International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714306

1714306 Vol 3 · Issue 5 Download Paper

Advances in Risk Based Financial Governance Shaping Institutional Investment Decision Practices Globally

Elikem Kwasi Agbosu Lovelyn Ekpedo Omolara Adeyoyin

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Risk-Based Financial Governance

Abstract

Recent developments in risk-based financial governance have significantly reshaped institutional investment decision-making practices globally. Traditional governance frameworks, which often emphasized compliance and reporting, are increasingly being supplemented or replaced by approaches that integrate risk assessment, predictive analytics, and dynamic monitoring into investment strategies. Risk-based governance enables institutional investors, including pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and asset managers, to systematically identify, evaluate, and mitigate financial, operational, and systemic risks while aligning investment decisions with organizational objectives and regulatory expectations. This evolution has been driven by heightened market volatility, increasing complexity of financial instruments, globalization of capital flows, and the growing recognition that traditional, rules-based oversight is insufficient for managing emerging and interconnected risks. Empirical and conceptual research highlights several key advances in risk-based governance. These include the adoption of enterprise-wide risk frameworks, incorporation of stress testing and scenario analysis, and integration of quantitative risk metrics such as Value-at-Risk, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and tail-risk measures into strategic allocation decisions. Furthermore, advances in predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and data-driven risk modeling have enhanced the ability of institutional investors to anticipate potential disruptions and optimize portfolio construction under uncertainty. Governance structures are increasingly designed to ensure accountability, transparency, and alignment between risk appetite, regulatory compliance, and investment objectives. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, particularly in harmonizing governance practices across jurisdictions, addressing data quality and model risk, and integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into risk-based decision frameworks. Future research is expected to focus on the operationalization of risk-based governance at both organizational and cross-market levels, development of standardized risk performance metrics, and the application of explainable AI to improve decision transparency. Overall, risk-based financial governance represents a strategic paradigm shift in institutional investment management, enhancing the ability to balance risk and return, improve resilience to systemic shocks, and meet long-term sustainability and fiduciary goals.

Keywords

Risk-Based Financial Governance; Institutional Investment; Portfolio Risk Management; Enterprise Risk Frameworks; Predictive Analytics; ESG Integration; Systemic Risk; Decision-Making Practices

References

[1] Abdulraheem, A.O., 2018. Just-in-time manufacturing for improving global supply chain resilience. Int J Eng Technol Res Manag, 2(11), p.58.

[2] Abrol, S., Chesir, B., Mehta, N. and Ziegler, R., 2016. High frequency trading and US stock market microstructure: a study of interactions between complexities, risks and strategies residing in US equity market microstructure. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 25(2), pp.107-165.

[3] Acharya, V.V., Mehran, H. and Thakor, A.V., 2016. Caught between Scylla and Charybdis? Regulating bank leverage when there is rent seeking and risk shifting. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 5(1), pp.36-75.

[4] Agbemabiese, L., Nyangon, J., Lee, J.S. and Byrne, J., 2018. Enhancing climate finance readiness: A review of selected investment frameworks as tools of multilevel governance. University of Delaware, Center for Energy & Environmental Policy, Working Paper Series.

[5] Ahmed, W.M., 2016. Cross-border equity flows and market volatility: the case of Qatar Exchange. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(3), pp.395-418.

[6] Ai, J., Brockett, P.L. and Wang, T., 2017. Optimal enterprise risk management and decision making with shared and dependent risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(4), pp.1127-1169.

[7] Alexander, K., 2016. Global economic governance and banking regulation: redesigning regulation to promote stakeholder interests. In The Reform of International Economic Governance (pp. 23-39). Routledge.

[8] Al‐Hadi, A., Hasan, M.M. and Habib, A., 2016. Risk committee, firm life cycle, and market risk disclosures. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(2), pp.145-170.

[9] Ames, D.A., Hines, C.S. and Sankara, J., 2018. Board risk committees: Insurer financial strength ratings and performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(2), pp.130-145.

[10] Amiram, D., Bozanic, Z., Cox, J.D., Dupont, Q., Karpoff, J.M. and Sloan, R., 2018. Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(2), pp.732-783.

[11] Anderson, N., Webber, L., Noss, J., Beale, D. and Crowley-Reidy, L., 2018. The resilience of financial market liquidity. SSRN.

[12] Anderson, R., Danielsson, J., Baba, C., Das, M.U.S., Kang, M.H. and Basurto, M.A.S., 2018. Macroprudential stress tests and policies: Searching for robust and implementable frameworks. International Monetary Fund.

[13] Bachmair, F.F., 2016. Contingent liabilities risk management: a credit risk analysis framework for sovereign guarantees and on-lending? country experiences from Colombia, Indonesia, Sweden, and Turkey. Country Experiences from Colombia, Indonesia, Sweden, and Turkey (January 22, 2016). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7538).

[14] Bank, B., 2016. Integrated Risk Management Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Department of Financial Institutions and Markets, www. bb. org. bd.

[15] Barker, R.M. and Chiu, I.H.Y., 2017. Corporate governance and investment management: the promises and limitations of the new financial economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

[16] Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A.W. and Valavanis, S., 2018. A survey of systemic risk analytics. NMIMS Mangagement Review, 36(3), pp.46-89.

[17] Bodellini, M., 2016. From systemic risk to financial scandals: The shortcomings of US hedge fund regulation. Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L., 11, p.417.

[18] Caldecott, B., Harnett, E., Cojoianu, T., Kok, I. and Pfeiffer, A., 2016. Stranded assets: a climate risk challenge.

[19] Celestin, M., 2018. Predictive analytics in strategic cost management: How companies use data to optimize pricing and operational efficiency. Brainae Journal of Business, Sciences and Technology (BJBST), 2(6), pp.706-717.

[20] Chiu, I.H., 2016. Fintech and disruptive business models in financial products, intermediation and markets-policy implications for financial regulators. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y, 21, p.55.

[21] Chiu, I.H., 2018. An institutional theory of corporate regulation. Current Legal Problems, 71(1), pp.279-334.

[22] Clichici, D. and Iordachi, V., 2017. Volatility of Cross-Border Financial Flows and Policy Responses. Global Economic Observer, 5(1).

[23] Cokins, G., 2017. Strategic business management: From planning to performance. John Wiley & Sons.

[24] Croft, T., Malhotra, A., Trumka, R.L. and Sullivan, R., 2017. The responsible investor handbook: Mobilizing workers' capital for a sustainable world. Routledge.

[25] Das, N. and Pattanayak, J.K., 2016. Corporate governance mechanism for academic institutions imparting higher education in India. International Journal of Management in Education, 10(2), pp.204-217.

[26] Dorgbefu, E.A., 2018. Leveraging predictive analytics for real estate marketing to enhance investor decision-making and housing affordability outcomes. Int J Eng Technol Res Manag, 2(12), p.135.

[27] Eccles, R.G., Kastrapeli, M.D. and Potter, S.J., 2017. How to integrate ESG into investment decision‐making: Results of a global survey of institutional investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 29(4), pp.125-133.

[28] Gianfrate, G., 2018. Designing carbon-neutral investment portfolios. In Designing a Sustainable Financial System: Development Goals and Socio-Ecological Responsibility (pp. 151-171). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[29] Gius, D., Mieszala, J.C., Panayiotou, E. and Poppensieker, T., 2018. Value and resilience through better risk management. McKinsey on Risk,(6), pp.43-53.

[30] Gontarek, W. and Belghitar, Y., 2018. Risk governance: Examining its impact upon bank performance and risk‐taking. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 27(5), pp.187-224.

[31] Greene, J.R., Krouskos, S., Hood, J., Basnayake, H. and Casey, W., 2018. The stress test every business needs: A capital agenda for confidently facing digital disruption, difficult investors, recessions and geopolitical threats. John Wiley & Sons.

[32] Hashmi, M., Governatori, G., Lam, H.P. and Wynn, M.T., 2018. Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead. Knowledge and Information Systems, 57(1), pp.79-133.

[33] Humphrey, C., 2018. Channeling private investment to infrastructure: What can multilateral development banks realistically do?.

[34] Hutchins, G., 2018. ISO 31000: 2018 enterprise risk management. Greg Hutchins.

[35] Jones, B., 2016. Institutionalizing Countercyclical Investment: A Framework for Long-term Asset Owners. International Monetary Fund.

[36] Kelliher, P.O.J., Acharyya, M., Couper, A., Grant, K., Maguire, E., Nicholas, P., Smerald, C., Stevenson, D., Thirlwell, J. and Cantle, N., 2017. Good practice guide to setting inputs for operational risk models. British Actuarial Journal, 22(1), pp.68-108.

[37] Kiow, T.S., Salleh, M.F.M. and Kassim, A.A.B.M., 2017. The determinants of individual taxpayers’ tax compliance behaviour in peninsular malaysia. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 1(1), pp.26-43.

[38] Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C. and Serafeim, G., 2016. ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), pp.10-16.

[39] Kress, J.C., McCoy, P.A. and Schwarcz, D., 2018. Regulating Entities and Activities: Complementary Approaches to Nonbank Systemic Risk. S. Cal. L. Rev., 92, p.1455.

[40] Lawal, A., Otokiti, B.O., Gobile, S., Okesiji, A., Oyasiji, O. and Adept, L.P., 2017. Taxation Law Compliance and Corporate Governance: Utilizing Business Analytics to Develop Effective Legal Strategies for Risk Management and Regulatory Adherence. Journal of Legal and Business Studies, 5(1), pp.1-10.

[41] Lema, R., Rabellotti, R. and Gehl Sampath, P., 2018. Innovation trajectories in developing countries: Co-evolution of global value chains and innovation systems. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), pp.345-363.

[42] Melis, D.A. and Nijhof, A., 2018. The role of institutional investors in enacting stewardship by corporate boards. Corporate Governance: the international journal of business in society, 18(4), pp.728-747.

[43] Mikes, A. and Zhivitskaya, M., 2017. Managing ambiguity. The Routledge Companion to Performance Management and Control, p.198.

[44] Nachane, D.M., 2016. Global Crisis, Regulatory Reform and International Policy Coordination. South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, 5(1), pp.63-95.

[45] Ng, A.W., 2018. From sustainability accounting to a green financing system: Institutional legitimacy and market heterogeneity in a global financial centre. Journal of cleaner production, 195, pp.585-592.

[46] Nonzee, N.J. and Luu, T.H., 2018. The drug shortage crisis in the United States: impact on cancer pharmaceutical safety. In Cancer Policy: Pharmaceutical Safety (pp. 75-92). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[47] Pakhchanyan, S., 2016. Operational risk management in financial institutions: A literature review. International Journal of financial studies, 4(4), p.20.

[48] Pedraza, A., Fuentes, O., Searle, P. and Stewart, F., 2017. Pension funds and the impact of switching regulation on long-term investment. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (8143).

[49] Piccinini, M., 2016. Setting the strategy of insurance firms using economic capital: concepts and tools to manage risk-adjusted performance.

[50] Rezaee, Z., 2016. Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting literature, 36(1), pp.48-64.

[51] Sae-Lim, P., 2017. Enterprise risk management and organizational performance: the empirical study of listed companies in Thailand.

[52] Salvioni, D.M. and Gennari, F., 2017. CSR, sustainable value creation and shareholder relations. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), pp.36-49.

[53] Scharfman, J.A., 2016. Hedge fund compliance: risks, regulation, and management. John Wiley & Sons.

[54] Scharfman, J.A., 2016. Hedge fund compliance: risks, regulation, and management. John Wiley & Sons.

[55] Sitnikov, C.S., Bocean, C.G., Berceanu, D. and Pîrvu, R., 2017. Risk management model from the perspective of the implementing ISO 9001: 2015 standard within financial services companies. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 19(Special Issue No. 11), pp.1017-1034.

[56] Sjafjell, B., 2018. Beyond climate risk: Integrating sustainability into the duties of the corporate board. Deakin Law Review, 23, pp.41-61.

[57] Soomro, M.A. and Lai, F.W., 2017. Examining A New Paradigm of Enterprise Sustainability Risk Management. Global Business & Management Research, 9.

[58] Stein, V. and Wiedemann, A., 2016. Risk governance: Conceptualization, tasks, and research agenda. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), pp.813-836.

[59] Trautman, L.J., 2016. The Board's Responsibility for Crisis Governance. Hastings Bus. LJ, 13, p.275.

[60] Viscelli, T.R., Beasley, M.S. and Hermanson, D.R., 2016. Research insights about risk governance: Implications from a review of ERM research. Sage Open, 6(4), p.2158244016680230.

[61] Viscelli, T.R., Hermanson, D.R. and Beasley, M.S., 2017. The integration of ERM and strategy: Implications for corporate governance. Accounting Horizons, 31(2), pp.69-82.

How to cite this paper

Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo, Omolara Adeyoyin "Advances in Risk Based Financial Governance Shaping Institutional Investment Decision Practices Globally" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 3 Issue 5 2019 Page 448-465
Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo, Omolara Adeyoyin "Advances in Risk Based Financial Governance Shaping Institutional Investment Decision Practices Globally" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 5, Nov. 2019
Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo, Omolara Adeyoyin (2019). Advances in Risk Based Financial Governance Shaping Institutional Investment Decision Practices Globally. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 3(5).
Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo, Omolara Adeyoyin "Advances in Risk Based Financial Governance Shaping Institutional Investment Decision Practices Globally" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 3, no. 5, Nov. 2019.
@article{1714306,
      author = {Elikem Kwasi Agbosu, Lovelyn Ekpedo, Omolara Adeyoyin},
      title = {Advances in Risk Based Financial Governance Shaping Institutional Investment Decision Practices Globally},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {448-465},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714306.pdf},
      abstract = {Recent developments in risk-based financial governance have significantly reshaped institutional investment decision-making practices globally. Traditional governance frameworks, which often emphasized compliance and reporting, are increasingly being supplemented or replaced by approaches that integrate risk assessment, predictive analytics, and dynamic monitoring into investment strategies. Risk-based governance enables institutional investors, including pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and asset managers, to systematically identify, evaluate, and mitigate financial, operational, and systemic risks while aligning investment decisions with organizational objectives and regulatory expectations. This evolution has been driven by heightened market volatility, increasing complexity of financial instruments, globalization of capital flows, and the growing recognition that traditional, rules-based oversight is insufficient for managing emerging and interconnected risks. Empirical and conceptual research highlights several key advances in risk-based governance. These include the adoption of enterprise-wide risk frameworks, incorporation of stress testing and scenario analysis, and integration of quantitative risk metrics such as Value-at-Risk, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and tail-risk measures into strategic allocation decisions. Furthermore, advances in predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and data-driven risk modeling have enhanced the ability of institutional investors to anticipate potential disruptions and optimize portfolio construction under uncertainty. Governance structures are increasingly designed to ensure accountability, transparency, and alignment between risk appetite, regulatory compliance, and investment objectives. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, particularly in harmonizing governance practices across jurisdictions, addressing data quality and model risk, and integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into risk-based decision frameworks. Future research is expected to focus on the operationalization of risk-based governance at both organizational and cross-market levels, development of standardized risk performance metrics, and the application of explainable AI to improve decision transparency. Overall, risk-based financial governance represents a strategic paradigm shift in institutional investment management, enhancing the ability to balance risk and return, improve resilience to systemic shocks, and meet long-term sustainability and fiduciary goals.},
      keywords = {Risk-Based Financial Governance; Institutional Investment; Portfolio Risk Management; Enterprise Risk Frameworks; Predictive Analytics; ESG Integration; Systemic Risk; Decision-Making Practices},
      month = {November},
  }