Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711097
Empirical Review of Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics in Private Credit Investment Portfolios
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Investment Management
Abstract
Private credit has emerged as a pivotal asset class within institutional investment portfolios, offering enhanced yield potential, diversification benefits, and exposure to non-traditional credit markets. However, the illiquid and heterogeneous nature of private credit instruments poses significant challenges in accurately assessing performance relative to risk. This presents an empirical review of risk-adjusted return metrics employed in private credit investment portfolios, examining their effectiveness in capturing both the returns and the inherent risks associated with diverse debt strategies, including direct lending, mezzanine financing, and distressed debt. This evaluates widely applied metrics such as the Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Information ratio, and alpha-beta decomposition, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations in the context of private credit. Emphasis is placed on metrics that account for asymmetric return profiles, downside risk, and the illiquidity premium that often characterizes mid-market lending and non-syndicated debt. The study also considers methodological challenges, including data availability, survivorship bias, and difficulties in benchmarking across heterogeneous portfolios. Empirical evidence from historical fund performance indicates that risk-adjusted returns in private credit are influenced by instrument type, leverage, sectoral concentration, macroeconomic cycles, and regional market conditions, with notable variation across developed and emerging markets. Findings suggest that while traditional risk-adjusted metrics provide valuable insights, they may inadequately capture idiosyncratic risks and liquidity constraints inherent in private credit. The study underscores the importance of incorporating scenario analysis, stress testing, and performance benchmarking when evaluating portfolio outcomes. Overall, this empirical review highlights the critical role of risk-adjusted return metrics in guiding allocation, monitoring, and investment decisions in private credit. It emphasizes the need for iterative refinement of performance measurement approaches, including the development of customized metrics that integrate liquidity considerations, default risk, and ESG factors, to support more informed and resilient portfolio management strategies.
Keywords
Risk-Adjusted Returns, Private Credit, Portfolio Performance, Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Information Ratio, Alpha, Beta, Treynor Ratio, Value-At-Risk, Portfolio Diversification, Credit Risk Assessment, Return Decomposition, Active Management Evaluation, Benchmark Comparison
References
[1] Abass, O.S., Balogun, O. & Didi P.U., 2019. A Predictive Analytics Framework for Optimizing Preventive Healthcare Sales and Engagement Outcomes. IRE Journals, 2(11), pp.497–503.
[2] Adams, J.C., Hayunga, D.K. and Mansi, S., 2018. Scale and performance in active management are not negatively related. Critical Finance Review, forthcoming.
[3] Adewoyin, M. A., Ogunnowo, E. O., Fiemotongha, J. E., Igunma, T. O., & Adeleke, A. K. (2019). A conceptual framework for dynamic mechanical analysis in high-performance material selection. IRE Journals, 4(5), 15–22.
[4] Adolfssson, A. and Åström, M., 2016. Development Finance Institutions’ Effect on The Fund Manager’s Investment Decisions: Balancing Financial Performance Goals and Development Impact Objectives.
[5] Adrian, T., Fleming, M., Shachar, O. and Vogt, E., 2017. Market liquidity after the financial crisis. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 9(1), pp.43-83.
[6] Agostino, M. and Trivieri, F., 2017. Collateral in lending relationships. A study on European SMEs microdata. International Review of Applied Economics, 31(3), pp.339-356.
[7] Akonobi, A. B., & Okpokwu, C. O. (2019). Designing a Customer-Centric Performance Model for Digital Lending Systems in Emerging Markets. IRE Journals, 3(4), 395–402. ISSN: 2456-8880
[8] Albers, A., Heimicke, J., Hirschter, T., Richter, T., Reiß, N., Maier, A. and Bursac, N., 2018. Managing systems of objectives in the agile development of mechatronic systems by ASD-agile systems design. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.
[9] Amenc, N., Ducoulombier, F., Goltz, F. and Ulahel, J., 2016. Ten misconceptions about smart beta. Edhec. Risk Institute.
[10] Anthonisz, S.A. and Putniņš, T.J., 2017. Asset pricing with downside liquidity risks. Management Science, 63(8), pp.2549-2572.
[11] Aplet, G.H. and Mckinley, P.S., 2017. A portfolio approach to managing ecological risks of global change. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 3(2), p.e01261.
[12] Augustyniak, M. and Boudreault, M., 2018. Risks & Rewards [online]
[13] Ayanbode, N., Cadet, E., Etim, E. D., Essien, I. A., & Ajayi, J. O. (2019). Deep learning approaches for malware detection in large-scale networks. IRE Journals, 3(1), 483–502. ISSN: 2456-8880
[14] Balogun, O., Abass, O.S. & Didi P.U., 2019. A Multi-Stage Brand Repositioning Framework for Regulated FMCG Markets in Sub Saharan Africa. IRE Journals, 2(8), pp.236–242.
[15] Bandelj, A., 2016. Should banks be geographically diversified? Empirical evidence from cross-country diversification of European banks. The European Journal of Finance, 22(2), pp.143-166.
[16] Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). Strategic cost forecasting framework for SaaS companies to improve budget accuracy and operational efficiency. IRE Journals, 2(10), 421–428. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709860.pdf
[17] Barbera, C., Jones, M., Korac, S., Saliterer, I. and Steccolini, I., 2017. Governmental financial resilience under austerity in Austria, England and Italy: how do local governments cope with financial shocks?. Public Administration, 95(3), pp.670-697.
[18] Batten, J.A. and Vo, X.V., 2016. Bank risk shifting and diversification in an emerging market. Risk Management, 18(4), pp.217-235.
[19] Benford, J., Joy, M., Kruger, M. and Best, T., 2016. Sovereign GDP-linked bonds. Bank of England Financial Stability Paper, (39).
[20] Brown, S.D., Nussbaum, B.B. and Pharm, B.S., 2018. Strategic Planning Advice. Am J Health-Syst Pharm, 75(2).
[21] Cerqueiro, G., Ongena, S. and Roszbach, K., 2016. Collateralization, bank loan rates, and monitoring. The Journal of Finance, 71(3), pp.1295-1322.
[22] Chambers, D.R., Black, K.H. and Lacey, N.J., 2018. Alternative investments: A primer for investment professionals. CFA Institute Research Foundation.
[23] Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). Business process intelligence for global enterprises: Optimizing vendor relations with analytical dashboards. IRE Journals, 2(8), 261–268. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710453.pdf
[24] Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). Blockchain-enabled systems fostering transparent corporate governance, reducing corruption, and improving global financial accountability. IRE Journals, 3(3), 259–263. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710455.pdf
[25] Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). AI-driven fraud detection enhancing financial auditing efficiency and ensuring improved organizational governance integrity. IRE Journals, 2(11), 556–562. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710454.pdf
[26] Damodaran, A., 2016. Country risk: determinants, measures and implications–The 2016 Edition. Measures and Implications–The.
[27] Didi P.U., Abass, O.S. & Balogun, O., 2019. A Multi-Tier Marketing Framework for Renewable Infrastructure Adoption in Emerging Economies. IRE Journals, 3(4), pp.337–345.
[28] Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D. and Sokolov, B., 2018. Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature. International journal of production research, 56(1-2), pp.414-430.
[29] Eccles, R.G. and Serafeim, G., 2017. Corporate and integrated reporting: A functional perspective. In Corporate stewardship (pp. 156-171). Routledge.
[30] Etim, E. D., Essien, I. A., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., & Obuse, E. (2019). AI-augmented intrusion detection: Advancements in real-time cyber threat recognition. IRE Journals, 3(3), 225–230. ISSN: 2456-8880
[31] Evans-Uzosike, I.O. & Okatta, C.G., 2019. Strategic Human Resource Management: Trends, Theories, and Practical Implications. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(4), pp.264-270
[32] Fasasi, S. T., Adebowale, O. J., Abdulsalam, A., & Nwokediegwu, Z. Q. S. (2019). Benchmarking performance metrics of methane monitoring technologies in simulated environments. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(3), 193–202.
[33] Fidanoski, F., Choudhry, M., Davidović, M. and Sergi, B.S., 2018. What does affect profitability of banks in Croatia?. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(4), pp.338-367.
[34] Foster, F.D. and Warren, G.J., 2016. Interviews with institutional investors: The how and why of active investing. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 17(1), pp.60-84.
[35] Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J.T. and Morse, A., 2016. Asset managers: Institutional performance and smart betas (No. w22982). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[36] Giacoletti, M. and Westrupp, V., 2017. The risk-adjusted performance of asset flippers. Available at SSRN 2892439.
[37] Guidolin, M. and Orlov, A.G., 2018. Can Investors Benefit from Hedge Fund Strategies? Utility‐Based, Out‐of‐Sample Evidence. Utility‐Based, Out‐of‐Sample Evidence (August 2018). BAFFI CAREFIN Centre Research Paper, (2018-90).
[38] Hammenfors, I. and Hafskjær, R., 2017. Financial Performance of Ethical Investments.
[39] Inderst, G. and Stewart, F., 2018. Incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into fixed income investment. World Bank Group publication, April.
[40] Jobst, A.A., 2018. Credit risk dynamics of infrastructure investment: considerations for financial regulators. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8373).
[41] KIMBRO, M.B. and W WEHRLY, E.R.I.C., 2017. Capital Planning, Selection, and Investment (Integrating Sustainability in Decision-making). Journal of Management for Global Sustainability, 5(2), p.8.
[42] Kopits, G., Ferrarini, B. and Ramayandi, A., 2016. Exploring risk-adjusted fiscal sustainability analysis for Asian economies. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, (483).
[43] Liu, J., Hull, V., Godfray, H.C.J., Tilman, D., Gleick, P., Hoff, H., Pahl-Wostl, C., Xu, Z., Chung, M.G., Sun, J. and Li, S., 2018. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nature sustainability, 1(9), pp.466-476.
[44] Low, R.K.Y., Alcock, J., Faff, R. and Brailsford, T., 2018. Canonical vine copulas in the context of modern portfolio management: Are they worth it?. Asymmetric Dependence in Finance: Diversification, Correlation and Portfolio Management in Market Downturns, pp.263-289.
[45] Lydenberg, S., 2016. Integrating systemic risk into modern portfolio theory and practice. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), pp.56-61.
[46] Malhotra, Y., 2017. Stress Testing for Cyber Risks: Cyber Risk Insurance Modeling beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR): Risk, Uncertainty, and, Profit for the Cyber Era. SSRN.
[47] Mishra, P., Montiel, P. and Sengupta, R., 2016. Monetary transmission in developing countries: Evidence from India. In Monetary policy in India: A modern macroeconomic perspective (pp. 59-110). New Delhi: Springer India.
[48] Mostafa, F., Dillon, T. and Chang, E., 2017. Computational intelligence applications to option pricing, volatility forecasting and value at risk. Springer International Publishing.
[49] Nwaimo, C.S., Oluoha, O.M. & Oyedokun, O., 2019. Big Data Analytics: Technologies, Applications, and Future Prospects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(11), pp.411-419.
[50] Nwokediegwu, Z. S., Bankole, A. O., & Okiye, S. E. (2019). Advancing interior and exterior construction design through large-scale 3D printing: A comprehensive review. IRE Journals, 3(1), 422-449. ISSN: 2456-8880
[51] Okenwa, O. K., Uzozie, O. T., & Onaghinor, O. (2019). Supply chain risk management strategies for mitigating geopolitical and economic risks. IRE Journals, 2(9), 242–258. https://irejournals.com
[52] Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). A dual-pressure model for healthcare finance: Comparing United States and African strategies under inflationary stress. IRE Journals, 3(6), 261–265. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710317.pdf
[53] Pan, K. and Zeng, Y., 2017. ETF arbitrage under liquidity mismatch. Available at SSRN 3723406.
[54] Pueyo, A., 2018. What constrains renewable energy investment in Sub-Saharan Africa? A comparison of Kenya and Ghana. World Development, 109, pp.85-100.
[55] SHARMA, A., ADEKUNLE, B.I., OGEAWUCHI, J.C., ABAYOMI, A.A. and ONIFADE, O., 2019. IoT-enabled Predictive Maintenance for Mechanical Systems: Innovations in Real-time Monitoring and Operational Excellence.
[56] Stuck, J., Broekel, T. and Revilla Diez, J., 2016. Network structures in regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 24(3), pp.423-442.
[57] Umoren, O., Didi, P.U., Balogun, O., Abass, O.S. & Akinrinoye, O.V., 2019. Linking Macroeconomic Analysis to Consumer Behavior Modeling for Strategic Business Planning in Evolving Market Environments. IRE Journals, 3(3), pp.203-210.
[58] Ung, D. and Luk, P., 2016. What is in your smart beta portfolio? A fundamental and macroeconomic analysis. The Journal of Index Investing, 7(1), p.49.
[59] Uzozie, O. T., Onaghinor, O., & Okenwa, O. K. (2019). The influence of big data analytics on supply chain decision-making. IRE Journals, 3(2), 754–770. https://irejournals.com
[60] Vermeulen, L.C., Kolesar, J., Crismon, M.L., Flynn, A.J., Stevenson, J.G., Almeter, P.J., Heath, W.M., Short, G.T., Enright, S.M., Ploetz, P. and Swarthout, M.D., 2018. ASHP Foundation Pharmacy Forecast 2018: Strategic planning advice for pharmacy departments in hospitals and health systems. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 75(2), pp.23-54.
[61] Weber, B., Staub-Bisang, M. and Alfen, H.W., 2016. Infrastructure as an asset class: investment strategy, sustainability, project finance and PPP. John wiley & sons.
[62] Zuber, P., 2017. Risk, return, responsibility–Inclusion of ESG criteria in a portfolio optimization framework. CMF Thesis Series, (23).
How to cite this paper
@article{1711097,
author = {Blessing Olajumoke Farounbi, Chizoba Michael Okafor, Esther Ebunoluwa Oguntegbe},
title = {Empirical Review of Risk-Adjusted Return Metrics in Private Credit Investment Portfolios},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2019},
volume = {3},
number = {4},
pages = {494-505},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711097.pdf},
abstract = {Private credit has emerged as a pivotal asset class within institutional investment portfolios, offering enhanced yield potential, diversification benefits, and exposure to non-traditional credit markets. However, the illiquid and heterogeneous nature of private credit instruments poses significant challenges in accurately assessing performance relative to risk. This presents an empirical review of risk-adjusted return metrics employed in private credit investment portfolios, examining their effectiveness in capturing both the returns and the inherent risks associated with diverse debt strategies, including direct lending, mezzanine financing, and distressed debt. This evaluates widely applied metrics such as the Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, Information ratio, and alpha-beta decomposition, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations in the context of private credit. Emphasis is placed on metrics that account for asymmetric return profiles, downside risk, and the illiquidity premium that often characterizes mid-market lending and non-syndicated debt. The study also considers methodological challenges, including data availability, survivorship bias, and difficulties in benchmarking across heterogeneous portfolios. Empirical evidence from historical fund performance indicates that risk-adjusted returns in private credit are influenced by instrument type, leverage, sectoral concentration, macroeconomic cycles, and regional market conditions, with notable variation across developed and emerging markets. Findings suggest that while traditional risk-adjusted metrics provide valuable insights, they may inadequately capture idiosyncratic risks and liquidity constraints inherent in private credit. The study underscores the importance of incorporating scenario analysis, stress testing, and performance benchmarking when evaluating portfolio outcomes. Overall, this empirical review highlights the critical role of risk-adjusted return metrics in guiding allocation, monitoring, and investment decisions in private credit. It emphasizes the need for iterative refinement of performance measurement approaches, including the development of customized metrics that integrate liquidity considerations, default risk, and ESG factors, to support more informed and resilient portfolio management strategies.},
keywords = {Risk-Adjusted Returns, Private Credit, Portfolio Performance, Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Information Ratio, Alpha, Beta, Treynor Ratio, Value-At-Risk, Portfolio Diversification, Credit Risk Assessment, Return Decomposition, Active Management Evaluation, Benchmark Comparison},
month = {October},
}