Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in the Digital Economy: Financing Models for Infrastructure and Platform-Based Investments

References

[1] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

[2] Fouad M, Rial I. Mastering the Risky Business of Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure. IMF Departmental Paper No. 2021/010. 2021. doi:10.5089/9781513576565.087.

[3] World Bank. Fiscal Risk in PPPs: Defining the Problem. PPP Knowledge Lab. 2020.

[4] World Bank. Infrastructure Monitor 2023: Global Trends in Private Investment in Infrastructure. 2023.

[5] World Bank. Benchmarking Infrastructure Development 2023 (BID 2023): The Full Report. 2024.

[6] World Bank. GovTech Maturity Index Update 2022. 2022.

[7] World Bank. PPI Database Global Report 2021. 2021.

[8] World Bank. PPI Database Global Report 2022. 2022.

[9] World Bank. PPI Database Global Report 2023. 2023.

[10] World Bank. PPI Database Global Report 2024. 2024.

[11] OECD. Digital Government Index: 2019 results. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 3. 2020. doi:10.1787/4de9f5bb-en.

[12] OECD. Development Co-operation Report 2021: Shaping a Just Digital Transformation. OECD Publishing. 2021. doi:10.1787/ce08832f-en.

[13] OECD. Going Digital Guide to Data Governance Policy Making. OECD Publishing. 2022. doi:10.1787/40d53904-en.

[14] G20. G20 New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration. 2023.

[15] World Economic Forum. What we can expect for digital public infrastructure in 2024. 2024.

[16] UNDP. The human and economic impact of digital public infrastructure. 2023.

[17] UNDP. UN releases Universal DPI Safeguards Framework to promote safe and inclusive digital public infrastructure. 2024.

[18] European Commission. Broadband Investment Handbook. 2024.

[19] Tolstolesova L, Glukhikh I, Yumanova N, Arzikulov O. Digital transformation of public-private partnership tools. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021;14(3):121. doi:10.3390/jrfm14030121.

[20] Selim AM, ElGohary AS. Public–private partnerships (PPPs) in smart infrastructure projects: the role of stakeholders. HBRC Journal. 2020;16(1):317–333. doi:10.1080/16874048.2020.1825038.

[21] Voorwinden A. The privatised city: technology and public-private partnerships in the smart city. Information, Communication & Society. 2021;24:439–463. doi:10.1080/17579961.2021.1977213.

[22] Pianezzi D, Mori Y, Uddin S. Public–private partnership in a smart city: a curious case in Japan. Cooperation and Conflict. 2023;89(3). doi:10.1177/00208523211051839.

[23] Quan X, Solheim MCW. Public-private partnerships in smart cities: a critical survey and research agenda. City, Culture and Society. 2023;32:100491. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100491.

[24] Casprini E, Palumbo R. Reaping the benefits of digital transformation through public-private partnership: a service ecosystem view applied to healthcare. Global Public Policy and Governance. 2022. doi:10.1007/s43508-022-00056-9.

[25] Shahid H, et al. Exploring the concept of public-private partnership in building critical infrastructure resilience against unexpected events: a systematic review. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection. 2022;39:100556. doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100556.

[26] Joglekar N, Anderson EG, Lee KB, Parker G, Settanni E, Srai JS. Configuration of digital and physical infrastructure platforms: private and public perspectives. Production and Operations Management. 2022;31(12). doi:10.1111/poms.13865.

[27] Mayer M, Yusuf JEW. Structuring public–private partnerships for public value: analysis of two transportation infrastructure case studies. American Review of Public Administration. 2022;27(3). doi:10.1177/1087724X221075010.

[28] International Capital Market Association (ICMA). Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles. 2024.

[29] Loan Syndications and Trading Association (LSTA), Loan Market Association (LMA), Asia Pacific Loan Market Association (APLMA). Sustainability-Linked Loan Principles (SLLP). 2025.

[30] Hasselgren B. Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnerships and the Regulatory Asset Base Model. OECD/International Transport Forum Discussion Paper. 2020

@article{1716141,
      author = {Imran Saee Muhammed},
      title = {Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) in the Digital Economy: Financing Models for Infrastructure and Platform-Based Investments},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {888-897},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716141.pdf},
      abstract = {There are two primary asset classes that play an important role in modern digital economies: (i) digital infrastructure (pipes, towers, cloud capacity, and data center facilities); and (ii) platform services coordinating their delivery (government clouds, “government as a service” APIs, digital identity, payments and data transmission mechanisms). Not only have public-private partnerships (PPPs) evolved from “pipelines” procurement vehicles, but have increasingly become funding and governance structures for platforms where value lies in the dynamics of network effects, trust and interoperability. The purpose of this literature review is to compile information about financing frameworks for digital economy PPP projects in 2020-2025. In addition to exploring how the design of payment logic and governance can affect the financing outcomes in terms of bankability, fiscal risks, and public value, special attention will be paid to PPP-related risks specific for the digital economy.According to PRISMA 2020 methodology [1], sources related to this topic will be identified using multilateral papers on fiscal risks and PPP ecosystems [2–6], government digital strategy and data governance documents [11–13] and DPI initiatives in international platforms [14–17]. In addition, scholarly sources on digital technology-based PPPs in smart infrastructure and platforms [19-27] will be analyzed. One can notice that while risk allocation in traditional PPP deals mostly revolved around issues of construction, materiality and transactions; in the digital economy, it involves issues of adoption, cybersecurity, data rights, vendors and obsolescence. Neglecting such risks can lead to capital cost savings and unsatisfactory results, which in turn leads to renegotiations and fiscal risks [2,3].Contributions include (a) conceptual framework for digital economy PPPs (Figure 1); (b) an overview of financing opportunities for infrastructure and platform investments (Table 1); and (c) a guide for developing financing frameworks in relation to government investment in digital economy assets.},
      keywords = {Public-Private Partnership; Digital Economy; Digital Infrastructure; Broadband; Data Centres; Government Cloud; Digital Public Infrastructure; Platform Governance; Fiscal Risk; Procurement; Interoperability; Cybersecurity; Performance-Based Payment.},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716141}
  }