International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711333

1711333 Vol 2 · Issue 9 Download Paper

Approximation Complexity Model for Cloud-Based Database Optimization Problems

Olushola Damilare Odejobi Nafiu Ikeoluwa Hammed Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Cloud Database Optimization

Abstract

Cloud-based database systems have become critical infrastructure for modern enterprises, supporting large-scale data storage, analytics, and transactional processing. However, the optimization of such databases?including query execution, resource allocation, indexing, and replication?presents significant computational challenges due to the combinatorial nature of underlying problems and the scale of cloud environments. Exact solutions are often intractable, particularly when multiple performance, cost, and reliability constraints must be satisfied simultaneously. This develops an approximation complexity model to analyze and address the computational limits of cloud database optimization problems, providing a framework for designing efficient, scalable, and near-optimal solutions. The proposed model formalizes key database optimization tasks as computational problems and characterizes their approximation hardness, identifying classes of problems where polynomial-time algorithms can guarantee provable bounds on solution quality. By integrating approximation algorithms with heuristic and metaheuristic strategies, the model enables the practical resolution of complex optimization tasks under resource and SLA constraints. The framework further incorporates multi-dimensional performance metrics, including query latency, throughput, storage efficiency, energy consumption, and fault tolerance, allowing a balanced assessment of trade-offs between computational efficiency and solution optimality. In addition, the model addresses cloud-specific considerations such as elasticity, multi-tenancy, and geographically distributed resources, highlighting the interaction between database optimization complexity and dynamic cloud infrastructure. Analytical insights derived from the approximation complexity characterization guide the design of algorithmic solutions that are both theoretically grounded and practically deployable in real-world cloud environments. The outcomes of this, provide a structured methodology for understanding the computational boundaries of cloud database optimization, informing decision-making for query scheduling, indexing, replication, and resource management. Future extensions of the model could incorporate AI-driven predictive analytics and real-time monitoring to further improve approximation strategies, enabling autonomous, adaptive, and efficient cloud database operations that meet performance, cost, and reliability objectives at scale.

Keywords

Approximation Complexity, Cloud-Based Databases, Database Optimization, Query Optimization, Resource Allocation, Computational Complexity, Algorithm Design, Approximation Algorithms, Heuristics, Cloud Infrastructure, Cost-Aware Optimization, Latency Reduction, Load Balancing, Elastic Scaling, Performance Tuning, Data Partitioning

References

[1] Adadi, A. and Berrada, M., 2018. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE access, 6, pp.52138-52160.

[2] Ajayi, J. O., & [Additional authors if available]. (n.d.). An expenditure monitoring model for capital project efficiency in governmental and large-scale private sector institutions. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[3] Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., Obuse, E., Ayanbode, N., & Cadet, E. (n.d.). Anomaly detection frameworks for early-stage threat identification in secure digital infrastructure environments. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[4] Anderson, D.N., Osting, B., Vorwerk, J., Dorval, A.D. and Butson, C.R., 2018. Optimized programming algorithm for cylindrical and directional deep brain stimulation electrodes. Journal of neural engineering, 15(2), p.026005.

[5] Asch, M., Moore, T., Badia, R., Beck, M., Beckman, P., Bidot, T., Bodin, F., Cappello, F., Choudhary, A., De Supinski, B. and Deelman, E., 2018. Big data and extreme-scale computing: Pathways to convergence-toward a shaping strategy for a future software and data ecosystem for scientific inquiry. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 32(4), pp.435-479.

[6] Ashraf, M.I., Liu, C.F., Bennis, M., Saad, W. and Hong, C.S., 2018. Dynamic resource allocation for optimized latency and reliability in vehicular networks. IEEE Access, 6, pp.63843-63858.

[7] Ayanbode, N., Cadet, E., Etim, E. D., Essien, I. A., & Ajayi, J. O. (2019). Deep learning approaches for malware detection in large-scale networks. IRE Journals, 3(1), 483–489. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710371.pdf

[8] Ayanbode, N., Cadet, E., Etim, E. D., Essien, I. A., & Ajayi, J. O. (n.d.). Developing AI-augmented intrusion detection systems for cloud-based financial platforms with real-time risk analysis. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[9] Babatunde, L. A., Cadet, E., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., Obuse, E., Ayanbode, N., & Essien, I. A. (n.d.). Simplifying third-party risk oversight through scalable digital governance tools. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[10] Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). Strategic cost forecasting framework for SaaS companies to improve budget accuracy and operational efficiency. IRE Journals, 2(10), 421–432.

[11] Belay, A., Prekas, G., Primorac, M., Klimovic, A., Grossman, S., Kozyrakis, C. and Bugnion, E., 2016. The IX operating system: Combining low latency, high throughput, and efficiency in a protected dataplane. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 34(4), pp.1-39.

[12] Belay, A., Prekas, G., Primorac, M., Klimovic, A., Grossman, S., Kozyrakis, C. and Bugnion, E., 2016. The IX operating system: Combining low latency, high throughput, and efficiency in a protected dataplane. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 34(4), pp.1-39.

[13] Blum, C. and Raidl, G.R., 2016. Hybrid metaheuristics: powerful tools for optimization. Springer.

[14] Bottou, L., Curtis, F.E. and Nocedal, J., 2018. Optimization methods for large-scale machine learning. SIAM review, 60(2), pp.223-311.

[15] Boutaba, R., Salahuddin, M.A., Limam, N., Ayoubi, S., Shahriar, N., Estrada-Solano, F. and Caicedo, O.M., 2018. A comprehensive survey on machine learning for networking: evolution, applications and research opportunities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 9(1), pp.1-99.

[16] Buyya, R., Srirama, S.N., Casale, G., Calheiros, R., Simmhan, Y., Varghese, B., Gelenbe, E., Javadi, B., Vaquero, L.M., Netto, M.A. and Toosi, A.N., 2018. A manifesto for future generation cloud computing: Research directions for the next decade. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 51(5), pp.1-38.

[17] Calvet, L., Armas, J.D., Masip, D. and Juan, A.A., 2017. Learnheuristics: hybridizing metaheuristics with machine learning for optimization with dynamic inputs. Open Mathematics, 15(1), pp.261-280.

[18] Chadès, I., Nicol, S., Rout, T.M., Péron, M., Dujardin, Y., Pichancourt, J.B., Hastings, A. and Hauser, C.E., 2017. Optimization methods to solve adaptive management problems. Theoretical Ecology, 10(1), pp.1-20.

[19] Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). Blockchain-enabled systems fostering transparent corporate governance, reducing corruption, and improving global financial accountability. IRE Journals, 3(3), 259–266.*

[20] Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). AI-driven fraud detection enhancing financial auditing efficiency and ensuring improved organizational governance integrity. IRE Journals, 2(11), 556–563.*

[21] Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). Business process intelligence for global enterprises: Optimizing vendor relations with analytical dashboards. IRE Journals, 2(8), 261–270.*

[22] Dare, S. O., Ajayi, J. O., & Chima, O. K. (n.d.). An integrated decision-making model for improving transparency and audit quality among small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[23] DeRousseau, M.A., Kasprzyk, J.R. and Srubar Iii, W.V., 2018. Computational design optimization of concrete mixtures: A review. Cement and concrete research, 109, pp.42-53.

[24] Essien, I. A., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., Obuse, E., & Ayanbode, N. (n.d.). Supply chain fraud risk mitigation using federated AI models for continuous transaction integrity verification. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[25] Essien, I. A., Cadet, E., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., & Obuse, E. (2019). Cloud security baseline development using OWASP, CIS benchmarks, and ISO 27001 for regulatory compliance. IRE Journals, 2(8), 250–256. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710217.pdf

[26] Essien, I. A., Cadet, E., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., & Obuse, E. (2019). Integrated governance, risk, and compliance framework for multi-cloud security and global regulatory alignment. IRE Journals, 3(3), 215–221. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710218.pdf

[27] Etim, E. D., Essien, I. A., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., & Obuse, E. (n.d.). Automation-enhanced ESG compliance models for vendor risk assessment in high-impact infrastructure procurement projects. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT

[28] Etim, E. D., Essien, I. A., Ajayi, J. O., Erigha, E. D., & Obuse, E. (2019). AI-augmented intrusion detection: Advancements in real-time cyber threat recognition. IRE Journals, 3(3), 225–231. https://irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1710369.pdf

[29] Fei, Z., Li, B., Yang, S., Xing, C., Chen, H. and Hanzo, L., 2016. A survey of multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor networks: Metrics, algorithms, and open problems. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 19(1), pp.550-586.

[30] Gallego, A.J., Calvo-Zaragoza, J., Valero-Mas, J.J. and Rico-Juan, J.R., 2018. Clustering-based k-nearest neighbor classification for large-scale data with neural codes representation. Pattern Recognition, 74, pp.531-543.

[31] Hart, W.E., Laird, C.D., Watson, J.P., Woodruff, D.L., Hackebeil, G.A., Nicholson, B.L. and Siirola, J.D., 2017. Pyomo-optimization modeling in python (Vol. 67, p. 277). Berlin: Springer.

[32] He, D., Ai, B., Guan, K., Wang, L., Zhong, Z. and Kürner, T., 2018. The design and applications of high-performance ray-tracing simulation platform for 5G and beyond wireless communications: A tutorial. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 21(1), pp.10-27.

[33] Herrera, J.G. and Botero, J.F., 2016. Resource allocation in NFV: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 13(3), pp.518-532.

[34] Ismaeel, S., Karim, R. and Miri, A., 2018. Proactive dynamic virtual-machine consolidation for energy conservation in cloud data centres. Journal of Cloud Computing, 7(1), p.10.

[35] Khalid, S., Ullah, S., Alam, A. and Din, F., 2016. Optimal latency in collaborative virtual environment to increase user performance: A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 142(3), pp.35-47.

[36] Killian, M. and Kozek, M., 2016. Ten questions concerning model predictive control for energy efficient buildings. Building and Environment, 105, pp.403-412.

[37] Klamroth, K., Mostaghim, S., Naujoks, B., Poles, S., Purshouse, R., Rudolph, G., Ruzika, S., Sayın, S., Wiecek, M.M. and Yao, X., 2017. Multiobjective optimization for interwoven systems. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(1-2), pp.71-81.

[38] Laganà, D., Mastroianni, C., Meo, M. and Renga, D., 2018. Reducing the operational cost of cloud data centers through renewable energy. Algorithms, 11(10), p.145.

[39] Lim, H., Andersen, D.G. and Kaminsky, M., 2016. Towards Accurate and Fast Evaluation of {Multi-Stage} Log-structured Designs. In 14th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST 16) (pp. 149-166).

[40] Maenhaut, P.J., Moens, H., Volckaert, B., Ongenae, V. and De Turck, F., 2017. A dynamic tenant-defined storage system for efficient resource management in cloud applications. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 93, pp.182-196.

[41] Malekimajd, M., Ardagna, D., Ciavotta, M., Gianniti, E., Passacantando, M. and Rizzi, A.M., 2018. An optimization framework for the capacity allocation and admission control of MapReduce jobs in cloud systems. The Journal of Supercomputing, 74(10), pp.5314-5348.

[42] Malekloo, M.H., Kara, N. and El Barachi, M., 2018. An energy efficient and SLA compliant approach for resource allocation and consolidation in cloud computing environments. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 17, pp.9-24.

[43] Malik, S.U.R., Khan, S.U., Ewen, S.J., Tziritas, N., Kolodziej, J., Zomaya, A.Y., Madani, S.A., Min-Allah, N., Wang, L., Xu, C.Z. and Malluhi, Q.M., 2016. Performance analysis of data intensive cloud systems based on data management and replication: a survey. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 34(2), pp.179-215.

[44] Mansouri, Y., Toosi, A.N. and Buyya, R., 2017. Data storage management in cloud environments: Taxonomy, survey, and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(6), pp.1-51.

[45] Martin, A., Egaña, J., Flórez, J., Montalban, J., Olaizola, I.G., Quartulli, M., Viola, R. and Zorrilla, M., 2018. Network resource allocation system for QoE-aware delivery of media services in 5G networks. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 64(2), pp.561-574.

[46] Modarresi, M.S., Xie, L., Campi, M.C., Garatti, S., Care, A., Thatte, A.A. and Kumar, P.R., 2018. Scenario-based economic dispatch with tunable risk levels in high-renewable power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(6), pp.5103-5114.

[47] Moslemi, S., Zavvar Sabegh, M.H., Mirzazadeh, A., Ozturkoglu, Y. and Maass, E., 2017. A multi-objective model for multi-production and multi-echelon closed-loop pharmaceutical supply chain considering quality concepts: NSGAII approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(Suppl 2), pp.1717-1733.

[48] Mustafa, S., Bilal, K., Malik, S.U.R. and Madani, S.A., 2018. SLA-aware energy efficient resource management for cloud environments. IEEE Access, 6, pp.15004-15020.

[49] Narani, S.R., Ayyalasomayajula, M.M.T. and Chintala, S., 2018. Strategies For Migrating Large, Mission-Critical Database Workloads To The Cloud. Webology (ISSN: 1735-188X), 15(1).

[50] Neumann, T. and Radke, B., 2018, May. Adaptive optimization of very large join queries. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 677-692).

[51] Nwokediegwu, Z. S., Bankole, A. O., & Okiye, S. E. (2019). Advancing interior and exterior construction design through large-scale 3D printing: A comprehensive review. IRE Journals, 3(1), 422-449. ISSN: 2456-8880

[52] Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2019). A dual-pressure model for healthcare finance: Comparing United States and African strategies under inflationary stress. IRE Journals, 3(6), 261–270.

[53] Park, P., Ergen, S.C., Fischione, C., Lu, C. and Johansson, K.H., 2017. Wireless network design for control systems: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(2), pp.978-1013.

[54] Ross, I.M., Gong, Q., Karpenko, M. and Proulx, R.J., 2018. Scaling and balancing for high-performance computation of optimal controls. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 41(10), pp.2086-2097.

[55] Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G. and Teicholz, P., 2018. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. John Wiley & Sons.

[56] Schniederjans, D.G. and Hales, D.N., 2016. Cloud computing and its impact on economic and environmental performance: A transaction cost economics perspective. Decision Support Systems, 86, pp.73-82.

[57] Tomassilli, A., Giroire, F., Huin, N. and Pérennes, S., 2018, April. Provably efficient algorithms for placement of service function chains with ordering constraints. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (pp. 774-782). IEEE.

[58] Xavier, M.G., Matteussi, K.J., Lorenzo, F. and De Rose, C.A., 2016, December. Understanding performance interference in multi-tenant cloud databases and web applications. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 2847-2852). IEEE.

[59] Yan, J., Jin, Q., Jain, S., Viglas, S.D. and Lee, A., 2018, June. Snowtrail: Testing with production queries on a cloud database. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Testing Database Systems (pp. 1-6).

[60] Yue, D. and You, F., 2016. Optimal supply chain design and operations under multi‐scale uncertainties: Nested stochastic robust optimization modeling framework and solution algorithm. Aiche journal, 62(9), pp.3041-3055.

[61] Zhao, Y., Luo, F., Chen, M., Wang, Y., Xia, J., Zhou, F., Wang, Y., Chen, Y. and Chen, W., 2018. Evaluating multi-dimensional visualizations for understanding fuzzy clusters. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 25(1), pp.12-21.

How to cite this paper

Olushola Damilare Odejobi, Nafiu Ikeoluwa Hammed, Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed "Approximation Complexity Model for Cloud-Based Database Optimization Problems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 2 Issue 9 2019 Page 401-415
Olushola Damilare Odejobi, Nafiu Ikeoluwa Hammed, Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed "Approximation Complexity Model for Cloud-Based Database Optimization Problems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 9, Mar. 2019
Olushola Damilare Odejobi, Nafiu Ikeoluwa Hammed, Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed (2019). Approximation Complexity Model for Cloud-Based Database Optimization Problems. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 2(9).
Olushola Damilare Odejobi, Nafiu Ikeoluwa Hammed, Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed "Approximation Complexity Model for Cloud-Based Database Optimization Problems" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 9, Mar. 2019.
@article{1711333,
      author = {Olushola Damilare Odejobi, Nafiu Ikeoluwa Hammed, Kabir Sholagberu Ahmed},
      title = {Approximation Complexity Model for Cloud-Based Database Optimization Problems},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {2},
      number = {9},
      pages = {401-415},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711333.pdf},
      abstract = {Cloud-based database systems have become critical infrastructure for modern enterprises, supporting large-scale data storage, analytics, and transactional processing. However, the optimization of such databases?including query execution, resource allocation, indexing, and replication?presents significant computational challenges due to the combinatorial nature of underlying problems and the scale of cloud environments. Exact solutions are often intractable, particularly when multiple performance, cost, and reliability constraints must be satisfied simultaneously. This develops an approximation complexity model to analyze and address the computational limits of cloud database optimization problems, providing a framework for designing efficient, scalable, and near-optimal solutions. The proposed model formalizes key database optimization tasks as computational problems and characterizes their approximation hardness, identifying classes of problems where polynomial-time algorithms can guarantee provable bounds on solution quality. By integrating approximation algorithms with heuristic and metaheuristic strategies, the model enables the practical resolution of complex optimization tasks under resource and SLA constraints. The framework further incorporates multi-dimensional performance metrics, including query latency, throughput, storage efficiency, energy consumption, and fault tolerance, allowing a balanced assessment of trade-offs between computational efficiency and solution optimality. In addition, the model addresses cloud-specific considerations such as elasticity, multi-tenancy, and geographically distributed resources, highlighting the interaction between database optimization complexity and dynamic cloud infrastructure. Analytical insights derived from the approximation complexity characterization guide the design of algorithmic solutions that are both theoretically grounded and practically deployable in real-world cloud environments. The outcomes of this, provide a structured methodology for understanding the computational boundaries of cloud database optimization, informing decision-making for query scheduling, indexing, replication, and resource management. Future extensions of the model could incorporate AI-driven predictive analytics and real-time monitoring to further improve approximation strategies, enabling autonomous, adaptive, and efficient cloud database operations that meet performance, cost, and reliability objectives at scale.},
      keywords = {Approximation Complexity, Cloud-Based Databases, Database Optimization, Query Optimization, Resource Allocation, Computational Complexity, Algorithm Design, Approximation Algorithms, Heuristics, Cloud Infrastructure, Cost-Aware Optimization, Latency Reduction, Load Balancing, Elastic Scaling, Performance Tuning, Data Partitioning},
      month = {March},
  }