International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714305

1714305 Vol 2 · Issue 6 Download Paper

Review of Quantitative Portfolio Optimization Research for Emerging Market Asset Management Strategies

Elikem Kwasi Agbosu Lovelyn Ekpedo

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Quantitative Portfolio Optimization

Abstract

The growing integration of emerging markets into global financial systems has intensified interest in quantitative portfolio optimization techniques tailored to their unique risk–return characteristics. Emerging market assets are often characterized by higher volatility, liquidity constraints, structural breaks, regulatory frictions, and pronounced exposure to macroeconomic and geopolitical shocks, posing significant challenges to traditional portfolio optimization frameworks developed for mature markets. This study provides a comprehensive review of quantitative portfolio optimization research with a specific focus on emerging market asset management strategies. Drawing on a broad body of empirical and methodological literature, the review examines the evolution of classical mean–variance optimization and its extensions, including downside risk measures, robust optimization, Bayesian approaches, and multi-period allocation models. Particular attention is given to how these techniques address estimation risk, non-normal return distributions, and unstable correlation structures prevalent in emerging markets. The review further synthesizes evidence on the application of advanced methods such as regime-switching models, shrinkage estimators, and machine learning–based optimization frameworks, highlighting their comparative performance under conditions of market stress and data limitations. Empirical findings suggest that constrained, robust, and adaptive optimization approaches generally outperform unconstrained mean–variance portfolios in emerging market contexts, especially during periods of heightened volatility. However, the review also identifies persistent gaps in the literature, including limited out-of-sample validation, underrepresentation of frontier markets, and insufficient consideration of transaction costs, currency risk, and regulatory constraints. By consolidating existing knowledge and identifying methodological limitations, this review contributes to a clearer understanding of how quantitative portfolio optimization can be effectively adapted for emerging market asset management. The study concludes by outlining future research directions aimed at developing context-sensitive optimization frameworks that enhance risk-adjusted performance, resilience, and practical implement ability for institutional and professional investors operating in emerging economies.

Keywords

Quantitative Portfolio Optimization; Emerging Markets; Asset Management; Risk-Adjusted Returns; Robust Optimization; Investment Strategy

References

[1] Abdeltawab, H.H. and Mohamed, Y.A.R.I., 2015. Market-oriented energy management of a hybrid wind-battery energy storage system via model predictive control with constraint optimizer. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(11), pp.6658-6670.

[2] Annaert, J., Buelens, F. and Riva, A., 2016. Financial history databases: old data, old issues, new insights. Financial market history, p.44.

[3] Baitinger, E., Dragosch, A. and Topalova, A., 2017. Extending the risk parity approach to higher moments: Is there any value added?. Journal of Portfolio Management, 43(2), p.24.

[4] Batten, J.A. and Vo, X.V., 2016. Bank risk shifting and diversification in an emerging market. Risk Management, 18(4), pp.217-235.

[5] Batten, S., Sowerbutts, R. and Tanaka, M., 2016. Let's talk about the weather: the impact of climate change on central banks.

[6] Bebchuk, L.A., Cohen, A. and Hirst, S., 2017. The agency problems of institutional investors. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), pp.89-112.

[7] Benos, E., Wood, M. and Gurrola-Perez, P., 2017. Managing market liquidity risk in central counterparties. Available at SSRN 3003564.

[8] Ben-Rephael, A., Kadan, O. and Wohl, A., 2015. The diminishing liquidity premium. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1-2), pp.197-229.

[9] Berglund, J., Gong, L., Sundström, H. and Johansson, B., 2017. Virtual reality and 3D imaging to support collaborative decision making for adaptation of long-life assets. In Dynamics of Long-Life Assets: From Technology Adaptation to Upgrading the Business Model (pp. 115-132). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[10] Bin, R.L.L. and Yuan, C.J., 2016. Portfolio Diversification Strategy in the Malaysian Stock Market. Capital Markets Review, 24(1), pp.38-67.

[11] Braga, M.D., 2015. Risk-based approaches to asset allocation: concepts and practical applications. Springer.

[12] Bussiere, M. and Phylaktis, K., 2016. Emerging markets finance: Issues of international capital flows–Overview of the special issue. Journal of International Money and Finance, 60, pp.1-7.

[13] Cevik, E.I., Kirci-Cevik, N. and Dibooglu, S., 2016. Global liquidity and financial stress: Evidence from major emerging economies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(12), pp.2790-2807.

[14] Chandy, R., Hassan, M. and Mukherji, P., 2017. Big data for good: Insights from emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), pp.703-713.

[15] Chen, Z., Consigli, G., Liu, J., Li, G., Fu, T. and Hu, Q., 2016. Multi-period risk measures and optimal investment policies. In Optimal financial decision making under uncertainty (pp. 1-34). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[16] Coleman, L., 2015. Facing up to fund managers: An exploratory field study of how institutional investors make decisions. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7(2), pp.111-135.

[17] Efremidze, L., Kim, S., Sula, O. and Willett, T.D., 2017. The relationships among capital flow surges, reversals and sudden stops. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 9(4), pp.393-413.

[18] Eichengreen, B., 2016. Global monetary order 29. The future of the international monetary and financial architecture, 21

[19] Faber, M., 2017. A quantitative approach to tactical asset allocation revisited 10 years later. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 44(2), pp.156-167.

[20] Fallahpour, S., Hakimian, H., Taheri, K. and Ramezanifar, E., 2016. Pairs trading strategy optimization using the reinforcement learning method: a cointegration approach. Soft Computing, 20(12), pp.5051-5066.

[21] Foo, M., 2017. A review of socially responsible investing in Australia. An independent report for National Australia Bank (NAB) by the Australian Centre for Financial Studies (ACFS) at Monash Business School.

[22] Gagliardini, P., Ossola, E. and Scaillet, O., 2016. Time‐varying risk premium in large cross‐sectional equity data sets. Econometrica, 84(3), pp.985-1046.

[23] Getmansky, M., Lee, P.A. and Lo, A.W., 2015. Hedge funds: A dynamic industry in transition. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), pp.483-577.

[24] Gökgöz, F. and Atmaca, M.E., 2017. Portfolio optimization under lower partial moments in emerging electricity markets: Evidence from Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, pp.437-449.

[25] Goto, S. and Xu, Y., 2015. Improving mean variance optimization through sparse hedging restrictions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(6), pp.1415-1441.

[26] Goyal, A., 2016. Macroeconomics and markets in developing and emerging economies. Routledge India.

[27] Grishina, N., Lucas, C.A. and Date, P., 2017. Prospect theory–based portfolio optimization: an empirical study and analysis using intelligent algorithms. Quantitative Finance, 17(3), pp.353-367.

[28] Gudivada, V., Apon, A. and Ding, J., 2017. Data quality considerations for big data and machine learning: Going beyond data cleaning and transformations. International Journal on Advances in Software, 10(1), pp.1-20.

[29] Henke, N. and Jacques Bughin, L., 2016. The age of analytics: Competing in a data-driven world.

[30] Javaira, Z. and Hassan, A., 2015. An examination of herding behavior in Pakistani stock market. International journal of emerging markets, 10(3), pp.474-490.

[31] Joshi, S. and Li, Y., 2016. What is corporate sustainability and how do firms practice it? A management accounting research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), pp.1-11.

[32] Kang, S.H., McIver, R. and Yoon, S.M., 2016. Modeling time-varying correlations in volatility between BRICS and commodity markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(7), pp.1698-1723.

[33] Kinlaw, W., Kritzman, M.P. and Turkington, D., 2017. A practitioner's guide to asset allocation. John Wiley & Sons.

[34] Kodongo, O. and Ojah, K., 2017. Cross-border capital flows and economic performance in Africa: A sectoral analysis. In Foreign capital flows and economic development in Africa: The impact of BRICS versus OECD (pp. 163-190). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

[35] Lam, J.W., 2016. Robo-advisors: A portfolio management perspective. Senior thesis, Yale College, 20, pp.2023-01.

[36] Liesen, A., Figge, F., Hoepner, A. and Patten, D.M., 2017. Climate change and asset prices: Are corporate carbon disclosure and performance priced appropriately?. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 44(1-2), pp.35-62.

[37] Luo, G., 2016. A review of automatic selection methods for machine learning algorithms and hyper-parameter values. Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, 5(1), p.18.

[38] Lwin, K.T., Qu, R. and MacCarthy, B.L., 2017. Mean-VaR portfolio optimization: A nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), pp.751-766.

[39] Marquis, C. and Raynard, M., 2015. Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), pp.291-335.

[40] Martel, A. and Klibi, W., 2016. Risk Analysis and Scenario Generation. In Designing Value-Creating Supply Chain Networks (pp. 371-416). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[41] Massacci, D., 2017. Tail risk dynamics in stock returns: Links to the macroeconomy and global markets connectedness. Management Science, 63(9), pp.3072-3089.

[42] Nechchi, P.G., 2016. Reinforcement learning for automated trading. Mathematical EngineeringPolitecnico di Milano: Milano, Italy.

[43] Ngene, G., Tah, K.A. and Darrat, A.F., 2017. The random-walk hypothesis revisited: new evidence on multiple structural breaks in emerging markets. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 10(1), pp.88-106.

[44] Oderda, G., 2015. Stochastic portfolio theory optimization and the origin of rule-based investing. Quantitative Finance, 15(8), pp.1259-1266.

[45] Oet, M.V., Dooley, J.M. and Ong, S.J., 2015. The financial stress index: Identification of systemic risk conditions. Risks, 3(3), pp.420-444.

[46] Pinto, T., Morais, H., Sousa, T.M., Sousa, T., Vale, Z., Praça, I., Faia, R. and Pires, E.J.S., 2015. Adaptive portfolio optimization for multiple electricity markets participation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 27(8), pp.1720-1733.

[47] Postek, K., den Hertog, D. and Melenberg, B., 2016. Computationally tractable counterparts of distributionally robust constraints on risk measures. SIAM Review, 58(4), pp.603-650.

[48] Quintana, D., Denysiuk, R., Garcia-Rodriguez, S. and Gaspar-Cunha, A., 2017. Portfolio implementation risk management using evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Applied Sciences, 7(10), p.1079.

[49] Roncalli, T. and Weisang, G., 2016. Risk parity portfolios with risk factors. Quantitative Finance, 16(3), pp.377-388.

[50] Sen, S. and Ganguly, S., 2017. Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development–A discussion. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 69, pp.1170-1181.

[51] Shafi, K., Elsayed, S., Sarker, R. and Ryan, M., 2017. Scenario-based multi-period program optimization for capability-based planning using evolutionary algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 56, pp.717-729.

[52] Sheng, A., 2015. Emerging Market Finance 2050. Finance for the future—Funding growth, inclusivity and environment.

[53] Shulman, J.M., 2017. Leadership matters: Crafting a smart beta portfolio with a founder-CEO twist. The Journal of Index Investing, 8(3), pp.51-74.

[54] Sözüer, S. and Thiele, A.C., 2016. The state of robust optimization. In Robustness analysis in decision aiding, optimization, and analytics (pp. 89-112). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[55] Stolbov, M. and Shchepeleva, M., 2016. Financial stress in emerging markets: Patterns, real effects, and cross-country spillovers. Review of Development Finance, 6(1), pp.71-81.

[56] Supandi, E.D. and Rosadi, D., 2017. An empirical comparison between robust estimation and robust optimization to mean-variance portfolio. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 16(1), p.32.

[57] Supandi, E.D., Rosadi, D. and Abdurakhman, A., 2017. Improved Robust Portfolio Optimization. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 11(2).

[58] Turtle, H.J. and Zhang, C., 2015. Structural breaks and portfolio performance in global equity markets. Quantitative Finance, 15(6), pp.909-922.

[59] Vannucci, M., Colla, V. and Cateni, S., 2017. Learners reliability estimated through neural networks applied to build a novel hybrid ensemble method. Neural Processing Letters, 46(3), pp.791-809.

[60] Zhao, J., 2016. Promoting a more efficient corporate governance model in emerging markets through corporate law. Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev., 15, p.447.

How to cite this paper

Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo "Review of Quantitative Portfolio Optimization Research for Emerging Market Asset Management Strategies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 2 Issue 6 2018 Page 219-233
Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo "Review of Quantitative Portfolio Optimization Research for Emerging Market Asset Management Strategies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 6, Dec. 2018
Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo (2018). Review of Quantitative Portfolio Optimization Research for Emerging Market Asset Management Strategies. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 2(6).
Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo "Review of Quantitative Portfolio Optimization Research for Emerging Market Asset Management Strategies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 6, Dec. 2018.
@article{1714305,
      author = {Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo},
      title = {Review of Quantitative Portfolio Optimization Research for Emerging Market Asset Management Strategies},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {2},
      number = {6},
      pages = {219-233},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714305.pdf},
      abstract = {The growing integration of emerging markets into global financial systems has intensified interest in quantitative portfolio optimization techniques tailored to their unique risk–return characteristics. Emerging market assets are often characterized by higher volatility, liquidity constraints, structural breaks, regulatory frictions, and pronounced exposure to macroeconomic and geopolitical shocks, posing significant challenges to traditional portfolio optimization frameworks developed for mature markets. This study provides a comprehensive review of quantitative portfolio optimization research with a specific focus on emerging market asset management strategies. Drawing on a broad body of empirical and methodological literature, the review examines the evolution of classical mean–variance optimization and its extensions, including downside risk measures, robust optimization, Bayesian approaches, and multi-period allocation models. Particular attention is given to how these techniques address estimation risk, non-normal return distributions, and unstable correlation structures prevalent in emerging markets. The review further synthesizes evidence on the application of advanced methods such as regime-switching models, shrinkage estimators, and machine learning–based optimization frameworks, highlighting their comparative performance under conditions of market stress and data limitations. Empirical findings suggest that constrained, robust, and adaptive optimization approaches generally outperform unconstrained mean–variance portfolios in emerging market contexts, especially during periods of heightened volatility. However, the review also identifies persistent gaps in the literature, including limited out-of-sample validation, underrepresentation of frontier markets, and insufficient consideration of transaction costs, currency risk, and regulatory constraints. By consolidating existing knowledge and identifying methodological limitations, this review contributes to a clearer understanding of how quantitative portfolio optimization can be effectively adapted for emerging market asset management. The study concludes by outlining future research directions aimed at developing context-sensitive optimization frameworks that enhance risk-adjusted performance, resilience, and practical implement ability for institutional and professional investors operating in emerging economies.},
      keywords = {Quantitative Portfolio Optimization; Emerging Markets; Asset Management; Risk-Adjusted Returns; Robust Optimization; Investment Strategy},
      month = {December},
  }