Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714733
From Waste to Energy Storage: Moderately Porous, N-doped Biochar from Microwave Pyrolysis of Watermelon Peel for Supercapacitor Applications
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Energy Storage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714733
Abstract
The microwave pyrolysis of watermelon peel at 250 °C yielded an extremely low solid residue (4.0 wt.%), indicating that the applied thermal conditions favored devolatilization rather than carbon conservation, making them suboptimal for targeted biochar production. Nonetheless, the resulting carbonaceous material exhibited a moderate specific surface area (~388 m² g⁻¹) and predominantly microporous structure with an average pore width of 1.64 nm, features favorable for charge storage. Its low pore volume (0.096 cm³ g⁻¹), however, limits immediate applicability as a high-capacitance electric double-layer capacitor (EDLC) electrode. To unlock its potential, post-synthesis activation—particularly chemical treatments to enhance surface area and pore volume while retaining nitrogen-derived heteroatom doping is recommended. Such optimization could introduce additional pseudocapacitance and broaden applicability to supercapacitors, adsorption, soil amendment, and catalysis. Overall, the study validates watermelon peel as a promising feedstock for functional porous carbons and highlights the need for process intensification and targeted activation to improve yield and electrochemical performance.
Keywords
Biomass, Pyrolysis, Microwaves. Biochar, Supercapacitor
References
[1] [1]Ben-Iwo, J., Manovic, V., & Longhurst, P. (2016). Biomass resources and biofuels potential for the production of transportation fuels in Nigeria. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 172–192.
[2] [2]Khiari, B., Jeguirim, M., Limousy, L., Bennici, S., (2019), Biomass derived chars for energy applications. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 108, 253–273.
[3] [3]Waqas, M.,. Aburiazaiza, A.S., Minadad, R., Rehan, M., Barakat, M.A., & Nizami, A.S.(2018).Development of biochar as fuel and catalyst in energy recovery technologies. Journal of Clean Production, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.
[4] [4]Liu, W.-J., Jiang, H. & Yu, H.-Q. (2019). Emerging applications of biochar-based materials for energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ. Sci., DOI: 10.1039/C9EE00206E.
[5] [5] Ferrero, G.A., Fuertes, A.B., Sevilla, M. (2015). From soybean residue to advanced supercapacitors, Sci. Rep. 5, 16618. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16618.
[6] [6]Galloway, T.R. (1998): Process and System for Converting Carbonaceous Feedstocks into Energy without Greenhouse Gas Emissions. United States Patent.
[7] [7] Sanwiriya, P., & Suleiman, N. (2019). The effects of drying method and temperature on the nutritional quality of watermelon rinds. In International Food Research Journal (Vol. 26, Issue 3).
[8] [8] John Lo, M. C., Abigail Pesebre, M. C., Jrace Riza, J. C., Bianca Samson, E. N., & Christine Cruz, A. O. (2019). CHARACTERIZATION OF POWDERED PECTIN FROM WATERMELON (Citrullus lanatus) RIND. ANTORCHA, 6(2).
[9] [9]Chen, X., Lin, Q., He, R., Zhao, X., & Li, G. (2017). Hydrochar production from watermelon peel by hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresource Technology, 241, 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.012
[10] [10] Kim, Y.-M., Jae, J., Lee, H. W., Han, T. U., Lee, H., Park, S. H., Kim, S., Watanabe, C., & Park, Y.-K. (2016). Ex-situ catalytic pyrolysis of citrus fruit peels over mesoporous MFI and Al-MCM-41. Energy Conversion and Management, 125, 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.065
[11] [11]Kawamoto, H. (2015). Reactions and Molecular Mechanisms of Cellulose Pyrolysis. Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 61(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2488/jwrs.61.1
[12] [12]Yang, H., Li, S., Liu, B., Chen, Y., Xiao, J., Dong, Z., Gong, M., & Chen, H. (2020). Hemicellulose pyrolysis mechanism based on functional group evolutions by two-dimensional perturbation correlation infrared spectroscopy. Fuel, 267, 117302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117302
[13] [13]Rodriguez Correa, C., Hehr, T., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Rauscher, Y., & Kruse, A. (2019). Pyrolysis vs. hydrothermal carbonization: Understanding the effect of biomass structural components and inorganic compounds on the char properties. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 140, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.007
[14] [14]Vassilev, S. V., Baxter, D., Andersen, L. K., & Vassileva, C. G. (2010). An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel, 89(5), 913–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.10.022
[15] [15]Motasemi, F., & Afzal, M. T. (2013). A review on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis technique. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.008
[16] [16]Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Zhao, X., Wang, S., & Xing, G. (2013). Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues of different heating processes. Energy & Fuels, 27(10), 5890–5899. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400972z
[17] [17]Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (Eds.). (2015). Biochar for environmental management: Science, technology and implementation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[18] [18]Awad, M. I., Makkawi, Y., & Hassan, N. M. (2024). Yield and Energy Modeling for Biochar and Bio-Oil Using Pyrolysis Temperature and Biomass Constituents. ACS omega, 9(16), 18654–18667. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c01646
[19] [19] Di Blasi, C., Signorelli, G., Di Russo, C., & Rea, G. (1999). Product Distribution from Pyrolysis of Wood and Agricultural Residues. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 38(6), 2216–2224.
[20] [20]Safdari, M. S., Amini, E., Weise, D. R., & Fletcher, T. H. (2019). Heating rate and temperature effects on pyrolysis products from live wildland fuels. Fuel, 242, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.040
[21] [21]Ayllón, M., Gea, G., Murillo, M. B., Sánchez, J. L., & Arauzo, J. (2006). Influence of temperature and heating rate on the fixed bed pyrolysis of meat and bone meal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 121(2-3), 85–96.
[22] [22]Mariyam, S., Alherbawi, M., Pradhan, S., Al-Ansari, T., & McKay, G. (2024). Biochar yield prediction using response surface methodology: effect of fixed carbon and pyrolysis operating conditions. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 14(22), 28879–28892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03825-6
[23] [23]Allen, J. A., S. M. G. T. F. E., & A. L. (2020). Predicting Slow Pyrolysis Process Outcomes with Simplified Empirical Correlations for a Consistent Higher Heating Temperature: Biochar Yield and Ash Content. Energy & Fuels, 34(11), 14223–14231.
[24] [24]Wang, J., & Kaskel, S. (2012). KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 22(45), 23710–23725. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM34066F
[25] [25]Wang, D. W., Li, F., Liu, M., Lu, G. Q., & Cheng, H. M. (2008). 3D aperiodic hierarchical porous graphitic carbon material for high-rate capacitive energy storage. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 47(2), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200702721
[26] [26]Jiang, J., Li, L., Zhu, J., & Li, L. (2013). Recent advances in metal oxide-based electrode architecture design for electrochemical energy storage. Electrochimica Acta, 113, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.003
[27] [27]Li, Y., Liu, X., & Li, X. (2020). Biomass-derived porous carbon materials for supercapacitors: Heteroatom doping and its function. ChemElectroChem, 7(5), 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201902086
[28] [28]Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011). Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO₂ capture. Energy & Environmental Science, 4(5), 1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00784F.
[29] [29]Chmiola, J., Yushin, G., Gogotsi, Y., Portet, C., Simon, P., & Taberna, P. L. (2006). Anomalous increase in carbon capacitance at pore sizes less than 1 nanometer. Science, 313(5794), 1760-1763. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132195
How to cite this paper
@article{1714733,
author = {Hafsat Nababa Abdulmumin, Muhammad Auwal Sa'ad , Sadiya Ahmad Muhammad },
title = {From Waste to Energy Storage: Moderately Porous, N-doped Biochar from Microwave Pyrolysis of Watermelon Peel for Supercapacitor Applications},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {8},
pages = {2066-2073},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714733.pdf},
abstract = {The microwave pyrolysis of watermelon peel at 250 °C yielded an extremely low solid residue (4.0 wt.%), indicating that the applied thermal conditions favored devolatilization rather than carbon conservation, making them suboptimal for targeted biochar production. Nonetheless, the resulting carbonaceous material exhibited a moderate specific surface area (~388 m² g⁻¹) and predominantly microporous structure with an average pore width of 1.64 nm, features favorable for charge storage. Its low pore volume (0.096 cm³ g⁻¹), however, limits immediate applicability as a high-capacitance electric double-layer capacitor (EDLC) electrode. To unlock its potential, post-synthesis activation—particularly chemical treatments to enhance surface area and pore volume while retaining nitrogen-derived heteroatom doping is recommended. Such optimization could introduce additional pseudocapacitance and broaden applicability to supercapacitors, adsorption, soil amendment, and catalysis. Overall, the study validates watermelon peel as a promising feedstock for functional porous carbons and highlights the need for process intensification and targeted activation to improve yield and electrochemical performance.},
keywords = {Biomass, Pyrolysis, Microwaves. Biochar, Supercapacitor},
month = {February},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714733}
}