International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714411

1714411 Vol 9 · Issue 8 Download Paper

Evaluating the Economic Viability of Locally Sourced versus Foreign Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Agents

Emeline Adaoma Temple Onuoha Fidelis Wopara Godwin Chukwuma Jacob Nmegbu Emenike Nyeche Wami

Subject area: Physical Sciences and Environment  ·  Area of research: Enhanced Oil Recovery Economics

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714411

Abstract

The high cost of imported chemicals and foreign exchange volatility pose significant challenges to the deployment of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in the Niger Delta. This study evaluates the technical and economic viability of locally sourced EOR agents against foreign synthetic alternatives. The crude oil used was characterized as heavy, with a density of 0.931 g/cm³, an API gravity of 20.6°, and a high Total Acid Number (TAN) of 3.02 mg KOH/g. A comparative laboratory analysis was conducted using synthetic agents (NaOH, SDS, and Xanthan gum) against a locally formulated ASP slug consisting of wood ash (alkaline), Codiaeum variegatus (surfactant), and potato peel powder(polymer). Core flooding results showed that the foreign ASP slug recovered 6.4 ml of oil, while the locally sourced slug achieved a competitive recovery of 6.1 ml. However, economic modeling using a Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) revealed a significant disparity. The foreign project was limited by a $100,000+ importation cost, yielding a BCR of 1.78. In contrast, the local ASP slug, utilizing waste-to-wealth materials and incurring zero importation duties, achieved a BCR of 4.06. This demonstrates that the locally sourced agents are 2.28 times more economically viable than imported alternatives, providing a sustainable and cost-effective pathway for enhancing heavy oil recovery in the Niger Delta.

Keywords

Heavy Oil; Woodash; Codiaeum Variegatus; Potato Peel Powder; Benefit-Cost Ratio; Enhanced Oil Recovery

References

[1] Ragab, A., & Mansour, E. M. (2021). Enhanced oil recovery: chemical flooding. Geophysics and Ocean Waves Studies, 51(1), 125-137.

[2] Boardman, A. E., Greenberg. A.R., & Vining.D. L, (2015). Cost Benefit Analysis Concepts and Practice, 5th Edition Cambridge University Press.

[3] Delamaide, E., & Parra Moreno, W. (2015, April). Enhanced oil recovery of heavy oil in reservoirs with bottom aquifer. In SPE Western Regional Meeting (pp. SPE-174050). SPE.

[4] Strantzali, E., & Aravossis, K. (2016). Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 55, 885-898.

[5] FAO, (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [Online] accessed on the 5th July,2023

[6] Irvine, F.R. (1965). West African Crops. Oxford University Press.3rd Edition, 97-114

[7] Gao, C., Shi, J., & Zhao, F. (2014). Successful polymer flooding and surfactant-polymer flooding projects at Shengli Oilfield from 1992 to 2012. Journal of petroleum exploration and production technology, 4(1), 1-8.

[8] Karatayev, M., Movkebayeva, G., & Bimagambetova, Z. (2018). Increasing utilisation of renewable energy sources: Comparative analysis of scenarios until 2050. In Energy Security: Policy Challenges and Solutions for Resource Efficiency (pp. 37-68). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[9] Peter, O. O., & Onyekonwu, M. (2018). A comparative study of locally designed and imported alkaline-surfactant-polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 10(4), 1119-1128

[10] Sampson, I. E., Akpabio, J. U., & Anyadiagwu, C. I. (2020). Economic Analysis of Gas Reinjection for Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Case Study of the Niger Delta. J. Eng. Res. Reports, 48-64

[11] Uzoho, C. U., Onyekonwu, M., & AdnAkaranta, O. (2015, August). Formulation of local Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer (ASP) for enhanced oil recovery in niger delta: A review. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (pp. SPE-178300). SPE.

[12] Uzoho, C. U., Onyekonwu, M., & Akaranta, O. (2019). Chemical flooding enhanced oil recovery using local alkali-surfactant-polymer. World journal of innovative research, 7(1), 16-24.

[13] Wopara, O.F & Sunny, E.I. (2018). Review of Studies on Pore Network Modeling of Wettability Effects on Waterflood Oil Recovery. Journal of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, 9(2), 11-22

[14] Xue, L., Liu, P., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Development and research status of heavy oil enhanced oil recovery. Geofluids, 2022(1), 5015045

[15] Chen, Y., He, H., Yu, Q., Liu, H., Chen, L., Ma, X., & Liu, W. (2021). Insights into Enhanced Oil Recovery by Polymer‐Viscosity Reducing Surfactant Combination Flooding in Conventional Heavy Oil Reservoir. Geofluids, 2021(1), 7110414.

[16] Zhenyuan, Z., Weifeng, Lv., Qingjie, L., Ninghong, J., Jianhua, Q., Zhibin, J.& Danyong, L, Chaona L, Evan G & Yang L (2012). Agricultural Waste, Water Environment Research, 83, (10), 1386-1406.

How to cite this paper

Emeline Adaoma Temple, Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Godwin Chukwuma Jacob Nmegbu, Emenike Nyeche Wami "Evaluating the Economic Viability of Locally Sourced versus Foreign Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Agents" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 8 2026 Page 1540-1545 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714411
Emeline Adaoma Temple, Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Godwin Chukwuma Jacob Nmegbu, Emenike Nyeche Wami "Evaluating the Economic Viability of Locally Sourced versus Foreign Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Agents" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714411
Emeline Adaoma Temple, Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Godwin Chukwuma Jacob Nmegbu, Emenike Nyeche Wami (2026). Evaluating the Economic Viability of Locally Sourced versus Foreign Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Agents. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714411
Emeline Adaoma Temple, Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Godwin Chukwuma Jacob Nmegbu, Emenike Nyeche Wami "Evaluating the Economic Viability of Locally Sourced versus Foreign Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Agents" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714411
@article{1714411,
      author = {Emeline Adaoma Temple, Onuoha Fidelis Wopara, Godwin Chukwuma Jacob Nmegbu, Emenike Nyeche Wami},
      title = {Evaluating the Economic Viability of Locally Sourced versus Foreign Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Agents},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {1540-1545},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714411.pdf},
      abstract = {The high cost of imported chemicals and foreign exchange volatility pose significant challenges to the deployment of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in the Niger Delta. This study evaluates the technical and economic viability of locally sourced EOR agents against foreign synthetic alternatives. The crude oil used was characterized as heavy, with a density of 0.931 g/cm³, an API gravity of 20.6°, and a high Total Acid Number (TAN) of 3.02 mg KOH/g. A comparative laboratory analysis was conducted using synthetic agents (NaOH, SDS, and Xanthan gum) against a locally formulated ASP slug consisting of wood ash (alkaline), Codiaeum variegatus (surfactant), and potato peel powder(polymer). Core flooding results showed that the foreign ASP slug recovered 6.4 ml of oil, while the locally sourced slug achieved a competitive recovery of 6.1 ml. However, economic modeling using a Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) revealed a significant disparity. The foreign project was limited by a $100,000+ importation cost, yielding a BCR of 1.78. In contrast, the local ASP slug, utilizing waste-to-wealth materials and incurring zero importation duties, achieved a BCR of 4.06. This demonstrates that the locally sourced agents are 2.28 times more economically viable than imported alternatives, providing a sustainable and cost-effective pathway for enhancing heavy oil recovery in the Niger Delta.},
      keywords = {Heavy Oil; Woodash; Codiaeum Variegatus; Potato Peel Powder; Benefit-Cost Ratio; Enhanced Oil Recovery},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714411}
  }