International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713592

1713592 Vol 9 · Issue 7 Download Paper

Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field

Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo Chinedu Ikenna NDUBUKA Mfonobong Edet Umana Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong Okon, Christopher Etim

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Petroleum Engineering

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713592

Abstract

One of the most significant challenges for extending production life in mature waterflood fields is high water cut. Couple with high reservoir heterogeneity, extensive layering and faulting, these fields often developed irregular flood patterns after decades of production which compounded the challenge of optimizing recovery from these fields. The severity of this problem has been observed in the Niger Delta oil fields, where several matured fields are producing at high water cut after many years of waterflooding. This study aimed to improve oil recovery using Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection in comparison with Waterflooding and Gas injection methods in the Niger Delta. Water- alternating-gas (WAG) injection process is one of innovative and new enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. This method Improves gas injection microscopic and water injection macroscopic displacement processes. In this study, a computer software known as ?ECLIPSE? was used to model and simulate the hydrocarbon flow of an oil field in the Niger Delta. The software was used in optimizing oil recovery using WAG method in comparison with water flooding and gas injection was discussed. From the results obtained, WAG injection had a maximum field oil efficiency (FOE) of 34%, a field oil production total (FOPT) of 76.46 MMSTB, a plateau time of 3.7years and a field water cut (FWCT)of 26.11%. Waterflooding had a FOE of 26.65%, a FOPT of 59.62 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2.2years and FWCT of 47.58%. Whereas gas injection had an FOE of 21.35%, a FOPT of 47.89 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2 years, and FWCT of 9.2%. From comparative analysis of the three recovery methods, WAG injection outperformed both waterflooding and gas injection with the highest FOE of 34%, the longest plateau time of 3.7years, and a minimal water cut of 26.11%. Therefore, WAG recovery method has thus far demonstrated to be the most effective recovery method, in comparison to waterflooding and gas injection methods

Keywords

Water Alternating Gas; Waterflooding; Gas Injection; Oil Recovery.

References

[1] Abdalla, A.M.A.; Zulkefi, B.Y.; and Abdurahman, H.N. (2014). Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques Miscible and Immiscible Flooding. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(10): 1016 - 1022.

[2] Adedosu, T.A.; and Sonibare, O.O. (2005). Characterization of Niger Delta Crude Oil by Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(5): 906 - 909.

[3] Allison, E.; and Mandler, B. (2018). Heavy Oil. Journal of Petroleum and the Environment.

[4] Archer, J.S.; and Wall, C.G. (1986). Secondary Recovery and Pressure Maintenance. In:

[5] Petroleum Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-

[6] 9601-0_11

[7] John, A.D. (2020). Introduction to Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://www.e-education.psu.edu/png301/node/642

[8] Madhav, M.K.; and Dandina, N.R. (2005). Experimental Investigation of Miscible and Immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Process Performance. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 48, 1 - 20.

[9] Masoud, R.; and Abdolah, G. (2016). The Influence of Spreading Coefficient on Carbonated Water Alternating Gas Injection in Heavy Crude Oil. Journal of Fuel, 178, 1 - 9.

[10] Miroslaw, Wojnicki, (2022). An Experimental Investigation of WAG Injection in a

[11] Nurafiqah, A.; and Nurul, H. (2021) (in press). The Implementation of Water Alternating Injection to obtain optimum recovery in Cornea Field, Australia. Materials Today: Proceeding.

[12] Ramasamy, M. Gounder. (2019). Heavy Crude Oil Processing: An Overview. Retrieved October 5, 2022, from https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/70193

[13] Saikou, Touray. (2013). Effect of Water Alternating Gas Injection on Ultimate Oil Recovery. Journal of Petroleum Engineering.

[14] Shokufe, A.; Nima, R.; and Sohrab, Z. (2018). A Comprehensive Review on Enhanced Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas Injection. Journal of Fuel, 227, 218 – 246.

[15] Short, K.C.; and Stauble, A.J. (1967). Outline of the Geology of Niger Delta. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, 51, 661 – 779.

[16] Srivastava J.P.; and Laxminarayan, M. (2012). Water Alternating Gas Injection, a Novel EOR Technique for Mature Light Oil Fields: A Laboratory Investigation for GS-5C Sand of Gandhar Field. 9th Biennial International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics. Ahmedabad, 109.

[17] Swapnil, P.; Gudendra, S.N.; Jatin, R.A.; Achinta, B.; and Maunish, S. (2020). Experimental and Simulation Studies for Optimization of Water Alternating Gas (CO2) Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Petroleum Research, 5, 227 – 234.

[18] Tarek, A. (2010). Reservoir Engineering Handbook (4th Edition). Gulf Professional Publishing, 1 – 28.

[19] Thamudi, M.; Feng, Y.; Sabrina, S.M.; and Jun, G. (2022). Investigation on the Performance Between Water Alternating Gas and Water Huff and Puff Techniques in the Tight Oil Reservoir by Three-Dimensional Model Simulation: A Case Study of Jilin Tight Oil Field. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences.

[20] Vishnu, B.; Afshin, G.; and Yap, Y. F. (2019). Experimental Study of Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) Process in Microporous Media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 1742 – 6596.

[21] Yaser, A.; Seyed, E.E.; Peyman, B.; Mahdi, H.; Yousef, K.; and Atena, V. (2015). Comprehensive Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Injection Study to Evaluate the Most Effective Method Based on Heavy Oil Recovery and Asphaltene Precipitation Tests. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 133, 123 – 129.

How to cite this paper

Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Chinedu Ikenna NDUBUKA, Mfonobong Edet Umana, Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong, Okon, Christopher Etim "Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 7 2026 Page 1095-1108 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713592
Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Chinedu Ikenna NDUBUKA, Mfonobong Edet Umana, Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong, Okon, Christopher Etim "Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713592
Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Chinedu Ikenna NDUBUKA, Mfonobong Edet Umana, Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong, Okon, Christopher Etim (2026). Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713592
Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Chinedu Ikenna NDUBUKA, Mfonobong Edet Umana, Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong, Okon, Christopher Etim "Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 7, Jan. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713592
@article{1713592,
      author = { Ini-Obong Saturday Asuquo, Chinedu Ikenna NDUBUKA, Mfonobong Edet Umana, Seyeneofon Emmanuel Ukpong, Okon, Christopher Etim},
      title = {Selection of A Suitable Oil Recovery Mechanism for A Niger Delta Field},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {7},
      pages = {1095-1108},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713592.pdf},
      abstract = {One of the most significant challenges for extending production life in mature waterflood fields is high water cut. Couple with high reservoir heterogeneity, extensive layering and faulting, these fields often developed irregular flood patterns after decades of production which compounded the challenge of optimizing recovery from these fields. The severity of this problem has been observed in the Niger Delta oil fields, where several matured fields are producing at high water cut after many years of waterflooding. This study aimed to improve oil recovery using Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection in comparison with Waterflooding and Gas injection methods in the Niger Delta. Water- alternating-gas (WAG) injection process is one of innovative and new enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. This method Improves gas injection microscopic and water injection macroscopic displacement processes. In this study, a computer software known as ?ECLIPSE? was used to model and simulate the hydrocarbon flow of an oil field in the Niger Delta. The software was used in optimizing oil recovery using WAG method in comparison with water flooding and gas injection was discussed. From the results obtained, WAG injection had a maximum field oil efficiency (FOE) of 34%, a field oil production total (FOPT) of 76.46 MMSTB, a plateau time of 3.7years and a field water cut (FWCT)of 26.11%. Waterflooding had a FOE of 26.65%, a FOPT of 59.62 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2.2years and FWCT of 47.58%. Whereas gas injection had an FOE of 21.35%, a FOPT of 47.89 MMSTB, a plateau time of 2 years, and FWCT of 9.2%. From comparative analysis of the three recovery methods, WAG injection outperformed both waterflooding and gas injection with the highest FOE of 34%, the longest plateau time of 3.7years, and a minimal water cut of 26.11%. Therefore, WAG recovery method has thus far demonstrated to be the most effective recovery method, in comparison to waterflooding and gas injection methods},
      keywords = {Water Alternating Gas; Waterflooding; Gas Injection; Oil Recovery.},
      month = {January},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I7-1713592}
  }