Assessing Local Government Engineers? Understanding of Legal and Regulatory Frameworks in Philippine Building and Permit Processes

References

[1] Open Government Partnership. (2025, June 26). Philippines – multi-stakeholder monitoring body for infrastructure. https://www.opengovpartnership.org

[2] Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System. (2025, November 30). Government’s tool for procurement reforms – PS-PhilGEPS. https://notices.philgeps.gov.ph

[3] Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2024, September 12). June building permit approvals decline 9%. https://pids.gov.ph

[4] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Budget and Management. (2018, July 2). Assessment of the Philippine public procurement system. https://learning.gppb.gov.ph

[5] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Budget and Management. (2020). Revised Philippine government internal audit manual (PGIAM). https://www.dbm.gov.ph

[6] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Budget and Management. (2021, October 13). Circular Letter No. 2021-9: Guidelines on internal control systems in government. https://www.dbm.gov.ph

[7] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Budget and Management. (2025, July 2). DBM approves standard forms for procurement for greater transparency, efficiency and accountability. https://www.dbm.gov.ph

[8] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Budget and Management. (2025, August 18). Learning and development (L&D) activities on the Philippine government internal audit. https://www.dbm.gov.ph

[9] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Public Works and Highways. (2022). Department Order No. 143, s. 2022: Revised guidelines on monitoring and supervision of infrastructure projects. https://www.dpwh.gov.ph

[10] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board. (2020, May 7). GPPB Resolution No. 09-2020. https://law.upd.edu.ph

[11] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board. (2020, September 15). GPPB Circular No. 04-2020: Guidelines on the conduct of procurement activities during a state of calamity. https://www.gppb.gov.ph

[12] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board. (2021). GPPB Resolution No. 19-2021: Updating of procurement thresholds and procedures. https://www.gppb.gov.ph

[13] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board. (2023). Republic Act No. 9184: Government Procurement Reform Act. https://www.gppb.gov.ph

[14] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board. (2019). 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184. https://www.gppb.gov.ph

[15] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board. (2023). Local government unit procurement manual. https://www.gppb.gov.ph

[16] Republic of the Philippines, Government Procurement Policy Board – Technical Support Office. (2025, October 22). Mandatory training on public procurement for government agencies [Status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/GovtProcurementPH

[17] Republic of the Philippines, Department of Budget and Management; World Bank. (2025, May 20). The impact of open government on public procurement transparency. https://www.dbm.gov.ph

[18] Remulla, J. C. (2025, August 23). Remulla urges strict compliance with new procurement law to promote transparency and accountability [Status update]. Department of Justice, Philippines. Facebook.

[19] TWIST Journal. (n.d.). Philippine public procurement challenges [PDF]. TWIST: Transactions on Industrial, Service, and Technology. https://twistjournal.net

[20] World Bank; Republic of the Philippines. (2018, July 2). Assessment of the Philippine public procurement system: Volume I. https://ngpa.gppb.gov.ph

[21] World Bank; Philippine Rural Development Project. (n.d.). LGU partners trained on World Bank harmonized procurement process. https://prdp.da.gov.ph

[22] Zahra, S., & colleagues. (2025). Analysis of construction delays in public sector projects at [country/region]. Journal of Infrastructure and Project Management, 10(2), 1–15. https://bpasjournals.com

@article{1713220,
      author = {Renz Paolo A. Cabual, Michael John M. Villar, PhD},
      title = {Assessing Local Government Engineers? Understanding of Legal and Regulatory Frameworks in Philippine Building and Permit Processes},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {2189-2211},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713220.pdf},
      abstract = {The study assessed the level of legal and regulatory compliance in building- and permit-related procurement and project implementation among engineers and technical personnel in key offices of LGU Cabanatuan City, Philippines, using a descriptive quantitative design and a structured Likert-scale survey of 30 respondents. Results showed generally high compliance in knowledge of laws, internal controls, and procurement capability enhancement, but only moderate compliance in transparency, conflict of interest management, monitoring, and continuous improvement, indicating a predominantly procedural and inward-focused compliance culture. At the same time, challenges were found to be systemic and highly challenging in documentation quality, personnel workload, training, internal systems, feedback mechanisms, and conflict management, while support services and some aspects of process timeliness were rated as challenging, revealing substantial operational and integrity constraints that undermine effective implementation despite high legal awareness. Correlation analysis indicated only a few significant relationships between compliance dimensions and challenges specifically, internal controls with personnel workload, procurement capability enhancement with internal systems, conflict of interest management with training, and monitoring with process timelines suggesting that institutional arrangements and systems, rather than legal knowledge alone, are most closely linked to day-to-day difficulties. The study concludes that enhancing legal and regulatory compliance in LGU Cabanatuan City requires prioritizing improvements in digital and integrated systems, documentation management, staffing and workload balancing, structured and technically focused training, strengthened conflict-of-interest safeguards, and robust monitoring, feedback, and continuous-improvement mechanisms that translate audit and field insights into sustained process reforms.},
      keywords = {Legal Compliance, Building Permit Processes, Local Government Unit, Transparency, Cabanatuan City},
      month = {December},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I6-1713220}
  }