Advances in Implantable Neurotechnology: Toward Precise, Adaptive, and Personalized Therapeutics

References

[1] L Pycroft, J Stein & T Aziz (2018) Deep brain stimulation: An overview of history, methods, and future developments. Brain and neuroscience advances.

[2] MJ Madou (2018) Fundamentals of microfabrication: the science of miniaturization. books.google.com.

[3] ME Kirlangic & G Ivanova (2003) Neurotherapy: More than an extra feedback loop to the pathological brain. Unable to determine the complete publication venue.

[4] G Liu, Z Lv, S Batool, MZ Li, P Zhao, L Guo, Y Wang, et al. (2023) Biocompatible material‐based flexible biosensors: from materials design to wearable/implantable devices and integrated sensing systems. Small.

[5] UK Patel, A Anwar, S Saleem, P Malik, B Rasul, et al. (2021) Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders. Journal of Neurology.

[6] M Wang, G Mi, D Shi, N Bassous, et al. (2018) Nanotechnology and nanomaterials for improving neural interfaces. Advanced Functional Materials.

[7] WH Ko (2012) Early history and challenges of implantable electronics. ACM Journal On Emerging Technologies In Computing Systems.

[8] AL Benabid (2003) Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Current opinion in neurobiology.

[9] S Carrette, P Boon, M Sprengers, R Raedt, et al. (2015) Responsive neurostimulation in epilepsy. Expert Review of Medical Devices.

[10] JI Glaser, AS Benjamin, RH Chowdhury, MG Perich, et al. (2020) Machine learning for neural decoding. eneuro.

[11] Y Cho, S Park, J Lee & KJ Yu (2021) Emerging materials and technologies with applications in flexible neural implants: a comprehensive review of current issues with neural devices. Advanced Materials.

[12] XY Xue, L Han, HQ Cai, K Zhang, ZC Sun, et al. (2025) Conductive Hydrogel‐Based Neural Interfaces: From Fabrication Methods, Properties, to Applications. Small Structures.

[13] MA Hannan, S Mutashar, SA Samad, et al. (2014) Energy harvesting for the implantable biomedical devices: issues and challenges. Journal of Biomedical Engineering.

[14] JA Miller, G Bélanger & T Mussivand (1993) Development of an autotuned transcutaneous energy transfer system. ASAIO journal.

[15] A Zebda, JP Alcaraz, P Vadgama, S Shleev, et al. (2018) Challenges for successful implantation of biofuel cells. Biosensors and Bioelectronics.

[16] H Lv, Y Zhao, J Chen, D Wang & H Chen (2019) Vagus nerve stimulation for depression: a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology.

[17] N Birbaumer & LG Cohen (2007) Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. The Journal of physiology.

[18] AA Ahmed & RA Muhammed (2021) Accessibility, use and effectiveness of neurotechnology devices for improved productivity in workplace. Unable to determine the complete publication venue.

[19] A Schulze-Bonhage (2019) Long-term outcome in neurostimulation of epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior.

[20] S Roy, ANMW Azad, S Baidya, et al. (2022) Powering solutions for biomedical sensors and implants inside the human body: A comprehensive review on energy harvesting units, energy storage, and wireless …. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[21] CL Schmidt & PM Skarstad (2001) The future of lithium and lithium-ion batteries in implantable medical devices. Journal of power sources.

[22] Y Jiao, E He, T Ye, Y Wang, H Yin, et al. (2025) Implantable batteries for bioelectronics. Accounts of Materials Research.

[23] D Katoozian, H Hosseini-Nejad & MRA Dehaqani (2024) A new approach for neural decoding by inspiring of hyperdimensional computing for implantable intra-cortical BMIs. Scientific Reports.

[24] S Santaniello, G Fiengo, L Glielmo, et al. (2010) Closed-loop control of deep brain stimulation: a simulation study. IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering.

[25] I Karageorgos, K Sriram, J Veselý, M Wu, et al. (2020) Hardware-software co-design for brain-computer interfaces. In 2020 ACM/IEEE 47th Annual International Symposium On Computer Architecture.

[26] JA Fairfield (2018) Nanostructured materials for neural electrical interfaces. Advanced Functional Materials.

[27] CAR Chapman, N Goshi & E Seker (2018) Multifunctional neural interfaces for closed‐loop control of neural activity. Advanced Functional Materials.

[28] AE Montgomery, JM Allen, et al. (2021) Adaptive neural decoder for prosthetic hand control. Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[29] C Li, X Huang, R Song, R Qian, X Liu & X Chen (2022) EEG-based seizure prediction via Transformer guided CNN. Measurement.

[30] MJIA Leccardi, P Vagni & D Ghezzi (2019) Multilayer 3D electrodes for neural implants. Journal of Neural Engineering.

@article{1713055,
      author = {Naheemat Olayemi Raji, Abdulsalam Oladipupo Abdulhakeem},
      title = {Advances in Implantable Neurotechnology: Toward Precise, Adaptive, and Personalized Therapeutics},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {1644-1652},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713055.pdf},
      abstract = {Implantable neurotechnology has emerged as a transformative approach for treating neurological disorders, yet challenges in power efficiency, adaptability, and clinical translation persist. We systematically review recent advances in implantable devices, focusing on design innovations, clinical applications, and translational barriers. Independent power systems, which harvest energy from the body, face limitations in output and placement flexibility, while externally powered alternatives enable reliable energy transfer but require external infrastructure. Lithium-based batteries remain a dominant solution, offering high energy density, but their long-term viability necessitates further exploration. In brain-machine interfaces, decoding algorithms bridge neuronal activity to motor parameters, enabling precise control of prosthetic limbs. Furthermore, closed-loop deep brain stimulation systems dynamically adjust stimulation parameters based on real-time neural signals, paving the way for personalized therapeutics. Our analysis highlights the interplay between device engineering and clinical needs, identifying gaps in safety, scalability, and patient-specific adaptation. By synthesizing insights from literature and ongoing trials, we outline a roadmap for next-generation neurotechnology, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to achieve precise, adaptive, and personalized therapies. The proposed framework not only advances scientific understanding but also informs practical strategies for overcoming translational hurdles in neuromodulation and neural rehabilitation.},
      month = {December},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1713055}
  }