International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711479

1711479 Vol 2 · Issue 3 Download Paper

Conceptual Framework for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Programs in Electricity Distribution Utilities

Bismark Kyere Yeboah Ojong Felix Enow

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Electricity Distribution Utilities

Abstract

Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) has emerged as a vital framework for optimizing asset management in electricity distribution utilities, where uninterrupted service delivery, safety, and cost efficiency are paramount. This conceptual framework presents a structured approach to designing and implementing RCM programs tailored to the unique operational and regulatory demands of electricity distribution networks. The framework is grounded in reliability engineering principles and systems theory, emphasizing the systematic identification of critical assets, analysis of potential failure modes, and development of risk-based maintenance strategies. Inputs such as asset condition data, historical failure records, reliability indices (e.g., SAIDI, SAIFI, CAIDI), regulatory standards, and resource availability form the foundation of the framework. The core processes involve asset criticality assessment, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and the selection of appropriate maintenance strategies?ranging from preventive and predictive measures to condition-based interventions. These processes are supported by decision-support tools, including advanced digital technologies such as IoT sensors, SCADA, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and data analytics platforms. Outputs of the framework include enhanced asset reliability, reduced system downtime, optimized operational costs, compliance with regulatory benchmarks, and improved customer satisfaction through reduced outage frequency and duration. A continuous feedback mechanism ensures adaptability, allowing utilities to refine strategies through performance monitoring, post-maintenance evaluations, and integration of emerging technologies. By aligning organizational resources, technical capabilities, and regulatory requirements, the conceptual framework not only extends asset life cycles but also fosters resilience, sustainability, and efficiency in power distribution systems. This model underscores the importance of integrating technical rigor with organizational culture and data-driven decision-making, offering a roadmap for utilities seeking to achieve long-term operational excellence in an increasingly complex and demand-driven energy landscape.

Keywords

Conceptual Framework, Reliability-Centered, Maintenance Programs, Electricity Distribution Utilities

References

[1] Abouel-Seoud, S.A., 2016. Maintenance Cost Optimization of Faulty Gearbox under Continuous Vibration Measurement Monitoring. International Journal of Vehicle Structures & Systems (IJVSS), 8(3).

[2] Afsharnia, F., 2017. Failure rate analysis. Failure analysis and prevention, pp.99-115.

[3] Aguero, J.R., Takayesu, E., Novosel, D. and Masiello, R., 2017. Modernizing the grid: Challenges and opportunities for a sustainable future. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 15(3), pp.74-83.

[4] Ahasan-Ul-Karim, M., 2015. Application of reliability centered maintenance (RCM) in lead oxide production system a case study.

[5] Alencar, M.H. and de Almeida, A.T., 2015. A multicriteria decision model for assessment of failure consequences in the RCM approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015(1), p.729865.

[6] Arno, R., Dowling, N. and Schuerger, R., 2015, May. Equipment failure characteristics & RCM for optimizing maintenance cost. In 2015 IEEE/IAS 51st Industrial & Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

[7] Beier, K.T., Steinberg, E.E., DeLoach, K.E., Xie, S., Miyamichi, K., Schwarz, L., Gao, X.J., Kremer, E.J., Malenka, R.C. and Luo, L., 2015. Circuit architecture of VTA dopamine neurons revealed by systematic input-output mapping. Cell, 162(3), pp.622-634.

[8] Bessa, R.J., Möhrlen, C., Fundel, V., Siefert, M., Browell, J., Haglund El Gaidi, S., Hodge, B.M., Cali, U. and Kariniotakis, G., 2017. Towards improved understanding of the applicability of uncertainty forecasts in the electric power industry. Energies, 10(9), p.1402.

[9] Bharadwaj, S.S., Chauhan, S. and Raman, A., 2015. Impact of knowledge management capabilities on knowledge management effectiveness in Indian organizations. Vikalpa, 40(4), pp.421-434.

[10] Brown, R.E., 2017. Electric power distribution reliability. CRC press.

[11] Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Sree Ramaswamy, P., DC, W. and Chu, M., 2017. Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier.

[12] Chemweno, P., Pintelon, L., Van Horenbeek, A. and Muchiri, P., 2015. Development of a risk assessment selection methodology for asset maintenance decision making: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, pp.663-676.

[13] Chen, C., Wang, J. and Ton, D., 2017. Modernizing distribution system restoration to achieve grid resiliency against extreme weather events: An integrated solution. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(7), pp.1267-1288.

[14] Chiaradonna, S., Di Giandomenico, F. and Masetti, G., 2016, October. Analyzing the impact of failures in the electric power distribution grid. In 2016 Seventh Latin-American symposium on dependable computing (LADC) (pp. 99-108). IEEE.

[15] Cosgrove, W.J. and Loucks, D.P., 2015. Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water resources research, 51(6), pp.4823-4839.

[16] Deering, D. and Lang, D., 2015. From Practical to Theoretical: Exploring the Bounded Use of Responsibility Center Budgeting and Management in Public University Finance.” with Darren Deering. In Association for Educational Finance Policy Annual Conference.

[17] Eid, C., Koliou, E., Valles, M., Reneses, J. and Hakvoort, R., 2016. Time-based pricing and electricity demand response: Existing barriers and next steps. Utilities Policy, 40, pp.15-25.

[18] Emovon, I., Norman, R.A. and Murphy, A.J., 2016. Elements of maintenance system and tools for implementation within framework of Reliability Centred Maintenance-A review. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (JMET), 8(2), pp.1-34.

[19] Gatzert, N. and Schmit, J., 2016. Supporting strategic success through enterprise-wide reputation risk management. The Journal of Risk Finance, 17(1), pp.26-45.

[20] Ghosn, M., Frangopol, D.M., McAllister, T.P., Shah, M., Diniz, S.M.C., Ellingwood, B.R., Manuel, L., Biondini, F., Catbas, N., Strauss, A. and Zhao, X.L., 2016. Reliability-based performance indicators for structural members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(9), p.F4016002.

[21] Gillespie, A., 2015, January. Condition based maintenance: Theory, methodology, & application. In Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (pp. 1-23).

[22] Guillén, A.J., Crespo, A., Macchi, M. and Gómez, J., 2016. On the role of Prognostics and Health Management in advanced maintenance systems. Production Planning & Control, 27(12), pp.991-1004.

[23] Gunningham, N., 2017. Compliance, enforcement, and regulatory excellence. RegNet Research Paper, (124).

[24] Gupta, T.K. and Singh, V., 2015. A systematic approach to evaluate supply chain management environment index using graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 21(1), pp.1-45.

[25] Haugh, D., McGowan, M.A., Andrews, D., Sánchez, A.C., Fulop, G. and Perea, P.G., 2017. Fostering innovative business investment in Spain.

[26] Hoseinie, S.H., Kumar, U. and Ghodrati, B., 2016. Reliability centered maintenance (RCM) for automated mining machinery. Luleå tekniska universitet.

[27] Intezari, A., Taskin, N. and Pauleen, D.J., 2017. Looking beyond knowledge sharing: an integrative approach to knowledge management culture. Journal of knowledge management, 21(2), pp.492-515.

[28] Johnson, L., 2016. Regulation of Investment Incentives: Instruments at an International/Supranational Level. In Rethinking Investment Incentives: Trends and Policy Options (pp. 264-322). Columbia University Press.

[29] Khan, M.A., Khan, J.A., Ali, Z., Ahmad, I. and Ahmad, M.N., 2016. The challenge of climate change and policy response in Pakistan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(5), p.412.

[30] Khuntia, S.R., Rueda, J.L., Bouwman, S. and van der Meijden, M.A., 2016. A literature survey on asset management in electrical power [transmission and distribution] system. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 26(10), pp.2123-2133.

[31] Latorella, K.A. and Prabhu, P.V., 2017. A review of human error in aviation maintenance and inspection. Human Error in Aviation, pp.521-549.

[32] Leal-Arcas, R., Lasniewska, F. and Proedrou, F., 2017. Smart grids in the European Union: Assessing energy security, regulation & social and ethical considerations. Colum. J. Eur. L., 24, p.291.

[33] Nakamanuruck, I., Talabgaew, S. and Rungreunganun, V., 2016. An application of reliability centered maintenance technique for preventive maintenance in refinery plant. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 848, pp.244-250.

[34] Öhman, M., Finne, M. and Holmström, J., 2015. Measuring service outcomes for adaptive preventive maintenance. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, pp.457-467.

[35] Okoh, P. and Haugen, S., 2015. Improving the robustness and resilience properties of maintenance. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 94, pp.212-226.

[36] Oree, V., Hassen, S.Z.S. and Fleming, P.J., 2017. Generation expansion planning optimisation with renewable energy integration: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, pp.790-803.

[37] Orugbo, E.E., Alkali, B.M., DeSilva, A. and Harrison, D.K., 2015. RCM and AHP hybrid model for road network maintenance prioritization. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 10(2), pp.182-190.

[38] Pacaiova, H. and Glatz, J., 2015. MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. MM Science Journal.

[39] Payne, H., 2017. All of the Above: One Way State Regulatory Frameworks Impact the Utility of the Future. Geo. Wash. J. Energy & Envtl. L., 8, p.78.

[40] Prakash, N., Roy, S.S., Ansari, M.A. and Sharma, S.K., 2015. A comprehensive manual on integrated farming system: An approach towards livelihood security and natural resource conservation. Publication No. RCM (TM), 8, p.368.

[41] Prettico, G., Gangale, F., MENGOLINI, A.M., ROCHA, P.L.A. and Fulli, G., 2016. Distribution system operators observatory: From european electricity distribution systems to representative distribution networks.

[42] Raghavan, S. and Chowdhury, B., 2015. State diagram-based life cycle management plans for power plant components. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6(2), pp.965-972.

[43] Reason, J., 2016. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge.

[44] Reinhart, W.F., Long, A.W., Howard, M.P., Ferguson, A.L. and Panagiotopoulos, A.Z., 2017. Machine learning for autonomous crystal structure identification. Soft Matter, 13(27), pp.4733-4745.

[45] Rødseth, H. and Schjølberg, P., 2017. Maintenance backlog for improving integrated planning. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 23(2), pp.195-225.

[46] Roelich, K., Knoeri, C., Steinberger, J.K., Varga, L., Blythe, P.T., Butler, D., Gupta, R., Harrison, G.P., Martin, C. and Purnell, P., 2015. Towards resource-efficient and service-oriented integrated infrastructure operation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, pp.40-52.

[47] Sakr, A.H., Tabassum, H., Hossain, E. and Kim, D.I., 2015. Cognitive spectrum access in device-to-device-enabled cellular networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(7), pp.126-133.

[48] Selcuk, S., 2017. Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 231(9), pp.1670-1679.

[49] Sheaves, M., Sporne, I., Dichmont, C.M., Bustamante, R., Dale, P., Deng, R., Dutra, L.X., Van Putten, I., Savina-Rollan, M. and Swinbourne, A., 2016. Principles for operationalizing climate change adaptation strategies to support the resilience of estuarine and coastal ecosystems: an Australian perspective. Marine Policy, 68, pp.229-240.

[50] Shin, J.H. and Jun, H.B., 2015. On condition based maintenance policy. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2(2), pp.119-127.

[51] Sifonte, J.R. and Reyes-Picknell, J.V., 2017. Reliability Centered Maintenance–Reengineered: Practical Optimization of the RCM Process with RCM-R®. Productivity Press.

[52] Singh, R., Wang, X., Mendoza, J.C. and Ackom, E.K., 2015. Electricity (in) accessibility to the urban poor in developing countries. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: energy and environment, 4(4), pp.339-353.

[53] Stamatis, D.H., 2017. The OEE primer: understanding overall equipment effectiveness, reliability, and maintainability. CRC Press.

[54] Stimpson, S., Todesco, J. and Maginley, A., 2015. Strategies for risk management and corporate social responsibility for oil and gas companies in emerging markets. Alta. L. Rev., 53, p.259.

[55] Trebilcock, M. and Rosenstock, M., 2015. Infrastructure public–private partnerships in the developing world: Lessons from recent experience. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(4), pp.335-354.

[56] Winstein, C.J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L.R., Cramer, S.C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J.J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R.L. and Lang, C.E., 2016. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 47(6), pp.e98-e169.

[57] Xiao, P., Wenjuan, L., Xiaotian, Z. and Song, J., 2016, August. The influence of green development idea on power supply reliability and power quality of distribution network. In 2016 China International Conference on Electricity Distribution (CICED) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

[58] Yadav, Y., 2015. How algorithmic trading undermines efficiency in capital markets. Vand. L. Rev., 68, p.1607.

[59] Yan, J., 2015. Machinery prognostics and prognosis oriented maintenance management. John Wiley & Sons.

[60] Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., Yu, M. and Chen, Y., 2017. Reliability evaluation and component importance measure for manufacturing systems based on failure losses. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 28(8), pp.1859-1869.

How to cite this paper

Bismark Kyere Yeboah, Ojong Felix Enow "Conceptual Framework for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Programs in Electricity Distribution Utilities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 2 Issue 3 2018 Page 140-153
Bismark Kyere Yeboah, Ojong Felix Enow "Conceptual Framework for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Programs in Electricity Distribution Utilities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2018
Bismark Kyere Yeboah, Ojong Felix Enow (2018). Conceptual Framework for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Programs in Electricity Distribution Utilities. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 2(3).
Bismark Kyere Yeboah, Ojong Felix Enow "Conceptual Framework for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Programs in Electricity Distribution Utilities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2018.
@article{1711479,
      author = {Bismark Kyere Yeboah, Ojong Felix Enow},
      title = {Conceptual Framework for Reliability-Centered Maintenance Programs in Electricity Distribution Utilities},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {140-153},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711479.pdf},
      abstract = {Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) has emerged as a vital framework for optimizing asset management in electricity distribution utilities, where uninterrupted service delivery, safety, and cost efficiency are paramount. This conceptual framework presents a structured approach to designing and implementing RCM programs tailored to the unique operational and regulatory demands of electricity distribution networks. The framework is grounded in reliability engineering principles and systems theory, emphasizing the systematic identification of critical assets, analysis of potential failure modes, and development of risk-based maintenance strategies. Inputs such as asset condition data, historical failure records, reliability indices (e.g., SAIDI, SAIFI, CAIDI), regulatory standards, and resource availability form the foundation of the framework. The core processes involve asset criticality assessment, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and the selection of appropriate maintenance strategies?ranging from preventive and predictive measures to condition-based interventions. These processes are supported by decision-support tools, including advanced digital technologies such as IoT sensors, SCADA, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and data analytics platforms. Outputs of the framework include enhanced asset reliability, reduced system downtime, optimized operational costs, compliance with regulatory benchmarks, and improved customer satisfaction through reduced outage frequency and duration. A continuous feedback mechanism ensures adaptability, allowing utilities to refine strategies through performance monitoring, post-maintenance evaluations, and integration of emerging technologies. By aligning organizational resources, technical capabilities, and regulatory requirements, the conceptual framework not only extends asset life cycles but also fosters resilience, sustainability, and efficiency in power distribution systems. This model underscores the importance of integrating technical rigor with organizational culture and data-driven decision-making, offering a roadmap for utilities seeking to achieve long-term operational excellence in an increasingly complex and demand-driven energy landscape.},
      keywords = {Conceptual Framework, Reliability-Centered, Maintenance Programs, Electricity Distribution Utilities},
      month = {September},
  }