International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712852

1712852 Vol 3 · Issue 5 Download Paper

Integrated Production Optimization Framework Enhancing Development Planning Decisions In Heterogeneous Petroleum Reservoir Environments

Lymmy Ogbidi Benneth Oteh

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Petroleum Reservoir Engineering

Abstract

In heterogeneous petroleum reservoir environments, effective development planning and production optimization are critical to maximizing hydrocarbon recovery while minimizing operational costs. This study proposes an Integrated Production Optimization Framework (IPOF) aimed at enhancing decision-making in the development planning phase of such reservoirs. The framework integrates advanced modeling techniques, real-time data analytics, and machine learning algorithms to optimize production strategies, accounting for reservoir complexities such as varying permeability, fluid properties, and geological features. The IPOF employs a multi-criteria decision analysis approach, combining geological, geophysical, and engineering data with economic and environmental considerations. This integrated approach allows for the generation of optimized production schedules and enhanced resource allocation, ensuring that the overall reservoir management strategy is both cost-effective and sustainable. Key components of the IPOF include reservoir simulation models for different production scenarios, optimization algorithms for well placement and production rates, and predictive analytics for forecasting reservoir performance. Additionally, the framework incorporates uncertainty quantification techniques to account for data gaps and model inaccuracies, ensuring more reliable decision-making. By combining both deterministic and stochastic methods, the IPOF offers a comprehensive solution for development planning in heterogeneous environments, where traditional models may struggle to provide accurate predictions. Through case studies and simulation results, the effectiveness of the IPOF in improving development planning decisions is demonstrated. The framework?s ability to integrate various reservoir characteristics and production variables enables operators to make informed decisions that lead to improved recovery rates and reduced operational risks. The proposed framework can be applied to various petroleum reservoirs worldwide, offering a versatile tool for enhancing production optimization and development planning.

Keywords

Integrated Production Optimization, Reservoir Management, Decision-Making, Machine Learning, Petroleum Reservoir, Development Planning, Reservoir Simulation, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Optimization Algorithms, Uncertainty Quantification.

References

[1] Aalsalem, M. Y., Khan, W. Z., Gharibi, W., Khan, M. K., & Arshad, Q. (2018). Wireless Sensor Networks in oil and gas industry: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open challenges. Journal of network and computer applications, 113, 87-97.

[2] Agista, M. N., Guo, K., & Yu, Z. (2018). A state-of-the-art review of nanoparticles application in petroleum with a focus on enhanced oil recovery. Applied sciences, 8(6), 871.

[3] Akomea-Agyin, K., & Asante, M. (2019). Analysis of security vulnerabilities in wired equivalent privacy (WEP). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 529-536.

[4] Akpan, U. U., Adekoya, K. O., Awe, E. T., Garba, N., Oguncoker, G. D., & Ojo, S. G. (2017). Mini-STRs screening of 12 relatives of Hausa origin in northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(1), 48-57.

[5] Akpan, U. U., Awe, T. E., & Idowu, D. (2019). Types and frequency of fingerprint minutiae in individuals of Igbo and Yoruba ethnic groups of Nigeria. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 10(1).

[6] Alfarge, D., Wei, M., & Bai, B. (2017, April). IOR methods in unconventional reservoirs of North America: Comprehensive review. In SPE Western Regional Meeting (p. D031S008R005). SPE.

[7] Al-Qahtani, K. Y., & Elkamel, A. (2011). Planning and integration of refinery and petrochemical operations. John Wiley & Sons.

[8] Amirian, E., Dejam, M., & Chen, Z. (2018). Performance forecasting for polymer flooding in heavy oil reservoirs. Fuel, 216, 83-100.

[9] Amirian, E., Fedutenko, E., Yang, C., Chen, Z., & Nghiem, L. (2018). Artificial neural network modeling and forecasting of oil reservoir performance. Applications of Data Management and Analysis: Case Studies in Social Networks and Beyond, 43-67.

[10] Asante, M., & Akomea-Agyin, K. (2019). Analysis of security vulnerabilities in wifi-protected access pre-shared key.

[11] Aslanyan, A., Gilfanov, A., Gulyaev, D., Krichevsky, V., & Timerbaev, M. (2017, October). Dynamic reservoir-pressure maintenance system study in carbonate reservoir with complicated pore structure by production analysis, production logging and well-testing. In SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference (p. D023S008R003). SPE.

[12] Awe, E. T. (2017). Hybridization of snout mouth deformed and normal mouth African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Animal Research International, 14(3), 2804-2808.

[13] Awe, E. T., & Akpan, U. U. (2017). Cytological study of Allium cepa and Allium sativum.

[14] Awe, E. T., Akpan, U. U., & Adekoya, K. O. (2017). Evaluation of two MiniSTR loci mutation events in five Father-Mother-Child trios of Yoruba origin. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 33, 120-124.

[15] Balaji, K., Rabiei, M., Suicmez, V., Canbaz, C. H., Agharzeyva, Z., Tek, S., ... & Temizel, C. (2018, June). Status of data-driven methods and their applications in oil and gas industry. In SPE Europec featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition? (p. D031S005R007). SPE.

[16] Bello, O., Yang, D., Lazarus, S., Wang, X. S., & Denney, T. (2017, May). Next generation downhole big data platform for dynamic data-driven well and reservoir management. In SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition (p. D031S014R002). SPE.

[17] Benyeogor, O., Jambol, D., Amah, O., Obiga, D., Awe, S., & Erinle, A. (2019, August). Pressure relief management philosophy for MPD operations on surface stack HPHT exploration wells. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D033S014R005). SPE.

[18] Biniwale, S., Nitura, J., Sifuentes, W., Ramdzani, R., Talabi, O. A., Seruji, N. E., ... & Koundarkar, O. (2016, November). Integrated Live Asset Modeling-A Necessity to Unlock Oil in Mature Fields Achieving True Integrated Operations IO. In International Petroleum Technology Conference (p. D031S048R002). IPTC.

[19] Brentan, B., Meirelles, G., Luvizotto Jr, E., & Izquierdo, J. (2018). Joint operation of pressure-reducing valves and pumps for improving the efficiency of water distribution systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 144(9), 04018055.

[20] Brown, J. B., Salehi, A., Benhallam, W., & Matringe, S. F. (2017, April). Using data-driven technologies to accelerate the field development planning process for mature field rejuvenation. In SPE Western Regional Meeting (p. D041S012R001). SPE.

[21] Bukshtynov, V., Volkov, O., Durlofsky, L. J., & Aziz, K. (2015). Comprehensive framework for gradient-based optimization in closed-loop reservoir management. Computational Geosciences, 19(4), 877-897.

[22] Caineng, Z. O. U., Yunhong, D. I. N. G., Yongjun, L. U., Xiangui, L., Jianjun, C., Xin, W., ... & Yutian, L. U. O. (2017). Concept, technology and practice of “man-made reservoirs” development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 44(1), 146-158.

[23] Camponogara, E., Teixeira, A. F., Hulse, E. O., Silva, T. L., Sunjerga, S., & Miyatake, L. K. (2017). Integrated methodology for production optimization from multiple offshore reservoirs in the Santos Basin. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 14(2), 669-680.

[24] Castro, A., Laksana, S., Abdussalam, G., Allotai, O., Shaiebi, M., Alkhemri, T., ... & Omar, F. (2012, November). Integrated Reservoir Modeling On Heterogeneous Ordovician Sandstone Of IR-Fields, Murzuq Basin Libya, Helps Optimizing Field Development Plan And Reduce Uncertainty. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (pp. SPE-161197). SPE.

[25] Davarpanah, A., Mirshekari, B., Jafari Behbahani, T., & Hemmati, M. (2018). Integrated production logging tools approach for convenient experimental individual layer permeability measurements in a multi-layered fractured reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 8(3), 743-751.

[26] Denney, D. (2011). Modeling, History Matching, Forecasting, and Analysis of Shale-Reservoir Performance With Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 63(09), 60-63.

[27] Druetta, P., Tesi, P., De Persis, C., & Picchioni, F. (2016). Methods in oil recovery processes and reservoir simulation. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 399-435.

[28] Eli, A., Aboaja, U., & Ajayi, A. (2013, August). Integrated production System Modeling (IPSM) as an opportunity Realization and optimization tool for improved asset management. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (pp. SPE-167557). SPE.

[29] Esmaili, S., & Mohaghegh, S. D. (2016). Full field reservoir modeling of shale assets using advanced data-driven analytics. Geoscience Frontiers, 7(1), 11-20.

[30] Fayaed, S. S., El-Shafie, A., & Jaafar, O. (2013). Reservoir-system simulation and optimization techniques. Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, 27(7), 1751-1772.

[31] Freifeld, B. M., Oldenburg, C. M., Jordan, P., Pan, L., Perfect, S., Morris, J., ... & Rose, K. (2016). Well Integrity for Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Reservoirs and Aquifers (No. LBNL-1006165). Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.(LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States).

[32] Ghassemzadeh, S., & Charkhi, A. H. (2016). Optimization of integrated production system using advanced proxy based models: A new approach. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 35, 89-96.

[33] Gherardi, F., Audigane, P., & Gaucher, E. C. (2012). Predicting long-term geochemical alteration of wellbore cement in a generic geological CO2 confinement site: Tackling a difficult reactive transport modeling challenge. Journal of Hydrology, 420, 340-359.

[34] Gopa, K., Yamov, S., Naugolnov, M., Perets, D., & Simonov, M. (2018, October). Cognitive analytical system based on data-driven approach for mature reservoir management. In SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference (p. D013S002R003). SPE.

[35] Goudarzi, A., Delshad, M., & Sepehrnoori, K. (2013, February). A critical assessment of several reservoir simulators for modeling chemical enhanced oil recovery processes. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference (pp. SPE-163578). SPE.

[36] Hafez, H., Al Mansoori, Y., Bahamaish, J., Saputelli, L., Escorcia, A., Sousa, S., ... & Mijares, G. (2018, November). Large Scale Subsurface and Surface Integrated Asset Modeling-An Effective Outcome Driven Approach. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D031S087R002). SPE.

[37] Hoda, M. F., Hoffmann, A., Majzoub Dahouk, M., Kuntadi, A., Astutik, W., Juell, A., & Whitson, C. H. (2017, May). Successful Implementations of Integrated Asset Modeling. In SPE Middle East Intelligent Oil and Gas Symposium (pp. SPE-187471). SPE.

[38] Holanda, R. W. D., Gildin, E., Jensen, J. L., Lake, L. W., & Kabir, C. S. (2018). A state-of-the-art literature review on capacitance resistance models for reservoir characterization and performance forecasting. Energies, 11(12), 3368.

[39] Hou, J., Zhou, K., Zhang, X. S., Kang, X. D., & Xie, H. (2015). A review of closed-loop reservoir management. Petroleum Science, 12(1), 114-128.

[40] Islam, M. R., Hossain, M. E., Mousavizadegan, S. H., Mustafiz, S., & Abou-Kassem, J. H. (2016). Advanced petroleum reservoir simulation: Towards developing reservoir emulators. John Wiley & Sons.

[41] Jiang, J., & Younis, R. M. (2016). Hybrid coupled discrete-fracture/matrix and multicontinuum models for unconventional-reservoir simulation. SPE Journal, 21(03), 1009-1027.

[42] Jiang, X., Hassan, W. A. A., & Gluyas, J. (2013). Modelling and monitoring of geological carbon storage: A perspective on cross-validation. Applied energy, 112, 784-792.

[43] Kamari, A., Nikookar, M., Sahranavard, L., & Mohammadi, A. H. (2014). Efficient screening of enhanced oil recovery methods and predictive economic analysis. Neural Computing and Applications, 25(3), 815-824.

[44] Kang, B., & Choe, J. (2017). Initial model selection for efficient history matching of channel reservoirs using Ensemble Smoother. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 152, 294-308.

[45] Kang, P. S., Lim, J. S., & Huh, C. (2016). Screening criteria and considerations of offshore enhanced oil recovery. Energies, 9(1), 44.

[46] Katterbauer, K., Arango, S., Sun, S., & Hoteit, I. (2015). Multi-data reservoir history matching for enhanced reservoir forecasting and uncertainty quantification. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 128, 160-176.

[47] Khor, C. S., Elkamel, A., & Shah, N. (2017). Optimization methods for petroleum fields development and production systems: a review. Optimization and Engineering, 18(4), 907-941.

[48] Kovscek, A. R. (2012). Emerging challenges and potential futures for thermally enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 98, 130-143.

[49] Kurtoglu, B. (2013). Integrated reservoir characterization and modeling in support of enhanced oil recovery for Bakken. Colorado School of Mines.

[50] Lehnert, M., Linhart, A., & Röglinger, M. (2016). Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement. Business Research, 9(2), 377-419.

[51] Li, Q., & Liu, G. (2016). Risk assessment of the geological storage of CO2: A review. Geologic carbon sequestration: Understanding reservoir behavior, 249-284.

[52] Lifton, V. A. (2016). Microfluidics: an enabling screening technology for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Lab on a Chip, 16(10), 1777-1796.

[53] Liu, D., & Sun, J. (2017). The control theory and application for well pattern optimization of heterogeneous sandstone reservoirs (pp. 334-363). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

[54] Mabo, T., Swar, B., & Aghili, S. (2018, March). A vulnerability study of Mhealth chronic disease management (CDM) applications (apps). In World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 587-598). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[55] Manceau, J. C., Hatzignatiou, D. G., De Lary, L., Jensen, N. B., & Réveillère, A. (2014). Mitigation and remediation technologies and practices in case of undesired migration of CO2 from a geological storage unit Current status. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 22, 272-290.

[56] Mijnarends, R., Frolov, A., Grishko, F., Kryanev, S., Mikhaylenko, E., Nizamutdinov, E., ... & Lvov, A. (2015, September). Advanced data-driven performance analysis for mature waterfloods. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (p. D021S011R008). SPE.

[57] Mohaghegh, S. D., Gaskari, R., Maysami, M., & Khazaeni, Y. (2014, October). Data-driven reservoir management of a giant mature oilfield in the Middle East. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (pp. SPE-170660). SPE.

[58] Muggeridge, A., Cockin, A., Webb, K., Frampton, H., Collins, I., Moulds, T., & Salino, P. (2014). Recovery rates, enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2006).

[59] Myer, L. (2011). Global status of geologic CO2 storage technology development. United States carbon sequestration council report July, 2011.

[60] Namhata, A., Oladyshkin, S., Dilmore, R. M., Zhang, L., & Nakles, D. V. (2016). Probabilistic assessment of above zone pressure predictions at a geologic carbon storage site. Scientific reports, 6(1), 39536.

[61] Nazarov, R., Zalama, P., Hernandez, M., & Rivas, C. (2014, June). Integrated Asset Modeling in Mature Offshore Fields: Challenges and Successes. In SPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference (p. D031S013R002). SPE.

[62] Nwankwor, E. (2014). A unified metaheuristic and system-theoretic framework for petroleum reservoir management (Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool).

[63] Ogundipe, F., Sampson, E., Bakare, O. I., Oketola, O., & Folorunso, A. (2019). Digital Transformation and its Role in Advancing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). transformation, 19, 48.

[64] Olajire, A. A. (2014). Review of ASP EOR (alkaline surfactant polymer enhanced oil recovery) technology in the petroleum industry: Prospects and challenges. Energy, 77, 963-982.

[65] Oliveira, T., Thomas, M. and Espadanal, M., 2014. Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & management, 51(5), pp.497-510.

[66] Oni, O., Adeshina, Y. T., Iloeje, K. F., & Olatunji, O. O. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Model Fairness Auditor For Loan Systems. Journal ID, 8993, 1162.

[67] Osabuohien, F. O. (2017). Review of the environmental impact of polymer degradation. Communication in Physical Sciences, 2(1).

[68] Osabuohien, F. O. (2019). Green Analytical Methods for Monitoring APIs and Metabolites in Nigerian Wastewater: A Pilot Environmental Risk Study. Communication In Physical Sciences, 4(2), 174-186.

[69] Owulade, O. A., Isi, L. R., Okereke, M., Sofoluwe, O., Isaac, G., Olugbemi, T., & Essien, N. A. (2019). Review of Reliability Engineering Techniques to Optimize Performance and Risk Management in Energy Infrastructure. Burns, 18.

[70] Pal, S., Mushtaq, M., Banat, F., & Al Sumaiti, A. M. (2018). Review of surfactant-assisted chemical enhanced oil recovery for carbonate reservoirs: challenges and future perspectives. Petroleum Science, 15(1), 77-102.

[71] Parada, C. H., & Ertekin, T. (2012, March). A new screening tool for improved oil recovery methods using artificial neural networks. In SPE Western Regional Meeting (pp. SPE-153321). SPE.

[72] Pathak, V., Palaschak, C., Martinez, O., Hudson, J., Ita, J., Saaf, F., ... & Segundo, J. (2016, September). Solving the challenges of short and long-term production forecasting and uncertainty using a fully-coupled implicit integrated production modelling system. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (p. D021S022R008). SPE.

[73] Pérez, F., Tillero, E., Pérez, E., Niño, P., Rojas, J., Araujo, J., ... & Piña, M. (2012, May). An Innovative Integrated Asset Modeling for an Offshore-Onshore Field Development. Tomoporo Field Case. In SPE International Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition (pp. SPE-157556). SPE.

[74] Pope, G. A. (2011). Recent developments and remaining challenges of enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 63(07), 65-68.

[75] Reddicharla, N., Meqbali, N. A., AlSelaiti, I. H., & Singh, S. (2017, November). Best Practices for Successful Implementation of Integrated Asset Model Based Well and Reservoir Workflow Automation-A Practical Learning Experience from Mature Brown Fields. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D031S077R005). SPE.

[76] Riazi, S. H., Zargar, G., Baharimoghadam, M., Moslemi, B., & Darani, E. S. (2016). Fractured reservoir history matching improved based on artificial intelligent. Petroleum, 2(4), 344-360.

[77] Ringrose, P., & Bentley, M. (2016). Reservoir model design (Vol. 2). Berlin: Springer.

[78] Rodosta, T., & Ackiewicz, M. (2014). US DOE/NETL Core R&D program for carbon storage technology development. Energy Procedia, 63, 6368-6378.

[79] Rodosta, T., Bromhal, G., & Damiani, D. (2018, October). US DOE/NETL Carbon Storage Program: Addressing Key Science and Technology Challenges. In 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Melbourne (pp. 21-26).

[80] Rui, Z., Lu, J., Zhang, Z., Guo, R., Ling, K., Zhang, R., & Patil, S. (2017). A quantitative oil and gas reservoir evaluation system for development. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 42, 31-39.

[81] Rwechungura, R., Dadashpour, M., & Kleppe, J. (2011, September). Advanced history matching techniques reviewed. In SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference (pp. SPE-142497). SPE.

[82] Santos, S. M., Gaspar, A. T., & Schiozer, D. J. (2018). Managing reservoir uncertainty in petroleum field development: Defining a flexible production strategy from a set of rigid candidate strategies. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 171, 516-528.

[83] Saputelli, L., Cherian, B., Gregoriadis, K., Nikolaou, M., Oudinot, C., Reddy, G., ... & Ehlig-Economides, C. (2000, November). Integration of Computer-Aided High-Intensity Design with Reservoir Exploitation of Remote and Offshore Locations. In SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China (pp. SPE-64621). SPE.

[84] Sardinha, C., Petr, C., Lehmann, J., & Pyecroft, J. (2014, September). Determining interwell connectivity and reservoir complexity through frac pressure hits and production interference analysis. In SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference (p. D031S010R005). SPE.

[85] Satter, A., & Iqbal, G. M. (2015). Reservoir engineering: the fundamentals, simulation, and management of conventional and unconventional recoveries. Gulf Professional Publishing.

[86] Schultz, R. A., Mutlu, U., & Bere, A. (2016, June). Critical issues in subsurface integrity. In ARMA US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium (pp. ARMA-2016). ARMA.

[87] Selvaggio, P., Freni, F., Rossi, R., Di Giorgio, D. C., & Colombo, I. (2018, November). New generation integrated asset modelling: High-resolution reservoir multi models coupled with an external steady-State network solver. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D022S155R001). SPE.

[88] Semenov, A., Altaf, B., Allouti, A., Bu-Hindi, H., & Ibrahim, L. (2017, November). History matching of integrated reservoir simulation model for green field offshore Abu Dhabi. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D021S030R002). SPE.

[89] Shafiei, A., Dusseault, M. B., Zendehboudi, S., & Chatzis, I. (2013). A new screening tool for evaluation of steamflooding performance in Naturally Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs. Fuel, 108, 502-514.

[90] Shah, N. K., Li, Z., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2011). Petroleum refining operations: key issues, advances, and opportunities. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50(3), 1161-1170.

[91] Tavallali, M. S., & Karimi, I. A. (2016). Integrated oil-field management: from well placement and planning to production scheduling. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 55(4), 978-994.

[92] Temizel, C., Aktas, S., Kirmaci, H., Susuz, O., Zhu, Y., Balaji, K., ... & Yegin, C. (2016, September). Turning Data into Knowledge: Data-Driven Surveillance and Optimization in Mature Fields. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (p. D031S057R001). SPE.

[93] Temizel, C., Canbaz, C. H., Tran, M., Abdelfatah, E., Jia, B., Putra, D., ... & Alkouh, A. (2018, December). A comprehensive review heavy oil reservoirs, latest techniques, discoveries, technologies and applications in the oil and gas industry. In SPE International Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition (p. D012S024R001). SPE.

[94] Toby, S. (2014, October). Making the Best of Integrated Asset Modelling. In SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference (pp. SPE-171161). SPE.

[95] Trebolle, R., Hamdan, V. H., Sepulveda, W., Whitney, P., Grigorescu, R., Mohammad, A., ... & Curteis, C. (2011, May). Opportunities/Lessons Learnt and New Technologies for Redevelopment of a Mature Field. In SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition (pp. SPE-149105). SPE.

[96] Udy, J., Hansen, B., Maddux, S., Petersen, D., Heilner, S., Stevens, K., ... & Hedengren, J. D. (2017). Review of field development optimization of waterflooding, EOR, and well placement focusing on history matching and optimization algorithms. Processes, 5(3), 34.

[97] Uzondu, F. N., & Ofoedu, A. T. (2014). Modeling Of Asphaltic Sludge Generation from Spent Engine Oil.

[98] Uzondu, F. N., & Ofoedu, A. T. (2011): Feasibility Of Spent Engine Oil And Charcoal As Raw Materials For The Production Of Black Printing Ink.

[99] Wenrui, H., Jingwei, B., & Bin, H. (2013). Trend and progress in global oil and gas exploration. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40(4), 439-443.

[100] Wilson, A. (2018). Data-Driven Technologies Accelerate Planning for Mature-Field Rejuvenation. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 70(01), 54-57.

[101] Yap, F. K. (2016). Representative models for history matching and robust optimization (Doctoral dissertation, MSc thesis, Delft University of Technology).

[102] Younis, R. M. (2011). Modern advances in software and solution algorithms for reservoir simulation. Stanford University.

[103] Yuan, B., & Wood, D. A. (2018). A comprehensive review of formation damage during enhanced oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 167, 287-299.

[104] Zhao, H., Kang, Z., Zhang, X., Sun, H., Cao, L., & Reynolds, A. C. (2016). A physics-based data-driven numerical model for reservoir history matching and prediction with a field application. SPE Journal, 21(06), 2175-2194.

How to cite this paper

Lymmy Ogbidi, Benneth Oteh "Integrated Production Optimization Framework Enhancing Development Planning Decisions In Heterogeneous Petroleum Reservoir Environments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 3 Issue 5 2019 Page 345-366
Lymmy Ogbidi, Benneth Oteh "Integrated Production Optimization Framework Enhancing Development Planning Decisions In Heterogeneous Petroleum Reservoir Environments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 5, Nov. 2019
Lymmy Ogbidi, Benneth Oteh (2019). Integrated Production Optimization Framework Enhancing Development Planning Decisions In Heterogeneous Petroleum Reservoir Environments. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 3(5).
Lymmy Ogbidi, Benneth Oteh "Integrated Production Optimization Framework Enhancing Development Planning Decisions In Heterogeneous Petroleum Reservoir Environments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 5, Nov. 2019.
@article{1712852,
      author = {Lymmy Ogbidi, Benneth Oteh},
      title = {Integrated Production Optimization Framework Enhancing Development Planning Decisions In Heterogeneous Petroleum Reservoir Environments},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {345-366},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712852.pdf},
      abstract = {In heterogeneous petroleum reservoir environments, effective development planning and production optimization are critical to maximizing hydrocarbon recovery while minimizing operational costs. This study proposes an Integrated Production Optimization Framework (IPOF) aimed at enhancing decision-making in the development planning phase of such reservoirs. The framework integrates advanced modeling techniques, real-time data analytics, and machine learning algorithms to optimize production strategies, accounting for reservoir complexities such as varying permeability, fluid properties, and geological features. The IPOF employs a multi-criteria decision analysis approach, combining geological, geophysical, and engineering data with economic and environmental considerations. This integrated approach allows for the generation of optimized production schedules and enhanced resource allocation, ensuring that the overall reservoir management strategy is both cost-effective and sustainable. Key components of the IPOF include reservoir simulation models for different production scenarios, optimization algorithms for well placement and production rates, and predictive analytics for forecasting reservoir performance. Additionally, the framework incorporates uncertainty quantification techniques to account for data gaps and model inaccuracies, ensuring more reliable decision-making. By combining both deterministic and stochastic methods, the IPOF offers a comprehensive solution for development planning in heterogeneous environments, where traditional models may struggle to provide accurate predictions. Through case studies and simulation results, the effectiveness of the IPOF in improving development planning decisions is demonstrated. The framework?s ability to integrate various reservoir characteristics and production variables enables operators to make informed decisions that lead to improved recovery rates and reduced operational risks. The proposed framework can be applied to various petroleum reservoirs worldwide, offering a versatile tool for enhancing production optimization and development planning.},
      keywords = {Integrated Production Optimization, Reservoir Management, Decision-Making, Machine Learning, Petroleum Reservoir, Development Planning, Reservoir Simulation, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Optimization Algorithms, Uncertainty Quantification.},
      month = {November},
  }