Home / Current Issue / Paper 1710753
Risk-Based Compliance Models and Behavioral Insights in Tax Administration: Evidence from East Africa
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Tax Administration
Abstract
This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of risk-based compliance models in tax administration across East African countries, with particular focus on behavioral insights that influence taxpayer compliance. The research investigates how tax authorities in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, and Ethiopia have adopted risk assessment frameworks to optimize resource allocation and improve voluntary compliance rates. Through comprehensive analysis of administrative data, policy documents, and behavioral indicators spanning 2010-2018, this study reveals significant variations in compliance model effectiveness across the region. The findings demonstrate that countries implementing comprehensive risk-based approaches, combined with behavioral nudging strategies, achieved compliance improvement rates of 15-23% compared to traditional enforcement methods. Kenya's integrated risk assessment system, incorporating behavioral profiling and predictive analytics, showed the most substantial gains in voluntary compliance, particularly among small and medium enterprises. Tanzania's pilot behavioral intervention program demonstrated that simple communication modifications and social norm messaging increased filing compliance by 18% among targeted taxpayer segments. The study identifies key behavioral factors influencing compliance decisions, including perceived fairness of tax system, trust in government institutions, social norms, and simplicity of tax procedures. Risk-based models that incorporate these behavioral insights prove more effective than purely algorithmic approaches focused solely on audit probability. However, implementation challenges persist across the region, including limited technological infrastructure, insufficient staff training, and resistance to change within traditional tax administration cultures. The research reveals that successful risk-based compliance systems require substantial upfront investment in data systems, analytical capabilities, and behavioral expertise. Countries with stronger institutional frameworks and governance structures demonstrate greater success in sustaining risk-based compliance improvements over time. The study contributes to the growing literature on tax administration modernization in developing countries by providing empirical evidence of behavioral insights' role in compliance model effectiveness. Practical recommendations include graduated implementation strategies, emphasis on taxpayer education and service delivery, integration of behavioral nudges with traditional enforcement tools, and development of locally appropriate risk indicators. The findings have significant implications for tax policy design and administration reform efforts across Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly as countries seek to improve domestic revenue mobilization while maintaining taxpayer trust and voluntary compliance.
Keywords
Risk-Based Compliance, Behavioral Insights, Tax Administration, East Africa, Voluntary Compliance, Taxpayer Behavior, Revenue Mobilization, Developing Countries
References
[1] Abass, O.S., Balogun, O. & Didi P.U. (2019). A Predictive Analytics Framework for Optimizing Preventive Healthcare Sales and Engagement Outcomes. IRE Journals, 2(11), 497–503.
[2] Adenuga, T., Ayobami, A.T. & Okolo, F.C. (2019). Laying the Groundwork for Predictive Workforce Planning Through Strategic Data Analytics and Talent Modeling. IRE Journals, 3(3), 159–161.
[3] Ajonbadi, H.A., Lawal, A.A., Badmus, D.A. & Otokiti, B.O. (2014). Financial control and organisational performance of the Nigerian small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A catalyst for economic growth. American Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 2(2), 135-143.
[4] Akinsulire, A.A. (2012). Sustaining competitive advantage in a small-sized animation & movie studio in a developing economy like Nigeria: A case study of Mighty Jot Studios (Unpublished master's thesis). The University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
[5] Alsharari, N.M., Dixon, R. and Youssef, M.A.E.A., 2015. Management accounting change: critical review and a new contextual framework. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(4), pp.476-502.
[6] Balogun, O., Abass, O.S. & Didi P.U. (2019). A Multi-Stage Brand Repositioning Framework for Regulated FMCG Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa. IRE Journals, 2(8), 236–242.
[7] Benn, S. & Baker, E. (2017). Advancing sustainability through change and innovation: A co-evolutionary perspective. In Sustainability and Organizational Change Management (pp. 108-121). Routledge.
[8] Birnberg, J.G., 2009. The Case for Post‐Modern Management Accounting: Thinking Outside the Box. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21(1), pp.3-18.
[9] Burns, J. and Scapens, R.W., 2000. Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework. Management accounting research, 11(1), pp.3-25.
[10] Chaudhuri, A. & Gangadharan, L. (2007). An experimental analysis of trust and trustworthiness. Southern Economic Journal, 73(4), 959-985.
[11] Cobham, A. (2005). Tax evasion, tax avoidance and development finance. Queen Elizabeth House Working Paper, 129.
[12] Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
[13] Cummings, R.G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M. & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 447-457.
[14] De Juan, A., Lasheras, M.A. & Mayo, R. (1994). Voluntary tax compliant behavior of Spanish income tax payers. Public Finance, 49, 90-105.
[15] Doerrenberg, P. & Peichl, A. (2013). Progressive taxation and tax morale. Public Choice, 155(3-4), 293-316.
[16] Dollar, D. & Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 133-162.
[17] Dwenger, N., Kleven, H., Rasul, I. & Rincke, J. (2016). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations for tax compliance: Evidence from a field experiment in Germany. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 203-232.
[18] Dyreng, S.D., Hanlon, M. & Maydew, E.L. (2008). Long‐run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82.
[19] Eisenhauer, J.G. (2008). Ethical preferences, risk aversion, and taxpayer behavior. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 45-63.
[20] Erard, B. & Feinstein, J.S. (1994). Honesty and evasion in the tax compliance game. The RAND Journal of Economics, 25(1), 1-19.
[21] Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press.
[22] Falkinger, J. (1988). Tax evasion and equity: A theoretical analysis. Public Finance, 43(3), 388-395.
[23] Feld, L.P. & Frey, B.S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99.
[24] Feld, L.P. & Frey, B.S. (2007). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law & Policy, 29(1), 102-120.
[25] Feld, L.P. & Tyran, J.R. (2002). Tax evasion and voting: An experimental analysis. Kyklos, 55(2), 197-221.
[26] Fogarty, T.J., 1992. Financial accounting standard setting as an institutionalized action field: constraints, opportunities and dilemmas. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 11(4), pp.331-355.
[27] Forest, A. & Sheffrin, S.M. (2002). Complexity and compliance: An empirical investigation. National Tax Journal, 55(1), 75-88.
[28] Frey, B.S. & Feld, L.P. (2002). Deterrence and morale in taxation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(4), 491-521.
[29] Frey, B.S. (1997). A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues. The Economic Journal, 107(443), 1043-1053.
[30] Gillitzer, C. & Skov, P.E. (2018). The use of third-party information reporting for tax deductions: Evidence and implications from charitable deductions in Denmark. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(3), 892-912.
[31] Gordon, R. & Li, W. (2009). Tax structures in developing countries: Many puzzles and a possible explanation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(7-8), 855-866.
[32] Graetz, M.J. & Wilde, L.L. (1985). The economics of tax compliance: Fact and fantasy. National Tax Journal, 38(3), 355-363.
[33] Guala, F. & Mittone, L. (2005). Experiments in economics: External validity and the robustness of phenomena. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(4), 495-515.
[34] Gërxhani, K. (2004). The informal sector in developed and less developed countries: a literature survey. Public Choice, 120(3-4), 267-300.
[35] Hammar, H., Jagers, S.C. & Nordblom, K. (2009). Perceived tax evasion and the importance of trust. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2), 238-245.
[36] Hanlon, M. & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
[37] Hart, O., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W. (1997). The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1127-1161.
[38] Hasseldine, J. & Hite, P.A. (2003). Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 517-533.
[39] Henderson, B.C. & Kaplan, S.E. (2005). An examination of audit report lag for banks: A panel data approach. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(2), 159-174.
[40] Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K. & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346-380.
[41] Ibitoye, B.A., AbdulWahab, R. & Mustapha, S.D. (2017). Estimation of drivers' critical gap acceptance and follow-up time at four–legged unsignalized intersection. CARD International Journal of Science and Advanced Innovative Research, 1(1), 98-107.
[42] International Finance Corporation. (2013). Paying Taxes 2014: The Global Picture. IFC Publishing.
[43] Irvine, H., 2011. From go to woe: How a not‐for‐profit managed the change to accrual accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(7), pp.824-847.
[44] James, S. & Alley, C. (2004). Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 2(2), 27-42.
[45] Jensen, A. (2017). Employment structure and the rise of the modern tax system. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 25502.
[46] Johannesen, N. & Zucman, G. (2014). The end of bank secrecy? An evaluation of the G20 tax haven crackdown. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(1), 65-91.
[47] Kagan, R.A. & Scholz, J.T. (1984). The criminology of the corporation and regulatory enforcement strategies. Enforcing Regulation, 67-95.
[48] Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220-246.
[49] Kinney, W.R., 2001. Accounting scholarship: What is uniquely ours?. The Accounting Review, 76(2), pp.275-284.
[50] Kleven, H.J., Knudsen, M.B., Kreiner, C.T., Pedersen, S. & Saez, E. (2011). Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a tax audit experiment in Denmark. Econometrica, 79(3), 651-692.
[51] Kornhauser, M.E. (2007). Normative and cognitive aspects of tax compliance: Literature review and recommendations for the IRS regarding individual taxpayers. Florida Tax Review, 8(4), 599-632.
[52] Kuo, C.Y. & Yang, C.H. (2008). Knowledge capital and spillover on regional economic growth: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 19(4), 594-604.
[53] Levi, M. (1988). Of Rule and Revenue. University of California Press.
[54] Lewis, A. (1982). The Psychology of Taxation. Martin Robertson.
[55] Long, S.B. & Swingen, J.A. (1991). Taxpayer compliance: Setting new agendas for research. Law and Society Review, 25(3), 637-683.
[56] Maines, L.A., Bartov, E., Fairfield, P.M. and Hirst, D.E., 2003. Implications of Accounting Research. Accounting Horizons, 17(2), pp.175-185.
[57] Martinez-Vazquez, J. & McNab, R.M. (2000). The tax reform experiment in transitional countries. National Tax Journal, 53(2), 273-298.
[58] McKerchar, M. & Evans, C. (2009). Sustaining growth in developing economies through improved taxpayer compliance: Challenges for policy makers and revenue authorities. eJournal of Tax Research, 7(2), 171-201.
[59] Menson, W.N.A., Olawepo, J.O., Bruno, T., Gbadamosi, S.O., Nalda, N.F., Anyebe, V., Ogidi, A., Onoka, C., Oko, J.O. & Ezeanolue, E.E. (2018). Reliability of self-reported Mobile phone ownership in rural north-Central Nigeria: cross-sectional study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(3), e8760.
[60] Mezias, S.J. and Scarselletta, M., 1994. Resolving financial reporting problems: An institutional analysis of the process. administrative science quarterly, pp.654-678.
[61] Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378.
[62] Miller, P. and O'Leary, T., 1990. Making accountancy practical. Accounting, Organizations and society, 15(5), pp.479-498.
[63] Mookherjee, D. (1997). Incentive reforms in developing country bureaucracies: Lessons from tax administration. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 103-125.
[64] Moore, M. (2004). Revenues, state formation, and the quality of governance in developing countries. International Political Science Review, 25(3), 297-319.
[65] Murphy, K. (2008). Enforcing tax compliance: To punish or persuade? Economic Analysis and Policy, 38(1), 113-135.
[66] Myles, G.D. & Naylor, R.A. (1996). A model of tax evasion with group conformity and social customs. European Journal of Political Economy, 12(1), 49-66.
[67] Naritomi, J. (2019). Consumers as tax auditors. American Economic Review, 109(9), 3031-3072.
[68] North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
[69] Nwokediegwu, Z.S., Bankole, A.O. & Okiye, S.E. (2019). Advancing interior and exterior construction design through large-scale 3D printing: A comprehensive review. IRE Journals, 3(1), 422-449.
[70] Orviska, M. & Hudson, J. (2003). Tax evasion, civic duty and the law abiding citizen. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(1), 83-102.
[71] Otokiti, B.O. & Akorede, A.F. (2018). Advancing sustainability through change and innovation: A co-evolutionary perspective. Innovation: Taking creativity to the market. Book of Readings in Honour of Professor SO Otokiti, 1(1), 161-167.
[72] Pashev, K.V. (2006). Presumptive taxation: Lessons from Bulgaria. Post-Communist Economies, 18(4), 399-418.
[73] Porcano, T.M. (1988). Correlates of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9(1), 47-67.
[74] Potter, B.N., 2005. Accounting as a social and institutional practice: Perspectives to enrich our understanding of accounting change. Abacus, 41(3), pp.265-289.
[75] Poulson, B.W. & Kaplan, J.G. (2008). State income taxes and economic growth. Cato Journal, 28(1), 53-71.
[76] Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
[77] Rappaport, A., 1977. Economic impact of accounting standards--Implications for the FASB. Journal of Accountancy (pre-1986), 143(000005), p.89.
[78] Richardson, G. (2006). Determinants of tax evasion: A cross-country investigation. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 150-169.
[79] Roth, J.A., Scholz, J.T. & Witte, A.D. (1989). Taxpayer Compliance, Volume 1: An Agenda for Research. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[80] Sandmo, A. (2005). The theory of tax evasion: A retrospective view. National Tax Journal, 58(4), 643-663.
[81] Schneider, F. & Enste, D.H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77-114.
[82] Scholz, J.T. & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398-417.
[83] Sheffrin, S.M. & Triest, R.K. (1992). Can brute deterrence backfire? Perceptions and attitudes in taxpayer compliance. Public Finance Economics, 445-459.
[84] Slemrod, J. & Weber, C. (2012). Evidence of the invisible: toward a credibility revolution in the empirical analysis of tax evasion and the informal economy. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 25-53.
[85] Slemrod, J. & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. Handbook of Public Economics, 3, 1423-1470.
[86] Slemrod, J. (2002). Trust in public finance. Public Finance and Public Policy in the New Century, 49-88.
[87] Smith, K.W. (1992). Reciprocity and fairness: Positive incentives for tax compliance. Why People Pay Taxes, 223-250.
[88] Song, Y.D. & Yarbrough, T.E. (1978). Tax ethics and taxpayer attitudes: A survey. Public Administration Review, 38(5), 442-452.
[89] Steinmo, S. (1993). Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. Yale University Press.
[90] Stiglitz, J.E. (1999). Economics of the public sector. WW Norton & Company.
[91] Tanzi, V. & Zee, H.H. (2000). Tax policy for emerging markets: developing countries. National Tax Journal, 53(2), 299-322.
[92] Thomas, M.A. (2010). What do the worldwide governance indicators measure? European Journal of Development Research, 22(1), 31-54.
[93] Torgler, B. & Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228-245.
[94] Torgler, B. (2003). Tax morale: Theory and analysis of tax compliance. University of Basel WWZ Discussion Paper, 2003/02.
[95] Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
[96] Verboon, P. & van Dijke, M. (2011). When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural justice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 120-130.
[97] Wartick, M.L., Madeo, S.A. & Vines, C.C. (1999). Reward dominance in tax-reporting experiments: The role of context. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 21(2), 20-31.
[98] Webley, P., Robben, H., Elffers, H. & Hessing, D. (1991). Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. Cambridge University Press.
[99] Wenzel, M. (2004). An analysis of norm processes in tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(2), 213-228.
[100] Wilson, E.R., Reck, J.L., Kattelus, S.C. and Robbins, W.A., 2010. Accounting for governmental and nonprofit entities. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(1), pp.176-177.
[101] Wilson, J.Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic Books.
[102] Yitzhaki, S. (1974). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 201-202.
[103] Young, J.C. (1994). Outlining regulatory space: Agenda issues and the FASB. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(1), 83-109.
How to cite this paper
@article{1710753,
author = {Caroline Atuhaire, Carolyne Karungi},
title = {Risk-Based Compliance Models and Behavioral Insights in Tax Administration: Evidence from East Africa},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2019},
volume = {2},
number = {12},
pages = {408-435},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710753.pdf},
abstract = {This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of risk-based compliance models in tax administration across East African countries, with particular focus on behavioral insights that influence taxpayer compliance. The research investigates how tax authorities in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, and Ethiopia have adopted risk assessment frameworks to optimize resource allocation and improve voluntary compliance rates. Through comprehensive analysis of administrative data, policy documents, and behavioral indicators spanning 2010-2018, this study reveals significant variations in compliance model effectiveness across the region. The findings demonstrate that countries implementing comprehensive risk-based approaches, combined with behavioral nudging strategies, achieved compliance improvement rates of 15-23% compared to traditional enforcement methods. Kenya's integrated risk assessment system, incorporating behavioral profiling and predictive analytics, showed the most substantial gains in voluntary compliance, particularly among small and medium enterprises. Tanzania's pilot behavioral intervention program demonstrated that simple communication modifications and social norm messaging increased filing compliance by 18% among targeted taxpayer segments. The study identifies key behavioral factors influencing compliance decisions, including perceived fairness of tax system, trust in government institutions, social norms, and simplicity of tax procedures. Risk-based models that incorporate these behavioral insights prove more effective than purely algorithmic approaches focused solely on audit probability. However, implementation challenges persist across the region, including limited technological infrastructure, insufficient staff training, and resistance to change within traditional tax administration cultures. The research reveals that successful risk-based compliance systems require substantial upfront investment in data systems, analytical capabilities, and behavioral expertise. Countries with stronger institutional frameworks and governance structures demonstrate greater success in sustaining risk-based compliance improvements over time. The study contributes to the growing literature on tax administration modernization in developing countries by providing empirical evidence of behavioral insights' role in compliance model effectiveness. Practical recommendations include graduated implementation strategies, emphasis on taxpayer education and service delivery, integration of behavioral nudges with traditional enforcement tools, and development of locally appropriate risk indicators. The findings have significant implications for tax policy design and administration reform efforts across Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly as countries seek to improve domestic revenue mobilization while maintaining taxpayer trust and voluntary compliance.},
keywords = {Risk-Based Compliance, Behavioral Insights, Tax Administration, East Africa, Voluntary Compliance, Taxpayer Behavior, Revenue Mobilization, Developing Countries},
month = {June},
}