Conceptual Framework for Cost Reduction Through Contract Negotiation and Vendor Governance

References

[1] Abdi, Y.N. and Minja, D.M., 2018. Influence of corporate governance compliance programs and performance of state corporations in Kenya: The case of National Social Security Fund (NSSF). International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 3(2), pp.360-383.

[2] Abdulraheem, A.O., 2018. Just-in-time manufacturing for improving global supply chain resilience. Int J Eng Technol Res Manag, 2(11), p.58.

[3] Adewunmi, Y.A., Iyagba, R. and Omirin, M., 2017. Multi-sector framework for benchmarking in facilities management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(4), pp.826-856.

[4] Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., Cepeda-Carrion, G. and Henseler, J., 2018. Developing green innovation performance by fostering of organizational knowledge and coopetitive relations. Review of managerial science, 12(2), pp.499-517.

[5] Almeida, H., Hankins, K.W. and Williams, R., 2017. Risk management with supply contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(12), pp.4179-4215.

[6] Ashok, A., Brison, M. and LeTallec, Y., 2017. Improving cold chain systems: Challenges and solutions. Vaccine, 35(17), pp.2217-2223.

[7] Babich, V. and Kouvelis, P., 2018. Introduction to the special issue on research at the interface of finance, operations, and risk management (iFORM): Recent contributions and future directions. Manufacturing & service operations management, 20(1), pp.1-18.

[8] Bals, L. and Turkulainen, V., 2017. Achieving efficiency and effectiveness in Purchasing and Supply Management: Organization design and outsourcing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(4), pp.256-267.

[9] Bouchet, M.H., Fishkin, C.A. and Goguel, A., 2018. What Is Country Risk?. In Managing Country Risk in an Age of Globalization: A Practical Guide to Overcoming Challenges in a Complex World (pp. 21-52). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[10] Brito, R.P. and Miguel, P.L., 2017. Power, governance, and value in collaboration: Differences between buyer and supplier perspectives. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(2), pp.61-87.

[11] Brolsma, D. and Kouwenhoven, M., 2018. M_o_R® Management of Risk Practitioner Courseware–English. Van Haren.

[12] Brown, T.L., Potoski, M. and Van Slyke, D.M., 2017. Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. In Debating Public Administration (pp. 155-175). Routledge.

[13] Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Govindan, K., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Benhida, K. and Mokhlis, A., 2017. A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance. International Journal of Production Research, 55(15), pp.4481-4515.

[14] Christopher, M. and Holweg, M., 2017. Supply chain 2.0 revisited: a framework for managing volatility-induced risk in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(1), pp.2-17.

[15] Croker, R., Walker, A.J., Bacon, S., Curtis, H.J., French, L. and Goldacre, B., 2018. New mechanism to identify cost savings in English NHS prescribing: minimising ‘price per unit’, a cross-sectional study. BMJ open, 8(2), p.e019643.

[16] Dechezleprêtre, A. and Sato, M., 2017. The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of environmental economics and policy.

[17] Delbufalo, E. and Bastl, M., 2018. Multi-principal collaboration and supplier’s compliance with codes-of-conduct. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(4), pp.1237-1254.

[18] Dosumu, O., 2018. Assessment of the likelihood of risk occurrence on tendering and procurement of construction projects. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 2(1), pp.20-32.

[19] Eckerd, A. and Girth, A.M., 2017. Designing the buyer–supplier contract for risk management: Assessing complexity and mission criticality. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(3), pp.60-75.

[20] El-adaway, I., Abotaleb, I. and Eteifa, S., 2017. Framework for multiparty relational contracting. Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 9(3), p.04517018.

[21] Ghadge, A., Dani, S., Ojha, R. and Caldwell, N., 2017. Using risk sharing contracts for supply chain risk mitigation: A buyer-supplier power and dependence perspective. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103, pp.262-270.

[22] Gill, T., 2017. Applying a governance framework to an evolving outsourcing contract of public sector real estate management. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 7(1), pp.29-38.

[23] Grover, V., Chiang, R.H., Liang, T.P. and Zhang, D., 2018. Creating strategic business value from big data analytics: A research framework. Journal of management information systems, 35(2), pp.388-423.

[24] Guersola, M., Lima, E.P.D. and Steiner, M.T.A., 2018. Supply chain performance measurement: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 31(1), pp.109-131.

[25] Hagenbruch, T. and Zeumer, B., 2017. How benchmarking can improve cost competitiveness in steel. McKinsey & Company.

[26] Hallberg, P., Hasche, N., Kask, J. and Öberg, C., 2018. Quality management systems as indicators for stability and change in customer-supplier relationships. IMP Journal, 12(3), pp.483-497.

[27] Hamdi, F., Ghorbel, A., Masmoudi, F. and Dupont, L., 2018. Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 29(4), pp.763-788.

[28] Hochrein, S., Muther, M. and Glock, C.H., 2017. Strategy alignment in purchasing and supply management: A systematic literature review and research framework on the performance impact. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 11(1), pp.44-86.

[29] Hofstetter, J.S., 2018. Extending management upstream in supply chains beyond direct suppliers. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(1), pp.106-116.

[30] Jain, P., Mentzer, R. and Mannan, M.S., 2018. Resilience metrics for improved process-risk decision making: Survey, analysis and application. Safety science, 108, pp.13-28.

[31] Jia, F. and Jiang, Y., 2018. Sustainable global sourcing: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 10(3), p.595.

[32] Johnsen, T., Howard, M. and Miemczyk, J., 2018. Purchasing and supply chain management: A sustainability perspective. Routledge.

[33] Knight, A.K., Blessner, P., Olson, B.A. and Blackburn, T.D., 2017. Strategic sourcing and corporate social responsibility: Aligning a healthcare organization's strategic objectives. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(2), pp.94-104.

[34] Kontogiannis, T., Leva, M.C. and Balfe, N., 2017. Total safety management: principles, processes and methods. Safety science, 100, pp.128-142.

[35] Lappi, T. and Aaltonen, K., 2017. Project governance in public sector agile software projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(2), pp.263-294.

[36] Liu, T., Bennon, M., Garvin, M.J. and Wang, S., 2017. Sharing the big risk: Assessment framework for revenue risk sharing mechanisms in transportation public-private partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(12), p.04017086.

[37] Lumineau, F., 2017. How contracts influence trust and distrust. Journal of management, 43(5), pp.1553-1577.

[38] Mitrega, M., Forkmann, S., Zaefarian, G. and Henneberg, S.C., 2017. Networking capability in supplier relationships and its impact on product innovation and firm performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(5), pp.577-606.

[39] Moheb-Alizadeh, H. and Handfield, R., 2018. The impact of raw materials price volatility on cost of goods sold (COGS) for product manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), pp.460-473.

[40] Nissen, C., Gronager, J.E., Metzger, R.S. and Rishikof, H., 2018. Deliver uncompromised: A strategy for supply chain security and resilience in response to the changing character of war.

[41] Noorbakhsh, A., Boehl, C. and Brown, K., 2018, November. Assessing total cost of ownership: Effective asset management along the supply chain. In Asset Intelligence through Integration and Interoperability and Contemporary Vibration Engineering Technologies: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and the 13th International Conference on Vibration Engineering and Technology of Machinery (pp. 433-440). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[42] Okwir, S., Nudurupati, S.S., Ginieis, M. and Angelis, J., 2018. Performance measurement and management systems: a perspective from complexity theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(3), pp.731-754.

[43] Östensson, O., 2017. Local content, supply chains, and shared infrastructure. Extractive Industries, 505.

[44] Pantlin, N., Wiseman, C. and Everett, M., 2018. Supply chain arrangements: The ABC to GDPR compliance A spotlight on emerging market practice in supplier contracts in light of the GDPR. Computer law & Security review, 34(4), pp.881-885.

[45] Raj, P. and Raman, A., 2018. Multi-cloud management: Technologies, tools, and techniques. In Software-defined cloud centers: Operational and management technologies and tools (pp. 219-240). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[46] Rudolf, C.A. and Spinler, S., 2018. Key risks in the supply chain of large scale engineering and construction projects. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(4), pp.336-350.

[47] Sarhan, S., Pasquire, C., Manu, E. and King, A., 2017. Contractual governance as a source of institutionalised waste in constructionA review, implications, and road map for future research directions. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), pp.550-577.

[48] Sarhan, S., Pasquire, C., Manu, E. and King, A., 2017. Contractual governance as a source of institutionalised waste in constructionA review, implications, and road map for future research directions. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(3), pp.550-577.

[49] Schiele, H., 2018. Purchasing and supply management. In Operations, logistics and supply chain management (pp. 45-73). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[50] Selviaridis, K. and Spring, M., 2018. Supply chain alignment as process: contracting, learning and pay-for-performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), pp.732-755.

[51] Shafiq, A., Johnson, P.F., Klassen, R.D. and Awaysheh, A., 2017. Exploring the implications of supply risk on sustainability performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(10), pp.1386-1407.

[52] Sivabrovornvatana, N., 2018. Management, Business, and Economics. IJMBE, p.117.

[53] Srivastava, P., Iyer, K.N. and Rawwas, M.Y., 2017. Performance impact of supply chain partnership strategy-environment co-alignment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(7), pp.927-949.

[54] Stein-Brzozowska, G., Bergins, C., Kukoski, A., Wu, S., Agraniotis, M. and Kakaras, E., 2016. The Current Trends in Conventional Power Plant Technology on Two Continents From the Perspective of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Contractor and Original Equipment Manufacturer. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 138(4), p.044501.

[55] Stevenson, M. and Cole, R., 2018. Modern slavery in supply chains: a secondary data analysis of detection, remediation and disclosure. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(2), pp.81-99.

[56] Stone, J. and Rahimifard, S., 2018. Resilience in agri-food supply chains: a critical analysis of the literature and synthesis of a novel framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(3), pp.207-238.

[57] Supino, S., Malandrino, O., Testa, M. and Sica, D., 2016. Sustainability in the EU cement industry: the Italian and German experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp.430-442.

[58] Tong, A., Calvo, J. and Haapala, K.R., 2018. Integration of sustainability indicators and the viable system model towards a systemic sustainability assessment methodology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(5), pp.564-587.

[59] Verbruggen, P., 2017. Private regulatory standards in commercial contracts: Questions of compliance. In Contract and Regulation (pp. 284-322). Edward Elgar Publishing.

[60] Yuliansyah, Y. and Jermias, J., 2018. Strategic performance measurement system, organizational learning and service strategic alignment: Impact on performance. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(4), pp.564-592.

@article{1713121,
      author = {Chineme Scholar Okonkwo, Olufunmilayo Ogunwole, Obinna ThankGod Okeke, Winner Mayo},
      title = {Conceptual Framework for Cost Reduction Through Contract Negotiation and Vendor Governance},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {2},
      number = {9},
      pages = {468-481},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713121.pdf},
      abstract = {Effective cost management is a critical priority for organizations operating in complex and capital-intensive industries, where procurement expenditures represent a significant portion of total operational costs. This presents a conceptual framework for cost reduction through contract negotiation and vendor governance, emphasizing the strategic integration of contractual strategies and supplier management practices to optimize financial performance and operational efficiency. The framework positions contract negotiation and vendor governance not merely as transactional activities, but as proactive, value-creating functions that enhance supplier performance, mitigate risks, and deliver sustainable cost savings. The framework is grounded in two complementary components. First, contract negotiation strategies focus on optimizing total cost of ownership, leveraging volume and bundling agreements, standardizing contract terms, and incorporating risk-sharing and incentive-based pricing models. Effective negotiation ensures that procurement contracts are aligned with organizational objectives, provide cost transparency, and account for operational risks. Second, vendor governance mechanisms provide structured processes for monitoring supplier performance, ensuring compliance, managing risk, and fostering continuous improvement. This includes supplier segmentation, performance evaluation, audits, and relationship management, which collectively enhance accountability, reliability, and service quality. Integration with organizational systems, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) and contract management tools, enables real-time visibility, data-driven decision-making, and alignment between procurement, finance, and operational units. The framework emphasizes continuous evaluation and iterative improvement, with key performance indicators such as cost savings, supplier reliability, contract compliance, and process efficiency guiding performance measurement. Benchmarking against industry best practices provides additional insights to refine strategies and maintain competitive advantage. Application of this conceptual framework enables organizations to achieve reduced procurement and operational costs, enhanced supplier accountability, improved risk management, and sustainable value creation. By treating contract negotiation and vendor governance as strategic, integrated processes, the framework supports long-term operational resilience and financial performance.},
      keywords = {Contract Negotiation; Vendor Governance; Cost Reduction; Supplier Performance; Risk Management; Total Cost of Ownership; Procurement Optimization; Operational Efficiency.},
      month = {March},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I9-1713121}
  }