Integrating Procurement Data Systems for Enhanced Organizational Transparency and Process Efficiency

References

[1] Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R. and Jardim-Goncalves, R., 2016. Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in industry, 79, pp.64-76.

[2] Alvarez, S. and Rubio, A., 2015. Carbon footprint in Green Public Procurement: a case study in the services sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, pp.159-166.

[3] Bals, L. and Turkulainen, V., 2017. Achieving efficiency and effectiveness in Purchasing and Supply Management: Organization design and outsourcing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(4), pp.256-267.

[4] Bandyopadhyay, T., Beyene, D. and Negash, S., 2015. IT outsourcing risk management practices in higher educational institutes in Ethiopia–A qualitative study.

[5] Batran, A., Erben, A., Schulz, R. and Sperl, F., 2017. Procurement 4.0: A survival guide in a digital, disruptive world. Campus Verlag.

[6] Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y. and King, J.L., 2016. Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organization science, 27(3), pp.551-572.

[7] Boström, M., Jönsson, A.M., Lockie, S., Mol, A.P. and Oosterveer, P., 2015. Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, pp.1-7.

[8] Bruck, C., 2017. Challenges and opportunities of Data Governance in private and public organizations. Vienna University of Economics and Business.

[9] Coe, N.M., 2017. Missing links: Logistics, governance and upgrading in a shifting global economy. In Global value chains and global production networks (pp. 224-256). Routledge.

[10] Daraio, C. and Glänzel, W., 2016. Grand challenges in data integration—State of the art and future perspectives: An introduction. Scientometrics, 108(1), pp.391-400.

[11] Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A. and O'Loughlin, A., 2017. Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: a structured literature review. International journal of management reviews, 19(4), pp.379-407.

[12] Fazekas, M. and Dávid-Barrett, E., 2015. Corruption risks in UK public procurement and new anti-corruption tools. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 23(2), pp.245-267.

[13] Fekete, A., Tzavella, K., Armas, I., Binner, J., Garschagen, M., Giupponi, C., Mojtahed, V., Pettita, M., Schneiderbauer, S. and Serre, D., 2015. Critical data source; tool or even infrastructure? Challenges of geographic information systems and remote sensing for disaster risk governance. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(4), pp.1848-1869.

[14] Gharaibeh, A., Salahuddin, M.A., Hussini, S.J., Khreishah, A., Khalil, I., Guizani, M. and Al-Fuqaha, A., 2017. Smart cities: A survey on data management, security, and enabling technologies. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 19(4), pp.2456-2501.

[15] Giannakis, M. and Louis, M., 2016. A multi-agent based system with big data processing for enhanced supply chain agility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(5), pp.706-727.

[16] Givehchi, O., Landsdorf, K., Simoens, P. and Colombo, A.W., 2017. Interoperability for industrial cyber-physical systems: An approach for legacy systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(6), pp.3370-3378.

[17] Handfield, R. and Linton, T., 2017. The LIVING supply chain: The evolving imperative of operating in real time. John Wiley & Sons.

[18] Haralambides, H., 2017. Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(1), pp.1-51.

[19] Hazen, B.T., Skipper, J.B., Ezell, J.D. and Boone, C.A., 2016. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: A theory-driven research agenda. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, pp.592-598.

[20] Henderson, M.I., Novosel, D. and Crow, M.L., 2017. Electric power grid modernization trends, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Power Energy.

[21] Karaosman, H., Brun, A. and Morales-Alonso, G., 2017. Vogue or vague: sustainability performance appraisal in luxury fashion supply chains. In Sustainable management of luxury (pp. 301-330). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

[22] Kashmanian, R.M., 2017. Building greater transparency in supply chains to advance sustainability. Environmental Quality Management, 26(3), pp.73-104.

[23] Kim, M. and Chai, S., 2017. The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, pp.42-52.

[24] Kindström, D. and Kowalkowski, C., 2015. Service driven business model innovation: organizing the shift from a product-based to a service-centric business model. Business Model Innovation: The Organizational Dimension, Nicolai Foss and Tina Saebi (Eds.), Oxford University Press, UK, Forthcoming.

[25] Krotov, V., Junglas, I. and Steel, D., 2015. The mobile agility framework: An exploratory study of mobile technology enhancing organizational agility. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 10(3), pp.1-7.

[26] Kwon, I.W.G., Kim, S.H. and Martin, D.G., 2016. Healthcare supply chain management; strategic areas for quality and financial improvement. Technological forecasting and social change, 113, pp.422-428.

[27] Liang, H., Wang, N., Xue, Y. and Ge, S., 2017. Unraveling the alignment paradox: how does business—IT alignment shape organizational agility?. Information Systems Research, 28(4), pp.863-879.

[28] Manda, J.K., 2017. Cybersecurity strategies for legacy telecom systems: Developing tailored cybersecurity strategies to secure aging telecom infrastructures against modern cyber threats, leveraging your experience with legacy systems and cybersecurity practices. Leveraging your Experience with Legacy Systems and Cybersecurity Practices (January 01, 2017).

[29] Mangan, J. and Lalwani, C., 2016. Global logistics and supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons.

[30] Marcos, C., González-Ferrer, A., Peleg, M. and Cavero, C., 2015. Solving the interoperability challenge of a distributed complex patient guidance system: a data integrator based on HL7’s Virtual Medical Record standard. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(3), pp.587-599.

[31] Mate, S., Köpcke, F., Toddenroth, D., Martin, M., Prokosch, H.U., Bürkle, T. and Ganslandt, T., 2015. Ontology-based data integration between clinical and research systems. PloS one, 10(1), p.e0116656.

[32] Mathews, M., Robles, D. and Bowe, B., 2017. BIM+ blockchain: A solution to the trust problem in collaboration?.

[33] McCue, C.P., Prier, E. and Swanson, D., 2015. Five dilemmas in public procurement. Journal of public procurement, 15(2), pp.177-207.

[34] Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., Batenburg, R.S. and Wetering, R.V.D., 2015. Purchasing alignment under multiple contingencies: a configuration theory approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(4), pp.625-645.

[35] Moretto, A., Ronchi, S. and Patrucco, A.S., 2017. Increasing the effectiveness of procurement decisions: The value of big data in the procurement process. International Journal of RF Technologies, 8(3), pp.79-103.

[36] Mourtzis, D., 2016. Challenges and future perspectives for the life cycle of manufacturing networks in the mass customisation era. Logistics Research, 9(1), p.2.

[37] Murfield, M.L. and Tate, W.L., 2017. Buyer and supplier perspectives on environmental initiatives: Potential implications for supply chain relationships. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(4), pp.1319-1350.

[38] Musau, E.G., 2015. Determinants of procurement function and its role in organizational effectiveness. Journal of Business Management, 17(2), pp.12-25.

[39] Musau, E.G., 2015. Determinants of procurement function and its role in organizational effectiveness. Journal of Business Management, 17(2), pp.12-25.

[40] Natarajan, P., Frenzel, J.C. and Smaltz, D.H., 2017. Demystifying big data and machine learning for healthcare. CRC Press.

[41] Njagi, M.M. and Shalle, N., 2016. Role of supplier relationship management on procurement performance in manufacturing sector in Kenya: A case of East African Breweries. International Academic Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), pp.1-20.

[42] O’Malley, A.S., Collins, A., Contreary, K. and Rich, E.C., 2016. Barriers to and facilitators of evidence-based decision making at the point of care: implications for delivery systems, payers, and policy makers. MDM Policy & Practice, 1(1), p.2381468316660375.

[43] Papadonikolaki, E. and Wamelink, H., 2017. Inter-and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM. Building research & information, 45(6), pp.649-664.

[44] Pross, C., Geissler, A. and Busse, R., 2017. Measuring, reporting, and rewarding quality of care in 5 nations: 5 policy levers to enhance hospital quality accountability. The Milbank Quarterly, 95(1), pp.136-183.

[45] Quinn, L., Dibb, S., Simkin, L., Canhoto, A. and Analogbei, M., 2016. Troubled waters: the transformation of marketing in a digital world. European Journal of Marketing, 50(12), pp.2103-2133.

[46] Ravichandran, A., Taylor, K. and Waterhouse, P., 2016. DevOps for digital leaders: Reignite business with a modern DevOps-enabled software factory (p. 173). Springer Nature.

[47] Reddy, A., 2015. The Scrumban [r] evolution: getting the most out of Agile, Scrum, and lean Kanban. Addison-Wesley Professional.

[48] Revilla, E. and Knoppen, D., 2015. Building knowledge integration in buyer-supplier relationships: The critical role of strategic supply management and trust. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(10), pp.1408-1436.

[49] Roden, S., Nucciarelli, A., Li, F. and Graham, G., 2017. Big data and the transformation of operations models: a framework and a new research agenda. Production Planning & Control, 28(11-12), pp.929-944.

[50] Saldanha, J.P., Mello, J.E., Knemeyer, A.M. and Vijayaraghavan, T.A.S., 2015. Implementing supply chain technologies in emerging markets: an institutional theory perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(1), pp.5-26.

[51] Sarker, S., Engwall, M., Trucco, P. and Feldmann, A., 2016. Internal visibility of external supplier risks and the dynamics of risk management silos. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(4), pp.451-461.

[52] Schwertner, K., 2017. Digital transformation of business. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 15(1), pp.388-393.

[53] Shahmoradi, L., Safadari, R. and Jimma, W., 2017. Knowledge management implementation and the tools utilized in healthcare for evidence-based decision making: a systematic review. Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 27(5), pp.541-558.

[54] Short, J.L., Toffel, M.W. and Hugill, A.R., 2016. Monitoring global supply chains. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), pp.1878-1897.

[55] Singh, J., Pasquier, T., Bacon, J., Ko, H. and Eyers, D., 2015. Twenty security considerations for cloud-supported Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of things Journal, 3(3), pp.269-284.

[56] Tunisini, A. and Sebastiani, R., 2015. Innovative and networked business functions: customer-driven procurement. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 30(3/4), pp.302-311.

[57] Usman, N. and Ibrahim, A.M., 2015. Efficient Management of Construction Logistics: A Challenge to both Conventional and Technological Systems in the Developing Nations. In Conference: Conference: ICCCE (p. 1883â).

[58] Vaidya, K. and Campbell, J., 2016. Multidisciplinary approach to defining public e-procurement and evaluating its impact on procurement efficiency. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), pp.333-348.

[59] Werner, M. and Gehrke, N., 2015. Multilevel process mining for financial audits. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 8(6), pp.820-832.

[60] Yan, T., Choi, T.Y., Kim, Y. and Yang, Y., 2015. A theory of the nexus supplier: A critical supplier from a network perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(1), pp.52-66.

@article{1710780,
      author = {Oluwagbemisola Faith Akinlade, Opeyemi Morenike Filani, Priscilla Samuel Nwachukwu},
      title = {Integrating Procurement Data Systems for Enhanced Organizational Transparency and Process Efficiency},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {1},
      number = {7},
      pages = {104-118},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710780.pdf},
      abstract = {Procurement has evolved from a transactional function to a strategic enabler of organizational efficiency, competitiveness, and accountability. However, many organizations continue to face challenges arising from fragmented data systems, siloed information, and a lack of visibility across procurement processes. These issues hinder transparency, increase risks of non-compliance, and reduce overall process efficiency. Integrating procurement data systems provides a transformative solution, enabling seamless information flow, real-time visibility, and data-driven decision-making across organizational levels. This examines the role of integrated procurement data systems in enhancing organizational transparency and process efficiency. Key data sources include enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, supplier portals, e-procurement tools, financial systems, and external intelligence databases. Advanced integration approaches, such as centralized procurement platforms, cloud-based solutions, and API-driven interoperability, allow organizations to consolidate structured and unstructured data into unified systems. Furthermore, data harmonization and governance frameworks ensure consistency, security, and compliance with regulatory standards. The integration of procurement systems delivers multiple benefits. It enhances transparency by providing stakeholders with real-time access to procurement activities, supplier performance metrics, and compliance records, thereby reducing risks of fraud and inefficiency. Process efficiency is strengthened through automation, reduced manual errors, and streamlined supplier evaluation and contract management. Integrated systems also empower strategic decision-making, enabling advanced analytics for spend analysis, risk mitigation, and demand forecasting. Additionally, procurement integration fosters collaboration across departments, aligning procurement strategies with organizational goals and sustainability initiatives. Despite its benefits, integration faces challenges including legacy system incompatibilities, high implementation costs, and workforce skill gaps. Nevertheless, emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, and blockchain offer promising directions for the future of procurement transparency and efficiency. Overall, integrated procurement data systems represent a strategic imperative for organizations seeking resilient, transparent, and competitive operations in dynamic global markets.},
      keywords = {Procurement Data Integration, Organizational Transparency, Process Efficiency, Supply Chain Management, Digital Procurement Systems, Data-Driven Decision Making, Workflow Optimization, Enterprise Resource Planning, Procurement Analytics, Real-Time Reporting},
      month = {January},
  }