Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713120
Model for Inventory Availability and Plant Uptime Improvement in Energy Facilities
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Inventory Management
Abstract
Ensuring uninterrupted operations and optimal performance in energy facilities requires effective management of inventory and plant uptime. Interruptions due to equipment unavailability, delayed maintenance, or supply chain disruptions can result in significant financial losses, operational inefficiencies, and safety risks. This paper presents a comprehensive model for inventory availability and plant uptime improvement that integrates demand forecasting, inventory optimization, maintenance planning, and digital monitoring to enhance operational reliability in energy facilities. The model emphasizes a proactive and data-driven approach, moving beyond reactive replenishment and ad hoc maintenance practices. Central to the model is inventory availability management, which aligns stock levels of critical spares, consumables, and maintenance materials with operational requirements and risk assessments. Predictive demand forecasting, based on historical consumption, production schedules, and equipment criticality, informs optimal stock levels, safety buffers, and reorder points. Inventory segmentation techniques, differentiating critical, strategic, and routine items, allow resource prioritization and cost-effective stocking strategies. Integration with plant maintenance schedules ensures that required components are available for planned and preventive maintenance activities, minimizing unplanned downtime. The model also incorporates plant uptime optimization through preventive and predictive maintenance practices, real-time condition monitoring, and performance tracking. Linking inventory management with maintenance planning enables timely interventions and reduces operational disruptions. Key performance indicators, such as mean time between failures, equipment availability, and stock-out frequency, provide actionable insights for continuous improvement. The framework promotes digital enablement, including enterprise resource planning (ERP) integration and data analytics, to monitor inventory levels, track asset performance, and support decision-making. By applying this model, energy facilities can achieve higher operational reliability, reduce costs associated with unplanned downtime, and enhance overall plant performance. Additionally, optimized inventory and maintenance practices support safety, regulatory compliance, and sustainable operational outcomes.
Keywords
Inventory Availability; Plant Uptime; Energy Facilities; Preventive Maintenance; Predictive Analytics; Operational Reliability; ERP Integration; Supply Chain Optimization.
References
[1] Alam, A.B., Zulkernine, M. and Haque, A., 2017, November. A reliability-based resource allocation approach for cloud computing. In 2017 IEEE 7th International Symposium on Cloud and Service Computing (SC2) (pp. 249-252). IEEE.
[2] Ali, A., Mahfouz, A. and Arisha, A., 2017. Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply chain management: an international journal, 22(1), pp.16-39.
[3] Andersson, A. and Molin, E., 2017. Procurement Policy: A Conceptual Design to Optimize Purchasing Policy and Safety Stocks.
[4] Armour, J., Mayer, C. and Polo, A., 2017. Regulatory sanctions and reputational damage in financial markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(4), pp.1429-1448.
[5] Aro-Gordon, S. and Gupte, J., 2016. Review of modern inventory management techniques. Global journal of business & management, 1(2), pp.1-22.
[6] Basri, E.I., Abdul Razak, I.H., Ab-Samat, H. and Kamaruddin, S., 2017. Preventive maintenance (PM) planning: a review. Journal of quality in maintenance engineering, 23(2), pp.114-143.
[7] Bousdekis, A., Papageorgiou, N., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D. and Mentzas, G., 2017. A proactive event-driven decision model for joint equipment predictive maintenance and spare parts inventory optimization. Procedia Cirp, 59, pp.184-189.
[8] Brown, A.J., 2017. Development of a supplier segmentation method for increased resilience and robustness: A study using agent based modeling and simulation. University of Kentucky.
[9] Castellano, E., Zubizarreta, P.X., Pagalday, G., Uribetxebarria, J. and Márquez, A.C., 2017. Service 4.0: The reasons and purposes of industry 4.0 within the ambit of after-sales maintenance. In Optimum Decision Making in Asset Management (pp. 139-162). IGI Global.
[10] Chase, C.W., 2016. Next generation demand management: People, process, analytics, and technology. John Wiley & Sons.
[11] Colman-Meixner, C., Develder, C., Tornatore, M. and Mukherjee, B., 2016. A survey on resiliency techniques in cloud computing infrastructures and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), pp.2244-2281.
[12] Daily, J. and Peterson, J., 2016. Predictive maintenance: How big data analysis can improve maintenance. In Supply chain integration challenges in commercial aerospace: A comprehensive perspective on the aviation value chain (pp. 267-278). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[13] Davis, R.A., 2016. Demand-driven inventory optimization and replenishment: Creating a more efficient supply chain. John Wiley & Sons.
[14] Dolan, T., Walsh, C.L., Bouch, C. and Carhart, N.J., 2016. A conceptual approach to strategic performance indicators. Infrastructure Asset Management, 3(4), pp.132-142.
[15] Driessen, M., Arts, J., Van Houtum, G.J., Rustenburg, J.W. and Huisman, B., 2015. Maintenance spare parts planning and control: a framework for control and agenda for future research. Production Planning & Control, 26(5), pp.407-426.
[16] Enbar, N., Weng, D. and Klise, G.T., 2016. Budgeting for Solar PV Plant Operations & Maintenance: Practices and Pricing (No. SAND-2016-0649R). Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States).
[17] Erkoyuncu, J.A., Khan, S., Eiroa, A.L., Butler, N., Rushton, K. and Brocklebank, S., 2017. Perspectives on trading cost and availability for corrective maintenance at the equipment type level. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 168, pp.53-69.
[18] Fang, C., Liu, X., Pardalos, P.M. and Pei, J., 2016. Optimization for a three-stage production system in the Internet of Things: procurement, production and product recovery, and acquisition. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(5), pp.689-710.
[19] Finnerty, N., Sterling, R., Coakley, D., Contreras, S., Coffey, R. and Keane, M.M., 2017. Development of a Global Energy Management System for non-energy intensive multi-site industrial organisations: A methodology. Energy, 136, pp.16-31.
[20] Gulenko, A., Wallschläger, M., Schmidt, F., Kao, O. and Liu, F., 2016, December. Evaluating machine learning algorithms for anomaly detection in clouds. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 2716-2721). IEEE.
[21] Hashmi, M., Governatori, G. and Wynn, M.T., 2016. Normative requirements for regulatory compliance: An abstract formal framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(3), pp.429-455.
[22] Ivanov, D., 2017. Simulation-based ripple effect modelling in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(7), pp.2083-2101.
[23] Jin, X., Weiss, B.A., Siegel, D. and Lee, J., 2016. Present status and future growth of advanced maintenance technology and strategy in US manufacturing. International journal of prognostics and health management, 7(Spec Iss on Smart Manufacturing PHM), p.012.
[24] Jin, X., Weiss, B.A., Siegel, D. and Lee, J., 2016. Present status and future growth of advanced maintenance technology and strategy in US manufacturing. International journal of prognostics and health management, 7(Spec Iss on Smart Manufacturing PHM), p.012.
[25] Kalra, N. and Paddock, S.M., 2016. Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 94, pp.182-193.
[26] Kamalahmadi, M. and Mellat-Parast, M., 2016. Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), pp.302-321.
[27] Kansanoja, K., 2016. Spare parts classification–a step for better inventory management.
[28] Ketter, W., Peters, M., Collins, J. and Gupta, A., 2016. Competitive benchmarking. MIS quarterly, 40(4), pp.1057-1080.
[29] Khosrojerdi, A., Zegordi, S.H., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F., 2016. A method for designing power supply chain networks accounting for failure scenarios and preventive maintenance. Engineering Optimization, 48(1), pp.154-172.
[30] Kumar, R., Hindawi, K., Awobadejo, M., Alharthy, S. and Al Jumah, A., 2016, September. Maximizing Well Uptime Through Effective Well Operations and Integrity in South Iraq. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? (p. D011S012R005). SPE.
[31] Li, Y., Jia, G., Cheng, Y. and Hu, Y., 2017. Additive manufacturing technology in spare parts supply chain: a comparative study. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), pp.1498-1515.
[32] Liu, D., Zhao, Y., Xu, H., Sun, Y., Pei, D., Luo, J., Jing, X. and Feng, M., 2015, October. Opprentice: Towards practical and automatic anomaly detection through machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2015 internet measurement conference (pp. 211-224).
[33] Lv, Y. and Lin, D., 2017. Design an intelligent real-time operation planning system in distributed manufacturing network. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(4), pp.742-753.
[34] MacCarthy, B.L., Blome, C., Olhager, J., Srai, J.S. and Zhao, X., 2016. Supply chain evolution–theory, concepts and science. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(12), pp.1696-1718.
[35] Madanhire, I. and Mbohwa, C., 2016. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) in improving operational efficiency: Case study. Procedia CIrP, 40, pp.225-229.
[36] Mello, M.H., Strandhagen, J.O. and Alfnes, E., 2015. Analyzing the factors affecting coordination in engineer-to-order supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(7), pp.1005-1031.
[37] Molina, E., Lazaro, O., Sepulcre, M., Gozalvez, J., Passarella, A., Raptis, T.P., Ude, A., Nemec, B., Rooker, M., Kirstein, F. and Mooij, E., 2017, August. The AUTOWARE framework and requirements for the cognitive digital automation. In Working conference on virtual enterprises (pp. 107-117). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[38] Moore, N.Y., Loredo, E.N., Cox, A.G. and Grammich, C.A., 2015. Identifying and managing acquisition and sustainment supply chain risks.
[39] Myerson, A.S., Krumme, M., Nasr, M., Thomas, H. and Braatz, R.D., 2015. Control systems engineering in continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing May 20–21, 2014 continuous manufacturing symposium. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 104(3), pp.832-839.
[40] Nowell, B., Bodkin, C.P. and Bayoumi, D., 2017. Redundancy as a strategy in disaster response systems: A pathway to resilience or a recipe for disaster?. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(3), pp.123-135.
[41] Pagoropoulos, A., Maier, A. and McAloone, T.C., 2017. Assessing transformational change from institutionalising digital capabilities on implementation and development of Product-Service Systems: Learnings from the maritime industry. Journal of cleaner production, 166, pp.369-380.
[42] Parella, K., 2017. Reputational regulation. Duke LJ, 67, p.907.
[43] Pärn, E.A., Edwards, D.J. and Sing, M.C., 2017. The building information modelling trajectory in facilities management: A review. Automation in construction, 75, pp.45-55.
[44] Paul, S.K., Sarker, R. and Essam, D., 2016. Managing risk and disruption in production-inventory and supply chain systems: A review. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization.
[45] Piechnicki, F., Loures, E. and Santos, E., 2017. A conceptual framework of knowledge conciliation to decision making support in RCM deployment. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, pp.1135-1144.
[46] Rees, J., 2016. Reforming the workplace: A study of self-regulation in occupational safety. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[47] Rose, A. and Huyck, C.K., 2016. Improving catastrophe modeling for business interruption insurance needs. Risk analysis, 36(10), pp.1896-1915.
[48] Sajid, A., Abbas, H. and Saleem, K., 2016. Cloud-assisted IoT-based SCADA systems security: A review of the state of the art and future challenges. Ieee Access, 4, pp.1375-1384.
[49] Samaranayake, P. and Laosirihongthong, T., 2016. Configuration of supply chain integration and delivery performance: Unitary structure model and fuzzy approach. Journal of modelling in management, 11(1), pp.43-74.
[50] Scott-Parker, B., Goode, N. and Salmon, P., 2015. The driver, the road, the rules… and the rest? A systems-based approach to young driver road safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, pp.297-305.
[51] Seth, D. and Panigrahi, A., 2015. Application and evaluation of packaging postponement strategy to boost supply chain responsiveness: a case study. Production planning & control, 26(13), pp.1069-1089.
[52] Sheffi, Y., 2015. The power of resilience: How the best companies manage the unexpected. mit Press.
[53] Slama, D., Puhlmann, F., Morrish, J. and Bhatnagar, R.M., 2015. Enterprise IoT: Strategies and Best practices for connected products and services. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
[54] Stamatis, D.H., 2017. The OEE primer: understanding overall equipment effectiveness, reliability, and maintainability. CRC Press.
[55] Stefanovic, N., 2015. Collaborative predictive business intelligence model for spare parts inventory replenishment. Computer Science and Information Systems, 12(3), pp.911-930.
[56] Velmurugan, R.S. and Dhingra, T., 2015. Maintenance strategy selection and its impact in maintenance function: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(12), pp.1622-1661.
[57] Wan, S., Li, D., Gao, J., Roy, R. and Tong, Y., 2017. Process and knowledge management in a collaborative maintenance planning system for high value machine tools. Computers in Industry, 84, pp.14-24.
[58] Wang, F., Xu, H., Xu, T., Li, K., Shafie-Khah, M. and Catalão, J.P., 2017. The values of market-based demand response on improving power system reliability under extreme circumstances. Applied energy, 193, pp.220-231.
[59] Wibowo, S. and Grandhi, S., 2017. Benchmarking knowledge management practices in small and medium enterprises: A fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(5), pp.1215-1233.
[60] Wong, J.K.W. and Zhou, J., 2015. Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review. Automation in construction, 57, pp.156-165.
How to cite this paper
@article{1713120,
author = {Chineme Scholar Okonkwo, Olufunmilayo Ogunwole, Obinna ThankGod Okeke},
title = {Model for Inventory Availability and Plant Uptime Improvement in Energy Facilities},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2018},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {160-172},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713120.pdf},
abstract = {Ensuring uninterrupted operations and optimal performance in energy facilities requires effective management of inventory and plant uptime. Interruptions due to equipment unavailability, delayed maintenance, or supply chain disruptions can result in significant financial losses, operational inefficiencies, and safety risks. This paper presents a comprehensive model for inventory availability and plant uptime improvement that integrates demand forecasting, inventory optimization, maintenance planning, and digital monitoring to enhance operational reliability in energy facilities. The model emphasizes a proactive and data-driven approach, moving beyond reactive replenishment and ad hoc maintenance practices. Central to the model is inventory availability management, which aligns stock levels of critical spares, consumables, and maintenance materials with operational requirements and risk assessments. Predictive demand forecasting, based on historical consumption, production schedules, and equipment criticality, informs optimal stock levels, safety buffers, and reorder points. Inventory segmentation techniques, differentiating critical, strategic, and routine items, allow resource prioritization and cost-effective stocking strategies. Integration with plant maintenance schedules ensures that required components are available for planned and preventive maintenance activities, minimizing unplanned downtime. The model also incorporates plant uptime optimization through preventive and predictive maintenance practices, real-time condition monitoring, and performance tracking. Linking inventory management with maintenance planning enables timely interventions and reduces operational disruptions. Key performance indicators, such as mean time between failures, equipment availability, and stock-out frequency, provide actionable insights for continuous improvement. The framework promotes digital enablement, including enterprise resource planning (ERP) integration and data analytics, to monitor inventory levels, track asset performance, and support decision-making. By applying this model, energy facilities can achieve higher operational reliability, reduce costs associated with unplanned downtime, and enhance overall plant performance. Additionally, optimized inventory and maintenance practices support safety, regulatory compliance, and sustainable operational outcomes.},
keywords = {Inventory Availability; Plant Uptime; Energy Facilities; Preventive Maintenance; Predictive Analytics; Operational Reliability; ERP Integration; Supply Chain Optimization.},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I4-1713120}
}