Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711083
Employee Background Screening: A Key Tool for Workplace Trust, Safety, and Compliance
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Management
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I4-1711083-4181
Abstract
This paper examines technological innovations in background screening and their impact on workforce management. It explores the integration of AI-driven hiring tools, digital identity verification, and blockchain-based compliance systems, assessing their influence on efficiency, fairness, and global workforce mobility. Using a mixed-methods approach that combined surveys of multinational corporations with interviews of HR professionals, the study found that AI tools streamline processes and reduce administrative costs, blockchain enhances security and trust in identity verification, and perceptions of fairness strongly shape candidate trust in algorithmic decision-making. Furthermore, these technologies ease cross-border employment verification, supporting workforce mobility, yet they introduce ethical challenges linked to transparency and bias. The study concludes that organizations must balance technological efficiency with ethical oversight, recommending regulatory harmonization, bias-mitigation frameworks, and context-specific blockchain adoption.
Keywords
Background Screening, Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Digital Identity Verification, Global Workforce Mobility, Fairness, Human Resource Management
References
[1] Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691575
[2] Ajunwa, I. (2020). The paradox of automation as anti-bias intervention. Cardozo Law Review, 41(5), 1671–1742. https://cardozolawreview.com
[3] Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press. https://fairmlbook.org
[4] Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. (2019). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707
[5] Bauer, T. N., Erdogan, B., Caughlin, D. E., & Truxillo, D. M. (2020). Overqualified employees: Relations with voice, exit, loyalty, and neglect. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 103368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103368
[6] Bennett, C. J., & Raab, C. D. (2020). Revisiting the governance of privacy: Contemporary policy instruments in global perspective. Regulation & Governance, 14(3), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12223
[7] Bennett, J., & Robson, M. (2020). Safeguarding and employment screening in health and education sectors: A comparative review. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7), 913–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1687574
[8] Berkelaar, B. L. (2018). Different ways new information technologies influence conventional organizational practices and employment relationships: The case of cybervetting. Human Relations, 71(4), 565–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717727226
[9] Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). Help wanted: An examination of hiring algorithms, equity, and bias. Upturn. https://www.upturn.org/reports/2018/hiring-algorithms
[10] Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(5), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.7
[11] Brody, R. G., Melendy, S. R., & Perri, F. S. (2020). Fraud detection through background checks. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(3), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2020-0003
[12] Brown, V. R., & Vaughn, E. D. (2011). The writing on the (Facebook) wall: The use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9221-x
[13] Bushway, S. D., & Kalra, N. (2021). A policy review of employers’ open access to conviction records. Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-021622
[14] Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2019). New talent signals: Shiny new objects or a brave new world? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(2), 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.6
[15] Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2020). People profession 2030: A collective view of future trends. CIPD. https://www.cipd.org
[16] Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2020). Pre-employment checks: An international perspective. CIPD. https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge
[17] Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2021). Pre-employment checks: Employer practices and worker rights. CIPD. https://www.cipd.org/uk
[18] Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2022). Resourcing and talent planning survey 2022. CIPD. https://www.cipd.org/uk/knowledge/reports/resourcing-talent-planning
[19] Clay, J. M., & Stephens, E. C. (1995). Liability for negligent hiring: The importance of background checks. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/001088049503600527
[20] Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
[21] Colquitt, J. A., Baer, M. D., Long, D. M., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2022). Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: Building and reacting to trust among air traffic controllers. Academy of Management Journal, 65(1), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0561
[22] Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757
[23] Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2019). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790723.001.0001
[24] Cooper, M. D., Spence, C., & Lee, T. R. (2022). Human factors and safety-critical roles: Screening, monitoring, and managing competence. Safety Science, 151, 105726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105726
[25] Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099
[26] De Stefano, V. (2022). Algorithmic hiring and EU data protection: Towards fairness in automated recruitment. European Labour Law Journal, 13(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525221079312
[27] Dhemba, J., & Dhemba, B. (2019). Employment and social protection in Southern Africa: Emerging issues and policy responses. Development Southern Africa, 36(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2018.1548963
[28] EEOC. (2021). Guidance on algorithmic decision-making in employment. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov
[29] ENISA. (2020). Remote identity proofing: Analysis of methods to carry out identity proofing remotely. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications
[30] European Commission. (2021). Data protection rules as a trust-enabler in the EU and beyond – Taking stock. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/01526
[31] European Commission. (2021). Employment and social developments in Europe 2021. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2767/13466
[32] European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation on artificial intelligence. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206
[33] European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
[34] European Union. (2018). General Data Protection Regulation. https://gdpr.eu
[35] European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2020). Getting the future right: Artificial intelligence and fundamental rights. Publications Office of the European Union. https://fra.europa.eu
[36] European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2021). Data protection and employment: Trends and developments 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. https://fra.europa.eu
[37] European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2020). Remote identity proofing: Analysis of methods to carry out identity proofing remotely. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications
[38] Fletcher, K. (2019). Ethics and trust in employment background checks: The balance of transparency and control. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 31(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-019-09341-7
[39] Gilliland, S. W., & Hale, J. (2017). The science of fairness in employment selection. In M. Frese & J. Keith (Eds.), Successful personnel selection and development (pp. 112–130). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737756
[40] Greenberg, J. (2020). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1259–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320917865
[41] Greene, E. (2002). Negligent hiring: Holding employers liable for screening failures. Labor Law Journal, 53(2), 67–74.
[42] Harris, J., & Jeske, D. (2022). Digital pre-employment checks and organizational outcomes: Balancing efficiency with fairness. Employee Relations, 44(6), 1245–1262. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2021-0295
[43] Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
[44] Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118–127. https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain
[45] International Labour Organization. (2019). The future of work in law and practice. ILO. https://www.ilo.org
[46] International Labour Organization. (2020). Global employment policies for the digital age. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications
[47] International Labour Organization. (2020). Guidelines on employment background checks and labor rights. ILO Publications. https://www.ilo.org
[48] International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2021
[49] International Labour Organization. (2021). Data protection and workers’ rights: Global report. ILO Publications. https://www.ilo.org
[50] Jeske, D., & Shultz, K. S. (2016). Using social media content for screening in recruitment and selection: Pros and cons. Work, Employment and Society, 30(3), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015613746
[51] Kim, P. T. (2022). Data-driven discrimination at work. William & Mary Law Review, 63(3), 857–924. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol63/iss3/4
[52] Khosla, N., & McGuire, J. (2023). Patient safety, workforce integrity, and the role of credential verification in healthcare. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 37(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-06-2022-0229
[53] Konradt, U., Diener, E., & Li, K. (2020). A meta-analysis of change in applicants’ perceptions of fairness. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(3–4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12305
[54] Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol165/iss3/3
[55] Kuhn, K. M., Milasi, S., & Yoon, S. Y. (2020). Screening with fairness: Balancing safety, ethics, and compliance in recruitment. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(3), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
[56] Kuhn, T. (2020). Ethics and governance in employee risk management: Rethinking proportionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3971-7
[57] Lam, H., Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2021). The relationship between procedural justice and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103517
[58] Lageson, S., & Stewart, R. (2024). The problem with criminal records: Discrepancies between state reports and private-sector background checks. Criminology, 62(1), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12359
[59] Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684
[60] Lee, S. (2021). Background screening trends in Asia: Regulatory convergence and corporate governance. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16(2), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.12
[61] Lin, X., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Corporate fraud prevention and employee screening: Evidence from Chinese financial institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04911-8
[62] Lodge, M., & Hood, C. (2020). From digital government to algorithmic regulation? Risks, opportunities, and the prospects for accountability. Regulation & Governance, 14(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12220
[63] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
[64] Martin, K. (2019). Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3
[65] Martin, K. E., & Shilton, K. (2016). Why experience matters to ethical decision making in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(3), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9649-1
[66] McElhattan, D. (2021). The exception as the rule: Negligent hiring liability, structured uncertainty, and the rise of criminal background checks in the United States. Law & Social Inquiry, 46(2), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12345
[67] Minor, D., Persico, N., & Weiss, D. (2018). Criminal background and job performance. American Economic Review, 108(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151575
[68] Nguyen, T., & Klein, H. K. (2020). Compliance, legitimacy, and institutional pressures: A study of financial institutions’ employee vetting practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04315-7
[69] Nguyen, T. T., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2019). AI and hiring: Predicting candidate suitability from multimodal data. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 15(3), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309197
[70] Noble, S. M., Foster, L. L., & Craig, S. B. (2021). The procedural and interpersonal justice of automated application and resume screening. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12320
[71] Noble, S. U., Roberts, S. T., & Benjamin, R. (2021). The ethics of hiring algorithms: Procedural justice, transparency, and fairness. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121996042
[72] Nunn, A., Johnson, S., & Monro, S. (2021). Algorithmic fairness in recruitment: Evidence and interventions. Work, Employment and Society, 35(4), 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020956979
[73] OECD. (2019). Employment outlook 2019: The future of work. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en
[74] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Artificial intelligence in society. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en
[75] OECD. (2021). Using artificial intelligence to help combat COVID-19. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses
[76] Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
[77] Parker, C. (2002). The open corporation: Effective self-regulation and democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550032
[78] Petriglieri, G. (2020). F**k science? An invitation to humanize organization studies. Organization Studies, 41(10), 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620934065
[79] Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In F. X. Olleros & M. Zhegu (Eds.), Research handbook on digital transformations (pp. 225–253). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717766.00019
[80] Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372828
[81] Rigotti, T. (2024). Digital hiring platforms and perceived fairness: A global study. Human Resource Management Review, 34(1), 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100915
[82] Rosenblat, A., Kneese, T., & boyd, d. (2019). Algorithmic invisibility: Unequal visibility of risks and harms in data-driven hiring. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719858741
[83] Rothstein, M. A. (2018). Ethical challenges in pre-employment background checks. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(3), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518804221
[84] Schoeffer, J., & Kuehl, N. (2021). Fairness and bias in algorithmic recruitment: An empirical review. Business Research, 14(3), 1035–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-021-00148-9
[85] SHRM. (2021). Background screening trends and practices report. Society for Human Resource Management. https://www.shrm.org
[86] SHRM. (2022). Background screening: Trends and best practices. Society for Human Resource Management. https://www.shrm.org
[87] Smit, B., & De Beer, L. T. (2021). Employee vetting and workplace risk management: Practices and challenges in the digital era. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(17), 3645–3667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674362
[88] Stoll, M. A., & Bushway, S. (2019). The effect of criminal background checks on hiring ex-offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(1), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12415
[89] Strohmeier, S., & Piazza, F. (2015). Artificial intelligence techniques in human resource management: A conceptual exploration. In T. Bondarouk & H. Ruel (Eds.), Electronic HRM in theory and practice (pp. 149–172). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120150000011009
[90] Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910
[91] Todolí-Signes, A. (2019). Algorithmic management, labor rights and the gig economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 25(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258919843498
[92] Timmons, C. J. (2021). Privacy and fairness in employment screening. Employee Relations Law Journal, 46(3), 45–62. https://www.lawjournalnewsletters.com
[93] Trindade, R. (2014). Workplace violence and pre-employment screening. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(3), 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12406
[94] Tursunbayeva, A., Di Lauro, S., & Pagliari, C. (2018). People analytics—A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.002
[95] Upadhyay, A. K., & Khandelwal, K. (2019). Applying artificial intelligence: Implications for recruitment. Strategic HR Review, 18(5), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-04-2019-0021
[96] van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021). When the machine meets the expert: An ethnography of developing AI for hiring. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1557–1580. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16252
[97] van Esch, P., Black, J. S., & Ferolie, J. (2021). Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106578
[98] Vosen, E. (2021). Social media screening and procedural justice: Towards fairer use of social media in selection. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 33(4), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09372-4
[99] Walsh, B. M. (2010). Investigating the moderating role of cultural practices on the effect of selection fairness perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00519.x
[100] Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
[101] World Economic Forum. (2022). Responsible use of technology in HR. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org
[102] Zarsky, T. Z. (2016). The trouble with algorithmic decisions: An analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575
How to cite this paper
@article{1711083,
author = {Princewill Oseghale ABUMERE },
title = {Employee Background Screening: A Key Tool for Workplace Trust, Safety, and Compliance},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {4},
pages = {134-160},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711083.pdf},
abstract = {This paper examines technological innovations in background screening and their impact on workforce management. It explores the integration of AI-driven hiring tools, digital identity verification, and blockchain-based compliance systems, assessing their influence on efficiency, fairness, and global workforce mobility. Using a mixed-methods approach that combined surveys of multinational corporations with interviews of HR professionals, the study found that AI tools streamline processes and reduce administrative costs, blockchain enhances security and trust in identity verification, and perceptions of fairness strongly shape candidate trust in algorithmic decision-making. Furthermore, these technologies ease cross-border employment verification, supporting workforce mobility, yet they introduce ethical challenges linked to transparency and bias. The study concludes that organizations must balance technological efficiency with ethical oversight, recommending regulatory harmonization, bias-mitigation frameworks, and context-specific blockchain adoption.},
keywords = {Background Screening, Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Digital Identity Verification, Global Workforce Mobility, Fairness, Human Resource Management},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711083-4181}
}