Home / Current Issue / Paper 1713978
Algorithmic Decision Support in Trade Spend and Sales Planning: Managerial Implications of AI-Driven Optimization Models
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
Trade spend and sales planning represent two of the most complex and resource-intensive decision domains in large commercial organizations. Decisions regarding promotional investments, customer incentives, and sales targets involve significant financial exposure, competing objectives, and high levels of uncertainty. Traditionally, these decisions have relied on managerial experience, historical performance analysis, and negotiated planning processes. While such approaches offer contextual flexibility, they struggle to scale and often result in inconsistent outcomes across markets and channels. This paper examines the growing role of algorithmic decision support in trade spend and sales planning, with a particular focus on AI-driven optimization models. Adopting a business management perspective, the study moves beyond technical model performance to analyze how algorithmic decision support reshapes managerial roles, decision authority, and governance structures. The paper conceptualizes AI-driven optimization as a decision design capability that augments managerial judgment rather than replacing it. The analysis highlights how algorithmic decision support enables organizations to evaluate complex trade-offs among volume growth, profitability, and relational considerations at scale. At the same time, it reveals new managerial challenges related to transparency, accountability, and trust in algorithmic recommendations. The paper argues that the strategic value of AI-driven optimization depends on how decision authority is allocated between human managers and intelligent systems, particularly in high-stakes domains such as trade spend allocation. To address these challenges, the study proposes a managerial framework for integrating algorithmic decision support into trade spend and sales planning processes. The framework emphasizes decision-type differentiation, controlled delegation of authority, and governance mechanisms that align algorithmic outputs with strategic intent. The paper contributes to business management literature by clarifying the managerial implications of AI-driven optimization models and provides practitioners with guidance for institutionalizing algorithmic decision support as a scalable and governable capability in commercial planning.
Keywords
Algorithmic Decision Support, Trade Spend Management, Sales Planning, AI-Driven Optimization, Managerial Decision-Making
References
[1] Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business School Press.
[2] Davenport, T. H. (2014). Big Data at Work: Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities. Harvard Business Review Press.
[3] Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.
[4] Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.
[5] Power, D. J. (2002). Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers. Quorum Books.
[6] Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data Science for Business: What You Need to Know About Data Mining and Data-Analytic Thinking. O’Reilly Media.
[7] Wierenga, B., Van Bruggen, G. H., & Staelin, R. (1999). The success of marketing management support systems. Marketing Science, 18(3), 196–207.
[8] Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 97–121.
[9] Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83.
[10] Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210.
[11] Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586.
[12] Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46–60.
[13] Guszcza, J., Rahwan, I., Bible, W., & Cebrian, M. (2018). Why we need to audit algorithms. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(1), 1–4.
[14] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
[15] Mintzberg, H. (2009). Managing. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[16] Lilien, G. L., Rangaswamy, A., & De Bruyn, A. (2013). Principles of Marketing Engineering (2nd ed.). DecisionPro / Trafford Publishing.
[17] Fildes, R., Ma, S., & Kolassa, S. (2019). Retail forecasting: Research and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 35(1), 1–9.
How to cite this paper
@article{1713978,
author = {Ufuk Elevli},
title = {Algorithmic Decision Support in Trade Spend and Sales Planning: Managerial Implications of AI-Driven Optimization Models},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2024},
volume = {8},
number = {3},
pages = {1036-1044},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1713978.pdf},
abstract = {Trade spend and sales planning represent two of the most complex and resource-intensive decision domains in large commercial organizations. Decisions regarding promotional investments, customer incentives, and sales targets involve significant financial exposure, competing objectives, and high levels of uncertainty. Traditionally, these decisions have relied on managerial experience, historical performance analysis, and negotiated planning processes. While such approaches offer contextual flexibility, they struggle to scale and often result in inconsistent outcomes across markets and channels. This paper examines the growing role of algorithmic decision support in trade spend and sales planning, with a particular focus on AI-driven optimization models. Adopting a business management perspective, the study moves beyond technical model performance to analyze how algorithmic decision support reshapes managerial roles, decision authority, and governance structures. The paper conceptualizes AI-driven optimization as a decision design capability that augments managerial judgment rather than replacing it. The analysis highlights how algorithmic decision support enables organizations to evaluate complex trade-offs among volume growth, profitability, and relational considerations at scale. At the same time, it reveals new managerial challenges related to transparency, accountability, and trust in algorithmic recommendations. The paper argues that the strategic value of AI-driven optimization depends on how decision authority is allocated between human managers and intelligent systems, particularly in high-stakes domains such as trade spend allocation. To address these challenges, the study proposes a managerial framework for integrating algorithmic decision support into trade spend and sales planning processes. The framework emphasizes decision-type differentiation, controlled delegation of authority, and governance mechanisms that align algorithmic outputs with strategic intent. The paper contributes to business management literature by clarifying the managerial implications of AI-driven optimization models and provides practitioners with guidance for institutionalizing algorithmic decision support as a scalable and governable capability in commercial planning.},
keywords = {Algorithmic Decision Support, Trade Spend Management, Sales Planning, AI-Driven Optimization, Managerial Decision-Making},
month = {September},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV8I3-1713978}
}