Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713119
Framework for Strategic Procurement Optimization in Oil and Gas Operations
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Procurement Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I7-1713119
Abstract
Procurement functions in oil and gas operations are increasingly recognized as strategic drivers of cost efficiency, operational reliability, and risk management. The sector?s inherent complexity characterized by capital-intensive projects, volatile commodity markets, stringent regulatory requirements, and dependence on highly specialized suppliers necessitates a structured and integrated approach to procurement. This abstract presents a framework for strategic procurement optimization designed to enhance value creation across upstream, midstream, and downstream oil and gas activities. The proposed framework is built around five interrelated pillars: governance and policy alignment, demand forecasting and spend analysis, supplier strategy and relationship management, contracting and commercial optimization, and digital enablement. Governance alignment ensures procurement activities are consistent with corporate objectives, regulatory compliance, and health, safety, and environmental standards, thereby strengthening accountability and transparency. Demand forecasting and spend analysis integrate procurement planning with operational schedules, enabling improved cost control, reduced variability, and proactive sourcing decisions. Supplier strategy and relationship management emphasize segmentation based on criticality and risk, promoting long-term partnerships, performance-based contracting, and local supplier development. Contracting and commercial optimization focus on standardized contract structures, balanced risk-sharing mechanisms, and effective contract lifecycle management to enhance predictability and minimize disputes. Digital enablement, through e-procurement platforms, enterprise resource planning systems, and data analytics, supports process automation, real-time visibility, and evidence-based decision-making. The framework also embeds risk management and performance monitoring through defined key performance indicators, continuous feedback loops, and adaptive procurement strategies. By integrating these elements, the framework positions procurement as a strategic, value-generating function rather than a transactional support activity. Adoption of this framework is expected to improve cost efficiency, supply chain resilience, supplier performance, and overall operational sustainability in oil and gas operations, particularly in environments characterized by uncertainty and resource constraints.
Keywords
Strategic Procurement; Oil And Gas Operations; Procurement Optimization; Supply Chain Resilience; Supplier Management; Contract Management; Digital Procurement Systems.
References
[1] Agarwal¹, M., Sharma, R. and Alex, L.M., 2016. Challenges in supply chain management in upstream sector of oil and gas industry.
[2] Ahmad, W.N.K.W., Rezaei, J., Tavasszy, L.A. and de Brito, M.P., 2016. Commitment to and preparedness for sustainable supply chain management in the oil and gas industry. Journal of environmental management, 180, pp.202-213.
[3] Ali, I., Nagalingam, S. and Gurd, B., 2017. Building resilience in SMEs of perishable product supply chains: enablers, barriers and risks. Production Planning & Control, 28(15), pp.1236-1250.
[4] Ancarani, A., Guccio, C. and Rizzo, I., 2017. The role of firms' qualification in public contracts execution: An empirical assessment. Journal of public procurement, 16(4), pp.554-582.
[5] Appelt, S. and Galindo-Rueda, F., 2016. Measuring the link between public procurement and innovation.
[6] Arlen, J. and Kahan, M., 2017. Corporate governance regulation through nonprosecution. The University of Chicago Law Review, pp.323-387.
[7] Badiru, A.B. and Osisanya, S.O., 2016. Project management for the oil and gas industry: a world system approach. CRC press.
[8] Blundell, N., 2017. Faster, higher, stronger: the competitive advantage of efficient data management for front-end decision making. The APPEA Journal, 57(1), pp.1-9.
[9] Bodiako, A.V., Ponomareva, S.V., Rogulenko, T.M., Karp, M., Kirova, E., Gorlov, V. and Burdina, A., 2016. The goal setting of internal control in the system of project financing. International journal of economics and financial issues, 6(4), pp.1945-1955.
[10] Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., Wang, L. and Zhang, Y., 2017. WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. American Economic Review, 107(9), pp.2784-2820.
[11] Brooks, J. and Matthews, A., 2015. Trade dimensions of food security.
[12] Bruel, O., 2016. Strategic sourcing management: Structural and operational decision-making. Kogan Page Publishers.
[13] Butt, A., Naaranoja, M. and Savolainen, J., 2016. Project change stakeholder communication. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), pp.1579-1595.
[14] Cerruti, C., Mena, C., Skipworth, H. and Tavoletti, E., 2016. Characterizing agile supply partnerships in the fashion industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(8), pp.923-947.
[15] Cui, W., 2015. Administrative decentralization and tax compliance: A transactional cost perspective. University of Toronto Law Journal, 65(3), pp.186-238.
[16] Ditillo, A. and Lisi, I.E., 2016. Exploring sustainability control systems' integration: The relevance of sustainability orientation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), pp.125-148.
[17] Dubb, S., 2016. Community wealth building forms: What they are and how to use them at the local level. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), pp.141-152.
[18] Duncombe, C., Rosenblum, S., Hellmann, N., Holmes, C., Wilkinson, L., Biot, M., Bygrave, H., Hoos, D. and Garnett, G., 2015. Reframing HIV care: putting people at the centre of antiretroviral delivery. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 20(4), pp.430-447.
[19] Eriksson, P.E. and Lind, H., 2016. STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING MORAL HAZARD IN CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Journal of Self-Governance & Management Economics, 4(1).
[20] Foerstl, K., Azadegan, A., Leppelt, T. and Hartmann, E., 2015. Drivers of supplier sustainability: Moving beyond compliance to commitment. Journal of supply chain management, 51(1), pp.67-92.
[21] Gosine, R. and Warrian, P., 2017. Digitalizing extractive industries: State-of-the-art to the art-of-the-possible—Opportunities and challenges for Canada.
[22] Grosse, S.D., Berry, R.J., Tilford, J.M., Kucik, J.E. and Waitzman, N.J., 2016. Retrospective assessment of cost savings from prevention: folic acid fortification and spina bifida in the US. American journal of preventive medicine, 50(5), pp.S74-S80.
[23] Hallikas, J. and Lintukangas, K., 2016. Purchasing and supply: An investigation of risk management performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, pp.487-494.
[24] Handfield, R.B., Primo, M. and Oliveira, M.P.V.D., 2015. The role of effective relationship management in successful large oil and gas projects: Insights from procurement executives. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 1(1), pp.15-41.
[25] Heitor, M., 2015. How university global partnerships may facilitate a new era of international affairs and foster political and economic relations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, pp.276-293.
[26] Helmold, M. and Terry, B., 2016. Global sourcing and supply management excellence in China. Singapur: Springer Verlag.
[27] Inubiwon, B.E., 2017. Developing small and medium enterprises in the Nigerian oil and gas sector.
[28] Jensen, P.A., 2017. Strategic sourcing and procurement of facilities management services. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 10(2), pp.138-158.
[29] Joshi, P.S., Haghnegahdar, L., Anika, Z. and Singh, M., 2017. Supply chain innovations in the oil and gas industry. In IISE Annual Conference. Proceedings (pp. 1852-1857). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
[30] Jupp, J.R., 2016. Cross industry learning: a comparative study of product lifecycle management and building information modelling. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 9(3), pp.258-284.
[31] Kimutai, B. and Ismael, N.S., 2016. Role of strategic e-sourcing practices on supply chain performance in state corporations in Kenya: A case of Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. International Academic Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain Management, 2(2), pp.113-133.
[32] Li, Q., Niu, B. and Chu, L.K., 2016. Forward sourcing or spot trading? Optimal commodity procurement policy with demand uncertainty risk and forecast update. IEEE Systems Journal, 11(3), pp.1526-1536.
[33] Lorino, P., Mourey, D. and Schmidt, G., 2017. Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, pp.32-49.
[34] Martek, I. and Chen, C., 2016. Value chain supply procurement strategies in international construction: cases of foreign constructors in China. Management Decision, 54(2), pp.501-521.
[35] Moretto, A., Ronchi, S. and Patrucco, A.S., 2017. Increasing the effectiveness of procurement decisions: The value of big data in the procurement process. International Journal of RF Technologies, 8(3), pp.79-103.
[36] Ngarachu, A., Draper, P. and Owino, K., 2017. Are Private Sustainability Standards Obstacles to or Enablers of SME Participation in Value Chains. Insights from South Africa and Kenya. September.
[37] Nicoletti, B., 2017. The future: procurement 4.0. In Agile Procurement: Volume II: Designing and Implementing a Digital Transformation (pp. 189-230). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[38] Olejnik, L., Englehardt, S. and Narayanan, A., 2017. Battery status not included: Assessing privacy in web standards. In 2017 International Workshop on Privacy Engineering.
[39] Olson, D.L. and Wu, D.D., 2015. Enterprise risk management (Vol. 3). World Scientific Publishing Company.
[40] Östensson, O., 2017. Local content, supply chains, and shared infrastructure. Extractive Industries, 505.
[41] Pak, A., Carden, L.L. and Kovach, J.V., 2016. Integration of project management, human resource development, and business teams: a partnership, planning model for organizational training and development initiatives. Human Resource Development International, 19(3), pp.245-260.
[42] Papadopoulos, G.A., Zamer, N., Gayialis, S.P. and Tatsiopoulos, I.P., 2016. Supply chain improvement in construction industry. Universal Journal of Management, 4(10), pp.528-534.
[43] Pepper, S.E., Pickett, C.A., Queirolo, A., Bachner, K.M. and Worrall, L.G., 2015. The US/IAEA Workshop on Software Sustainability for Safeguards Instrumentation: Report to the NNSA DOE Office of International Nuclear Safeguards (NA-241) (No. BNL-107824-2015). Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States).
[44] Plugge, A., Borman, M. and Janssen, M., 2016. Strategic manoeuvers in outsourcing arrangements: The need for adapting capability in delivering long-term results. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 9(2), pp.139-158.
[45] Provines, C.D., 2017. Value-based pricing meets twenty-first century procurement. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 16(1), pp.4-17.
[46] Rebelo, M.F., Santos, G. and Silva, R., 2016. Integration of management systems: towards a sustained success and development of organizations. Journal of cleaner production, 127, pp.96-111.
[47] Reddy, D.V. and Swamidas, A.S.J., 2016. Essentials of offshore structures: framed and gravity platforms. CRC press.
[48] Ross, D.F., 2015. Procurement and supplier management. In Distribution planning and control: Managing in the era of supply chain management (pp. 531-604). New York, NY: Springer US.
[49] Sheffi, Y., 2015. Preparing for disruptions through early detection. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(1), p.31.
[50] Sin, I.S.M., Musa, N.A. and Ng, K.Y.N., 2017. Building business resilience through incident management body of knowledge (IMBOKTM): The amalgamated framework for total resilient capability. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 22(1), pp.38-50.
[51] Singh, R., Sharma, S.K. and Matai, R., 2017. Barriers and Enablers of Strategic Sourcing Risk Management: A Perspective of Indian Automotive Industry. EVIDENCE BASED MANAGEMENT, p.236.
[52] Sithole, B., Silva, S.G. and Kavelj, M., 2016. Supply chain optimization: enhancing end-to-end visibility. Procedia engineering, 159, pp.12-18.
[53] Sparrow, P.R. and Makram, H., 2015. What is the value of talent management? Building value-driven processes within a talent management architecture. Human resource management review, 25(3), pp.249-263.
[54] Stein, V. and Wiedemann, A., 2016. Risk governance: Conceptualization, tasks, and research agenda. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), pp.813-836.
[55] Teece, D., Peteraf, M. and Leih, S., 2016. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California management review, 58(4), pp.13-35.
[56] Tsai, H.F. and Luan, C.J., 2016. What makes firms embrace risks? A risk-taking capability perspective. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), pp.219-231.
[57] Turki, M., Medhioub, E. and Kallel, M., 2017. Evaluation of a national food industry based on environmental performance and condition indicators: critical success and barriers of EMS implementation in Tunisia. Environment Systems and Decisions, 37(4), pp.423-434.
[58] White, S., 2017. Regulating for local content: Limitations of legal and regulatory instruments in promoting small scale suppliers in extractive industries in developing economies. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(2), pp.260-266.
[59] Wicken, O., 2016. 12 Industrial diversification processes and strategies in an oil economy. Economic diversification policies in natural resource rich economies, 295.
[60] Wong, J.J., Abdullah, M.O., Baini, R. and Tan, Y.H., 2017. Performance monitoring: A study on ISO 14001 certified power plant in Malaysia. Journal of cleaner production, 147, pp.165-174.
How to cite this paper
@article{1713119,
author = {Chineme Scholar Okonkwo, Olufunmilayo Ogunwole, Obinna ThankGod Okeke},
title = {Framework for Strategic Procurement Optimization in Oil and Gas Operations},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2018},
volume = {1},
number = {7},
pages = {153-168},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713119.pdf},
abstract = {Procurement functions in oil and gas operations are increasingly recognized as strategic drivers of cost efficiency, operational reliability, and risk management. The sector?s inherent complexity characterized by capital-intensive projects, volatile commodity markets, stringent regulatory requirements, and dependence on highly specialized suppliers necessitates a structured and integrated approach to procurement. This abstract presents a framework for strategic procurement optimization designed to enhance value creation across upstream, midstream, and downstream oil and gas activities. The proposed framework is built around five interrelated pillars: governance and policy alignment, demand forecasting and spend analysis, supplier strategy and relationship management, contracting and commercial optimization, and digital enablement. Governance alignment ensures procurement activities are consistent with corporate objectives, regulatory compliance, and health, safety, and environmental standards, thereby strengthening accountability and transparency. Demand forecasting and spend analysis integrate procurement planning with operational schedules, enabling improved cost control, reduced variability, and proactive sourcing decisions. Supplier strategy and relationship management emphasize segmentation based on criticality and risk, promoting long-term partnerships, performance-based contracting, and local supplier development. Contracting and commercial optimization focus on standardized contract structures, balanced risk-sharing mechanisms, and effective contract lifecycle management to enhance predictability and minimize disputes. Digital enablement, through e-procurement platforms, enterprise resource planning systems, and data analytics, supports process automation, real-time visibility, and evidence-based decision-making. The framework also embeds risk management and performance monitoring through defined key performance indicators, continuous feedback loops, and adaptive procurement strategies. By integrating these elements, the framework positions procurement as a strategic, value-generating function rather than a transactional support activity. Adoption of this framework is expected to improve cost efficiency, supply chain resilience, supplier performance, and overall operational sustainability in oil and gas operations, particularly in environments characterized by uncertainty and resource constraints.},
keywords = {Strategic Procurement; Oil And Gas Operations; Procurement Optimization; Supply Chain Resilience; Supplier Management; Contract Management; Digital Procurement Systems.},
month = {January},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I7-1713119}
}