ICT, Seamless Recreation and Tourism: An Anthropological Perspective

References

[1] Arts, K., van der Wal, R., & Adams, W. M. (2024). Digital conservation: Ethical considerations for open-source tools and data sharing. Conservation Technology Review, 12(1), 45–59.

[2] Boes, K., Buhalis, D., & Inversini, A. (2024). Smart tourism and urban mobility: Lessons from pilot cities. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 13(2), 101–115.

[3] Buhalis, D., & Amaranggana, A. (2024). Interoperability in smart tourism: Standards and frameworks. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 100–110.

[4] Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2024). Socio-technical systems in tourism: A smart destination approach. Tourism Review, 79(1), 1–15.

[5] Buhalis, D., & Sinarta, Y. (2024). Measuring digital tourism: From downloads to meaningful KPIs. Information Technology & Tourism, 26(1), 23–39.

[6] Buhalis, D., Neuhofer, B., & Tussyadiah, I. (2023). Seamless tourism and immersive technologies. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(3), 210–225.

[7] Burns, G. L., & Benz-Schwarzburg, J. (2023). Virtual wildlife tourism and the ethics of animal representation. Tourism Ethics Quarterly, 5(2), 88–104.

[8] Chambers, D. (2024). Community-engaged scholarship in digital heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 96, 102–118.

[9] Christen, K. (2024). Cultural protocols and digital heritage: Ethical frameworks for immersive media. Museum Anthropology Review, 18(1), 55–70.

[10] Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2024). Data colonialism and tourism: Ethics, consent, and sovereignty. Digital Society, 3(1), 1–18.

[11] Davidson, S. (2024). Exnovation and responsible innovation in conservation technology. Technology in Society, 76, 102–119.

[12] Dickinson, J. E., Ghali, K., & Cherrett, T. (2024). Mobile tourism and accessibility in rural destinations. Tourism Geographies, 26(2), 145–162.

[13] Duffy, R., St. John, F. A. V., & Massé, F. (2023). Surveillance and conservation: Ethical tensions in digital monitoring. Conservation and Society, 21(1), 12–25.

[14] EC (European Commission). (2024). Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act: Implementation and impact. Brussels: European Union Publications.

[15] Femenia-Serra, F., Ivars-Baidal, J. A., & Perles-Ribes, J. F. (2024). Evaluating smart tourism: Co-learning and capacity building. Tourism Management, 95, 104–118.

[16] Fennell, D. A. (2023). Virtual nature and environmental values: A critical review. Journal of Ecotourism, 22(1), 1–17.

[17] Fletcher, R., Murray Mas, I., Blázquez-Salom, M., & Blanco-Romero, A. (2024). Tourism, climate change, and degrowth. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(1), 1–20.

[18] Fortune Business Insights. (2025). Ecotourism market size, share & trends analysis report. Retrieved from https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com

[19] Future Market Insights. (2024–2025). Wildlife tourism and immersive technology trends. Retrieved from https://www.futuremarketinsights.com

[20] Gössling, S., & Hall, C. M. (2024). Tourism and climate change: Policy, impacts, and adaptation. Tourism Management, 92, 104–122.

[21] Gössling, S., Scott, D., & Hall, C. M. (2024). Platform capitalism and tourism: Governance and sustainability. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(1), 1–20.

[22] Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2024). Smart tourism evaluation: Beyond technology adoption. Tourism Management Perspectives, 40, 100–115.

[23] Hall, C. M. (2024). Structural change and sustainability in tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 49(1), 1–10.

[24] Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. (2024). Digital anthropology: Understanding culture through technology. London: Routledge.

[25] Huynh, D., Pham, T., & Le, Q. (2023). Blockchain in tourism: Applications and challenges. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 14(2), 123–140.

[26] Huckle, S., & White, M. (2024). Legal frameworks for blockchain in tourism. Information & Communications Technology Law, 33(1), 1–18.

[27] Invest India. (2023). Amrit Dharohar: Wetland conservation and eco-tourism development. Retrieved from https://www.investindia.gov.in

[28] Ivars-Baidal, J. A., Celdrán-Bernabeu, M. A., & Femenia-Serra, F. (2024). Biometric systems and smart tourism governance. Tourism Review, 79(2), 145–160.

[29] Jamal, T., & Camargo, B. A. (2024). Digital literacy and inclusive tourism development. Tourism Planning & Development, 21(1), 1–18.

[30] Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2023). Indigenous data sovereignty and tourism technologies. Indigenous Policy Journal, 34(2), 1–12.

[31] Lamba, A., Singh, R., & Sharma, P. (2024). Conservation technology and big data. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(3), 1–20.

[32] Lyon, D. (2024). Surveillance, privacy, and biometric ethics. Surveillance & Society, 22(1), 1–15.

[33] Marston, H. R., Shore, L., & White, P. J. (2024). Data governance in smart tourism. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(1), 1–20.

[34] Miao, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2025). Synthetic reality and immersive tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 10(1), 1–15.

[35] Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2024). Smart tourism experiences: Accessibility and personalization. Tourism Management, 91, 104–117.

[36] Önder, I., & Treiblmaier, H. (2024). Blockchain and disintermediation in tourism. Tourism Economics, 30(1), 1–20.

[37] Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., & Hjorth, L. (2024). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Sage.

[38] Sandbrook, C., Luque-Lora, R., & Adams, W. M. (2024). Community-led conservation and technology. Conservation Letters, 17(1), e12845.

[39] Seyitoğlu, F., & Ivanov, S. (2024). Blockchain for sustainable tourism. Sustainability, 16(2), 1–18.

[40] Smith, L. (2024). Cultural sensitivity in digital heritage design. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(1), 1–14.

[41] Srnicek, N. (2024). Platform capitalism and digital governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[42] Titiloye, T. O., Arowosafe, F. C., Adeyinka, F., & Olakanmi, T. (2025). The level of awareness of cloud computing among staff in hotel establishments in Osun State, Nigeria. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals (IRE Journals), 9(3). https://www.irejournals.com/paper-details/1710632

[43] Timothy, D. J. (2024). Public procurement and community benefit in tourism tech. Tourism Management, 95, 104–130.

[44] Toyama, K. (2024). Designing for low-connectivity environments. Information Technologies & International Development, 20(1), 1–10.

[45] Treiblmaier, H., & Önder, I. (2023). Blockchain applications in tourism ecosystems. Tourism Review, 78(4), 567–582.

[46] Truby, J., Brown, R., & Ahmed, M. (2024). Blockchain energy use and sustainability. Energy Research & Social Science, 96, 102–118.

[47] Tussyadiah, I., Wang, D., & Jung, T. (2024). Immersive technologies and tourism behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 63(1), 1–15.

[48] UN Tourism / UNWTO. (2024). Smart destinations and digital transformation guidelines. Madrid: United Nations World Tourism Organization.

@article{1711611,
      author = {Titiloye, T. O., Faruwa, O. O., Olakanmi, T., Ishola, O. T., Ogunsuyi, O.},
      title = {ICT, Seamless Recreation and Tourism: An Anthropological Perspective},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {4},
      pages = {1613-1621},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711611.pdf},
      abstract = {The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into wildlife and ecotourism marks a profound transformation in how humans engage with natural environments and Indigenous communities. This manuscript explores seamless tourism through an anthropological lens, examining how digital technologies mediate human-nature relationships, reshape cultural practices, and influence conservation outcomes. Seamless tourism refers to a frictionless visitor journey?from planning to post-visit?enabled by integrated ICT systems that ensure continuity through data flows, interoperable services, and context-aware interfaces. The global ecotourism market is rapidly expanding, driven by technologies such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and artificial intelligence that enhance visitor experiences while supporting conservation goals. Digital anthropology provides insight into how cultural meanings, identities, and relationships evolve through digital mediation, revealing how platforms and interfaces reconfigure host?guest dynamics and heritage expression. Findings show that while digital tools can enhance environmental education and conservation awareness, they may also commodity nature and disrupt traditional ecological relationships. Smartphones and web apps now serve as primary interfaces for travelers, combining booking, navigation, and interpretation, though their widespread use centralizes control in platform operators. Case studies highlight how virtual reality can reduce environmental impact, such as immersive orientation programs that lower wildlife disturbance. The manuscript also addresses ethical concerns, including digital colonialism, surveillance through monitoring technologies, and debates over whether virtual wildlife experiences can equitably represent non-human rights and welfare. Anthropological analysis emphasizes the need for culturally sensitive approaches that respect Indigenous knowledge systems, promote community co-production of digital content, and uphold data sovereignty. Recent innovations include virtual reef tours and digital twins that optimize visitor flows while minimizing ecological harm. This research offers guidance for professionals navigating the intersection of technology, culture, and conservation, advocating for inclusive, sustainable, and ethically grounded digital tourism practices.},
      keywords = {Seamless Tourism, Wildlife Tourism, Ecotourism, Digital Anthropology, Environmental Anthropology, ICT, Conservation Technology, Virtual Reality, Sustainable Tourism},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I4-1711611-4842}
  }