International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712110

1712110 Vol 3 · Issue 6 Download Paper

Model for Enhancing Network Integration and Interoperability Across Diverse Technology Platforms

Oluranti Ogundapo

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Network Integration

Abstract

The increasing complexity and heterogeneity of modern telecommunications and internet infrastructures necessitate robust models for enhancing network integration and interoperability across diverse technology platforms. With the proliferation of 5G/6G networks, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, cloud computing, and edge architectures, communication networks face unprecedented challenges in ensuring seamless connectivity, consistent service quality, and secure data exchange among heterogeneous systems. This study proposes a comprehensive model that emphasizes standardized protocols, modular design principles, and intelligent orchestration mechanisms to facilitate interoperability while maintaining reliability, scalability, and performance. The proposed model adopts a layered and modular architecture to abstract the physical, network, service, and management layers, enabling seamless integration of legacy systems with emerging technologies. Standardized interfaces and open protocols, guided by international standards such as 3GPP, IETF, and ITU-T, form the foundation for multi-vendor compatibility and cross-platform communication. In addition, the model incorporates software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV), allowing dynamic allocation of network resources, automated configuration, and adaptive routing across heterogeneous environments. By leveraging AI-driven orchestration and predictive analytics, the framework optimizes traffic management, reduces latency, and mitigates the impact of network congestion or failures, thereby improving end-to-end service quality. Security and compliance are integral components of the model, encompassing end-to-end encryption, authentication mechanisms, and data privacy adherence in alignment with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and HIPAA. Furthermore, edge computing integration ensures that data processing occurs closer to end-users, enhancing responsiveness and reducing bandwidth requirements. The significance of this model lies in its scalability, adaptability, and cross-platform applicability, making it suitable for telecom operators, cloud service providers, IoT ecosystems, and enterprise networks. By promoting standardized integration, intelligent management, and secure interoperability, the framework addresses the growing demand for resilient, efficient, and unified communication infrastructures capable of supporting the evolving digital economy.

Keywords

Network Integration, Interoperability, SDN, NFV, AI Orchestration, Edge Computing, Multi-Platform Connectivity, Standardized Protocols, Scalable Infrastructure.

References

[1] Adebiyi, F.M., Akinola, A.S., Santoro, A. and Mastrolitti, S., 2017. Chemical analysis of resin fraction of Nigerian bitumen for organic and trace metal compositions. Petroleum Science and Technology, 35(13), pp.1370-1380.

[2] Adebiyi, F.M., Thoss, V. and Akinola, A.S., 2014. Comparative studies of the elements that are associated with petroleum hydrocarbon formation in Nigerian crude oil and bitumen using ICP-OES. Journal of sustainable energy engineering, 2(1), pp.10-18.

[3] Akinola, A.S., Adebiyi, F.M., Santoro, A. and Mastrolitti, S., 2018. Study of resin fraction of Nigerian crude oil using spectroscopic/spectrometric analytical techniques. Petroleum Science and Technology, 36(6), pp.429-436.

[4] Al-Shehri, S.M., Loskot, P., Numanoglu, T. and Mert, M., 2017. Common metrics for analyzing, developing and managing telecommunication networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.03290.

[5] Anthi, E., Ahmad, S., Rana, O., Theodorakopoulos, G. and Burnap, P., 2018. EclipseIoT: A secure and adaptive hub for the Internet of Things. Computers & Security, 78, pp.477-490.

[6] Aujla, G.S., Chaudhary, R., Kaur, K., Garg, S., Kumar, N. and Ranjan, R., 2018. SAFE: SDN-assisted framework for edge–cloud interplay in secure healthcare ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(1), pp.469-480.

[7] Boppana, V., 2018. Emerging Technologies: Shaping the Future of Innovation. Global Research Review in Business and Economics [GRRBE], 10(05).

[8] Brynskov, M., Facca, F.M. and Hrasko, G., 2018. Next Generation Internet of Things. H2020 Coordination and Support Action (CSA), NGIoT Consortium, 2021, p.2019.

[9] Buyya, R., Srirama, S.N., Casale, G., Calheiros, R., Simmhan, Y., Varghese, B., Gelenbe, E., Javadi, B., Vaquero, L.M., Netto, M.A. and Toosi, A.N., 2018. A manifesto for future generation cloud computing: Research directions for the next decade. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 51(5), pp.1-38.

[10] Buzachis, A. and Villari, M., 2018, December. Basic principles of osmotic computing: secure and dependable microelements (mels) orchestration leveraging blockchain facilities. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing Companion (UCC Companion) (pp. 47-52). IEEE.

[11] Cerović, D., Del Piccolo, V., Amamou, A., Haddadou, K. and Pujolle, G., 2018. Fast packet processing: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4), pp.3645-3676.

[12] Chih-Lin, I., Sun, Q., Liu, Z., Zhang, S. and Han, S., 2017. The big-data-driven intelligent wireless network: Architecture, use cases, solutions, and future trends. IEEE vehicular technology magazine, 12(4), pp.20-29.

[13] Ciribini, A.L.C., Ventura, S.M. and Paneroni, M., 2016. Implementation of an interoperable process to optimise design and construction phases of a residential building: A BIM Pilot Project. Automation in construction, 71, pp.62-73.

[14] Davis, J., Eze, O. and Adrian, G., 2017. Frameworks for future cyber defense: Integrating AI and zero-trust in emerging economies.

[15] Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J.D. and Lippman, A., 2016, August. A Case Study for Blockchain in Healthcare:“MedRec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data. In Proceedings of IEEE open & big data conference (Vol. 13, No. 13).

[16] Elsaadany, M., Ali, A. and Hamouda, W., 2017. Cellular LTE-A technologies for the future Internet-of-Things: Physical layer features and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), pp.2544-2572.

[17] Firoozjaei, M.D., Jeong, J.P., Ko, H. and Kim, H., 2017. Security challenges with network functions virtualization. Future Generation Computer Systems, 67, pp.315-324.

[18] Floriano, S., 2018. Market challenges of incumbent telecom companies entering Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems and organizational implications: A case study.

[19] Fortino, G., Savaglio, C., Palau, C.E., De Puga, J.S., Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Montesinos, M., Liotta, A. and Llop, M., 2017. Towards multi-layer interoperability of heterogeneous IoT platforms: The INTER-IoT approach. In Integration, interconnection, and interoperability of IoT systems (pp. 199-232). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[20] Ghaleb, B., Al-Dubai, A.Y., Ekonomou, E., Alsarhan, A., Nasser, Y., Mackenzie, L.M. and Boukerche, A., 2018. A survey of limitations and enhancements of the ipv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks: A focus on core operations. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), pp.1607-1635.

[21] Heinimann, H.R. and Hatfield, K., 2017. Infrastructure resilience assessment, management and governance–state and perspectives. In Resilience and risk: methods and application in environment, cyber and social domains (pp. 147-187). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

[22] Herrera, J.G. and Botero, J.F., 2016. Resource allocation in NFV: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 13(3), pp.518-532.

[23] Ibrahim, D., Chen, Z., Eljailany, H.A., Yu, G., Ipaye, A.A., Abouda, K.A. and Idress, W.M., 2016. Internet of Things. Elektor publication.

[24] Iqbal, S., Kiah, M.L.M., Anuar, N.B., Daghighi, B., Wahab, A.W.A. and Khan, S., 2016. Service delivery models of cloud computing: security issues and open challenges. Security and communication networks, 9(17), pp.4726-4750.

[25] Jabbar, S., Ullah, F., Khalid, S., Khan, M. and Han, K., 2017. Semantic interoperability in heterogeneous IoT infrastructure for healthcare. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2017(1), p.9731806.

[26] Kache, F. and Seuring, S., 2017. Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International journal of operations & production management, 37(1), pp.10-36.

[27] Kaur, K., Sharma, D.S. and Kahlon, D.K.S., 2017. Interoperability and portability approaches in inter-connected clouds: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(4), pp.1-40.

[28] Khalid, S., Ullah, S., Alam, A. and Din, F., 2016. Optimal latency in collaborative virtual environment to increase user performance: A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 142(3), pp.35-47.

[29] Krancher, O., Luther, P. and Jost, M., 2018. Key affordances of platform-as-a-service: Self-organization and continuous feedback. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(3), pp.776-812.

[30] Kumbhare, N., Tunc, C., Hariri, S., Djordjevic, I., Akoglu, A. and Siegel, H.J., 2016, November. Just in time architecture (jita) for dynamically composable data centers. In 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.

[31] Lemarleni, J.E., Ochieng, I., Gakobo, T. and Mwaura, P., 2017. Effects of resource allocation on strategy implementation at Kenya Police Service in Nairobi County. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 2(4), pp.1-26.

[32] Leminen, S., Rajahonka, M., Westerlund, M. and Wendelin, R., 2018. The future of the Internet of Things: toward heterarchical ecosystems and service business models. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33(6), pp.749-767.

[33] Levin, A., Lorenz, D., Merlino, G., Panarello, A., Puliafito, A. and Tricomi, G., 2018. Hierarchical load balancing as a service for federated cloud networks. Computer communications, 129, pp.125-137.

[34] Lv, W.D., Tian, D., Wei, Y. and Xi, R.X., 2018. Innovation resilience: A new approach for managing uncertainties concerned with sustainable innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), p.3641.

[35] Mabo, T., Swar, B. and Aghili, S., 2018, March. A vulnerability study of Mhealth chronic disease management (CDM) applications (apps). In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 587-598). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[36] Manic, M., Wijayasekara, D., Amarasinghe, K. and Rodriguez-Andina, J.J., 2016. Building energy management systems: The age of intelligent and adaptive buildings. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 10(1), pp.25-39.

[37] Matter, D.I.R.S. and An, E., 2017. STOCK RETURNS SENSITIVITY TO INTEREST RATE CHANGES.

[38] Moinudeen, G.K., Ahmad, F., Kumar, D., Al-Douri, Y. and Ahmad, S., 2017. IoT applications in future foreseen guided by engineered nanomaterials and printed intelligence technologies a technology review. International Journal of Internet of Things, 6(3), pp.106-148.

[39] Neghabi, A.A., Navimipour, N.J., Hosseinzadeh, M. and Rezaee, A., 2018. Load balancing mechanisms in the software defined networks: a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature. IEEE access, 6, pp.14159-14178.

[40] Nicho, M., 2018. A process model for implementing information systems security governance. Information & Computer Security, 26(1), pp.10-38.

[41] Oni, O., Adeshina, Y.T., Iloeje, K.F. and Olatunji, O.O., ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL FAIRNESS AUDITOR FOR LOAN SYSTEMS. Journal ID, 8993, p.1162.

[42] Osabuohien, F.O., 2017. Review of the environmental impact of polymer degradation. Communication in Physical Sciences, 2(1).

[43] OSHOMEGIE, M.J., 2018. THE SPILL OVER EFFECTS OF STAFF STRIKE ACTION ON MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM SCALE BUSINESSES IN NIGERIA: A CASE STUDY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN AND IBADAN POLYTECHNIC.

[44] Palattella, M.R., Dohler, M., Grieco, A., Rizzo, G., Torsner, J., Engel, T. and Ladid, L., 2016. Internet of things in the 5G era: Enablers, architecture, and business models. IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, 34(3), pp.510-527.

[45] Panetto, H., Zdravkovic, M., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Romero, D., Cecil, J. and Mezgár, I., 2016. New perspectives for the future interoperable enterprise systems. Computers in industry, 79, pp.47-63.

[46] Pattaranantakul, M., He, R., Song, Q., Zhang, Z. and Meddahi, A., 2018. NFV security survey: From use case driven threat analysis to state-of-the-art countermeasures. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(4), pp.3330-3368.

[47] Qiu, T., Chen, N., Li, K., Qiao, D. and Fu, Z., 2017. Heterogeneous ad hoc networks: Architectures, advances and challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 55, pp.143-152.

[48] Radhakrishnan, R., Edmonson, W.W., Afghah, F., Rodriguez-Osorio, R.M., Pinto, F. and Burleigh, S.C., 2016. Survey of inter-satellite communication for small satellite systems: Physical layer to network layer view. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(4), pp.2442-2473.

[49] Ribeiro, L. and Björkman, M., 2017. Transitioning from standard automation solutions to cyber-physical production systems: An assessment of critical conceptual and technical challenges. IEEE systems journal, 12(4), pp.3816-3827.

[50] Risius, M. and Spohrer, K., 2017. A blockchain research framework: What we (don’t) know, where we go from here, and how we will get there. Business & information systems engineering, 59(6), pp.385-409.

[51] Sandberg, J., Holmström, J. and Lyytinen, K., 2018. Digital transformation of ABB through platforms: the emergence of hybrid architecture in process automation. In Digitalization Cases: How Organizations Rethink Their Business for the Digital Age (pp. 273-291). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[52] Schöggl, J.P., Fritz, M.M. and Baumgartner, R.J., 2016. Toward supply chain-wide sustainability assessment: A conceptual framework and an aggregation method to assess supply chain performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, pp.822-835.

[53] Serrano, W., 2018. Digital systems in smart city and infrastructure: Digital as a service. Smart cities, 1(1), pp.134-154.

[54] Shirazi, S.N., Gouglidis, A., Farshad, A. and Hutchison, D., 2017. The extended cloud: Review and analysis of mobile edge computing and fog from a security and resilience perspective. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 35(11), pp.2586-2595.

[55] Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S. and Sabella, D., 2017. On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1657-1681.

[56] Tselios, C. and Tsolis, G., 2016, February. A survey on software tools and architectures for deploying multimedia-aware cloud applications. In Algorithmic Aspects of Cloud Computing: First International Workshop, ALGOCLOUD 2015, Patras, Greece, September 14-15, 2015. Revised Selected Papers (pp. 168-180). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[57] Volkova, A., Niedermeier, M., Basmadjian, R. and de Meer, H., 2018. Security challenges in control network protocols: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(1), pp.619-639.

[58] Wachter, S., 2018. Normative challenges of identification in the Internet of Things: Privacy, profiling, discrimination, and the GDPR. Computer law & security review, 34(3), pp.436-449.

[59] Xu, K., Qu, Y. and Yang, K., 2016. A tutorial on the internet of things: from a heterogeneous network integration perspective. IEEE network, 30(2), pp.102-108.

[60] Yaqoob, I., Ahmed, E., Hashem, I.A.T., Ahmed, A.I.A., Gani, A., Imran, M. and Guizani, M., 2017. Internet of things architecture: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges. IEEE wireless communications, 24(3), pp.10-16.

[61] Yellanki, S.K., 2016. Smart Services and Network Infrastructure: Building Seamless Digital Ecosystems. Global Research Development (GRD) ISSN: 2455-5703, 1(12), pp.1-23.

How to cite this paper

Oluranti Ogundapo "Model for Enhancing Network Integration and Interoperability Across Diverse Technology Platforms" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 3 Issue 6 2019 Page 381-394
Oluranti Ogundapo "Model for Enhancing Network Integration and Interoperability Across Diverse Technology Platforms" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 6, Dec. 2019
Oluranti Ogundapo (2019). Model for Enhancing Network Integration and Interoperability Across Diverse Technology Platforms. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 3(6).
Oluranti Ogundapo "Model for Enhancing Network Integration and Interoperability Across Diverse Technology Platforms" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 6, Dec. 2019.
@article{1712110,
      author = {Oluranti Ogundapo},
      title = {Model for Enhancing Network Integration and Interoperability Across Diverse Technology Platforms},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {3},
      number = {6},
      pages = {381-394},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712110.pdf},
      abstract = {The increasing complexity and heterogeneity of modern telecommunications and internet infrastructures necessitate robust models for enhancing network integration and interoperability across diverse technology platforms. With the proliferation of 5G/6G networks, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, cloud computing, and edge architectures, communication networks face unprecedented challenges in ensuring seamless connectivity, consistent service quality, and secure data exchange among heterogeneous systems. This study proposes a comprehensive model that emphasizes standardized protocols, modular design principles, and intelligent orchestration mechanisms to facilitate interoperability while maintaining reliability, scalability, and performance. The proposed model adopts a layered and modular architecture to abstract the physical, network, service, and management layers, enabling seamless integration of legacy systems with emerging technologies. Standardized interfaces and open protocols, guided by international standards such as 3GPP, IETF, and ITU-T, form the foundation for multi-vendor compatibility and cross-platform communication. In addition, the model incorporates software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV), allowing dynamic allocation of network resources, automated configuration, and adaptive routing across heterogeneous environments. By leveraging AI-driven orchestration and predictive analytics, the framework optimizes traffic management, reduces latency, and mitigates the impact of network congestion or failures, thereby improving end-to-end service quality. Security and compliance are integral components of the model, encompassing end-to-end encryption, authentication mechanisms, and data privacy adherence in alignment with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR and HIPAA. Furthermore, edge computing integration ensures that data processing occurs closer to end-users, enhancing responsiveness and reducing bandwidth requirements. The significance of this model lies in its scalability, adaptability, and cross-platform applicability, making it suitable for telecom operators, cloud service providers, IoT ecosystems, and enterprise networks. By promoting standardized integration, intelligent management, and secure interoperability, the framework addresses the growing demand for resilient, efficient, and unified communication infrastructures capable of supporting the evolving digital economy.},
      keywords = {Network Integration, Interoperability, SDN, NFV, AI Orchestration, Edge Computing, Multi-Platform Connectivity, Standardized Protocols, Scalable Infrastructure.},
      month = {December},
  }