International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714308

1714308 Vol 9 · Issue 8 Download Paper

Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics (PWERD): A Theoretical Framework for Rebuilding and Sustaining Growth in Post-Conflict Economies

Anietie Akpan Eyoh Ebele Stella Nwokoye

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Economic Growth and Development

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714308

Abstract

This study introduces the post-war economic regenerative dynamics (PWERD) hypothesis, a novel theoretical framework designed to provide comprehensive understanding of processes of economic rebuilding and sustainable growth in post-conflict economies. Unlike conventional post-war recovery approaches that emphasize physical infrastructure reconstruction and restoration, PWERD argues that sustainable economic recovery requires dynamic and synergistic interplay of four core regenerative pillars: institutional reconstruction, human capital development, infrastructural and technological rebuilding, and trust-based economic integration. Post-war economic regenerative dynamics draws on and extends into multiple theoretical perspectives. The hypothesis provides multidimensional lens for understanding post-war recovery and proposes empirical design to guide future research and for discussions on broader theoretical and practical interventions for conflict and economic recovery policies.

Keywords

Post-War Reconstruction, Economic Regeneration, Institutional Reconstruction, Trust-Based Economy, Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics

References

[1] Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Press.

[2] Addison, T. (2019). Development and reconstruction in fragile and conflict-affected states. Oxford University Press.

[3] Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

[4] Chenery, H. B. (1979). Structural change and development policy. Oxford University Press.

[5] Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S1), S95–S120.

[6] Collier, P., Elliott, V. L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. World Bank and Oxford University Press.

[7] Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

[8] Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[9] Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.

[10] Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.

[11] Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

[12] North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

[13] North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press.

[14] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). States of fragility 2020. OECD Publishing.

[15] Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

[16] Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.

[17] Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

[18] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Human development report 2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives. UNDP.

[19] World Bank. (2020). Fragility, conflict, and violence strategy 2020–2025. World Bank.

[20] World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. World Bank.

How to cite this paper

Anietie Akpan Eyoh, Ebele Stella Nwokoye "Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics (PWERD): A Theoretical Framework for Rebuilding and Sustaining Growth in Post-Conflict Economies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 8 2026 Page 749-768 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714308
Anietie Akpan Eyoh, Ebele Stella Nwokoye "Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics (PWERD): A Theoretical Framework for Rebuilding and Sustaining Growth in Post-Conflict Economies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714308
Anietie Akpan Eyoh, Ebele Stella Nwokoye (2026). Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics (PWERD): A Theoretical Framework for Rebuilding and Sustaining Growth in Post-Conflict Economies. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714308
Anietie Akpan Eyoh, Ebele Stella Nwokoye "Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics (PWERD): A Theoretical Framework for Rebuilding and Sustaining Growth in Post-Conflict Economies" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714308
@article{1714308,
      author = {Anietie Akpan Eyoh, Ebele Stella Nwokoye},
      title = {Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics (PWERD): A Theoretical Framework for Rebuilding and Sustaining Growth in Post-Conflict Economies},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {749-768},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714308.pdf},
      abstract = {This study introduces the post-war economic regenerative dynamics (PWERD) hypothesis, a novel theoretical framework designed to provide comprehensive understanding of processes of economic rebuilding and sustainable growth in post-conflict economies. Unlike conventional post-war recovery approaches that emphasize physical infrastructure reconstruction and restoration, PWERD argues that sustainable economic recovery requires dynamic and synergistic interplay of four core regenerative pillars: institutional reconstruction, human capital development, infrastructural and technological rebuilding, and trust-based economic integration. Post-war economic regenerative dynamics draws on and extends into multiple theoretical perspectives. The hypothesis provides multidimensional lens for understanding post-war recovery and proposes empirical design to guide future research and for discussions on broader theoretical and practical interventions for conflict and economic recovery policies.},
      keywords = {Post-War Reconstruction, Economic Regeneration, Institutional Reconstruction, Trust-Based Economy, Post-War Economic Regenerative Dynamics},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714308}
  }