International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1711961

1711961 Vol 9 · Issue 5 Download Paper

Optimization of Propulsion Efficiency to Reduce Fuel Consumption of a Marine Vessel

Morrison Inegiyemiema Uchenna A. Robinson Scotia B. Princewill

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Marine Engineering

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I5-1711961

Abstract

Operators can use techniques like slow steaming, hull maintenance, optimum weather routing, and cutting-edge technologies like wind-assisted propulsion systems to reduce fuel usage in ships. In addition to lowering operating expenses, these strategies assist in lowering emissions and complying with ever-tougher environmental standards. Here, we look at some of the most important tools, techniques, and factors for more environmentally friendly sailing. The aim of the research is to optimize the propulsion efficiency of a marine vessel for reduced fuel consumption. Static analysis was performed in a medium water medium at rest while a hydrostatic force was applied using either concentrated or uniformly distributed loads in order to determine pressure. As a result, the concentric pressure created over the propeller creates stress, strain, and deformation in the propeller blade, which results in vibration and lowers the safety factor of the propulsion system. A model of the propeller shaft was created using CAD. Alloy Steel material was selected, knowing the material properties, the model information was generated, which includes the weight, volume, density. A linear dynamic study analysis was performed to determine the effect of torque and vibration on the shaft, two end faces were fixed and a torque was applied across the section of the shaft. Meshing was carried out to effect check the force distribution as it is paramount in FEA. The effect of the torque and the vibration can be seen in the analysis result. As indicated in figure 3 and 4, shows that the nuclear power plant will be grossly underutilized at the cruise speed. Hence, this power plant should rarely be used during cruise period. The resistance and power graph shows a continuous rise in power and resistance with RPM with the graph peaking at 3750kW and 150kN for 250RPM respectively. The graph of PE against RT as in figure 5 shows that as the ship resistance increases it causes a corresponding increase in the effective power and vice versa. This shows that a proportional relationship exists between the ship resistance and the effective power with the peak values at 120kN and 2.4??10?^4kW respectively. It was observed that vibration effect is higher in solid propulsion shaft when compared with the hollow propulsion shaft. With the same shaft diameter of 0.78 meters and length of 3 meters, solid propulsion shaft has a frequency of 407.02 Hz while the hollow shaft has a frequency of 248 Hertz. The amplitudes of vibration are in phase relative to the frequency. High amplitudes with a phase angle of 180? or ? rad are produced by misalignment which occurs when the shaft length of two directly mating parts meet at an angle. It was concluded that solid propulsion shaft contributed about 39.06% increase in frequency as compared to the hollow propulsion shaft. Hence vibration effect is higher in solid propulsion shaft, and that about 21.72% error in the manual value of the natural frequency calculated and the value obtained from the numerical analysis, therefore it's advisable to avoid the frequency range of 318.63Hz and 407.02Hz.

Keywords

RPM, Shaft Power, Shaft Vibration, Fuel Consumption, Propeller Blade

References

[1] H. N. Psaraftis, "Market-based measures for greenhouse gas emissions from Ship, a review," WMU J. Marit Affairs, pp. 211-232, 2021.

[2] P. T. Aakko-Saksa, K. Lehtoranta, N. Kuittinen, A. Järvinen, J. P. Jalkanen, K. Johnson, H. Jung, L. Ntziachristos, S. Gagne, C. Takahashi, P. Karjalainen, T. Ronkko and H. Timonen, "Reduction in greenhouse gas and other emissions from ship Engines: Current Trend and Future Option," Journal of Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, pp. 101-115, 2023.

[3] UNCTAD, "Review of Maritime Transport: Call for a “just and equitable transition to a decarbonized shipping industry.," 2023.

[4] J. J. Corbett and H. W. Koehler, "Updated emissions from ocean shipping," Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, pp. 1-15, 2003.

[5] Y. H. Lin, M. C. Fang and R. W. Yeung, "The optimization of ship weather routing algorithm based on the composite influence of multi-dynamic elements," Applied Ocean Research, pp. 184-194, 2013.

[6] M. Tadros, M. Ventura and C. Guedes Soares, "Optimum design of a container ship’s propeller from Wageningen B-series at the minimum BSFC. In Sustainable Development and Innovations in Marine Technologies; Georgiev, P., Guedes Soares, C., Eds.;," Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, p. 269–274, 2020.

[7] L. Yang, Y. Cai, Z. Wang and Y. Tang, "A bibliometric analysis on the research of ship energy efficiency," The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, pp. 35(1), 13-19, 2019.

[8] R. Szłapczyński and H. Ghaemi, "A multi-objective weather routing algorithm based on the Crew Decision-Making Model," Ocean Engineering, pp. 213, 107682, 2020.

[9] F. Vesting and R. E. Bensow, "application of evolutionary algorithms to propeller optimization.," Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, pp. 11A-77086, 2018.

[10] A. Lewis and S. Mirjalili, "Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for propeller design," Marine applications of computational fluid dynamics, p. 161–183, 2015.

[11] S. Gaggero, T. Gaggero, G. Tani, D. Villa and M. Viviani, "Design of contracted and tip loaded propellers by using a numerical optimization approach," Ocean Engineering, p. 266–283., 2017.

[12] A. Abel, U. A. Robinson and S. Nitonye, "Engine Performance Prediction Under Different Loading Conditions: A Comparative Approach," Irish International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, pp. 19-28, 2025.

[13] C. Bialkowski, C. Hargrave and C. McCarthy, "An approach to yield mapping, fault detection and yield prediction for sugar cane," Biosystems Engineering, pp. 20-33, 2016.

[14] C. Zhao, J. Zhang and Y. Ma, "A novel method for ship fuel efficiency optimization based on real-time data mining and adaptive modeling," Ocean Engineering, pp. 237, 109600, 2021.

[15] E. B. Besikçi, T. Kececi, O. Arslan and O. Turan, "An application of fuzzy Logic and Reliability-Centered Maintenance for analysing occupational risks on board ships," Safety Science, pp. 266-277, 2016.

[16] J. KuiKen, "Propeller Design for High Efficiency and Low Vibration," Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN), Wageningen, The Netherlands, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2008.

How to cite this paper

Morrison Inegiyemiema, Uchenna A. Robinson, Scotia B. Princewill "Optimization of Propulsion Efficiency to Reduce Fuel Consumption of a Marine Vessel" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 5 2025 Page 2618-2629 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1711961
Morrison Inegiyemiema, Uchenna A. Robinson, Scotia B. Princewill "Optimization of Propulsion Efficiency to Reduce Fuel Consumption of a Marine Vessel" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 5, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1711961
Morrison Inegiyemiema, Uchenna A. Robinson, Scotia B. Princewill (2025). Optimization of Propulsion Efficiency to Reduce Fuel Consumption of a Marine Vessel. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1711961
Morrison Inegiyemiema, Uchenna A. Robinson, Scotia B. Princewill "Optimization of Propulsion Efficiency to Reduce Fuel Consumption of a Marine Vessel" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 5, Nov. 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1711961
@article{1711961,
      author = {Morrison Inegiyemiema, Uchenna A. Robinson, Scotia B. Princewill},
      title = {Optimization of Propulsion Efficiency to Reduce Fuel Consumption of a Marine Vessel},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {5},
      pages = {2618-2629},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1711961.pdf},
      abstract = {Operators can use techniques like slow steaming, hull maintenance, optimum weather routing, and cutting-edge technologies like wind-assisted propulsion systems to reduce fuel usage in ships. In addition to lowering operating expenses, these strategies assist in lowering emissions and complying with ever-tougher environmental standards. Here, we look at some of the most important tools, techniques, and factors for more environmentally friendly sailing. The aim of the research is to optimize the propulsion efficiency of a marine vessel for reduced fuel consumption. Static analysis was performed in a medium water medium at rest while a hydrostatic force was applied using either concentrated or uniformly distributed loads in order to determine pressure. As a result, the concentric pressure created over the propeller creates stress, strain, and deformation in the propeller blade, which results in vibration and lowers the safety factor of the propulsion system.  A model of the propeller shaft was created using CAD. Alloy Steel   material was selected, knowing the material properties, the model information was generated, which includes the weight, volume, density. A linear dynamic study analysis was performed to determine the effect of torque and vibration on the shaft, two end faces were fixed and a torque was applied across the section of the shaft. Meshing was carried out to effect check the force distribution as it is paramount in FEA. The effect of the torque and the vibration can be seen in the analysis result. As indicated in figure 3 and 4, shows that the nuclear power plant will be grossly underutilized at the cruise speed. Hence, this power plant should rarely be used during cruise period. The resistance and power graph shows a continuous rise in power and resistance with RPM with the graph peaking at 3750kW and 150kN for 250RPM respectively. The graph of PE against RT as in figure 5 shows that as the ship resistance increases it causes a corresponding increase in the effective power and vice versa. This shows that a proportional relationship exists between the ship resistance and the effective power with the peak values at 120kN and 2.4??10?^4kW respectively. It was observed that vibration effect is higher in solid propulsion shaft when compared with the hollow propulsion shaft. With the same shaft diameter of 0.78 meters and length of 3 meters, solid propulsion shaft has a frequency of 407.02 Hz while the hollow shaft has a frequency of 248 Hertz. The amplitudes of vibration are in phase relative to the frequency. High amplitudes with a phase angle of 180? or ? rad are produced by misalignment which occurs when the shaft length of two directly mating parts meet at an angle. It was concluded that solid propulsion shaft contributed about 39.06% increase in frequency as compared to the hollow propulsion shaft. Hence vibration effect is higher in solid propulsion shaft, and that about 21.72% error in the manual value of the natural frequency calculated and the value obtained from the numerical analysis, therefore it's advisable to avoid the frequency range of 318.63Hz and 407.02Hz.},
      keywords = {RPM, Shaft Power, Shaft Vibration, Fuel Consumption, Propeller Blade},
      month = {November},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1711961}
  }