
[11] Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., Leitão, P. and Barata, J., 2019. Digital transformation of manufacturing through cloud services and resource virtualization. Computers in Industry, 108, pp.150-162.
[12] Cajot, S. and Schüler, N., 2019. * European Institute for Energy Research, Karlsruhe, Germany, Industrial Process and Energy Systems Engineering Group, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
[13] Chou, J.S. and Tran, D.S., 2018. Forecasting energy consumption time series using machine learning techniques based on usage patterns of residential householders. Energy, 165, pp.709-726.
[14] Ciocoiu, L., Siemieniuch, C.E. and Hubbard, E.M., 2017. From preventative to predictive maintenance: The organisational challenge. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 231(10), pp.1174-1185.
[15] Daher, B., Saad, W., Pierce, S.A., Hülsmann, S. and Mohtar, R.H., 2017. Trade-offs and decision support tools for FEW nexus-oriented management. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 4(3), pp.153-159.
[16] DeCaro, D.A., Chaffin, B.C., Schlager, E., Garmestani, A.S. and Ruhl, J.B., 2017. Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecology and society: A journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, 22(1), p.1.
[17] Espinosa, A. and Walker, J., 2017. Complexity approach to sustainability, a: theory and application (Vol. 5). World Scientific.
[18] Ezhilarasu, C.M., Skaf, Z. and Jennions, I.K., 2019, October. Understanding the role of a digital twin in integrated vehicle health management (IVHM). In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 1484-1491). IEEE.
[19] Fagan, A.A., Bumbarger, B.K., Barth, R.P., Bradshaw, C.P., Cooper, B.R., Supplee, L.H. and Walker, D.K., 2019. Scaling up evidence-based interventions in US public systems to prevent behavioral health problems: Challenges and opportunities. Prevention Science, 20(8), pp.1147-1168.
[20] Fernández, F., Sánchez, Á., Vélez, J.F. and Moreno, A.B., 2019, May. Symbiotic autonomous systems with consciousness using digital twins. In International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation (pp. 23-32). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[21] Fernando, Y. and Hor, W.L., 2017. Impacts of energy management practices on energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction: a survey of Malaysian manufacturing firms. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126, pp.62-73.
[22] Frangopol, D.M. and Soliman, M., 2019. Life-cycle of structural systems: recent achievements and future directions. In Structures and infrastructure systems (pp. 46-65). Routledge.
[23] Gosnell, H., Chaffin, B.C., Ruhl, J.B., Arnold, C.A., Craig, R.K., Benson, M.H. and Devenish, A., 2017. Transforming (perceived) rigidity in environmental law through adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 22(4).
[24] Gozman, D. and Willcocks, L., 2019. The emerging Cloud Dilemma: Balancing innovation with cross-border privacy and outsourcing regulations. Journal of Business Research, 97, pp.235-256.
[25] Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R. and Shaw, S., 2017. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(11), p.e8775.
[26] Grima, S., Spiteri, J. and Romanova, I., 2019. The challenges for regulation and control in an environment of rapid technological innovations. In InsurTech: a legal and regulatory view (pp. 83-98). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[27] Grondzik, W.T. and Kwok, A.G., 2019. Mechanical and electrical equipment for buildings. John wiley & sons.
[28] Jia, Y., Lin, Q., Liu, B., Liu, H., Lin, L. and Xu, Z., 2019. Research on integrated management system of power grid information of provincial and county based on the OMS system. In Emerging Developments in the Power and Energy Industry (pp. 361-366). CRC Press.
[29] Kelly, E. and Lange, K., 2019. Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through enhanced cross-sector collaboration with a multi-stakeholder approach: A case-study on the Food Partnership of the city of Malmö.
[30] Kourtit, K. and Nijkamp, P., 2018. Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities–An experiment on stockholm. Land use policy, 71, pp.24-35.
[31] Kuenkel, P. and Gruen, A., 2017. Co-creation for sustainability as a societal learning journey. In Lifelong Learning and Education in Healthy and Sustainable Cities (pp. 377-393). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[32] Laranjeiro, T., May, R. and Verones, F., 2018. Impacts of onshore wind energy production on birds and bats: recommendations for future life cycle impact assessment developments. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(10), pp.2007-2023.
[33] Latif, H.H., Gopalakrishnan, B., Nimbarte, A. and Currie, K., 2017. Sustainability index development for manufacturing industry. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 24, pp.82-95.
[34] Li, Y., O’Donnell, J., García-Castro, R. and Vega-Sánchez, S., 2017. Identifying stakeholders and key performance indicators for district and building energy performance analysis. Energy and Buildings, 155, pp.1-15.
[35] Lu, X., Singh, R., Wang, J. and Reilly, J.T., 2017. Foundational report series: Advanced distribution management systems for grid modernization, business case calculations for dms (No. ANL/ESD-17/3). Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).
[36] Madden, A.L., Arora, V., Holmes, K. and Pfautsch, S., 2018. Cool schools. Western Sydney University.
[37] Moslehi, S. and Reddy, T.A., 2019. A new quantitative life cycle sustainability assessment framework: Application to integrated energy systems. Applied Energy, 239, pp.482-493.
[38] Ng, S.T., Xu, F.J., Yang, Y. and Lu, M., 2017. A master data management solution to unlock the value of big infrastructure data for smart, sustainable and resilient city planning. Procedia engineering, 196, pp.939-947.
[39] Niu, G., 2017. Data-driven technology for engineering systems health management. Springer Singapore, 10, pp.978-981.
[40] Olivotti, D., Dreyer, S., Lebek, B. and Breitner, M.H., 2019. Creating the foundation for digital twins in the manufacturing industry: an integrated installed base management system. Information systems and e-business management, 17(1), pp.89-116.
[41] Peduzzi, P., 2019. The disaster risk, global change, and sustainability nexus. Sustainability, 11(4), p.957.
[42] Pires, F., Cachada, A., Barbosa, J., Moreira, A.P. and Leitão, P., 2019, July. Digital twin in industry 4.0: Technologies, applications and challenges. In 2019 IEEE 17th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) (Vol. 1, pp. 721-726). IEEE.
[43] Qiuchen Lu, V., Parlikad, A.K., Woodall, P., Ranasinghe, G.D. and Heaton, J., 2019. Developing a dynamic digital twin at a building level: Using Cambridge campus as case study. In International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction 2019 (ICSIC) Driving data-informed decision-making (pp. 67-75). ICE Publishing.
[44] Rasheed, A., San, O. and Kvamsdal, T., 2019. Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01719.
[45] Shahin, M., Babar, M.A. and Zhu, L., 2017. Continuous integration, delivery and deployment: a systematic review on approaches, tools, challenges and practices. IEEE access, 5, pp.3909-3943.
[46] Shahmoradi, L., Safadari, R. and Jimma, W., 2017. Knowledge management implementation and the tools utilized in healthcare for evidence-based decision making: a systematic review. Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 27(5), pp.541-558.
[47] SHARMA, A., ADEKUNLE, B.I., OGEAWUCHI, J.C., ABAYOMI, A.A. and ONIFADE, O., 2019. IoT-enabled Predictive Maintenance for Mechanical Systems: Innovations in Real-time Monitoring and Operational Excellence.
[48] Sigwele, T., Hu, Y.F., Ali, M., Hou, J., Susanto, M. and Fitriawan, H., 2018, August. An intelligent edge computing based semantic gateway for healthcare systems interoperability and collaboration. In 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) (pp. 370-376). IEEE.
[49] Singh, S. and Yassine, A., 2018. Big data mining of energy time series for behavioral analytics and energy consumption forecasting. Energies, 11(2), p.452.
[50] Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A. and Nee, A.Y., 2018. Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics, 15(4), pp.2405-2415.
[51] Tauro, F., Selker, J., Van De Giesen, N., Abrate, T., Uijlenhoet, R., Porfiri, M., Manfreda, S., Caylor, K., Moramarco, T., Benveniste, J. and Ciraolo, G., 2018. Measurements and observations in the XXI century (MOXXI): Innovation and multi-disciplinarity to sense the hydrological cycle. Hydrological sciences journal, 63(2), pp.169-196.
[52] Temizel, C., Irani, M., Ghannadi, S., Canbaz, C.H., Moreno, R., Bashtani, F. and Basri, M.A., 2019, September. Optimization of Steam-Additive Processes with DTS/DAS Applications in Heavy Oil Reservoirs. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (p. D031S057R005). SPE.
[53] Walasek, D. and Barszcz, A., 2017. Analysis of the adoption rate of building information modeling [BIM] and its return on investment [ROI]. Procedia Engineering, 172, pp.1227-1234.
[54] Williams, D.S., Máñez Costa, M., Sutherland, C., Celliers, L. and Scheffran, J., 2019. Vulnerability of informal settlements in the context of rapid urbanization and climate change. Environment and urbanization, 31(1), pp.157-176.
[55] Williams, J., 2019. Circular cities: Challenges to implementing looping actions. Sustainability, 11(2), p.423.
[56] Yang, Y., Ng, S.T., Xu, F.J., Skitmore, M. and Zhou, S., 2019. Towards resilient civil infrastructure asset management: An information elicitation and analytical framework. Sustainability, 11(16), p.4439.
[57] Yildiz, E., Melo, M., Møller, C. and Bessa, M., 2019, November. Designing collaborative and coordinated virtual reality training integrated with virtual and physical factories. In 2019 International Conference on Graphics and Interaction (ICGI) (pp. 48-55). IEEE.
[58] Zhang, W., Yang, D. and Wang, H., 2019. Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: A survey. IEEE systems journal, 13(3), pp.2213-2227.
[59] Zhang, Y., Huang, T. and Bompard, E.F., 2018. Big data analytics in smart grids: a review. Energy informatics, 1(1), pp.1-24.
[60] Zhou, L., Pan, S., Wang, J. and Vasilakos, A.V., 2017. Machine learning on big data: Opportunities and challenges. Neurocomputing, 237, pp.350-361.
[61] Zhu, T., Ran, Y., Zhou, X. and Wen, Y., 2019. A survey of predictive maintenance: Systems, purposes and approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07383.
How to cite this paper
@article{1710573,
author = {Olamide Folahanmi Bayeroju, Adepeju Nafisat Sanusi, Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu},
title = {Conceptual Framework for Applying Digital Twins in Sustainable Construction and Infrastructure Management},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2020},
volume = {4},
number = {1},
pages = {323-338},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710573.pdf},
abstract = {The increasing complexity of construction projects and the growing imperative for sustainable infrastructure management have intensified the need for advanced digital solutions. Digital twin technology?a virtual representation of physical assets that integrates real-time data, simulations, and predictive analytics?offers transformative potential for sustainable construction and infrastructure management. This proposes a conceptual framework for applying digital twins to enhance environmental performance, operational efficiency, and resilience throughout the lifecycle of construction projects and infrastructure systems. The framework is structured around four interdependent layers. The input layer encompasses real-time sensor data, Internet of Things (IoT) networks, and historical performance records, providing a comprehensive foundation for understanding physical and environmental conditions. The decision layer employs advanced analytics, including machine learning, predictive modeling, and scenario simulation, to optimize design, resource allocation, and operational strategies in line with sustainability targets. The implementation layer integrates digital twin outputs into building management systems, asset operations, and infrastructure governance, facilitating evidence-based decision-making and automated compliance with environmental standards. Finally, the feedback layer ensures continuous learning, enabling adaptive management, performance benchmarking, and knowledge transfer across projects and portfolios. Application scenarios for the framework include monitoring energy efficiency in commercial and residential buildings, optimizing water and resource use in urban infrastructure, predicting maintenance needs for bridges and transportation networks, and supporting lifecycle-based environmental impact assessments. By linking real-time data with predictive simulations, digital twins enable proactive interventions, minimize resource waste, and enhance the resilience of infrastructure systems under changing environmental and operational conditions. This framework bridges technological innovation, sustainability objectives, and strategic management, positioning digital twins as a central tool for advancing sustainable construction practices. Future directions emphasize integration with artificial intelligence for automated decision-making, blockchain-enabled data integrity for transparent reporting, and cross-sector collaborations to scale adoption globally. The conceptual framework thus provides a structured pathway for leveraging digital twin technology to achieve efficient, resilient, and environmentally responsible construction and infrastructure systems.},
keywords = {Digital Twins, Sustainable Construction, Infrastructure Management, Smart Buildings, Real-Time Monitoring, Predictive Maintenance, Lifecycle Assessment, Energy Efficiency, Resource Optimization, Data Analytics, Building Performance, Simulation Modeling, Iot Integration},
month = {July},
}