Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711939
A Comparative Analysis of Fulfulde and Kanuri Sociopolitical and Symbolic Order in Northern Nigeria: A Cultural Semiotics Perspective
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Languages
Abstract
This study explores the symbolic sociopolitical structures of the Kanuri and Fulani peoples of Northern Nigeria. The study employs multiple qualitative data collection methods: Ethnographic fieldwork and Semi-structured interviews. Using a semiotic-structural approach, the study reveals that Kanuri authority is spatially ritualized and dynastically centralized, whereas Fulani symbolic order is dualistic combining emirate ceremonialism with the moral code of Pulaaku. The findings further, demonstrate how symbols like turbans, palaces, titles, and pastoral rituals serve not only as visual texts but as instruments of sociopolitical cohesion and historical continuity. legitimacy, and identity are constructed through ritual, architecture, regalia, and moral codes. The Shehu of Borno represents a dynastic embodiment of political-spiritual authority, while Fulani leadership particularly in the Adamawa and Gombe emirates emerges from the historical jihadist legacy of the Sokoto Caliphate, blending religious scholarship with governance.
Keywords
Symbolic, Socio-political, Culture and Identity
References
[1] Atkin, A. (2006). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/
[2] Ayittey, G. N. (2012). The Kanuri Empire. A New Nigeria. Retrieved from https://seunfakze.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/the-kanuri-empire-by-prof-g-n-ayittey/
[3] Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
[4] Barthes, R. (1983). The Fashion System. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[5] Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[6] Brenner, L. (1973). The Shehus of Kukawa: A History of the Al-Kanemi Dynasty of Bornu. Oxford University Press.
[7] Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
[8] Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
[9] Dweich, A., & Al Ghabra, M. (2020). Introduction to Semiotics and Its Application in Media Studies. International Journal of Media and Communication.
[10] Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
[11] Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
[12] Hiribarren, V. (2013). Writing a Seamless History of Borno (1902–1960). Retrieved from https://www.vincenthiribarren.com/pdf/Hiribarren_-_2013_-_Writing_History_Borno.pdf
[13] Maman, Y. (2014). The Linguistic Sign and Semiotics: A Reconsideration. Semiotica, 198, 33–56.
[14] Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[15] Quest Journals. (2019). The Transformation of Local Administration in Fombina (Adamawa Emirate) under British Colonial Rule. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(5), 75-88. Retrieved from https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/vol9-issue5/Ser-5/M09057588.pdf
[16] Kanuri Complete (2017). Retrieved from:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320271910_KANURI_COMPLETE
[17] Saussure, F. de. (1913/1916). Course in General Linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.). London: Duckworth.
[18] Saussure, F. de. (1916). Course in General Linguistics. McGraw-Hill.
[19] Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
[20] Turner, V. (1967). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Cornell University Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1711939,
author = {Mahir Harun Mahir, Abubakar Alhaji Shuwa, Adamu Usman, Yusuf Zakariya Abdullahi; Yusuf Mohammed, Janet John; Muhammad Bashir Yusuf},
title = {A Comparative Analysis of Fulfulde and Kanuri Sociopolitical and Symbolic Order in Northern Nigeria: A Cultural Semiotics Perspective},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {5},
pages = {652-658},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711939.pdf},
abstract = {This study explores the symbolic sociopolitical structures of the Kanuri and Fulani peoples of Northern Nigeria. The study employs multiple qualitative data collection methods: Ethnographic fieldwork and Semi-structured interviews. Using a semiotic-structural approach, the study reveals that Kanuri authority is spatially ritualized and dynastically centralized, whereas Fulani symbolic order is dualistic combining emirate ceremonialism with the moral code of Pulaaku. The findings further, demonstrate how symbols like turbans, palaces, titles, and pastoral rituals serve not only as visual texts but as instruments of sociopolitical cohesion and historical continuity. legitimacy, and identity are constructed through ritual, architecture, regalia, and moral codes. The Shehu of Borno represents a dynastic embodiment of political-spiritual authority, while Fulani leadership particularly in the Adamawa and Gombe emirates emerges from the historical jihadist legacy of the Sokoto Caliphate, blending religious scholarship with governance.},
keywords = {Symbolic, Socio-political, Culture and Identity},
month = {November},
}