Managing Cognitive Load in L2 Academic Writing: Memory-Informed Strategies for Low-Proficiency Learners in Indian Classrooms

References

[1] Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00412-3

[2] Chen, D., Liu, W., & Liu, X. (2024). What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model. Acta Psychologica, 249, Article 104442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104442

[3] Chou, M. H. (2023). Examining the influence of L2 grit and English proficiency on learning approaches: A mediation analysis through expectancy of success and perceived task difficulty. Educational Psychology, 43(9), 1102–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2152223

[4] Dahl, B. M., Vasset, F., & Frilund, M. (2023). Students’ approaches to scientific essay writing as an educational method in higher education: A mixed methods study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), Article 100389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100389

[5] Derakhshan, A., & Fathi, J. (2024). Grit and foreign language enjoyment as predictors of EFL learners’ online engagement: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00724-6

[6] Fathi, J., Pawlak, M., Saeedian, S., & Ghaderi, A. (2024). Exploring factors affecting foreign language achievement: The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy, and L2 grit. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241234567

[7] Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2312345

[8] Gebrekidan, H., & Zeru, A. (2023). Effects of portfolio-based assessment on EFL students’ conceptions and approaches to writing. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2195749. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2195749

[9] Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2022). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2312–2331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1861023

[10] Huang, F., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Modelling generative AI acceptance, perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and self-efficacy to English as a foreign language learners’ well-being in the digital era. European Journal of Education, 59(4), Article e12770. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12770

[11] Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13012-w

[12] Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2234567

[13] Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2024a). Exploring AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ AI adoption and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2345678

[14] Liu, G. L., Darvin, R., & Ma, C. (2024b). Unpacking the role of motivation and enjoyment in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE): A mixed-method investigation in the Chinese context. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, Article 108362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108362

[15] Liu, G. L., Zhao, X., & Yang, B. (2024c). The predictive effects of motivation, enjoyment, and self-efficacy on informal digital learning of LOTE: Evidence from French and German learners in China. System, 126, Article 103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103504

[16] Liu, G. L., Zou, M. M., Soyoof, A., & Chiu, M. M. (2025). Untangling the relationship between AI-mediated informal digital learning of English (AI-IDLE), foreign language enjoyment and the ideal L2 self: Evidence from Chinese university EFL students. European Journal of Education, 60(1), Article e12846. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12846

[17] Mendoza, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Lehtonen, T., & Hyytinen, H. (2023). Understanding master’s thesis writers in a Finnish EMI context: Writing conceptions, apprehension about grammar, self-efficacy for thesis writing and thesis grade. International Journal of Educational Development, 103, Article 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102874

[18] Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2256789

[19] Nguyen, L. Q., Le, H. V., & Nguyen, P. T. (2024). A mixed-methods study on the use of ChatGPT in the pre-writing stage: EFL learners’ utilisation patterns, affective engagement, and writing performance. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 10511–10534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12876-0

[20] Okur, M. R., & Hamutoğlu, N. B. (2023). Internal technology barriers, learning approaches, and technology adoption. Distance Education, 44(3), 406–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2212345

[21] Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5020–5040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2156789

@article{1714301,
      author = {Dr. R. Geetha },
      title = {Managing Cognitive Load in L2 Academic Writing: Memory-Informed Strategies for Low-Proficiency Learners in Indian Classrooms},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {922-930},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714301.pdf},
      abstract = {Academic writing is a major challenge that low-proficiency second language (L2) learners in Indian higher education have to deal with because of the dual task of learning disciplinary material and harnessing the linguistic complexity of English. Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) assumes that the learning process can reach a critical state when the capacity of the working memory is congested by ineffective instruction design, especially in the case of both unfamiliar language and unfamiliar content. This paper will contend that memory-based pedagogical interventions based on cognitive science principles, including dual coding, retrieval practice, and schema activation, can reduce extraneous cognitive load and enable more successful L2 writing development. It is a speculative paper that gathers the insights of Cognitive Load Theory, research evidence in second language acquisition, and evidence-based memory science. It is based on empirical research in applied linguistics and educational psychology, and the contextual analysis brings into focus the realities of the Indian undergraduate and post-graduate classrooms, which are multilingual and resource constrained. A proposal of a memory-sensitive L2 writing instruction framework is provided using theoretical integration. The result of the analysis is a unified pedagogic framework, which can be used to provide the CLT principles with L2 writing assignments typical of Indian academia (e.g., literature reviews, argument essays, research abstracts). Some of the key strategies involve segmentation of complex tasks, combination of visual and verbal input, worked examples, and embedding spaced retrieval practice in low-proficiency L2 conditions. This paper substantiates the thesis that the architecture of human memory is the most effective way to reorganise L2 writing teaching as it does not consider the cognitive limitations of the approach, which is traditionally product-oriented or founded on fluency. The suggested framework provides a theory-based and scalable alternative that acknowledges the linguistic background of learners and develops academic literacy. It is also consistent with the objectives of multilingualism, critical thinking and equity in the National Education Policy (2020) of India. They should be empirically validated in future, but the conceptual base offers a timely intervention to teacher educators and curriculum designers.},
      keywords = {Cognitive Load Theory; L2 Academic Writing; Memory-Informed Instruction; Low-Proficiency Learners; Indian Higher Education},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714301}
  }