International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713353

1713353 Vol 9 · Issue 7 Download Paper

Human Security and Non State Actors in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword under Neoliberal Governance

Auwalu Musa

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Human Security

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713353

Abstract

Human security in Africa is increasingly shaped by the activities of non-state actors (NSAs), both non-violent, sometimes mitigating terrorism, and violent, which exacerbate human insecurity. The dual role of NSAs, coupled with neoliberal governance frameworks characterised by economic liberalisation, foreign investment, and conditional aid, presents a double-edged sword for African populations. While neoliberal policies have improved access to healthcare, education, and livelihood opportunities in certain contexts, they have simultaneously intensified socioeconomic inequalities, weakened state institutions, and disproportionately affected marginalised communities, undermining long-term stability. The study aims to critically analyse the interplay between human security, non-state actors, and neoliberal governance in Africa, with a focus on understanding how these dynamics simultaneously empower and endanger populations. Employing a qualitative research design, the study relies on secondary sources, including peer-reviewed literature, institutional reports, and policy documents, analysed through content analysis to identify patterns, contradictions, and systemic impacts of both violent and non-violent NSAs on human security outcomes. Findings reveal that non-violent NSAs, such as NGOs and international development agencies, enhance resilience by providing education, healthcare, and livelihood support, sometimes abating terrorist influence. Conversely, violent NSAs, including insurgent groups and militias, exploit socioeconomic disparities and weak governance to perpetuate insecurity. The research concludes that sustainable human security requires integrated, context-sensitive policies that harmonise state and non-state actor efforts, strengthen institutional accountability, and mitigate the unintended negative effects of neoliberal interventions. The study contributes conceptually by clarifying the dual, ?double-edged? nature of human security under neoliberalism in Africa and offers policy-relevant insights for development practitioners, governments, and peacebuilding initiatives.

Keywords

Human Security, Non-State Actors, Violent and Non-Violent Actors, Neoliberalism, Africa, Development, Resilience, Vulnerability

References

[1] Acharya, A. (2001). Human security: East versus West? RSIS Working Paper, WP017. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. September 1. https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/nts/17-wp017-human-security-east-v/

[2] Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED, 2025). #Nigeria: Conflict Index 2024 December update. Facebook. January 7. https://web.facebook.com/ACLEDINFO/posts/nigeria-conflict-index-2024-december-updatenigeria-ranks-in-the-extreme-category/1014985060648474/

[3] Burton, J. (1990). Conflict: Resolution and prevention. Macmillan.

[4] Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

[5] Chandler, D. (2010). International statebuilding: The rise of post-liberal governance. Routledge.

[6] Clapham, C. (1996). Africa and the international system: The politics of state survival. Cambridge University Press.

[7] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

[8] Duffield, M. (2007) Development, security and unending war: Governing the world of peoples. Polity Press.

[9] Ehiane, S., & Moyo, P. (2021). Climate change, human insecurity and conflict dynamics in the Lake Chad region. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 57(1), Article 002190962110638. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096211063817

[10] Farmer, P. (2004). An anthropology of structural violence. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/382250

[11] Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301

[12] Galtung, J. (1980). The basic needs approach. In K. Lederer (Ed.), Human needs: A contribution to the current debate (pp. 55–66). Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

[13] GIZ. (2022). Strengthening resilience in North-East Nigeria: Improving living conditions in host and return communities of internally displaced persons in the states of Borno and Adamawa [PDF]. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. https://www.giz.de/en/projects/support-internally-displaced-persons-and-resilience-host-communities-north-and-north-east#:~:text=Approach,650%2C000%20direct%20and%20indirect%20beneficiaries.

[14] Hanna, T., Bohl, D. K., Rafa, M., & Moyer, J. D. (202). Assessing the impact of conflict on development in North-East Nigeria. UNDP. , June 23. https://africacenter.org/security-article/assessing-the-impact-of-conflict-on-development-in-north-east-nigeria/

[15] Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

[16] Kaldor, M. (2013). Human security: Reflections on globalisation and intervention. Polity Press.

[17] Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and interdependence (3rd ed.). Longman.

[18] Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

[19] Kwarkye, S. (2024, 25 November). Can ECOWAS revive its counterterrorism efforts? ISS Today. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.org/iss-today/can-ecowas-revive-its-counter-terrorism-efforts

[20] Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

[21] Mkandawire T (2001) Social policy in a development context. Social Policy and Development Paper No. 7. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD). Available at: http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/search/C83739F8E9A9AA0980256B5E0 03C5225? OpenDocument

[22] Musa, A. (2014). External loan: One step forward, many steps backwards for socio-economic development in Nigeria. Journal of Production Research & Management, 4(3), 15–22. Publication of Scientific, Technical and Medical Journals.

[23] Musa, A. (2025). Unveiling the drivers of drug abuse and violent insurgency in Nigeria: The complex realities of Adamawa and Borno States. Journal of Security Management, Policy & Administration, 2(1), 257–284.

[24] Musa, A., & Bayero, A. A. (2024). External debt, socio-economic underdevelopment and human insecurity in Nigeria, 1990–2022. Pyla-Mac Publishers.

[25] Omirin, O. (2025). UNICEF, Borno train 1,033 Boko Haram survivors in vocational skills. BusinessDay Nigeria. October 8. https://businessday.ng/news/article/unicef-borno-train-1033-boko-haram-survivors-in-vocational-skills

[26] Onuoha, F. (2014). Boko Haram and the evolving Salafi jihadist threat in Nigeria. In M.-A. Pérouse de Montclos (Ed.), Boko Haram: Islamism, politics, security and the state in Nigeria. IFRA Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.ifra.1813

[27] Paris, R. (2001). Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? International Security, 26(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228801753191141

[28] Parnell, S., & Pieterse, E. (2010). The “right to the city”: Institutional imperatives of a developmental state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 146–162.

[29] Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford University Press.

[30] Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2016). Contemporary conflict resolution (4th ed.). Polity Press.

[31] Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton University Press.

[32] Schneckener, U. (2006). Fragile Statehood, Armed Non-State Actors and Security Governance. LIT.

[33] Serwat, L., Birru, J. G., & Bofin, P. (2024, January 12). Regional overview: Africa | December 2023. Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). https://acleddata.com/update/regionaloverviewafricadecember2023

[34] Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W. W. Norton.

[35] Tadjbakhsh, S., & Chenoy, A. M. (2007). Human security: Concepts and implications. Routledge.

[36] Ukoji, V. U., & Ukoji, V. N. (2023). Trends and patterns of violencerelated mortality in Nigeria: Evidence from a 16year analysis of secondary data. Injury Prevention, 29(6), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip2023044895

[37] UNICEF (2025), Nigeria Humanitarian Situation Report No. 2: Reporting period 1 January to 30 June 2025, UNICEF, available at: https://www.unicef.org/media/172976/file/Nigeria-Humanitarian-SitRep-30-June-2025.pdf

[38] United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security. UNDP.

[39] Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? (pp. 5–20). Institute for International Economics.

[40] World Bank. (2018). Pathways for peace: Inclusive approaches to preventing violent conflict. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/4c36fca6-c7e0-5927-b171-468b0b236b59

[41] World Bank. (2020). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/521171602138084512/pdf/Poverty-and-Shared-Prosperity-2020-Reversals-of-Fortune.pdf

[42] Žižek, S. (2008). Violence: Six sideways reflections. Picador.

How to cite this paper

Auwalu Musa "Human Security and Non State Actors in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword under Neoliberal Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 7 2026 Page 298-312 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713353
Auwalu Musa "Human Security and Non State Actors in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword under Neoliberal Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713353
Auwalu Musa (2026). Human Security and Non State Actors in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword under Neoliberal Governance. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713353
Auwalu Musa "Human Security and Non State Actors in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword under Neoliberal Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713353
@article{1713353,
      author = {Auwalu Musa},
      title = {Human Security and Non State Actors in Africa: A Double-Edged Sword under Neoliberal Governance},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {298-312},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713353.pdf},
      abstract = {Human security in Africa is increasingly shaped by the activities of non-state actors (NSAs), both non-violent, sometimes mitigating terrorism, and violent, which exacerbate human insecurity. The dual role of NSAs, coupled with neoliberal governance frameworks characterised by economic liberalisation, foreign investment, and conditional aid, presents a double-edged sword for African populations. While neoliberal policies have improved access to healthcare, education, and livelihood opportunities in certain contexts, they have simultaneously intensified socioeconomic inequalities, weakened state institutions, and disproportionately affected marginalised communities, undermining long-term stability. The study aims to critically analyse the interplay between human security, non-state actors, and neoliberal governance in Africa, with a focus on understanding how these dynamics simultaneously empower and endanger populations. Employing a qualitative research design, the study relies on secondary sources, including peer-reviewed literature, institutional reports, and policy documents, analysed through content analysis to identify patterns, contradictions, and systemic impacts of both violent and non-violent NSAs on human security outcomes. Findings reveal that non-violent NSAs, such as NGOs and international development agencies, enhance resilience by providing education, healthcare, and livelihood support, sometimes abating terrorist influence. Conversely, violent NSAs, including insurgent groups and militias, exploit socioeconomic disparities and weak governance to perpetuate insecurity. The research concludes that sustainable human security requires integrated, context-sensitive policies that harmonise state and non-state actor efforts, strengthen institutional accountability, and mitigate the unintended negative effects of neoliberal interventions. The study contributes conceptually by clarifying the dual, ?double-edged? nature of human security under neoliberalism in Africa and offers policy-relevant insights for development practitioners, governments, and peacebuilding initiatives.},
      keywords = {Human Security, Non-State Actors, Violent and Non-Violent Actors, Neoliberalism, Africa, Development, Resilience, Vulnerability},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713353}
  }