Hydrogen as a Secondary Energy Carrier: Modeling Its Integration in National Grids

References

[1] Abdalla, A.M., Hossain, S., Nisfindy, O.B., Azad, A.T., Dawood, M. and Azad, A.K., 2018. Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: A review. Energy conversion and management, 165, pp.602-627.

[2] Adeoba, M., Tesfamichael, S.G. and Yessoufou, K., 2019. Preserving the tree of life of the fish family Cyprinidae in Africa in the face of the ongoing extinction crisis. Genome, 62(3), pp.170-182.

[3] Adeoba, M.I. and Yessoufou, K., 2018. Analysis of temporal diversification of African Cyprinidae (Teleostei, Cypriniformes). ZooKeys, (806), p.141.

[4] Adeoba, M.I., 2018. Phylogenetic analysis of extinction risk and diversification history of the African Cyprinidae using DNA barcodes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg).

[5] Adeoba, M.I., Kabongo, R., Van der Bank, H. and Yessoufou, K., 2018. Re-evaluation of the discriminatory power of DNA barcoding on some specimens of African Cyprinidae (subfamilies Cyprininae and Danioninae). ZooKeys, (746), p.105.

[6] Agostinho, C., Ducq, Y., Zacharewicz, G., Sarraipa, J., Lampathaki, F., Poler, R. and Jardim-Goncalves, R., 2016. Towards a sustainable interoperability in networked enterprise information systems: Trends of knowledge and model-driven technology. Computers in industry, 79, pp.64-76.

[7] Ail, S.S. and Dasappa, S., 2016. Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis–Technology review and current scenario. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 58, pp.267-286.

[8] Akinluwade, K.J., Omole, F.O., Isadare, D.A., Adesina, O.S. and Adetunji, A.R., 2015. Material selection for heat sinks in HPC microchip-based circuitries. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(1), p.124.

[9] Ardo, S., Rivas, D.F., Modestino, M.A., Greiving, V.S., Abdi, F.F., Llado, E.A., Artero, V., Ayers, K., Battaglia, C., Becker, J.P. and Bederak, D., 2018. Pathways to electrochemical solar-hydrogen technologies. Energy & environmental science, 11(10), pp.2768-2783.

[10] Ayivor, P.K., 2018. Feasibility of Demand Side Response from Electrolysers to support Power System Stability. Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands.

[11] Banwo, A.O., Du, J. and Onokala, U., 2017. The determinants of location specific choice: small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7, pp.1-17.

[12] Barrows, C.P., Katz, J.R., Cochran, J.M., Maclaurin, G.J., Marollano, M.C., Gabis, M.G., Reyes, N.C., Munoz, K.J., Jesus, C.D., Asedillo, N. and Binayug, J., 2018. Greening the grid: Solar and wind grid integration study for the Luzon-Visayas system of the Philippines (No. NREL/TP-6A20-68594). National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

[13] Bevrani, H., François, B. and Ise, T., 2017. Microgrid dynamics and control. John Wiley & Sons.

[14] Bicer, Y. and Dincer, I., 2018. Clean fuel options with hydrogen for sea transportation: A life cycle approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(2), pp.1179-1193.

[15] Bögel, P., Oltra, C., Sala, R., Lores, M., Upham, P., Dütschke, E., Schneider, U. and Wiemann, P., 2018. The role of attitudes in technology acceptance management: Reflections on the case of hydrogen fuel cells in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, pp.125-135.

[16] Brandon, N.P. and Kurban, Z., 2017. Clean energy and the hydrogen economy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2098), p.20160400.

[17] Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M. and Venters, W., 2017. Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), pp.167-182.

[18] Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E. and Sovacool, B., 2018. Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, pp.175-190.

[19] Clarke, C.J., Tu, W.C., Levers, O., Brohl, A. and Hallett, J.P., 2018. Green and sustainable solvents in chemical processes. Chemical reviews, 118(2), pp.747-800.

[20] Dincer, I. and Acar, C., 2018. Smart energy solutions with hydrogen options. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(18), pp.8579-8599.

[21] Dolara, A., Grimaccia, F., Magistrati, G. and Marchegiani, G., 2017. Optimization Models for islanded micro-grids: A comparative analysis between linear programming and mixed integer programming. Energies, 10(2), p.241.

[22] Ela, E., Milligan, M., Bloom, A., Botterud, A., Townsend, A. and Levin, T., 2018. Long-term resource adequacy, long-term flexibility requirements, and revenue sufficiency. Electricity markets with increasing levels of renewable generation: Structure, operation, agent-based simulation, and emerging designs, pp.129-164.

[23] Eveloy, V. and Gebreegziabher, T., 2018. A review of projected power-to-gas deployment scenarios. Energies, 11(7), p.1824.

[24] Feng, Q., Liu, G., Wei, B., Zhang, Z., Li, H. and Wang, H., 2017. A review of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis on degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Journal of Power Sources, 366, pp.33-55.

[25] Filippov, S., 2018. New technological revolution and energy requirements. Форсайт, 12(4 (eng)), pp.20-33.

[26] Gacitua, L., Gallegos, P., Henriquez-Auba, R., Lorca, Á., Negrete-Pincetic, M., Olivares, D., Valenzuela, A. and Wenzel, G., 2018. A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 98, pp.346-360.

[27] Glachant, J.M., Rossetto, N. and Vasconcelos, J., 2017. Moving the electricity transmission system towards a decarbonised and integrated Europe: Missing pillars and roadblocks.

[28] Grimoldi, C., 2017. Village-scale multi-energy system modelling tools: a review and critical analysis.

[29] Groppi, D., Garcia, D.A., Basso, G.L., Cumo, F. and De Santoli, L., 2018. Analysing economic and environmental sustainability related to the use of battery and hydrogen energy storages for increasing the energy independence of small islands. Energy Conversion and Management, 177, pp.64-76.

[30] Guandalini, G., Colbertaldo, P. and Campanari, S., 2017. Dynamic modeling of natural gas quality within transport pipelines in presence of hydrogen injections. Applied energy, 185, pp.1712-1723.

[31] Hall, L.M. and Buckley, A.R., 2016. A review of energy systems models in the UK: Prevalent usage and categorisation. Applied Energy, 169, pp.607-628.

[32] Hardman, S., Shiu, E., Steinberger-Wilckens, R. and Turrentine, T., 2017. Barriers to the adoption of fuel cell vehicles: A qualitative investigation into early adopters attitudes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, pp.166-182.

[33] Haroon, A., Shah, M.A., Asim, Y., Naeem, W., Kamran, M. and Javaid, Q., 2016. Constraints in the IoT: the world in 2020 and beyond. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(11).

[34] Hirsch, A., Parag, Y. and Guerrero, J., 2018. Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renewable and sustainable Energy reviews, 90, pp.402-411.

[35] Huijts, N., Molin, E., Chorus, C. and van Wee, B., 2016. Public acceptance of hydrogen technologies in transport: a review of and reflection on empirical studies. Transition towards sustainable mobility, pp.137-164.

[36] Jafari, A. and Valentin, V., 2018. Selection of optimization objectives for decision-making in building energy retrofits. Building and Environment, 130, pp.94-103.

[37] Khan, M.I., 2017. Identifying and addressing barriers for the sustainable development of natural gas as automotive fuel. International journal of hydrogen energy, 42(40), pp.25453-25473.

[38] Kupecki, J., Skrzypkiewicz, M. and Błesznowski, M., 2018. Towards Hydrogen Societies: Expert Group Meeting. In Current advancements in hydrogen technology and pathways to deep decarbonisation, On the sidelines of the 24th Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)-COP24.

[39] Levidow, L. and Upham, P., 2017. Linking the multi-level perspective with social representations theory: Gasifiers as a niche innovation reinforcing the energy-from-waste (EfW) regime. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, pp.1-13.

[40] Markard, J. and Hoffmann, V.H., 2016. Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition. Technological forecasting and social change, 111, pp.63-75.

[41] Markert, F., Marangon, A., Carcassi, M. and Duijm, N.J., 2017. Risk and sustainability analysis of complex hydrogen infrastructures. international journal of hydrogen energy, 42(11), pp.7698-7706.

[42] Maroufmashat, A., Fowler, M., Khavas, S.S., Elkamel, A., Roshandel, R. and Hajimiragha, A., 2016. Mixed integer linear programing based approach for optimal planning and operation of a smart urban energy network to support the hydrogen economy. International Journal of hydrogen energy, 41(19), pp.7700-7716.

[43] Martens, J.A., Bogaerts, A., De Kimpe, N., Jacobs, P.A., Marin, G.B., Rabaey, K., Saeys, M. and Verhelst, S., 2017. The chemical route to a carbon dioxide neutral world. ChemSusChem, 10(6), pp.1039-1055.

[44] Meng, K., Lou, P., Peng, X. and Prybutok, V., 2017. Multi-objective optimization decision-making of quality dependent product recovery for sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, pp.72-85.

[45] Michalski, J., 2017. Investment decisions in imperfect power markets with hydrogen storage and large share of intermittent electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(19), pp.13368-13381.

[46] Milligan, M., Frew, B.A., Bloom, A., Ela, E., Botterud, A., Townsend, A. and Levin, T., 2016. Wholesale electricity market design with increasing levels of renewable generation: Revenue sufficiency and long-term reliability. The Electricity Journal, 29(2), pp.26-38.

[47] Moore, J. and Shabani, B., 2016. A critical study of stationary energy storage policies in Australia in an international context: the role of hydrogen and battery technologies. Energies, 9(9), p.674.

[48] Motlagh, N.H., Taleb, T. and Arouk, O., 2016. Low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicles-based internet of things services: Comprehensive survey and future perspectives. IEEE internet of things journal, 3(6), pp.899-922.

[49] Mulder, F.M., Weninger, B.M.H., Middelkoop, J., Ooms, F.G.B. and Schreuders, H., 2017. Efficient electricity storage with a battolyser, an integrated Ni–Fe battery and electrolyser. Energy & Environmental Science, 10(3), pp.756-764.

[50] Mustapha, A.Y., Chianumba, E.C., Forkuo, A.Y., Osamika, D. and Komi, L.S., 2018. Systematic Review of Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications for Infectious Disease Surveillance in Developing Countries. Methodology, 66.

[51] Nadeem, F., Hussain, S.S., Tiwari, P.K., Goswami, A.K. and Ustun, T.S., 2018. Comparative review of energy storage systems, their roles, and impacts on future power systems. IEEE access, 7, pp.4555-4585.

[52] Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M. and Schillaci, C.E., 2018. The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: A measurement framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, pp.640-673.

[53] Oduola, O.M., Omole, F.O., Akinluwade, K.J. and Adetunji, A.R., 2014. A comparative study of product development process using computer numerical control and rapid prototyping methods. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4(30), p.4291.

[54] Olaoye, T., Ajilore, T., Akinluwade, K., Omole, F. and Adetunji, A., 2016. Energy crisis in Nigeria: Need for renewable energy mix. American journal of electrical and electronic engineering, 4(1), pp.1-8.

[55] Ornetzeder, M., Bettin, S., Gutting, A., Christensen, T.H., Friis, F., Skjølsvold, T.M., Ryghaug, M. and Throndsen, W., 2018. Determining factors for integrated smart energy solutions.

[56] Oteman, M., Kooij, H.J. and Wiering, M.A., 2017. Pioneering renewable energy in an economic energy policy system: The history and development of dutch grassroots initiatives. Sustainability, 9(4), p.550.

[57] OyedokunOyewale Chioma Susan Nwaimo, Oluchukwu Modesta Oluoha (2019). Big Data Analytics: Technologies, Applications, and Future Prospects. 2(11), pp 441-438

[58] Panfilov, M., 2016. Underground and pipeline hydrogen storage. In Compendium of hydrogen energy (pp. 91-115). Woodhead Publishing.

[59] Pinson, P., Mitridati, L., Ordoudis, C. and Østergaard, J., 2017. Towards fully renewable energy systems: Experience and trends in Denmark. CSEE journal of power and energy systems, 3(1), pp.26-35.

[60] Robinius, M., Otto, A., Heuser, P., Welder, L., Syranidis, K., Ryberg, D.S., Grube, T., Markewitz, P., Peters, R. and Stolten, D., 2017. Linking the power and transport sectors—Part 1: The principle of sector coupling. Energies, 10(7), p.956.

[61] Rosen, M.A. and Koohi-Fayegh, S., 2016. The prospects for hydrogen as an energy carrier: an overview of hydrogen energy and hydrogen energy systems. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 1, pp.10-29.

[62] Rosen, M.A. and Koohi-Fayegh, S., 2016. The prospects for hydrogen as an energy carrier: an overview of hydrogen energy and hydrogen energy systems. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 1, pp.10-29.

[63] Ryan, P.J. and Watson, R.B., 2017. Research challenges for the internet of things: what role can or play?. Systems, 5(1), p.24.

[64] Saba, S.M., Müller, M., Robinius, M. and Stolten, D., 2018. The investment costs of electrolysis–A comparison of cost studies from the past 30 years. International journal of hydrogen energy, 43(3), pp.1209-1223.

[65] SHARMA, A., ADEKUNLE, B.I., OGEAWUCHI, J.C., ABAYOMI, A.A. and ONIFADE, O., 2019. IoT-enabled Predictive Maintenance for Mechanical Systems: Innovations in Real-time Monitoring and Operational Excellence.

[66] Singh, A.K., Singh, S. and Kumar, A., 2016. Hydrogen energy future with formic acid: a renewable chemical hydrogen storage system. Catalysis Science & Technology, 6(1), pp.12-40.

[67] Siskos, P., Zazias, G., Petropoulos, A., Evangelopoulou, S. and Capros, P., 2018. Implications of delaying transport decarbonisation in the EU: A systems analysis using the PRIMES model. Energy Policy, 121, pp.48-60.

[68] Subramanian, A.S.R., Gundersen, T. and Adams, T.A., 2018. Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review. Processes, 6(12), p.238.

[69] Taibi, E., Miranda, R., Vanhoudt, W., Winkel, T., Lanoix, J.C. and Barth, F., 2018. Hydrogen from renewable power: Technology outlook for the energy transition.

[70] Tuller, H.L., 2017. Solar to fuels conversion technologies: a perspective. Materials for renewable and sustainable energy, 6, pp.1-16.

[71] Verdolini, E., Anadón, L.D., Baker, E., Bosetti, V. and Reis, L.A., 2018. Future prospects for energy technologies: insights from expert elicitations. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[72] Wang, D., Muratori, M., Eichman, J., Wei, M., Saxena, S. and Zhang, C., 2018. Quantifying the flexibility of hydrogen production systems to support large-scale renewable energy integration. Journal of Power Sources, 399, pp.383-391.

[73] Werbeloff, L. and Brown, R.R., 2016. Using policy and regulatory frameworks to facilitate water transitions. Water resources management, 30, pp.3653-3669.

[74] Wiese, F., Bramstoft, R., Koduvere, H., Alonso, A.P., Balyk, O., Kirkerud, J.G., Tveten, Å.G., Bolkesjø, T.F., Münster, M. and Ravn, H., 2018. Balmorel open source energy system model. Energy strategy reviews, 20, pp.26-34.

[75] Zaunbrecher, B.S., Bexten, T., Wirsum, M. and Ziefle, M., 2016. What is stored, why, and how? Mental models, knowledge, and public acceptance of hydrogen storage. Energy Procedia, 99, pp.108-119.

@article{1713909,
      author = {Habeeb Shittu, Ifeanyi Simon Opara, Ruth Adesola Elumilade, Ibukun Olaoluwa Adeniji},
      title = {Hydrogen as a Secondary Energy Carrier: Modeling Its Integration in National Grids},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1},
      pages = {628-643},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713909.pdf},
      abstract = {Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a pivotal secondary energy carrier with the potential to accelerate the global transition toward low-carbon energy systems. Its versatility allows it to function as a medium for storing, transporting, and converting energy derived from diverse primary sources, including renewables and fossil fuels with carbon capture. This examines the modeling of hydrogen’s integration into national electricity grids, emphasizing its role in enhancing system flexibility, supporting sector coupling, and enabling deep decarbonization. This explores various modeling frameworks, including integrated energy system models, capacity expansion models, power flow analyses, and multi-sector optimization tools. It addresses key technical, economic, and environmental factors influencing hydrogen integration, such as production pathways, storage options, transport infrastructure, and conversion efficiencies. The analysis also considers regulatory environments, policy incentives, and market dynamics that shape the feasibility and scalability of hydrogen-based systems. By analyzing case studies from Europe, Japan, the United States, and Australia, this highlights practical applications of hydrogen integration, including cross-border pipeline initiatives, import-based hydrogen supply chains, and localized grid-hydrogen projects. Despite its significant potential, integrating hydrogen into national grids presents challenges related to model complexity, uncertainty in technology evolution, data gaps, and interoperability with existing infrastructure. Furthermore, socioeconomic implications such as affordability, energy equity, and public acceptance must be carefully managed. This identifies emerging trends, including artificial intelligence-driven modeling, digital twins, and advanced scenario analysis, which offer new opportunities for more precise and adaptive planning. Ultimately, thisunderscores the importance of comprehensive, data-driven modeling to inform investments, regulatory frameworks, and policy interventions necessary to unlock hydrogen’s full value as a secondary energy carrier in future national and regional energy systems.},
      keywords = {Hydrogen, Secondary energy carrier, Modeling, Integration, National grids},
      month = {July},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I1-1713909}
  }