Resilient Supply Chain Framework Enhancing Multinational Oil and Gas Industry Sustainability

References

[1] Abdulraheem, A.O., 2018. Just-in-time manufacturing for improving global supply chain resilience. Int J Eng Technol Res Manag, 2(11), p.58.

[2] Ahmad, N.K.W., de Brito, M.P., Rezaei, J. and Tavasszy, L.A., 2017. An integrative framework for sustainable supply chain management practices in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(4), pp.577-601.

[3] Ahmad, W.N.K.W., Rezaei, J., Tavasszy, L.A. and de Brito, M.P., 2016. Commitment to and preparedness for sustainable supply chain management in the oil and gas industry. Journal of environmental management, 180, pp.202-213.

[4] Ali, Z. and Nicola, H., 2018. Accelerating Digital Transformation: Leveraging Enterprise Architecture and AI in Cloud-Driven DevOps and DataOps Frameworks.

[5] Amor, R.B. and Ghorbel, A., 2018. The risk in Petroleum Supply Chain: A review and typology. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9(2), pp.141-163.

[6] Amor, R.B. and Ghorbel, A., 2018. The risk in Petroleum Supply Chain: A review and typology. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9(2), pp.141-163.

[7] Averchenkova, A., Crick, F., Kocornik‐Mina, A., Leck, H. and Surminski, S., 2016. Multinational and large national corporations and climate adaptation: are we asking the right questions? A review of current knowledge and a new research perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(4), pp.517-536.

[8] Awan, U., Kraslawski, A. and Huiskonen, J., 2018. Governing interfirm relationships for social sustainability: the relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence. Sustainability, 10(12), p.4473.

[9] Balakrishnan, M., Raghavan, A. and Suresh, G.K., 2017. Eliminating undesirable variation in neonatal practice: balancing standardization and customization. Clinics in Perinatology, 44(3), pp.529-540.

[10] Bocken, N.M. and Short, S.W., 2016. Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: Experiences and opportunities. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 18, pp.41-61.

[11] Bolton, A., Goosen, L. and Kritzinger, E., 2016, September. Enterprise digitization enablement through unified communication & collaboration. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (pp. 1-10).

[12] Brenner, B., 2018. Transformative sustainable business models in the light of the digital imperative—A global business economics perspective. Sustainability, 10(12), p.4428.

[13] Brown, A.E., Ubeku, E. and Oshevire, P., 2015. Multi-algorithm of a single objective function of a single-phase induction motor. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), 2(12), pp.3400-3403.

[14] Buller, P.F. and McEvoy, G.M., 2016. A model for implementing a sustainability strategy through HRM practices. Business and Society Review, 121(4), pp.465-495.

[15] Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R. and Esposito, E., 2018. Environmental sustainability and energy-efficient supply chain management: A review of research trends and proposed guidelines. Energies, 11(2), p.275.

[16] Chakkol, M., Selviaridis, K. and Finne, M., 2018. The governance of collaboration in complex projects. International journal of operations & production management, 38(4), pp.997-1019.

[17] Christopher, M. and Holweg, M., 2017. Supply chain 2.0 revisited: a framework for managing volatility-induced risk in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(1), pp.2-17.

[18] Davies, R., Coole, T. and Smith, A., 2017. Review of socio-technical considerations to ensure successful implementation of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, pp.1288-1295.

[19] Davis, R.A., 2016. Demand-driven inventory optimization and replenishment: Creating a more efficient supply chain. John Wiley & Sons.

[20] Durugbo, C. and Erkoyuncu, J.A., 2016. Mitigating uncertainty for industrial service operations: a multi case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(5), pp.532-571.

[21] Ekins, P., Hughes, N., Brigenzu, S., Arden Clark, C., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Graedel, T., Hajer, M., Hashimoto, S., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Havlik, P. and Hertwich, E., 2016. Resource efficiency: Potential and economic implications.

[22] El Bilali, H. and Allahyari, M.S., 2018. Transition towards sustainability in agriculture and food systems: Role of information and communication technologies. Information processing in agriculture, 5(4), pp.456-464.

[23] Elshaug, A.G., Rosenthal, M.B., Lavis, J.N., Brownlee, S., Schmidt, H., Nagpal, S., Littlejohns, P., Srivastava, D., Tunis, S. and Saini, V., 2017. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care. The Lancet, 390(10090), pp.191-202.

[24] Eltantawy, R.A., 2016. The role of supply management resilience in attaining ambidexterity: a dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(1), pp.123-134.

[25] Fan, B. and Nie, S., 2018. Coproduction design of contingency planning in emergency governance structure: Qualitative metasynthesis of Chinese local government. Natural Hazards Review, 19(4), p.04018021.

[26] Fasnacht, D., 2018. Open innovation ecosystems. In Open Innovation Ecosystems: Creating New Value Constellations in the Financial Services (pp. 131-172). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[27] Ferrer, M. and Santa, R., 2017. The mediating role of outsourcing in the relationship between speed, flexibility and performance: a Saudi Arabian study. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 22(3), pp.395-412.

[28] Fischer, R.J., Halibozek, E.P. and Walters, D.C., 2018. Contingency planning emergency response and safety. Introduction to security, p.249.

[29] Gabler, C.B., Richey Jr, R.G. and Stewart, G.T., 2017. Disaster resilience through public–private short‐term collaboration. Journal of Business Logistics, 38(2), pp.130-144.

[30] Gath, M., 2016. Optimizing transport logistics processes with multiagent planning and control. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

[31] Gosling, J., Jia, F., Gong, Y. and Brown, S., 2016. The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, pp.1458-1469.

[32] Gatzert, N. and Schmit, J., 2016. Supporting strategic success through enterprise-wide reputation risk management. The Journal of Risk Finance, 17(1), pp.26-45.

[33] Gimenez, R., Labaka, L. and Hernantes, J., 2017. A maturity model for the involvement of stakeholders in the city resilience building process. Technological forecasting and social change, 121, pp.7-16.

[34] Gius, D., Mieszala, J.C., Panayiotou, E. and Poppensieker, T., 2018. Value and resilience through better risk management. McKinsey on Risk,(6), pp.43-53.

[35] Gius, D., Mieszala, J.C., Panayiotou, E. and Poppensieker, T., 2018. Value and resilience through better risk management. McKinsey on Risk,(6), pp.43-53.

[36] Klumpp, M., 2018. Automation and artificial intelligence in business logistics systems: human reactions and collaboration requirements. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 21(3), pp.224-242.

[37] Koh, S.C.L., Morris, J., Ebrahimi, S.M. and Obayi, R., 2016. Integrated resource efficiency: measurement and management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(11), pp.1576-1600.

[38] Kure, H.I., Islam, S. and Razzaque, M.A., 2018. An integrated cyber security risk management approach for a cyber-physical system. Applied Sciences, 8(6), p.898.

[39] Li, W., Liu, K., Belitski, M., Ghobadian, A. and O'Regan, N., 2016. e-Leadership through strategic alignment: An empirical study of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the digital age. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), pp.185-206.

[40] Malik, H. and Al-Toubi, S., 2018. Knowledge management in the public sector. In The palgrave handbook of knowledge management (pp. 515-538). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[41] Mangan, J. and Lalwani, C., 2016. Global logistics and supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons.

[42] Manning, L. and Soon, J.M., 2016. Building strategic resilience in the food supply chain. British Food Journal, 118(6), pp.1477-1493.

[43] Mariussen, Å., Rakhmatullin, R. and Stanionyte, L., 2016. Smart specialisation: Creating growth through transnational cooperation and value chains. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.

[44] Martín, C. and McTarnaghan, S., 2018. Institutionalizing urban resilience: A midterm monitoring and evaluation report of 100 resilient cities. Urban Institute.

[45] Maru, A., Berne, D., De Beer, J., Ballantyne, P., Pesce, V., Kalyesubula, S., Fourie, N., Addison, C., Collett, A. and Chaves, J., 2018. Digital and data-driven agriculture: Harnessing the power of data for smallholders. F1000Research, 7(525), p.525.

[46] Menson, W.N.A., Olawepo, J.O., Bruno, T., Gbadamosi, S.O., Nalda, N.F., Anyebe, V., Ogidi, A., Onoka, C., Oko, J.O. and Ezeanolue, E.E., 2018. Reliability of self-reported Mobile phone ownership in rural north-Central Nigeria: cross-sectional study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(3), p.e8760.

[47] Nadin, R.S.S. and Wei, J., 2016. Understanding climate risk and building resilience. Climate Risk and Resilience in China, pp.299-326.

[48] Naimoli, J.F. and Saxena, S., 2018. Realizing their potential to become learning organizations to foster health system resilience: opportunities and challenges for health ministries in low-and middle-income countries. Health policy and planning, 33(10), pp.1083-1095.

[49] Nwokediegwu, Z. S., Bankole, A. O., & Okiye, S. E. (2019). Advancing interior and exterior construction design through large-scale 3D printing: A comprehensive review. IRE Journals, 3(1), 422-449. ISSN: 2456-8880

[50] Oluwaseyi, J.A., Onifade, M.K. and Odeyinka, O.F., 2017. Evaluation of the role of inventory management in logistics chain of an organisation. LOGI: Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 8(2), pp.1-11.

[51] Pathranarakul, P. and Sae-Lim, P., 2018. Risk management and organizational adaptability-strategic framework for corporate crisis recovery: the study of oil and gas industry. PSAKU International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 7(2).

[52] Purvis, L., Spall, S., Naim, M. and Spiegler, V., 2016. Developing a resilient supply chain strategy during ‘boom’and ‘bust’. Production planning & control, 27(7-8), pp.579-590.

[53] Rajeev, A., Pati, R.K., Padhi, S.S. and Govindan, K., 2017. Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 162, pp.299-314.

[54] Sabet, E., Yazdani, N. and De Leeuw, S., 2017. Supply chain integration strategies in fast evolving industries. The international journal of logistics management, 28(1), pp.29-46.

[55] Sáenz, M.J., Revilla, E. and Acero, B., 2018. Aligning supply chain design for boosting resilience. Business Horizons, 61(3), pp.443-452.

[56] SHARMA, A., ADEKUNLE, B.I., OGEAWUCHI, J.C., ABAYOMI, A.A. and ONIFADE, O., 2019. IoT-enabled Predictive Maintenance for Mechanical Systems: Innovations in Real-time Monitoring and Operational Excellence.

[57] Srinivasan, R. and Swink, M., 2018. An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), pp.1849-1867.

[58] Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A. and Nee, A.Y., 2018. Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on industrial informatics, 15(4), pp.2405-2415.

[59] Teece, D., Peteraf, M. and Leih, S., 2016. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California management review, 58(4), pp.13-35.

[60] Vatn, J., 2018. Industry 4.0 and real-time synchronization of operation and maintenance. In Safety and reliability–safe societies in a changing world (pp. 681-686). CRC Press.

@article{1710823,
      author = {Olamide Folahanmi Bayeroju},
      title = {Resilient Supply Chain Framework Enhancing Multinational Oil and Gas Industry Sustainability},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1},
      pages = {530-543},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710823.pdf},
      abstract = {The oil and gas industry operates within a complex and volatile global environment, where supply chain disruptions, regulatory pressures, and environmental sustainability requirements pose significant operational and strategic challenges. This presents a Resilient Supply Chain Framework designed to enhance sustainability and operational continuity for multinational oil and gas enterprises. The framework integrates risk management, digital technologies, and sustainability principles to create adaptive, robust, and efficient supply chains capable of responding to market volatility, geopolitical uncertainties, and environmental constraints. The framework is structured around three core dimensions: supply chain resilience, sustainability integration, and technological enablement. Supply chain resilience focuses on identifying vulnerabilities, implementing contingency measures, and maintaining operational flexibility to mitigate disruptions. This includes redundancy planning, diversification of suppliers, and dynamic inventory management to ensure uninterrupted production and distribution. Sustainability integration addresses the growing imperative for environmental stewardship, emphasizing emissions reduction, resource efficiency, and compliance with international environmental standards. Technological enablement leverages digital tools, including predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and blockchain-based tracking systems, to enhance visibility, traceability, and data-driven decision-making across complex global supply networks. Expected outcomes of the framework include improved operational continuity, enhanced environmental performance, and optimized resource utilization. By proactively managing risks and integrating sustainable practices into supply chain design, multinational oil and gas enterprises can achieve measurable reductions in carbon footprint, minimize operational disruptions, and strengthen stakeholder confidence. Furthermore, the framework promotes organizational learning, knowledge sharing, and the adoption of best practices across regions and operational units, enabling scalable and replicable improvements. This underscores the importance of combining resilience, sustainability, and digital transformation in supply chain management for the oil and gas sector. The proposed framework provides a practical, evidence-based approach for multinational enterprises seeking to maintain competitiveness, enhance environmental performance, and achieve long-term operational and strategic sustainability in a rapidly evolving global energy landscape.},
      keywords = {Resilient Supply Chain, Oil and Gas Industry, Sustainability, Risk Management, Supply Chain Agility, Operational Efficiency, Environmental Compliance, Strategic Sourcing, Logistics Optimization, Disruption Mitigation, Predictive Analytics, Performance Monitoring, Energy Sector},
      month = {July},
  }