Circular Economy Integration in Construction: Conceptual Framework for Modular Housing Adoption

References

[1] Agenda, I., 2016, May. Shaping the future of construction a breakthrough in mindset and technology. In World Economic Forum (pp. 11-16).

[2] Ahluwalia, I.J. and Patel, U., 2018. Solid waste management in india: an assessment of resource recovery and environmental impact (No. 356). Working paper.

[3] Alibašić, H., 2018. Sustainability and resilience planning for local governments. The Quadruple Bottom Line Strategy. Springer, New York.

[4] Ang, J.H., Goh, C., Saldivar, A.A.F. and Li, Y., 2017. Energy-efficient through-life smart design, manufacturing and operation of ships in an industry 4.0 environment. Energies, 10(5), p.610.

[5] Aziz, Z., Riaz, Z. and Arslan, M., 2017. Leveraging BIM and Big Data to deliver well maintained highways. Facilities, 35(13/14), pp.818-832.

[6] Barbosa, F., Woetzel, J. and Mischke, J., 2017. Reinventing construction: A route of higher productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.

[7] Batty, M., 2018. Digital twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), pp.817-820.

[8] Boafo, F.E., Kim, J.H. and Kim, J.T., 2016. Performance of modular prefabricated architecture: Case study-based review and future pathways. Sustainability, 8(6), p.558.

[9] Bradley, R., Jawahir, I.S., Badurdeen, F. and Rouch, K., 2018. A total life cycle cost model (TLCCM) for the circular economy and its application to post-recovery resource allocation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, pp.141-149.

[10] Chalmers, C. and Nason, R., 2017. Systems thinking approach to robotics curriculum in schools. In Robotics in STEM education: Redesigning the learning experience (pp. 33-57). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[11] Chandra, A., McNamara, K.E. and Dargusch, P., 2018. Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings. Climate Policy, 18(4), pp.526-541.

[12] Cheung, W.F., Lin, T.H. and Lin, Y.C., 2018. A real-time construction safety monitoring system for hazardous gas integrating wireless sensor network and building information modeling technologies. Sensors, 18(2), p.436.

[13] Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P.A. and Toke, D., 2017. Rescaling the governance of renewable energy: lessons from the UK devolution experience. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(5), pp.480-502.

[14] Cui, Y. and Idota, H., 2018, July. Improving supply chain resilience with establishing a decentralized information sharing mechanism. In Proceedings of the 5th multidisciplinary international social networks conference (pp. 1-7).

[15] Dadzie, J., Runeson, G., Ding, G. and Bondinuba, F.K., 2018. Barriers to adoption of sustainable technologies for energy-efficient building upgrade—Semi-structured interviews. Buildings, 8(4), p.57.

[16] Ekins, P., Hughes, N., Brigenzu, S., Arden Clark, C., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Graedel, T., Hajer, M., Hashimoto, S., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Havlik, P. and Hertwich, E., 2016. Resource efficiency: Potential and economic implications.

[17] Gaustad, G., Krystofik, M., Bustamante, M. and Badami, K., 2018. Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, pp.24-33.

[18] Gosling, J., Pero, M., Schoenwitz, M., Towill, D. and Cigolini, R., 2016. Defining and categorizing modules in building projects: An international perspective. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142(11), p.04016062.

[19] Gourlis, G. and Kovacic, I., 2017. Building Information Modelling for analysis of energy efficient industrial buildings–A case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, pp.953-963.

[20] Govender, I.G., 2017. Development monitoring and evaluation systems enhancing local economic development outcomes in South Africa. The Anthropologist, 28(1-2), pp.19-29.

[21] Govindan, K. and Hasanagic, M., 2018. A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International journal of production research, 56(1-2), pp.278-311.

[22] Hobson, K. and Lynch, N., 2016. Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world. Futures, 82, pp.15-25.

[23] Hong, J., Shen, G.Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B. and Zhang, W., 2018. Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 172, pp.649-660.

[24] Hussain, S. and Jahanzaib, M., 2018. Sustainable manufacturing–An overview and a conceptual framework for continuous transformation and competitiveness. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 13(3), pp.237-253.

[25] Kamali, M. and Hewage, K., 2016. Life cycle performance of modular buildings: A critical review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 62, pp.1171-1183.

[26] Khan, S.A.R. and Qianli, D., 2017. Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: an empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(20), pp.16829-16844.

[27] Kumar, A. and Shoghli, O., 2018. A review of IoT applications in supply chain optimization of construction materials. In ISARC. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (Vol. 35, pp. 1-8). IAARC Publications.

[28] Lazurko, A., Drechsel, P. and Hanjra, M.A., 2018. Financing resource recovery and reuse in developing and emerging economies: enabling environment, financing sources and cost recovery (Vol. 11). International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE).

[29] Lehmann, S., 2018. Implementing the Urban Nexus approach for improved resource-efficiency of developing cities in Southeast-Asia. City, Culture and Society, 13, pp.46-56.

[30] Lewandowski, M., 2016. Designing the business models for circular economy—Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), p.43.

[31] Li, C.Z., Xu, X., Shen, G.Q., Fan, C., Li, X. and Hong, J., 2018. A model for simulating schedule risks in prefabrication housing production: A case study of six-day cycle assembly activities in Hong Kong. Journal of cleaner production, 185, pp.366-381.

[32] Ling, C.S., Almeida, S.J. and Wei, H.S., 2017. Affordable housing: challenges and the way forward. BNM Quarterly Bulletin: Box Article, Fourth Quarter, pp.19-26.

[33] Lopez, D. and Froese, T.M., 2016. Analysis of costs and benefits of panelized and modular prefabricated homes. Procedia engineering, 145, pp.1291-1297.

[34] Lukman, R.K., Glavič, P., Carpenter, A. and Virtič, P., 2016. Sustainable consumption and production–Research, experience, and development–The Europe we want. Journal of cleaner production, 138, pp.139-147.

[35] Machado, F.A. and Ruschel, R.C., 2018. Solutions integrating BIM and Internet Of Things in building life cycle: a critical review. PARC Research in Architecture and Building Construction, 9(3), pp.204-222.

[36] Mendoza, J.M.F., Sharmina, M., Gallego‐Schmid, A., Heyes, G. and Azapagic, A., 2017. Integrating backcasting and eco‐design for the circular economy: The BECE framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), pp.526-544.

[37] Milios, L., 2018. Advancing to a Circular Economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustainability science, 13(3), pp.861-878.

[38] Minunno, R., O’Grady, T., Morrison, G.M., Gruner, R.L. and Colling, M., 2018. Strategies for applying the circular economy to prefabricated buildings. Buildings, 8(9), p.125.

[39] Ness, D.A. and Xing, K., 2017. Toward a resource‐efficient built environment: A literature review and conceptual model. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), pp.572-592.

[40] Northrop, E., Biru, H., Lima, S., Bouye, M. and Song, R., 2016. Examining the alignment between the intended nationally determined contributions and sustainable development goals. World Resources Institute, pp.1-55.

[41] Nykamp, H., 2017. A transition to green buildings in Norway. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 24, pp.83-93.

[42] Ocheoha, I.A. and Moselhi, O., 2018. A BIM-based supply chain integration for prefabrication and modularization. Modular and Offsite Construction (MOC) Summit Proceedings.

[43] Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. and Topi, C., 2016. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8(11), p.1212.

[44] Rizvi, Z.M., 2016. Population growth, urbanization and slums: challenges for developing low-income affordable housing. Housing Finance International, 30(3).

[45] Sala, S., Reale, F., Cristobal-Garcia, J., Marelli, L. and Pant, R., 2016. Life cycle assessment for the impact assessment of policies. Report EUR, 28380.

[46] Samarghandi, H., Mousavi, S., Taabayan, P., Mir Hashemi, A. and Willoughby, K., 2016. Studying the Reasons for Delay and Cost Overrun in Construction Projects: The Case of Iran.

[47] Santonen, T., Creazzo, L., Griffon, A., Bódi, Z. and Aversano, P., 2017. Cities as Living Labs: Increasing the impact of investment in the circular economy for sustainable cities.

[48] Schluse, M., Priggemeyer, M., Atorf, L. and Rossmann, J., 2018. Experimentable digital twins—Streamlining simulation-based systems engineering for industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics, 14(4), pp.1722-1731.

[49] Sheldon, R.A., 2018. Metrics of green chemistry and sustainability: past, present, and future. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 6(1), pp.32-48.

[50] Si, J., Marjanovic-Halburd, L., Nasiri, F. and Bell, S., 2016. Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Sustainable cities and society, 27, pp.106-115.

[51] Simone, A. and Pieterse, E., 2018. New urban worlds: Inhabiting dissonant times. John Wiley & Sons.

[52] Sousa-Zomer, T.T., Magalhães, L., Zancul, E., Campos, L.M. and Cauchick-Miguel, P.A., 2018. Cleaner production as an antecedent for circular economy paradigm shift at the micro-level: Evidence from a home appliance manufacturer. Journal of cleaner production, 185, pp.740-748.

[53] Talukder, B., Blay-Palmer, A., Hipel, K.W. and VanLoon, G.W., 2017. Elimination method of multi-criteria decision analysis (mcda): A simple methodological approach for assessing agricultural sustainability. Sustainability, 9(2), p.287.

[54] Taranic, I., Behrens, A. and Topi, C., 2016. Understanding the circular economy in Europe, from resource efficiency to sharing platforms: The CEPS framework. CEPS Special Reports, (143).

[55] Tian, H., 2018. Establishing green finance system to support the circular economy. Industry 4.0: Empowering ASEAN for the Circular Economy, 203.

[56] Tukamuhabwa, B., Stevenson, M. and Busby, J., 2017. Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: a case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(6), pp.486-505.

[57] Veleva, V., Bodkin, G. and Todorova, S., 2017. The need for better measurement and employee engagement to advance a circular economy: Lessons from Biogen’s “zero waste” journey. Journal of cleaner production, 154, pp.517-529.

[58] Walker, S., Coleman, N., Hodgson, P., Collins, N. and Brimacombe, L., 2018. Evaluating the environmental dimension of material efficiency strategies relating to the circular economy. Sustainability, 10(3), p.666.

[59] Wilts, H., Von Gries, N. and Bahn-Walkowiak, B., 2016. From waste management to resource efficiency—The need for policy mixes. Sustainability, 8(7), p.622.

[60] Wongtschowski, M., Oonk, L. and Mur, R., 2016. Monitoring and evaluation for accountability and learning. Royal Tropical Institute.

@article{1710575,
      author = {Adepeju Nafisat Aransi, Olamide Folahanmi Bayeroju, Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu},
      title = {Circular Economy Integration in Construction: Conceptual Framework for Modular Housing Adoption},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {3},
      number = {3},
      pages = {279-295},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710575.pdf},
      abstract = {Rapid urbanization and housing shortages in both developed and emerging economies have intensified the demand for sustainable, efficient, and cost-effective construction solutions. Traditional construction methods are resource-intensive, generate significant waste, and often fail to meet long-term environmental and social objectives. In this context, modular housing?characterized by prefabrication, off-site assembly, and standardized design?offers a promising approach to accelerating housing delivery while enhancing efficiency. Integrating circular economy (CE) principles into modular construction can further optimize resource use, minimize waste, reduce carbon footprints, and enhance the lifecycle sustainability of housing projects. This presents a conceptual framework for the adoption of circular economy principles in modular housing construction, focusing on the unique challenges and opportunities in urban housing markets. The framework incorporates key dimensions, including governance and institutional support, design and technical considerations, resource and operational mechanisms, financial models, and monitoring and evaluation strategies. It emphasizes the use of innovative digital technologies such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), Internet of Things (IoT), and data analytics to track materials, optimize resource allocation, and ensure compliance with sustainability standards. Multi-stakeholder collaboration, encompassing policymakers, private developers, financiers, and local communities, is highlighted as essential for effective implementation, scaling, and knowledge transfer. The framework also identifies emerging trends, including the integration of circular materials, modular design innovations, and technology-enabled supply chain optimization. Regional variations in adoption, policy alignment, and financing mechanisms are analyzed, highlighting contextual factors that influence feasibility and scalability. By offering a structured, multi-dimensional approach, this conceptual framework provides actionable guidance for policymakers, construction practitioners, and researchers seeking to advance sustainable housing solutions. It underscores the potential of circular economy integration to transform modular housing into a resilient, resource-efficient, and socially inclusive infrastructure strategy, thereby contributing to long-term urban sustainability and climate-resilient development.},
      keywords = {Circular Economy, Modular Housing, Sustainable Construction, Prefabrication, Off-Site Assembly, Material Reuse, Resource Efficiency, Lifecycle Planning, Waste Minimization, Design Standardization},
      month = {September},
  }