Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713639
Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Produced Water Treatment Using Agricultural Waste?Derived Adsorbents
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Water Treatment
Abstract
The management of produced water generated from oil and gas operations remains a critical environmental and sustainability challenge, particularly in regions facing water scarcity and weak wastewater infrastructure. Produced water is characterized by complex mixtures of dissolved salts, hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and chemical additives, necessitating treatment technologies that are both effective and economically viable. This presents a conceptual framework for sustainable produced water treatment using agricultural waste derived adsorbents, integrating principles of circular economy, green chemistry, and low-cost environmental remediation. The framework outlines the systematic conversion of abundant agricultural residues such as rice husks, coconut shells, maize cobs, sugarcane bagasse, and groundnut shells into functional adsorbent materials through physical, chemical, or thermochemical activation processes. These bio-based adsorbents exhibit high surface area, tunable porosity, and surface functional groups capable of removing key produced water contaminants, including heavy metals, oil residues, and organic compounds. The proposed framework encompasses four interlinked stages: (i) feedstock selection and pretreatment based on regional agricultural waste availability, (ii) adsorbent synthesis and modification to enhance adsorption performance, (iii) integration into modular produced water treatment systems, and (iv) post-treatment management, including adsorbent regeneration, reuse, or environmentally safe disposal. Emphasis is placed on scalability, lifecycle sustainability, and adaptability to onshore and offshore oil and gas operations. The framework also highlights socio-economic co-benefits, such as waste valorization, reduced reliance on imported treatment media, and opportunities for local enterprise development. By aligning produced water treatment with sustainable resource utilization, this conceptual framework provides a strategic pathway for reducing environmental risks, lowering operational costs, and supporting regulatory compliance. It offers a foundation for future experimental validation, techno-economic assessment, and policy-oriented research aimed at advancing sustainable water management practices in energy-producing regions, particularly in developing economies.
Keywords
Produced Water Treatment; Agricultural Waste; Bio-Based Adsorbents; Sustainability; Circular Economy; Oil And Gas Wastewater; Environmental Remediation
References
[1] Adebiyi, F.M., Akinola, A.S., Santoro, A. and Mastrolitti, S., 2017. Chemical analysis of resin fraction of Nigerian bitumen for organic and trace metal compositions. Petroleum Science and Technology, 35(13), pp.1370-1380.
[2] Adebiyi, F.M., Thoss, V. and Akinola, A.S., 2014. Comparative studies of the elements that are associated with petroleum hydrocarbon formation in Nigerian crude oil and bitumen using ICP-OES. Journal of sustainable energy engineering, 2(1), pp.10-18.
[3] Akinrinoye, O.V., Umoren, O., Didi, P.U., Balogun, O. and Abass, O.S., 2015. Predictive and segmentation-based marketing analytics framework for optimizing customer acquisition, engagement, and retention strategies. Engineering and Technology Journal, 10(9), pp.6758-6776.
[4] Akpan, U.U., Adekoya, K.O., Awe, E.T., Garba, N., Oguncoker, G.D. and Ojo, S.G., 2017. Mini-STRs screening of 12 relatives of Hausa origin in northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(1), pp.48-57.
[5] Amrose, S., Burt, Z. and Ray, I., 2015. Safe drinking water for low-income regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40(1), pp.203-231.
[6] Arshadi, M., Attard, T.M., Lukasik, R.M., Brncic, M., da Costa Lopes, A.M., Finell, M., Geladi, P., Gerschenson, L.N., Gogus, F., Herrero, M. and Hunt, A.J., 2016. Pre-treatment and extraction techniques for recovery of added value compounds from wastes throughout the agri-food chain. Green Chemistry, 18(23), pp.6160-6204.
[7] Assayie, A.A., Gebreyohannes, A.Y. and Giorno, L., 2017. Municipal wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactors. In Sustainable membrane technology for water and wastewater treatment (pp. 265-294). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[8] Assouline, S., Russo, D., Silber, A. and Or, D., 2015. Balancing water scarcity and quality for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Water Resources Research, 51(5), pp.3419-3436.
[9] Awe, E.T. and Akpan, U.U., 2017. Cytological study of Allium cepa and Allium sativum.
[10] Awe, E.T., 2017. Hybridization of snout mouth deformed and normal mouth African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Animal Research International, 14(3), pp.2804-2808.
[11] Awe, E.T., Akpan, U.U. and Adekoya, K.O., 2017. Evaluation of two MiniSTR loci mutation events in five Father-Mother-Child trios of Yoruba origin. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 33, pp.120-124.
[12] Ayele, Y.Z., Barabadi, A. and Barabady, J., 2016. A methodology for identification of a suitable drilling waste handling system in the Arctic region. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 17(3-4), pp.227-250.
[13] Aziz, H.A., Ghazali, M.F., Hung, Y.T. and Wang, L.K., 2017. Toxicity, source, and control of barium in the environment. In Handbook of Advanced Industrial and Hazardous Wastes Management (pp. 463-482). CRC Press.
[14] Ball, M. and Weeda, M., 2015. The hydrogen economy–vision or reality?. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(25), pp.7903-7919.
[15] Bennich, T. and Belyazid, S., 2017. The route to sustainability—prospects and challenges of the bio-based economy. Sustainability, 9(6), p.887.
[16] Burckart, W. and Butterworth, J., 2017. INVESTING IN THE NEW INDUSTRIAL (R) EVOLUTION.
[17] Cao, X., Sun, S. and Sun, R., 2017. Application of biochar-based catalysts in biomass upgrading: a review. RSC advances, 7(77), pp.48793-48805.
[18] Chaukura, N., Gwenzi, W., Tavengwa, N. and Manyuchi, M.M., 2016. Biosorbents for the removal of synthetic organics and emerging pollutants: opportunities and challenges for developing countries. Environmental Development, 19, pp.84-89.
[19] Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N.H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A. and Fargione, J., 2015. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. Gcb Bioenergy, 7(5), pp.916-944.
[20] Dale, V.H., Kline, K.L., Buford, M.A., Volk, T.A., Smith, C.T. and Stupak, I., 2016. Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, pp.1158-1171.
[21] Drioli, E., Ali, A., Lee, Y.M., Al-Sharif, S.F., Al-Beirutty, M. and Macedonio, F., 2016. Membrane operations for produced water treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(31), pp.14317-14335.
[22] Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.A., Justes, E., Journet, E.P., Aubertot, J.N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.E. and Sarthou, J.P., 2015. How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 35(4), pp.1259-1281.
[23] Efobi, O.Z., Akinleye, O.K. and Fasawe, O., 2017. Framework for Quantitative Evaluation of ESG Adoption within SME Supply Chains in Emerging Economies. measurement.
[24] Eldridge, D.S., Crawford, R.J. and Harding, I.H., 2015. The role of metal ion-ligand interactions during divalent metal ion adsorption. Journal of colloid and interface science, 454, pp.20-26.
[25] Feron, S., 2016. Sustainability of off-grid photovoltaic systems for rural electrification in developing countries: A review. Sustainability, 8(12), p.1326.
[26] Gazali, A.K., Alkali, A.N., Mohammed, Y., Djauro, Y. and Muhammed, D.D., 2017. Environmental impact of produced water and driiling waste discharges from the Niger Delta petroleum industry. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 7(06), pp.22-29.
[27] Gude, V.G., 2015. Energy and water autarky of wastewater treatment and power generation systems. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 45, pp.52-68.
[28] Henninger, S.K., Ernst, S.J., Gordeeva, L., Bendix, P., Fröhlich, D., Grekova, A.D., Bonaccorsi, L., Aristov, Y. and Jaenchen, J., 2017. New materials for adsorption heat transformation and storage. Renewable Energy, 110, pp.59-68.
[29] Iacovidou, E., Millward-Hopkins, J., Busch, J., Purnell, P., Velis, C.A., Hahladakis, J.N., Zwirner, O. and Brown, A., 2017. A pathway to circular economy: Developing a conceptual framework for complex value assessment of resources recovered from waste. Journal of cleaner production, 168, pp.1279-1288.
[30] Isikgor, F.H. and Becer, C.R., 2015. Lignocellulosic biomass: a sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polymer chemistry, 6(25), pp.4497-4559.
[31] Katsanevakis, S., Tempera, F. and Teixeira, H., 2016. Mapping the impact of alien species on marine ecosystems: the Mediterranean Sea case study. Diversity and Distributions, 22(6), pp.694-707.
[32] Khatoon, H. and Rai, J.P.N., 2016. Agricultural waste materials as biosorbents for the removal of heavy metals and synthetic dyes-a review. Octa Journal of Environmental Research, 4(3).
[33] Konvensional, B.T., 2017. A review of oilfield wastewater treatment using membrane filtration over conventional technology. Malays. J. Anal. Sci, 21, pp.643-658.
[34] Li, X.H., Hou, X.H., Zhang, X. and Yuan, Z.X., 2015. A review on development of adsorption cooling—Novel beds and advanced cycles. Energy conversion and management, 94, pp.221-232.
[35] Malakahmad, A., Abualqumboz, M.S., Kutty, S.R.M. and Abunama, T.J., 2017. Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia. Waste Management, 70, pp.282-292.
[36] Mehta, C.M., Khunjar, W.O., Nguyen, V., Tait, S. and Batstone, D.J., 2015. Technologies to recover nutrients from waste streams: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 45(4), pp.385-427.
[37] Mentis, D., Siyal, S.H., Korkovelos, A. and Howells, M., 2016. A geospatial assessment of the techno-economic wind power potential in India using geographical restrictions. Renewable energy, 97, pp.77-88.
[38] Milani, D., Luu, M.T., McNaughton, R. and Abbas, A., 2017. A comparative study of solar heliostat assisted supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycles: dynamic modelling and control strategies. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 120, pp.113-124.
[39] Nasiri, M., Jafari, I. and Parniankhoy, B., 2017. Oil and gas produced water management: a review of treatment technologies, challenges, and opportunities. Chemical engineering communications, 204(8), pp.990-1005.
[40] Nelson, A.W., Eitrheim, E.S., Knight, A.W., May, D., Mehrhoff, M.A., Shannon, R., Litman, R., Burnett, W.C., Forbes, T.Z. and Schultz, M.K., 2015. Understanding the radioactive ingrowth and decay of naturally occurring radioactive materials in the environment: an analysis of produced fluids from the Marcellus Shale. Environmental Health Perspectives, 123(7), p.689.
[41] Osabuohien, F.O., 2017. Review of the environmental impact of polymer degradation. Communication in Physical Sciences, 2(1).
[42] Paterson, D.A., Ijomah, W.L. and Windmill, J.F., 2017. End-of-life decision tool with emphasis on remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner production, 148, pp.653-664.
[43] Pontié, M. and Charcosset, C., 2016. Seawater, Brackish Waters, and Natural Waters Treatment with Hybrid Membrane Processes. Integrated Membrane Systems and Processes, pp.165-196.
[44] Puigjaner, L., Pérez-Fortes, M. and Laínez-Aguirre, J.M., 2015. Towards a carbon-neutral energy sector: Opportunities and challenges of coordinated bioenergy supply Chains-A PSE approach. Energies, 8(6), pp.5613-5660.
[45] Sarker, T.C., Azam, S.M.G.G. and Bonanomi, G., 2017. Recent advances in sugarcane industry solid by-products valorization. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 8(2), pp.241-266.
[46] Sauvé, S., Bernard, S. and Sloan, P., 2016. Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental development, 17, pp.48-56.
[47] Schanes, K., Giljum, S. and Hertwich, E., 2016. Low carbon lifestyles: A framework to structure consumption strategies and options to reduce carbon footprints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, pp.1033-1043.
[48] Sengupta, S., Nawaz, T. and Beaudry, J., 2015. Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from wastewater. Current Pollution Reports, 1(3), pp.155-166.
[49] Su, Y., Song, K., Zhang, P., Su, Y., Cheng, J. and Chen, X., 2017. Progress of microalgae biofuel’s commercialization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, pp.402-411.
[50] Sulyman, M., Namieśnik, J. and Gierak, A., 2017. Low-cost adsorbents derived from agricultural by-products/wastes for enhancing contaminant uptakes from wastewater: a review. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26, pp.479-510.
[51] Suykens, C. and van Rijswick, H.F.M.W., 2016. Design principles for resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance; Lessons from cross-country comparisons.
[52] Tan, G., Sun, W., Xu, Y., Wang, H. and Xu, N., 2016. Sorption of mercury (II) and atrazine by biochar, modified biochars and biochar based activated carbon in aqueous solution. Bioresource technology, 211, pp.727-735.
[53] Thomassen, G., Egiguren Vila, U., Van Dael, M., Lemmens, B. and Van Passel, S., 2016. A techno-economic assessment of an algal-based biorefinery. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(6), pp.1849-1862.
[54] Tripathi, A. and Ranjan, M.R., 2015. Heavy metal removal from wastewater using low cost adsorbents. J Bioremed Biodeg, 6(6), p.315.
[55] Ummartyotin, S. and Pechyen, C., 2016. Strategies for development and implementation of bio-based materials as effective renewable resources of energy: A comprehensive review on adsorbent technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, pp.654-664.
[56] Wu, Z., Edgeman, R., Laasch, O., Azuara, M.W., Braungart, M. and Kocollari, U., 2015. Not For Sale.
[57] Yan, H., Yang, H., Li, A. and Cheng, R., 2016. pH-tunable surface charge of chitosan/graphene oxide composite adsorbent for efficient removal of multiple pollutants from water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 284, pp.1397-1405.
[58] Yang, S.S., Nasr, N., Ong, S.K. and Nee, A.Y.C., 2016. A holistic decision support tool for remanufacturing: end-of-life (EOL) strategy planning. Advances in Manufacturing, 4(3), pp.189-201.
[59] Yentekakis, I.V. and Goula, G., 2017. Biogas management: advanced utilization for production of renewable energy and added-value chemicals. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5, p.7.
[60] Zodrow, K.R., Li, Q., Buono, R.M., Chen, W., Daigger, G., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Elimelech, M., Huang, X., Jiang, G., Kim, J.H. and Logan, B.E., 2017. Advanced materials, technologies, and complex systems analyses: emerging opportunities to enhance urban water security.
How to cite this paper
@article{1713639,
author = {Oluwagbemisola Cynthia Falegan, Sabastine Obum Aniebonam},
title = {Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Produced Water Treatment Using Agricultural Waste?Derived Adsorbents},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2018},
volume = {2},
number = {5},
pages = {349-366},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713639.pdf},
abstract = {The management of produced water generated from oil and gas operations remains a critical environmental and sustainability challenge, particularly in regions facing water scarcity and weak wastewater infrastructure. Produced water is characterized by complex mixtures of dissolved salts, hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and chemical additives, necessitating treatment technologies that are both effective and economically viable. This presents a conceptual framework for sustainable produced water treatment using agricultural waste derived adsorbents, integrating principles of circular economy, green chemistry, and low-cost environmental remediation. The framework outlines the systematic conversion of abundant agricultural residues such as rice husks, coconut shells, maize cobs, sugarcane bagasse, and groundnut shells into functional adsorbent materials through physical, chemical, or thermochemical activation processes. These bio-based adsorbents exhibit high surface area, tunable porosity, and surface functional groups capable of removing key produced water contaminants, including heavy metals, oil residues, and organic compounds. The proposed framework encompasses four interlinked stages: (i) feedstock selection and pretreatment based on regional agricultural waste availability, (ii) adsorbent synthesis and modification to enhance adsorption performance, (iii) integration into modular produced water treatment systems, and (iv) post-treatment management, including adsorbent regeneration, reuse, or environmentally safe disposal. Emphasis is placed on scalability, lifecycle sustainability, and adaptability to onshore and offshore oil and gas operations. The framework also highlights socio-economic co-benefits, such as waste valorization, reduced reliance on imported treatment media, and opportunities for local enterprise development. By aligning produced water treatment with sustainable resource utilization, this conceptual framework provides a strategic pathway for reducing environmental risks, lowering operational costs, and supporting regulatory compliance. It offers a foundation for future experimental validation, techno-economic assessment, and policy-oriented research aimed at advancing sustainable water management practices in energy-producing regions, particularly in developing economies.},
keywords = {Produced Water Treatment; Agricultural Waste; Bio-Based Adsorbents; Sustainability; Circular Economy; Oil And Gas Wastewater; Environmental Remediation},
month = {November},
}