Analyzing the Prevalence and Factor Contributing to Examination Malpractice in Nigerian University (Case Study Federal University Lokoja)

References

[1] Adebayo, T. (2020). Social learning theory in the context of examination malpractice. Journal of Sociology and Education, 18(3), 102–116.

[2] Adamu, A. (2020). The role of socio-economic factors in examination malpractice. Journal ofEducation and Development, 15(4), 193–205.

[3] Adedeji, M., & Olatunji, A. (2021). The impact of examination malpractice on educationalstandards in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 112–125.

[4] Adedeji, S., & Olatunji, T. (2021a). Prevalence of examination malpractice in Nigerian universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 29(4), 237–251.

[5] Adedeji, S., & Olatunji, T. (2021b). The consequences of examination malpractice on educational integrity. Journal of Educational Review, 28(3), 193–207.

[6] Adeyemi, K., & Oyetakin, K. (2020). Examination malpractice and its implications for higher education in Nigeria. Journal of Educational Management, 6(2), 70–85.

[7] Agboola, A., & Adewale, O. (2021). Strain theory and academic dishonesty: Insights from Nigerian universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(1), 78–91.

[8] Akaranga, S. I., & Ongong, J. J. (2013). The phenomenon of examination malpractice: Anexample of Nairobi and Kenyatta Universities. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(18),87–96.

[9] Akinyele, T., & Adeyeye, O. (2018). Technology as a tool for examination malpractice prevention in Nigerian universities. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation,3(1), 41–56.

[10] Aluede, O., Oni, D., & Imoize, A. (2006). The social consequences of examination malpractice in Nigeria. Journal of Social Issues in Education, 13(2), 45–59.

[11] Alutu, A. (2005). The historical context of examination malpractice in Nigeria. African Journal of Educational Studies, 11(1), 14–25.

[12] Audu, A., Bako, S., & Idris, T. (2018). Socio-economic pressures and academic dishonesty in Nigerian universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 125–140.

[13] Bamgboye, A. (2019). Corruption in the examination process: A survey of university practices in Nigeria. African Journal of Educational Integrity, 4(3), 36–50.

[14] Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2).

[15] British Psychological Society. (2018). BPS code of human research ethics. British Psychological Society.

[16] Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

[17] Bulus, A. (2019). Economic implications of examination malpractice. Nigerian Journal of Economic Studies, 24(1), 87–105.

[18] Bulus, M. (2019). The implications of examination malpractice on human capital development in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 190–205.

[19] Chukwudi, E. (2021). Technological advancements and examination malpractice in Nigerianuniversities. Journal of Information Technology in Education, 22(3), 145–159.

[20] Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.

[21] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

[22] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

[23] DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.

[24] Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

[25] Ezekiel, O., Nwokocha, A., & Obasi, C. (2020). The impact of the internet on examinationmalpractice. Journal of Digital Learning, 11(2), 99–112.

[26] Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

[27] Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Sage.

[28] Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment,7(3), 238–247.

[29] Ibrahim, Y., & Shuaibu, A. (2019). Socio-economic challenges and examination malpractice: A study of Nigerian tertiary institutions. Journal of Educational Research in Africa, 7(2), 34–49.

[30] Iroha, J. (2021). Social media and academic dishonesty: Implications for Nigerian universities. African Journal of Educational Management, 10(1), 78–90.

[31] Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International.

[32] Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology,22(140), 1–55.

[33] Lohr, S. L. (2019). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

[34] National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Government Printing Office.

[35] Nduka, P., & Igwe, L. (2017). Academic preparedness and its relationship with examinationmalpractice in Nigerian universities. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(3), 78–85.

[36] Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advancesin Health Sciences Education, 15, 625–632.

[37] Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

[38] Nwaokugha, D., & Onyeike, V. (2022). Individual factors contributing to examination malpractice in Nigerian universities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(2), 54–68.

[39] Obafemi, A., & Adediran, O. (2021). Strategies for combating examination malpractice in the digital age: The role of technology. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(3), 215–230.

[40] Ogunji, J. A. (2011). Examination malpractice in Nigerian educational system: Causes, effects,and the way out. International Journal of Management and Business Studies, 1(3), 1–7.

[41] Okafor, C., & Okolie, I. (2020). Institutional enforcement and students’ cost–benefit analysis of malpractice. International Journal of Academic Integrity, 5(2), 44–59.

[42] Olatunji, K. (2021). Effective monitoring and examination malpractice: A comparative analysisin Nigerian universities. Journal of Educational Management, 6(2), 70–85.

[43] Olatunji, O. (2021). Effective policies for reducing examination malpractice in universities.Journal of Education Policy Review, 19(3), 209–223.

[44] Omonijo, D. O., Adekeye, O. A., Anyaegbunam, M. C., & Olowookere, E. I. (2021).Institutional factors facilitating examination malpractice in Nigerian universities. Journalof Social Sciences and Humanities, 21(2), 98–115.

[45] Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

[46] West African Examinations Council. (2020). Annual report on examination malpractice. https://www.waecdirect.org

@article{1711142,
      author = {Kingsley Bessong Enu, Olubunmi Temitope  Olorunpomi, Emmanuel Oloruntoba Ajare, Toluwani John Dare},
      title = {Analyzing the Prevalence and Factor Contributing to Examination Malpractice in Nigerian University (Case Study Federal University Lokoja)},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {391-402},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711142.pdf},
      abstract = {This study investigates the prevalence and underlying factors of examination malpractice at Nigerian University using a mixed-methods approach. It explores the extent of malpractice across faculties and academic levels, socio-economic drivers, and the academic and institutional consequences. Results reveal that examination malpractice remains a significant challenge, with a notable proportion of students reporting direct involvement or observation. Although, financial pressures and family expectations were not consistently cited as major contributors, the competitive job market emerged as a key factor motivating unethical practices. The study also highlights the detrimental effects of malpractice on students? academic performance, professional readiness, and the university?s reputation. To address these issues, a multifaceted approach is recommended, including stricter enforcement of regulations, targeted awareness campaigns, enhanced student support services, and periodic policy reviews to strengthen academic integrity and institutional credibility.},
      keywords = {Academic Integrity, Examination Malpractice, Higher Education; Policy Enforcement, Student Behavior},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711142-2720}
  }