Home / Current Issue / Paper 1710589
CBCT in Evaluating Healing Post-Apical Surgery
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Endodontics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I1-1710589-1459
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an essential tool in diagnostic endodontics, especially in assessing healing outcomes after apical surgery. Two-dimensional radiography often lacks sensitivity and usually shows anatomical superimposition underlying the changes in the periapical area. CBCT, on the contrary, offers three-dimensional images in which clinicians can view the periapical tissues and the healing of the bones much more accurately and reliably. Several authors have concluded that CBCT may reveal instances of incomplete or delayed healing that periapical radiographs may not show, thus permitting early treatment and accurate prognosis evaluation. It also avoids misinterpretation of cases by distinguishing between scar tissue and persistent periapical pathology. Despite this being a consideration, with responsible use, it is worth prioritizing in follow-up cases of the more complex surgical ones. Therefore, CBCT becomes a real game changer in the evaluation of healing following apical surgery and equally plays an important role in evidence-based endodontics.
Keywords
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Apical Surgery; Post-Surgical Healing; Endodontics; Periapical Lesions; Radiographic Evaluation.
References
[1] Liu, Y., Peng, B., Fan, W., & Zhao, D. (2022). Volumetric assessment of periapical healing using cone-beam computed tomography: A prospective clinical study. International Endodontic Journal, 55(1), 45–54.
[2] Singh, S. (2018). The efficacy of 3D imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in enhancing endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(6), 27-29.
[3] Patel, S., Brown, J., Semper, M., Abella, F., & Durack, C. (2022). European Society of Endodontology position statement: Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. International Endodontic Journal, 55(1), 15–25.
[4] Scarfe, W. C., Levin, M. D., Gane, D., & Farman, A. G. (2022). Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics: Current perspectives. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(1), 111–129.
[5] Torabinejad, M., Rubinstein, R. A., & Kim, S. (2022). The role of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontic microsurgery outcome assessment. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26(1), 89–97.
[6] Sharma, G., Abraham, D., Gupta, A., Aggarwal, V., Mehta, N., Jala, S., Chauhan, P., & Singh, A. (2022). Comparison of healing assessments of periapical endodontic surgery using conventional radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review. Imaging Sciences in Dentistry, 52(1), 1–9.
[7] Bieszczad, D., Wichlinski, J., & Kaczmarzyk, T. (2022). Factors affecting the success of endodontic microsurgery: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(14), 3991.
[8] Targeted endodontic microsurgery guided approach (2022). Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 13(i), 30.
[9] Guided osteotomy utilizing CBCT and surgical templates (2022). The Dental Operating Journal, 19030.
[10] Surgical Endodontics: Factors Influencing the Outcome of Treatment (2021-2022 Retrospective Study). International Endodontic Journal.
[11] Predictors of Healing of Periapical Bone Associated with Large Lesions (2021-2022 Study). International Endodontic Journal.
[12] The Two- and Three-Dimensional Healing Assessment of Large Through-and-Through Lesions (2021-2022 Study). International Endodontic Journal.
[13] Assessment of New CBCT Criteria Repeatability for Healing Evaluation (RAC/B Indices) (2019). Journal of Endodontics, 42(2), data included.
[14] How CBCT Is Changing Surgical Outcomes Assessment (AAE Overview). American Association of Endodontists.
[15] Erroneous Follow-Up during Periapical Surgery Assessments. Open Dentistry Journal.
How to cite this paper
@article{1710589,
author = {Balbara Fischer},
title = {CBCT in Evaluating Healing Post-Apical Surgery},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2022},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {813-819},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710589.pdf},
abstract = {Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an essential tool in diagnostic endodontics, especially in assessing healing outcomes after apical surgery. Two-dimensional radiography often lacks sensitivity and usually shows anatomical superimposition underlying the changes in the periapical area. CBCT, on the contrary, offers three-dimensional images in which clinicians can view the periapical tissues and the healing of the bones much more accurately and reliably. Several authors have concluded that CBCT may reveal instances of incomplete or delayed healing that periapical radiographs may not show, thus permitting early treatment and accurate prognosis evaluation. It also avoids misinterpretation of cases by distinguishing between scar tissue and persistent periapical pathology. Despite this being a consideration, with responsible use, it is worth prioritizing in follow-up cases of the more complex surgical ones. Therefore, CBCT becomes a real game changer in the evaluation of healing following apical surgery and equally plays an important role in evidence-based endodontics.},
keywords = {Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Apical Surgery; Post-Surgical Healing; Endodontics; Periapical Lesions; Radiographic Evaluation.},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV6I1-1710589-1459}
}