Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714837
Impact of Anthropogenic Threats on Management Effectiveness of Cross River National Park, Cross River State, Nigeria
Subject area: Physical Sciences and Environment · Area of research: Widlife Management
Abstract
This study assessed the impact of anthropogenic threats on the management effectiveness of Cross River National Park, a major biodiversity hotspot in Nigeria and habitat to endangered species such as the Cross River gorilla and the Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzee. Using the International Union for Conservation of Nature – World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN–WCPA) framework and Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) methodology, data were collected from 298 respondents (park staff, rangers, and support-zone communities) through structured questionnaires, alongside secondary park records (2018–2022). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and multiple regressions at a 5% significance level. Findings revealed that illegal farming, hunting, and logging were the most significant threats. The statistical results indicated a strong link between the threats and the effectiveness of management (F = 229.128; p < 0.05; R² = 0.947), meaning that 94.7% of the differences in management performance were attributable to these factors. The study concludes that persistent human-induced pressures significantly undermine park management. It recommends strengthened law enforcement, improved funding and ranger capacity, enhanced community participation, and sustainable livelihood programs to ensure long-term biodiversity conservation.
Keywords
Anthropogenic Threats, Management Effectiveness, Cross River National Park, Protected Area Management
References
[1] Adendem, M. N., Uloko, I. J., Tyouwa, A. T. B., Iwar, M. I., & Williams, M. M , (2025) Survey of Cross River Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) in Cross-River National Park, Cross River State. Nigeria, European Journal of Ecology, Biology and Agriculture, 2(6), 118-135.https://doi.org/10.59324/ejeba.2025.2 (6).12
[2] Adetola, B. O., & Ofuya, E (2021). Evaluating mitigation measures to biodiversity threats in Cross River National Park, Nigeria Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 40(6), 573–590.
[3] Adeyemi, A. A., Jimoh, S. O., & Adesoye, P. O. (2013). Assessment of tree diversities in Oban Division of the Cross River National Park (CRNP), Nigeria, Journal of Agriculture, Forestry and the Social Sciences, 11(1), 216-230.
[4] Appleton, M. R., Courtiol, A., Emerton, L., Slade, J. L., Tilker, A., Warr, L. C.,Long, B. (2022). Protected area personnel and ranger numbers are insufficient to deliver global expectations. Nature Sustainability, 5(12), 1100–1110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00970-0
[5] Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M (2021), Just transformations inconservation, BiologicalConservation,257,109138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109138.
[6] Bhusal, K. P. (2014). Buffer zone management system in Nepal: An analysis of policy, practice and impact. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 12(1), 1–13.
[7] BirdLife International, (2024). Ecosystem profile update for the Guinean Forests of West Africabiodiversityhotspotlaunched. https://www.birdlife.org/news/2024/06/05/ecosystem-profile-update-for-the-guinean-forests-of-west-africa-biodiversity-hotspot-launched
[8] Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2021), Analyzing Likert data, Journal of Extension, 59(2), 1–5.
[9] Chavan, A. S., Muley, E. D., & Naphade, S. R. (2023), animal trafficking and poaching: Major threats to biodiversity. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 11(5), 45-49 https://doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2023.v11.i5a.9231
[10] Cross River National Park – APES Atlas (2025). Cross River National Park is documented to host Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes ellioti) and Cross River gorillas (Gorilla gorilla diehli), alongside other threatened taxa.
[11] Cross River Watch. (2025). Cross River wildlife, forest faces extinction – Experts. https://crossriverwatch.com/2025/02/cross-river-wildlife-forest-faces-extinction-experts/
[12] Enuoh, A. & Ogogo, M. (2018). Evaluation of protected areas management in Cross River National Park, Nigeria, Nigerian Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(2), 34–41.
[13] Etta, C. A., Eja, I. E., Owan, E. J., Uyang, F. A., Arikpo, I. M., Ushie, C. A., Agbor-Obun, D. F., Ebagu, T. E., & Ayeni, Q. O. (2024), Evaluation of Cross River National Park as a catalyst for community livelihood sustenance, Nigeria, GeojournalofTourism and Geosites,53(2),647–656 https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53228-1240
[14] Fitz, J., et al. (2022). Increasing signs of forest fragmentation in the Cross River National Park in Nigeria: Underlying drivers and need for sustainable responses. Ecological Indicators, 146, 108943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108943
[15] Gizachew, F. G., Berhanu, B. K., Tafesse, A., & Lambamo, A. L. (2024). Digital tools and welfare: Adoption determinants among ginger producers in Southern and Central Ethiopia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, Article 1443775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1443775
[16] Geldmann, J., Crouzeilles, R., & Balmford, A. (2019). A global analysis of the effectiveness of protected areas at preventing deforestation, Biological Conservation, 127(7), 2346–2353
[17] Gu, L. (2025). How are residents’ livelihoods affected by national parks? A SEM model based on DFID framework, Land, 14(7), 1501
[18] Gray, T. N. E., Belecky, M., Singh, R., Moreto, W. D., & Chapman, S. (2024). Insufficient numbers and poor working conditions for rangers protecting tigers, Conservation Science and Practice, 6(7), e13157, https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13157
[19] Henson, D. W. (2016). Protected area management: Principles and practice, IUCN
[20] Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N., & Courrau, J. (2006). Evaluating effectiveness: A framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas (2nd ed.). IUCN
[21] IUCN Eastern and Southern Africa Region (2020). The State of Protected and Conserved Areas in Eastern and Southern Africa, 2020 Report. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.
[22] International Union for Conservation of Nature World Commission on Protected Areas, (2025),Protected and conserved areas are effective in conserving nature: IUCN WCPA report 2021–2025 (Annex 3). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
[23] Juffe-Bignoli, D., et al., (2024). A standard lexicon of terms for area-based conservation version 1.0Conservation Biology, [Advanceonlinepublication]https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14269.
[24] Lameed, A. A., Oloyede, A. O., Adesunloye, D. T., Olaniyi, T. O., Olarinde, R. O., & Olanipekun, B. F. (2025), Analyses of threats on managements, rangers and ranges in Old Oyo National Park as a tourism destination, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Tourismology, 11(1), 34–50.07
[25] Lessmann, J., Fajardo, J., Muñoz, J., & Bonilla, M. A. (2024), The role of funding in the performance of Latin America’s protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(8), e2307521121https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307521121
[26] Leverington, F., Costa, K. L., Pavese, H., Lisle, A., & Hockings, M (2010), A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness Environmental Management, 46(5), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5
[27] Manga, T. A., Alhassan, Y. J., & Sanchi, I. D. (2024), Assessment of the season of highest fish landings among fishing communities in Shiroro and Kainji dams, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Earth Science, 10(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijaes.v10.no8.2024.pg1.9
[28] Nchor, A. A., Urim, B. A., & Kejuo, E. T. (2023). Assessment of protected area management practices in the Nigerian National Park Service: The case of Cross River National Park. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 49(3), 1027–1036
[29] Nchor, A. A., Achima, A., & Peace, N, (2021). Assessment of wildlife law enforcement practices in Cross River National Park, Nigeria. International Journal of Conservation Science, 12(2), 647–658.
[30] Njana, M. A. (2025). Protected area management effectiveness is pivotal in nature-based solutions for carbon neutrality: A case from the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania, EcologicalIndicators,153,114306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114306
[31] Htay, T. (2020). Community dependency and perceptions of a protected area in a threatened ecoregion of Myanmar, International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 12(3), Article FEB0DC864826, NTFP extraction was recorded in about 85 % of protected areas in the country.
[32] Poudyal, N. C. (2024), A perception-based assessment of buffer zone programs and community support for protected area management. Society & Natural Resources, 37(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2024.2349889
[33] Punch Nigeria. (2025). Illegal mining: The silent war over Cross River’s mineral wealth. Punch Nigeria, https://punchng.com/illegal-mining-the-silent-war-over-cross- rivers-mineral-wealth/
[34] Roberton, T. (2022). Building monitoring and evaluation plans: A structured approach with practicalsteps,GlobalHealthAction, 152067396 https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2067396
[35] Schulze, J. K., et al. (2017). Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas: New tools for monitoring and management, Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 789–799
[36] Schwartz, M. W., Cook, C. N., Pressey, R. L., & Pullin, A. S (2023). Evidence-based conservation: Effective strategies for protecting biodiversity across landscapes and communities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-083919
[37] Sinclair, J. S., Stubbington, R., Welti, E. A. R., Aroviita, J., Baker, N., Canedo-Argüelles, M., Domisch, S., (2025), Current protected areas provide limited benefits for European river biodiversity. Nature Communications, 16, 1146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67125-5
[38] Terborgh, J., van Schaik, C. P., Davenport, L., & Rao, M. (Eds.) (2002). Making parks work: Strategies for preserving tropical nature. Island Press
[39] UNEP-WCMC & IUCN (2024), Protected Planet Report (2024). UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre
[40] Van, L. N. (2025). Management effectiveness evaluation of protected areas in Central Vietnam using the fourth version of the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool, Environmental Management, 1, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44415-025-00023-2
[41] Van Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W., & Dugelby, B. L. (1997), The silent crisis: The state of rainforest nature preserves. In R. A. Kramer et al. (Eds.), the last stand: Protected areas and the defense of tropical biodiversity (pp. 64–89). Oxford University Press
[42] Watson, J. E. M., Houghton, R. A., & Saura, S. (2014). The state of protected areas in a changing world, Science, 344(6182), 1301–1305
[43] Zhang, Y., Vanclay, F., & Hanna, P (2025, How communities and social impacts are considered in policies for protected areas in China, Land Use Policy, 148, 107404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107404
How to cite this paper
@article{1714837,
author = {Nwanja, E. F., Nchor, A. A., Ebu, V. T., Anoh R. A., Urim. B. A.},
title = {Impact of Anthropogenic Threats on Management Effectiveness of Cross River National Park, Cross River State, Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {9},
pages = {512-523},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714837.pdf},
abstract = {This study assessed the impact of anthropogenic threats on the management effectiveness of Cross River National Park, a major biodiversity hotspot in Nigeria and habitat to endangered species such as the Cross River gorilla and the Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzee. Using the International Union for Conservation of Nature – World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN–WCPA) framework and Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) methodology, data were collected from 298 respondents (park staff, rangers, and support-zone communities) through structured questionnaires, alongside secondary park records (2018–2022). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and multiple regressions at a 5% significance level. Findings revealed that illegal farming, hunting, and logging were the most significant threats. The statistical results indicated a strong link between the threats and the effectiveness of management (F = 229.128; p < 0.05; R² = 0.947), meaning that 94.7% of the differences in management performance were attributable to these factors. The study concludes that persistent human-induced pressures significantly undermine park management. It recommends strengthened law enforcement, improved funding and ranger capacity, enhanced community participation, and sustainable livelihood programs to ensure long-term biodiversity conservation.},
keywords = {Anthropogenic Threats, Management Effectiveness, Cross River National Park, Protected Area Management},
month = {March},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I9-1714837}
}