Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714300
CSBPNN VS BPNN Machine Learning Network Models Significant Assessment to Lung Cancer Recognition System
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Computer Science & Computer Engineering
Abstract
Cancer of the lung have been regarded as one of the most dangerous widespread type of cancer that needed to be addressed clinically using computational intelligence. In this paper, total datasets of 893 CT lung images were collected which comprises of 200 Benign, 393 of Malignant and 300 of Normal lung dataset. The analytical performance evaluation of Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) technique and Chameleon Swarm (CS) Optimization technique on Lung cancer prevalence was applied and yielded significant results. CSBPNN shows better performance and significant improvement than the BPNN with 98.20% accuracy level at precision time of 38.86secs compared with BPNN with 97.40% and 59.89secs accuracy and recognition time respectively. Furthermore, the evaluation results in terms of FPR, Specificity and Sensitivity metrics produces 0.33%, 99.67% and 96.95% respectively for CSBPNN indicating better performance; compared with 1.00% FPR, 99.00% Specificity and 95.42% Sensitivity values. With the results obtained, the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique outperformed the Back Propagation Neural Network technique in predicting and classifying lung cancer images. This was evident in the higher accuracy and precision scores of the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique. Additionally, the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique also showed better performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared to the BPNN technique. These results emphasise even more possibilities of the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique to raise the lung cancer diagnostic and treatment accuracy. Thus, the study contributes to the existing literatures on the application of swarm optimization techniques in the field of medical research.
Keywords
BPNN, CSBPNN, Lung Cancer, Optimization, Metrics, Performance
References
[1] A. Asuntha, A. Brindha, S. Idirani, & A. Srinivasan. “Lung Cancer Detection using SVM Algorithm and Optimization Techniques”. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(4), 2016, 3198-3203.
[2] J. Ji, W. Zhang, Y. Dong, R. Lin, Y. Geng, L. Hong. “Automated Lung Cancer Detection using Histopathological Images”. Researchsquare 2023, 1–13.
[3] S. K. Thakur, D. P. Singh & J. Choudhary. “Lung cancer identification: a review on detection and classification”. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews - Springer, 39: 2020, 989– 998.
[4] A. Bhandary, Prabhu, G. A., M. Basthikodi & K.M. Chaitra. “Early Diagnosis of Lung cancer Using Computer Aided Detection via Lung Segmentation Approach”. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 69(5), 2021, 85-93.
[5] A. Bhandary, & M. Basthikodi. “Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Using Computer Aided Detection via Lung Segmentation Approach”. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12205, 2021.
[6] R.M. Mohan, R. D. H. Devi, & A. Bai. “Lung cancer detection using Nearest Neigbour classifier”. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE). 8(2S11), 2019, pp. 3641–3645.
[7] R. R. Asaad, & R.I. Ali. “Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and sigmoid activation function in multi-layer networks”. Academic Journal of Nawroz University, 8(4), 2019, 216- 221.
[8] A. Srinivasulu, K. Ramanjaneyulu, R. Neelavenin, S.R. Karanam, S. Majji, M. Jothilingam, T.M. Patnala. “Advanced lung cancer prediction based on blockchain material using extended CNN". Applied Nanoscience, 13 (1), 2021, 1-13.
[9] D. Yang, Y. Liu, C. Bai, X. Wang, & C. A. Powell. “Epidemiology of lung cancer and lung cancer screening program in China and the United States”. Cancer Letters, vol. 468, 2020, pp. 82-87.
[10] N. Howlader, G. Forjaz, M. J. Mooradian, R. Meza, C.Y Kong, K. A. Cronin, A. B. Mariotto, D. R. Lowy, & E. J. Feuer. "The effect of advances in lung-cancer treatment on population mortality." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(7), 2020, 640-649.
[11] F. Calabrese, F. Lunardi, F. Pezzuto, F. Fortarezza, S.E.Vuljan, C. Marquette, & P. Hofman. “Are There New Biomarkers in Tissue and Liquid Biopsies for the Early Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?”. Journal of clinical medicine, 8(3), 2019, pp. 414.
[12] L. H. Araujo, L. Horn, R. E. Merritt, K. Shilo, M. XuWelliver, & D. P. Carbone. “Cancer of the Lung: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Small Cell Lung Cancer”. Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology, 2020, 1108-1158.
[13] Y. Q. Song, N. Wang, Y. Qiao, L. He, X. Li, X. F. Zhang, Q. K. Yang, R. Z. Wang, R. He, C. Y. Wang, Y. W. Ren, G. Li, & T. L. Wang “Treatment patterns and survival after18F- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided local consolidation therapy for oligometastatic non- small cell lung cancer: a two-center propensity score-matched analysis”. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 146(4), 2020, 1021–1031.
[14] Z. Megyesfalvi, C. M. Gay, H. Popper, R. Pirker, G. Ostoros, S. Heeke, C. Lang, K. Hoetzenecker, A. Schwendenwein, K. Boettiger, P. A. Bunn, F. R. Vamos, K. Schelch, H. Prosch. “Clinical insights into small cell lung cancer:Tumor heterogeneity, diagnosis, therapy, and future directions”. CA: a cancer Journal for clinicians, 73(6), 2023, 620-652.
[15] J. Kim, H. Lee, & B. W. Huang. “Lung cancer: diagnosis, treatment principles, and screening”. American family physician, 105(5), 2022, 487- 494.
[16] S. K. Vinod, & E. Hau. “Radiotherapy treatment for lung cancer: Current status and future directions”. Respirology, 25(S2), 2020 61–71.
[17] G. Sharma, & C. Prabha. “Applications of machine learning in cancer predictionand prognosis”. Cancer Prediction for Industrial IoT 4.0, 2021, 119-135.
[18] A. Zafar, M. Aamir, N. Mohd Nawi, A. Arshad, S. Riaz, A Alruban, A. K. Dutta, & S. Almotairi. “A Comparison of Pooling Methods for Convolutional Neural Networks”. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(17), 2022, 1–21.
[19] M. Krichen. “Convolutional Neural Networks: A Survey”. Computers, 12(8), 2023, pp.151.
[20] M. M. Taye. “Theoretical understanding of convolutional neural network: Concepts, architectures, applications, future directions”. Computation, 11(3), 2023, pp.52.
[21] S. Minaee, & A. Abdolrashidi. “DeepIris: iris recognition using a deep learning approach”. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09380. 2019.
How to cite this paper
@article{1714300,
author = {Oluwafemi J. Ayangbekun, Wilson Sakpere, Oladunni A. Akanni},
title = {CSBPNN VS BPNN Machine Learning Network Models Significant Assessment to Lung Cancer Recognition System},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {8},
pages = {505-513},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714300.pdf},
abstract = {Cancer of the lung have been regarded as one of the most dangerous widespread type of cancer that needed to be addressed clinically using computational intelligence. In this paper, total datasets of 893 CT lung images were collected which comprises of 200 Benign, 393 of Malignant and 300 of Normal lung dataset. The analytical performance evaluation of Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) technique and Chameleon Swarm (CS) Optimization technique on Lung cancer prevalence was applied and yielded significant results. CSBPNN shows better performance and significant improvement than the BPNN with 98.20% accuracy level at precision time of 38.86secs compared with BPNN with 97.40% and 59.89secs accuracy and recognition time respectively. Furthermore, the evaluation results in terms of FPR, Specificity and Sensitivity metrics produces 0.33%, 99.67% and 96.95% respectively for CSBPNN indicating better performance; compared with 1.00% FPR, 99.00% Specificity and 95.42% Sensitivity values. With the results obtained, the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique outperformed the Back Propagation Neural Network technique in predicting and classifying lung cancer images. This was evident in the higher accuracy and precision scores of the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique. Additionally, the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique also showed better performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared to the BPNN technique. These results emphasise even more possibilities of the Chameleon Swarm Optimization technique to raise the lung cancer diagnostic and treatment accuracy. Thus, the study contributes to the existing literatures on the application of swarm optimization techniques in the field of medical research.},
keywords = {BPNN, CSBPNN, Lung Cancer, Optimization, Metrics, Performance},
month = {February},
}