International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713574

1713574 Vol 9 · Issue 7 Download Paper

Effects of the Cabotage Regime on Indigenous Shipping Companies in Nigeria

Wachuku Achor Azubuike John Chuku Daniel Tamunodukobipi

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Maritime Transport

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713574

Abstract

This research looked at how the Nigerian government's 2003 Cabotage Regime affected the growth of local shipping enterprises. The introduction of the Cabotage Regime in 2003 was an independent variable, and it included both tight and liberalized cabotage policies. The development of indigenous shipping businesses was measured using the dependent variable, which is the activity of building ships, the Cabotage vessel finance fund, and human capacity building. The study employed a cross-sectional survey research design, and its theoretical foundations were the theory of relative state autonomy and the theory of policy implementation. We mostly relied on primary and secondary sources to compile our data. A structured questionnaire was used to gather primary data that was relevant to this investigation. All 101 registered indigenous shipping businesses in Nigeria comprised the study's population. However, the research focused solely on twenty-four (24) registered indigenous shipping enterprises. The research managed to collect 136 questionnaires out of a total of 144 that were distributed to 24 indigenous shipping enterprises in Nigeria. After reviewing all of the questionnaires, however, 133 (or 92.36%) were deemed useful for the analysis of the research. With a Cronbach's alpha threshold of 0.70, the research instrument was found to be reliable. The data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics in the research. The study objectives and hypotheses were tested using SPSS 25.0 and multiple regression analysis with an ordinary least squares estimator. The study found that there is much potential to improve the effectiveness of the Cabotage Regime 2003 in terms of shipbuilding, the cabotage vessel finance fund, and the human capacity building of indigenous shipping enterprises, all thanks to the rigorous cabotage policy. The research concluded that stringent cabotage rules help shipyards grow in Nigeria, but that issues with government policy inconsistencies, bad corporate practices, and procedural obstacles, among others, have hindered their implementation. The analysis identifies Section 9, which permits foreign ownership, as a weak point in the Cabotage statute. Findings indicate that human capacity building, a measure of indigenous shipping businesses' growth, is significantly impacted by stringent cabotage policy, which is a component of the Cabotage Regime 2003. However, the influence on the shipbuilding activity fund is favourable but small. Accordingly, the report suggested that the government initiate a procedure to evaluate the current Cabotage Regime in light of ground realities, ensuring that Nigerians reap the benefits of the program as intended.

Keywords

Cabotage; Indigenous Shipping; Cronbach's; Independent Variable

References

[1] Abdulhaleem, A. (2023). Effectiveness of Nigeria's cabotage laws. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/effectiveness-nigerias-cabotage-laws-abdullahi-abdulhaleem

[2] Adekola, O. A. (2018). Elements of cabotage law in Nigeria: Towards integrating Nigeria into the world economic order Author House.

[3] Adenubi, T (2018). Cabotage vessel Financing Fund Hits #37.9bn-NIMASA. http://www.tribuneonlineng.com/160066/.

[4] Adenubi, T (2018). Cabotage vessel Financing Fund Hits #37.9bn-NIMASA. Retrieved 30.12.2018 from http://www.tribuneonlineng.com/160066/.

[5] Agama, F. O., & Alisigwe, H. C. (2018). Cabotage regimes and their effects on states’ economy. Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 9(1), 71-82.

[6] Agbakoba, O. (2019). Guild for the Cabotage Financing for the Financial Sector in Nigeria. In NIMASA Seminar on Economic Potentials of Maritime Industry in Nigeria, Lagos, 17th and 19th May, 2002.

[7] Ajiye, S. (2013). Nigerian cabotage: Its policy, prospects and challenges. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(14), 11-19.

[8] Akanbi, F. (2011). Vested interests frustrate enforcement of cabotage law. http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/vested-interests-frustrate-enforcement-of- cabotage law/98677/

[9] Akpan, A. (2018). Maritime Cabotage Law Routledge. Lagos: Macmillan.

[10] Akujuru, C. A. & Enyioko, N. C. (2018). Social science research: Methodology and conceptual Perspectives. Lambert Academic Publishing

[11] Alayaki, G. (2019). Cabotage finally unbundled from the shackles of waivers. Retrieved from https://www.nimasa.gov.ng/press-centre/post/cabotage-finally-unbundled-from-the-shacklesof-waivers

[12] Alayaki, G. (2019). Cabotage finally unbundled from the shackles of waivers. https://www.nimasa.gov.ng/press-centre/post/cabotage-finally-unbundled-from-the shacklesof-waivers 1(1).

[13] Anele, K. K (2018). A Study of the Cabotage Policy in Nigeria from the Prisms of Ship Acquisition and Shipbuilding. World Maritime University Journal of Maritime Affairs,17(1), 91-117

[14] Ballack S (2006). International Maritime Digest. 4 (15):4-5

[15] Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business research methods Oxford university press.

[16] Bello-Olowookere, G. B. (2011). The effects of cabotage regime on indigenous shipping in Nigeria. World Maritime University Dissertations. Retrieved from http://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/176

[17] Black, H. C., Garner, B. A., McDaniel, B. R. & Schultz, D. W., (1999).West Publishing Company.

[18] Black's law dictionary West Group St. Paul, MN. Brooks, M. R. (2009). Liberalization in maritime transport.

[19] Cavana, R. Y. (2007). A qualitative analysis of reintroducing cabotage onto New Zeland's Coasts. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(3), 179-198.

[20] Casaca, A. C. P., & Lyridis, D. V. (2018). Protectionist vs liberalised maritime cabotage policies: A review. Maritime Business Review, 3(3), 210-242. Coastal and Inland Shipping. (2003). Cabotage Regime200

[21] Cabotage Regime(2003). Coastal and inland shipping (Cabotage) Regimehttp://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/nig61610.pdf

[22] Coastal and Inland Shipping. (2003). Cabotage Regime2003.

[23] Cole, M. (2010). Maritime Cabotage A Global Analysis Including Cabotage Campaigning Tools. A Report Jointly Produced by the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) and the International Transport Workers Federation (ITF)

[24] Congress of the Philippines (2004), "Republic Regime no. 9295, An Regime promoting the development of Philippine domestic shipping, shipbuilding, ship repair and shipbreaking, ordaining reforms in government policies towards shipping in the Philippines and for other purposes",

[25] Congress of the Philippines (2015). Republic Regime no. 10668. an Regime allowing foreign vessels to transport and co-load foreign cargoes for domestic transshipment and for other purposes”, 21 July 2015, available at: www.gov.ph/2015/07/21/republic-act-no-10668/ 43

[26] Dike, A. R., Obioma, O. P.; Ezema, N. J. C.; Nnani,, J. O & Chinelo, E. I. (2023). Legal Framework for Cabotage Regime in Nigeria: Making a Case for Reform Initiatives. International Law Research; 12, (1); 27-52

[27] Dimowo, H. (2010). The cabotage regime in Nigeria: The journey so far. The Vovage , 12-13.

[28] Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C.M. & Starnes, A.L. (1993). Building and Evaluating Family Support Initiatives: A National Study of Programs for Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.

[29] Ege, E. and Chilaka, E.M. (2018), Nigerian Cabotage Law and the Development of Indigenous Maritime Capacity, Journal of Nigeria Transport History

[30] Ekpo, E. I (2012). Impact of Shipping on Nigerian Economy: Implications for Sustainable Development”, in Journal of Education and Social Research, (2), 7

[31] Ezem, F. (2011). Cabotage Regime is Defective Admits Federal Government National Mirror, 14.

[32] Galbraith, S. (2014), ‘Thinking Outside the Box on Coastal shipping and Cabotage’, Maritime Trade Intelligence.

[33] Hand, M. (2017). Cabotage law between east and west Malaysia to be scrapped”, Seatrade Maritime News, 10 May 2017, available at: www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/asia/cabotage law-between-east-and-west-malaysia-to-be-scrapped.html

[34] Hodgson, J.R.F. & Brooks, M.R. (2012). Canada’s Maritime cabotage policy.http://maryrbrooks.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CabotageFinal.pdf .

[35] Igboanusi, C.C. & Nwokedi T. (2015). Cabotage Implementation in Nigeria; Analysis for improving coastal shipping business opportunities for local and joint venture operators Department of maritime management technology, federal university of technology, Owerri, Nigeria.

[36] Ijarshar, V.U. (2015). The empirical analysis of agricultural exports and economic growth in Nigeria.

[37] Ikwunze, K.C. & Ihunwo, C.K. (2024). Appraising the Operational Performance of Onne Port (A Case Study). Scholarly Journal of Science and Technology Research & Development,

[38] Iroegbu, C.A. (2010). Weaknesses of the Ongoing Reforms in the Maritime Industry. The Fronteria Post, 27.

[39] Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1980). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement

[40] Lemke, A. A., & Harris-Wai, J. N. (2015). Stakeholder engagement in policy development: Challenges and opportunities for human genomics. Genetics in Medicine, 17(12), 949.

[41] Llanto, G. M., & Navarro, A. M. (2012). No title. The Impact of Trade Liberalization and Economic Integration on the Logistics Industry: Maritime Transport and Freight Forwarders,

[42] Lorenzo, E. (1998). The domestic shipping industry of the Philippines: A situation report. Maritime Industry Authority (Unpublished Report)

[43] Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1977) Manifesto of the Communist Party, Moscow: Progress Publishers

[44] Mazmanian, D.A.& Sabatier, P.A. (2017). Implementation and Public Policy with a New Postscript. Washington: University Press of America, Inc.

[45] Mattos, J. & Acosta, M. (2003). Maritime Transport Liberalization and the Challenges to Further its Implementation in Chile’ [2003] CEPAL – SERIE Comercio international, 43.

[46] Merriam-Webster, P. (2019). Cabotage. https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/cabotage.

[47] Mukherjee, H. (2010), Maritime Commercial Law, Unpublished lecture handout, World Maritime University Malmo, Sweden.

[48] National Inland Waterways Authority (2019). Waterways. https://niwa.gov.ng/waterways/ Nigeria’s Maritime

[49] Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (2009) and Coastal and Inland Shipping Regime(2003).

[50] Navarro, A., & Llanto, G. (2014). Financing infrastructure in the Philippines: Fiscal landscape and resources mobilization. Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Discussion Paper Series, (2014-01)

[51] Ndikom, O., Buhari, S. O., Okeke, O. K., & Samuel, M. W. (2017). Critical assessment of maritime industry in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects of policy issues. African Journal for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues, 20(3), 114-131. 44

[52] Njar, G. N., & Okon, I. E. (2018). The Impacts of Cabotage Law Implementation on Nigeria’s Indigenous Shipping Industry: A Study of the Onne Sea Port, Rivers State, Nigeria. European Journal of Logistics, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 6(4), 13-27.

[53] Nwekeaku, C., & Atteh, J. (2016). Cabotage Regimeand the challenges of Nigerian shipping lines in Sub-Sahara Africa. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(5)

[54] Nwokedi, T. C., Kalu, D. I., Igboanusi, C. C., Addah, G. L., & Odumodu, C. U. (2019). Constraint theory approach analysis of the Nigerian shipbuilding industry. LOGI–Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 10(1), 50-61.

[55] Okafor, O. (2020). Assessment of Cabotage Regime implementation and its effect on Nigerian seafarers. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, 5(1), 124-132.

[56] Okeke, B. V., & Aniche, E. (2012). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the cabotage Regime2003 on Nigerian maritime administration. Sacha Journal of Policy and Strategic Studies, 2(1)

[57] Okon, I..E. & Edem, J.O. (2019). The impacts of cabotage law implementation on Nigeria’s indigenous shipping industry: A study of the Onne Sea Port, Rivers State, Nigeria”, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 8 (7), 388-403.

[58] Okoroji, O., & Ukpere, W. I. (2011). A strategic reposition of the maritime industry for economic recovery and sustainability: “The cabotage act”. Omuinu, O. (2012), Cabotage Law in Nigeria, NAILS press, Abuja.

[59] Osinuga, D. (2023). The Nigerian cabotage Regime and the ideals of the African Continental Free Trade Area: An unwholesome alliance? Journal of African Law, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855323000165

[60] Ozioruva A (2004). Nigeria Loses $4 billion Yearly to Foreign Ship Owners. Guardian, p. 53.

[61] Paixão, C. A. C., & Lyridis, D. V. (2018). Protectionist vs liberalised maritime cabotage policies: A review. Maritime Business Review, 3(3), 210-242.

[62] Parliament of Malaysia (1952). Ordinance 70/1952 – Merchant shipping ordinance 1952, incorporating latest amendments – RegimeA1316/2007", available at http://rr.mpc.gov.my/data/lic-legal-2013-12-24-15-29-43.pdf

[63] President of the Republic of Indonesia (2008). Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 17 of 2008 about shipping”, www.indolaw.org/UU/Law%20No.%2017%20of%202008%20on%20Shipping.pdf

[64] Ruslan, S. M. M., Ghani, G. M., & Khalid, H. (2019). The influence of cabotage policy on price disparity between peninsular Malaysia and Sabah. Institutions and Economies, 65-91.

[65] Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow-England: Pearson Education) (614).

[66] Surian, I. (2020). Cabotage – it’s global? [LexisNexis]. https://www.lexisnexis.co.za/ lexis-digest/legal/maritime-law/cabotage-its-global

[67] The World Bank. (2023). Nigeria - interest rate spread (Lending rate minus deposit rate %).

[68] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FR.INR.LNDP?locations=NG, 1(1), 23-35.

[69] Transport Canada. (2022). Coasting trade in Canada. https://tc.canada.ca/ en/corporate-services/policies/coasting-trade-canada

[70] Uche, L. (2012). History of Cabotage Law in Nigeria, Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, NIALS press, Abuja

[71] UNCTAD, (2023). Review of maritime https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt 2023_en.pdf transport retrieved from United States Maritime Administration. . A survey of world cabotage laws summary of responses from countries. Dept. of Transportation, Maritime Administration.

[72] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Review of maritime transport. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2022_en.pdf

[73] United Nations. (2023). United nations convention on the law of the sea of 10 December 1982 overview and full text. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/ convention_overview_convention.htm

[74] Usoro, M.E. (2003). Cabotage Policy and International Maritime Politics: The Nigerian Coastal and Inland Shipping (Cabotage) Regime2003. Paper presented at the annual maritime seminar of the Nigerian Maritime Law Association, 13, 14.

[75] Walter C. (2010) Cabotage Regimeand Development in Nigerian Maritime. http://www.thetidenewsonline.com. Accessed 19/06/18 at 10:42am.

[76] Weakley, J. H. (2016). The Importance of the Jones RegimeFleet to U.S. Homeland Security. The Maritime Executive: https://www.maritime executive.com/magazine/the-importance-of-the-jones-act-fleet-to-us-homeland-security

[77] Yee, G. & Din, N.K. (2015). Cabotage and its impRegimein Indonesia”, Clyde and Co.: www.clydeco.com/insight/article/cabotage-and-its-impact-in-indonesia.

How to cite this paper

Wachuku Achor, Azubuike John Chuku, Daniel Tamunodukobipi "Effects of the Cabotage Regime on Indigenous Shipping Companies in Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 7 2026 Page 1320-1350 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713574
Wachuku Achor, Azubuike John Chuku, Daniel Tamunodukobipi "Effects of the Cabotage Regime on Indigenous Shipping Companies in Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713574
Wachuku Achor, Azubuike John Chuku, Daniel Tamunodukobipi (2026). Effects of the Cabotage Regime on Indigenous Shipping Companies in Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713574
Wachuku Achor, Azubuike John Chuku, Daniel Tamunodukobipi "Effects of the Cabotage Regime on Indigenous Shipping Companies in Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713574
@article{1713574,
      author = {Wachuku Achor, Azubuike John Chuku, Daniel Tamunodukobipi},
      title = {Effects of the Cabotage Regime on Indigenous Shipping Companies in Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {1320-1350},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713574.pdf},
      abstract = {This research looked at how the Nigerian government's 2003 Cabotage Regime affected the growth of local shipping enterprises. The introduction of the Cabotage Regime in 2003 was an independent variable, and it included both tight and liberalized cabotage policies. The development of indigenous shipping businesses was measured using the dependent variable, which is the activity of building ships, the Cabotage vessel finance fund, and human capacity building. The study employed a cross-sectional survey research design, and its theoretical foundations were the theory of relative state autonomy and the theory of policy implementation. We mostly relied on primary and secondary sources to compile our data. A structured questionnaire was used to gather primary data that was relevant to this investigation. All 101 registered indigenous shipping businesses in Nigeria comprised the study's population. However, the research focused solely on twenty-four (24) registered indigenous shipping enterprises. The research managed to collect 136 questionnaires out of a total of 144 that were distributed to 24 indigenous shipping enterprises in Nigeria. After reviewing all of the questionnaires, however, 133 (or 92.36%) were deemed useful for the analysis of the research. With a Cronbach's alpha threshold of 0.70, the research instrument was found to be reliable. The data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics in the research. The study objectives and hypotheses were tested using SPSS 25.0 and multiple regression analysis with an ordinary least squares estimator. The study found that there is much potential to improve the effectiveness of the Cabotage Regime 2003 in terms of shipbuilding, the cabotage vessel finance fund, and the human capacity building of indigenous shipping enterprises, all thanks to the rigorous cabotage policy. The research concluded that stringent cabotage rules help shipyards grow in Nigeria, but that issues with government policy inconsistencies, bad corporate practices, and procedural obstacles, among others, have hindered their implementation. The analysis identifies Section 9, which permits foreign ownership, as a weak point in the Cabotage statute. Findings indicate that human capacity building, a measure of indigenous shipping businesses' growth, is significantly impacted by stringent cabotage policy, which is a component of the Cabotage Regime 2003. However, the influence on the shipbuilding activity fund is favourable but small. Accordingly, the report suggested that the government initiate a procedure to evaluate the current Cabotage Regime in light of ground realities, ensuring that Nigerians reap the benefits of the program as intended.},
      keywords = {Cabotage; Indigenous Shipping; Cronbach's; Independent Variable},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713574}
  }