Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716047
Heavy Metal Contamination in Rural Nigerian Groundwater: A Human Health Risk Assessment Framework for Sedimentary and Basement Complex Aquifers
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Groundwater
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716047
Abstract
While the occurrence of heavy metals in groundwater within Nigeria has been well documented, the quantification of human health risks from exposure to these metals via multiple exposure pathways has been critically understudied within rural Nigeria. This study provides the first quantitative Health Risk Assessment of heavy metals such as chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), vanadium (V), barium (Ba), and copper (Cu) within Sobe (Edo State) and Elegbeka (Ondo State), Nigeria. Heavy metals were collected from hand-dug wells within these communities during the dry and wet seasons. Hazard quotients (HQ) and cancer risk indices (CR) were calculated using the United States Environmental Protection Agency probabilistic risk model for three exposure routes: ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. The study found that chromium and cadmium were the most hazardous heavy metals for cancer risk in these communities. The total cancer risk indices were found to be above the acceptable limit of 1x10⁻⁴ for multiple wells in these communities during the dry season. Non-carcinogenic hazard indices were also found for zinc and chromium in these communities, with HI > 1 for multiple wells in Elegbeka, Nigeria. A comparative study of the study areas indicated that the geology of Elegbeka is a basement complex that increases the cancer risk due to the shallow depth of the water table. Additionally, the infiltration of anthropogenic refuse dumpsite leachate into groundwater is more prevalent in Elegbeka. Sobe is under a sedimentary terrain type of the Anambra Basin. While there is a difference in the geology of these study areas, the study found that Sobe is at a comparably higher non-carcinogenic hazard risk.
Keywords
Heavy metal contamination; Health risk assessment; Hazard quotient; Cancer risk; Groundwater; Nigeria; Chromium; Cadmium
References
[1] Adimalla, N. (2021). Heavy metals contamination in urban surface soils of Medak province, India, and its risk assessment and spatial distribution. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00270-1
[2] Adimalla, N., & Qian, H. (2021). Groundwater chemistry and human health risk assessment for drinking and non-potable uses: A case study of a hard rock region in South India. Chemosphere, 263, 128051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128051
[3] Aghazadeh, N., Chitsazan, M., & Golestan, Y. (2020). Hydrochemistry and quality assessment of groundwater in the Ardabil area, Iran. Applied Water Science, 7(7), 3599–3616.
[4] Ako, A. A., Eyong, G. T., Nkeng, G. E., Tita, M. A., Takem, G. E. L., & Vishwa, D. G. (2022). Groundwater quality assessment in the Douala Metropolis, Cameroon: Hydrochemical approach and health risk evaluation. Water, 14(5), 810.
[5] Akakuru, O. C., Eze, I. S., Ogban, F. E., & Nweke, O. (2020). Health risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater from artisanal gold mining areas in Zamfara, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 24(5), 849–857.
[6] Akpan, E. I., Ibuot, J. C., & George, N. J. (2022). Assessment of heavy metal contamination and health risk in groundwater resources in Cross River State, Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, 418.
[7] American Public Health Association (APHA). (1993). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (18th ed.). APHA.
[8] ASTM. (1990). Annual book of standards: Water and environmental technology. American Society for Testing and Materials.
[9] Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., & Walker, B. (2021). Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50(4), 834–869.
[10] IARC. (2012). Chromium(VI) compounds. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 100C, 147–167. International Agency for Research on Cancer.
[11] Ibrahim, A. M., Waziri, A. B., Bala, J. D., & Yakasai, I. A. (2023). Heavy metals in groundwater and human health risk in rural areas of Kano State, Nigeria. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 47(1), 1–15.
[12] Lanphear, B. P., Rauch, S., Auinger, P., Allen, R. W., & Hornung, R. W. (2019). Low-level lead exposure and mortality in US adults: A population-based cohort study. The Lancet Public Health, 3(4), e177–e184.
[13] Ngele, S. O., Afiukwa, J. N., & Obioha, J. C. (2021). Assessment of heavy metals in groundwater and associated health risks in Afikpo North, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 10(2), 35–48.
[14] Nwankwoala, H. O., Udom, G. J., & Amangabara, G. T. (2022). Hydrogeochemistry and health risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater from Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Heliyon, 8(3), e09031.
[15] Osayande, A. D., & Umukoro, I. A. (2025). Water quality assessment of hand dug wells, boreholes and surface water in Sobe, Edo State and hand dug wells in Elegbeka, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 29(4), 22–66.
[16] Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.
[17] Saha, N., Rahman, M. S., Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., & Guo, W. (2020). Industrial metal pollution in water and probabilistic assessment of human health risk. Journal of Environmental Management, 185, 70–78.
[18] Satarug, S., Vesey, D. A., & Gobe, G. C. (2020). Estimation of health risks associated with dietary cadmium exposure. Archives of Toxicology, 94(5), 1512–1526.
[19] USEPA. (1989). Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part A). Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1-89/002.
[20] USEPA. (2004). Risk assessment guidance for Superfund. Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part E, supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment). EPA/540/R/99/005.
[21] USEPA IRIS. (2023). Integrated Risk Information System. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/iris
[22] WHO/UNICEF. (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2000–2022. Special focus on gender. WHO and UNICEF.
[23] Wongsasuluk, P., Chotpantarat, S., Siriwong, W., & Robson, M. (2014). Heavy metal contamination and human health risk assessment in drinking water from shallow groundwater wells in an agricultural area in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 36(1), 169–182.
How to cite this paper
@article{1716047,
author = {Osayande, A.D, Umukoro, I. A},
title = {Heavy Metal Contamination in Rural Nigerian Groundwater: A Human Health Risk Assessment Framework for Sedimentary and Basement Complex Aquifers},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {477-484},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716047.pdf},
abstract = {While the occurrence of heavy metals in groundwater within Nigeria has been well documented, the quantification of human health risks from exposure to these metals via multiple exposure pathways has been critically understudied within rural Nigeria. This study provides the first quantitative Health Risk Assessment of heavy metals such as chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), vanadium (V), barium (Ba), and copper (Cu) within Sobe (Edo State) and Elegbeka (Ondo State), Nigeria. Heavy metals were collected from hand-dug wells within these communities during the dry and wet seasons. Hazard quotients (HQ) and cancer risk indices (CR) were calculated using the United States Environmental Protection Agency probabilistic risk model for three exposure routes: ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation. The study found that chromium and cadmium were the most hazardous heavy metals for cancer risk in these communities. The total cancer risk indices were found to be above the acceptable limit of 1x10⁻⁴ for multiple wells in these communities during the dry season. Non-carcinogenic hazard indices were also found for zinc and chromium in these communities, with HI > 1 for multiple wells in Elegbeka, Nigeria. A comparative study of the study areas indicated that the geology of Elegbeka is a basement complex that increases the cancer risk due to the shallow depth of the water table. Additionally, the infiltration of anthropogenic refuse dumpsite leachate into groundwater is more prevalent in Elegbeka. Sobe is under a sedimentary terrain type of the Anambra Basin. While there is a difference in the geology of these study areas, the study found that Sobe is at a comparably higher non-carcinogenic hazard risk.},
keywords = {Heavy metal contamination; Health risk assessment; Hazard quotient; Cancer risk; Groundwater; Nigeria; Chromium; Cadmium},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716047}
}