International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1710826

1710826 Vol 8 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics in Healthcare

Rishabh Agrawal Himanshu Kumar

Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences  ·  Area of research: Healthcare Data Analytics

DOI: 10.64388/IREV8I4-1710826

Abstract

The rapid digitization of healthcare has resulted in unprecedented levels of sensitive patient data being generated from electronic health records, imaging, wearables, and genomics. Even though this flood of data offers immense opportunity for advanced analytics and predictive modeling, traditional centralized machine learning approaches present daunting privacy, security, and regulatory challenges. Federated Learning (FL) is a paradigm-breaking technique that enables the joint training of models across numerous institutions without the need to transfer raw data to a common repository. In this paper, the theory foundations, implementation frameworks, and real-world implications of FL are described within the context of privacy-preserving healthcare analytics. We explain how FL leverages decentralized model updates, secure aggregation, differential privacy, and homomorphic encryption to mitigate threats such as data leakage, model inversion, and adversarial attacks. Through recent case studies, the paper demonstrates how FL has been employed in clinical decision support, medical imaging, and wearable health monitoring with satisfactory performance comparable to centralized models. We also introduce the unique challenges of FL deployment in healthcare, including data heterogeneity, communication bottlenecks, and privacy-utility trade-offs. We conclude by noting emerging trends like integration with blockchain, edge computing, and new cryptographic techniques that can further enhance the resilience and scalability of federated healthcare systems. By offering a well-balanced overview of the opportunities and challenges in this field, the paper offers practical recommendations for policymakers, researchers, practitioners, and data analysts that can balance innovation and privacy protection when dealing with data-driven healthcare.

Keywords

Federated Learning; Privacy-Preserving Analytics; Healthcare Data; Differential Privacy; Secure Aggregation

References

[1] Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).

[2] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information; Final rule. Federal Register, 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164.

[3] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification Rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Other Modifications to the HIPAA Rules. Federal Register, 78(17), 5566-5702.

[4] European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2016, April 27). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons about the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1-88.

[5] McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 54, 1273-1282.

[6] Koneĉný, J., McMahan, H. B., Yu, F. X., Richtárik, P., Suresh, A. T., & Bacon, D. (2016). Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492. https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05492

[7] Antunes, R. S., André da Costa, C., Küderle, A., Yari, I. A., & Eskofier, B. (2022). Federated learning for healthcare domain - pipeline, applications and challenges. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare, 3(4), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533708

[8] Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., ... & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1

[9] Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50-60.

[10] Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., ... & Seth, K. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1175-1191.

[11] Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., ... & Bakas, S. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 12598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1

[12] Li, W., Milletarì, F., Xu, D., Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Zhu, W., ... & Feng, A. (2019). Privacy-preserving federated brain tumour segmentation. International workshop on machine learning in medical imaging, 133-141. Springer.

[13] Li, X., Gu, Y., Dvornek, N., Staib, L. H., Ventola, P., & Duncan, J. S. (2020). Multi-site fMRI analysis using privacy-preserving federated learning and domain adaptation: ABIDE results. Medical Image Analysis, 65, 101765.

[14] Bonawitz, K., et al. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1175–1191.

[15] Brisimi, T. S., Chen, R., Mela, T., Olshevsky, A., Paschalidis, I. C., & Shi, W. (2018). Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 112, 59–67.

[16] Dwork, C. (2008). Differential privacy: A survey of results. Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, 1–19.

[17] Gentry, C. (2009). Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. STOC ’09 Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing.

[18] Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2021). Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(6), 473–484.

[19] McMahan, H. B., et al. (2018). Learning differentially private recurrent language models. International Conference on Learning Representations.

[20] Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2008). Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 111–125.

[21] Rieke, N., et al. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3, 119.

[22] Sheller, M. J., et al. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10, 12598.

[23] Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.

[24] Zhang, C., et al. (2021). Blockchain-based federated learning for privacy-preserving healthcare. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(4), 2343–2354.

[25] Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., … & van Overveldt, T. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale: System design. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 1, 374–388.

[26] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., … & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083

[27] Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2020.2975749

[28] McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. y. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 1273–1282.

[29] Papernot, N., Song, S., Mironov, I., Raghunathan, A., Talwar, K., & Erlingsson, Ú. (2018). Scalable private learning with PATE. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

[30] Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., … & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3, 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1

[31] Truex, S., Liu, L., Gursoy, M. E., Yu, L., & Wei, W. (2019). Demystifying membership inference attacks in machine learning as a service. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 14(6), 2073–2089. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2019.2897550

[32] Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298981

[33] Zhang, C., Xie, Y., Bai, H., Yu, B., Li, W., & Gao, Y. (2021). A survey on federated learning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 216, 106775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106775

[34] Bonawitz, K., et al. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. CCS 2017 / Google Research Publication.

[35] McMahan, H. B., et al. (2018). Learning differentially private recurrent language models. ICLR 2018 / arXiv.

[36] Gentry, C. (2009). A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. PhD thesis / STOC.

[37] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., et al. (2019). Advances and open problems in federated learning. arXiv / Foundations and Trends (2021 monograph).

[38] Bhagoji, A. N., et al. (2019). Analyzing federated learning through an adversarial lens. ICML 2019.

[39] Blanchard, P., et al. (2017). Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine-tolerant gradient descent (Krum). NeurIPS 2017.

[40] Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., Marcedone, A., McMahan, H. B., Patel, S., Ramage, D., Segal, A., & Seth, K. (2017). Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 1175–1191. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982

[41] McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2018). Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Models. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06963

[42] Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407. https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042

[43] Truex, S., Liu, L., Gursoy, M. E., Yu, L., & Wei, W. (2019). Demystifying Membership Inference Attacks in Machine Learning as a Service. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 14(6), 2073–2089. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2019.2897554

[44] Phong, L. T., Aono, Y., Hayashi, T., Wang, L., & Moriai, S. (2018). Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning via Additively Homomorphic Encryption. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 13(5), 1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2787987

[45] Hardy, S., Henecka, W., Ivey-Law, H., Nock, R., Patrini, G., Smith, G., & Thorne, B. (2017). Private Federated Learning on Vertically Partitioned Data via Entity Resolution and Additively Homomorphic Encryption. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10677.

[46] Hitaj, B., Ateniese, G., & Pérez-Cruz, F. (2017). Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134012

[47] Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep Learning with Differential Privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318

[48] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., … & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083

[49] Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., … & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3(119). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1

[50] Arxiv. (2020, May 27). Implementing federated learning in healthcare. https://arxiv.org/html/2409.09727v2

How to cite this paper

Rishabh Agrawal, Himanshu Kumar "Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics in Healthcare" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 8 Issue 4 2024 Page 863-875 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV8I4-1710826
Rishabh Agrawal, Himanshu Kumar "Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics in Healthcare" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 4, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV8I4-1710826
Rishabh Agrawal, Himanshu Kumar (2024). Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics in Healthcare. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 8(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV8I4-1710826
Rishabh Agrawal, Himanshu Kumar "Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics in Healthcare" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 8, no. 4, Oct. 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV8I4-1710826
@article{1710826,
      author = {Rishabh Agrawal, Himanshu Kumar},
      title = {Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Data Analytics in Healthcare},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {8},
      number = {4},
      pages = {863-875},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710826.pdf},
      abstract = {The rapid digitization of healthcare has resulted in unprecedented levels of sensitive patient data being generated from electronic health records, imaging, wearables, and genomics. Even though this flood of data offers immense opportunity for advanced analytics and predictive modeling, traditional centralized machine learning approaches present daunting privacy, security, and regulatory challenges. Federated Learning (FL) is a paradigm-breaking technique that enables the joint training of models across numerous institutions without the need to transfer raw data to a common repository. In this paper, the theory foundations, implementation frameworks, and real-world implications of FL are described within the context of privacy-preserving healthcare analytics. We explain how FL leverages decentralized model updates, secure aggregation, differential privacy, and homomorphic encryption to mitigate threats such as data leakage, model inversion, and adversarial attacks. Through recent case studies, the paper demonstrates how FL has been employed in clinical decision support, medical imaging, and wearable health monitoring with satisfactory performance comparable to centralized models. We also introduce the unique challenges of FL deployment in healthcare, including data heterogeneity, communication bottlenecks, and privacy-utility trade-offs. We conclude by noting emerging trends like integration with blockchain, edge computing, and new cryptographic techniques that can further enhance the resilience and scalability of federated healthcare systems. By offering a well-balanced overview of the opportunities and challenges in this field, the paper offers practical recommendations for policymakers, researchers, practitioners, and data analysts that can balance innovation and privacy protection when dealing with data-driven healthcare.},
      keywords = {Federated Learning; Privacy-Preserving Analytics; Healthcare Data; Differential Privacy; Secure Aggregation},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV8I4-1710826}
  }